Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

The_MOW Blog

  • Very violent, but certainly not for everybody

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Dawn of the Dead  (2003)

    A group of people from various walks of life are trapped in a huge shopping mall as a strange, unknown (and unexplained in the movie) virus turns all outside the mall into the walking dead -- or zombies.

    This movie is one of the most graphic, violent movies I have seen in areal long time. They show you just about everything when it comes to the destruction of the zombies. It is not for the weak of heart.

    The special effects, and make-up effects are incredible. I have a feeling that when it first came out, it made a good chunk of the audience squirm in their theater seats. They spent a lot of money on the special effects and make-up, and that's a good thing for a movie of this kind.

    You can pretty much tell who will make it to the closing credits at the end of the movie because those people have the most development. Some have very little development, and are killed early on, while others make it to about three-quarters of the way through.

    Another thing that this movie does well is the action. When the zombies attack, there is no time for the characters they are after or the audience to breathe. A good chunk of the movie takes place in the shopping mall, with the zombies trying to break in to get to the main cast, so there isn't action every five minutes.

    The development of the main cast was pretty good. It wasn't perfect, but you understood each character's motives as the movie went on.

    One of the things I didn't like was the "Andy" (Bruce Bohne) character. He spent most of the movie on the roof of a building near the shopping mall, and communicated with the main cast through a magic marker board. If you ask me, this character was not needed, as he did nothing for the movie.

    As for the soundtrack, it's all modern music with instrumental pieces used to enhance the scare factor, sometimes in a really good way.

    If you have a weak stomach, don't see this movie. And do not let young kids see this one. The violence factor is extreme and the imagery is even more graphic.


  • Not funny if you are not into black comedies

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    This is the story of the marriage of the "Roses" (Kathleen Turner, Michael Douglas) told through the words of a lawyer (Danny DeVito, who also directed) who relates the story to a potential client (Dan Castellaneta in a non-speaking role).

    I do not understand why Yahoo Movies say I would like black comedies, because they are only worth a couple of chuckles. And this one is no exception.

    Although the movie has a good cast, three members of which have worked together twice before -- in better movies, they only give a fair performance.

    Another problem with this movie is that only the "Roses" have any character development. The "Rose" children, who are seen in three stages of their lives, and the rest of the cast are not used well at all. They are mostly there, and aren't used well to advance the main storyline.

    One thing that I liked was the use of camera angles. Some of them were pretty unique like the one where the waring couple were shown looking out separate windows that were only a few feet apart. There were also a couple of extreme close-ups to show the anger of the "Roses" that were also pretty nice.

    Another thing that was not good was that the realism of the movie was horrible. You would think with a relationship that was this volatile, the neighbors would have called the cops at least once. Yes, many divorces can end this bad, but this just didn't feel realistic to me at all.

    This was certainly over-the-top, but it's not funny if you ask me. In fact, I don't even understand why this would be considered "comedy" even a black comedy. I probably chuckled at a couple of allegedly comedic moments.

    As for the music. None of it is memorable, and it didn't enhance any of the scenes or the fights between the "Roses". In fact, the music is so forgettable, I don't even remember hearing music until the closing credits.

    Save this one for a rainy day when you are desperate to see a movie.


  • Not as fast as "The Rocketeer," but pretty good

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Rocketeer  (1991)

    With World War II raging half-a-world away, and 1938's Los Angeles appears not to be involved in the war.

    Los Angeles, which is also known as "Hollywoodland" (back then), is a place where dreams are made. One of those with dreams is stunt-pilot "Cliff Seacord" (Billy Campbell), one of which is to spend the rest of his life with his girlfriend, "Jenny" (Jennifer Connely), herself having the dream of becoming a leading actress in movies.

    After being shot down in a fire fight between Federal law enforcement and the Mob, "Cliff" discovers a jet pack he eventually finds out was designed by billionaire aviator, "Howard Hughes" (Terry O'Quinn).

    "Seacord" eventually discovers that the Nazis are after the jet pack. So, they hire a secret agent who hides in the public eye.

    Now, "Seacord," in the guise of "The Rocketeer," goes after the spy and his hired muscle in the Mob, to save the jet pack, "Jenny" and possibly the free world from the Nazi regime.

    Based on a classic comic book story, this is a fair attempt at bringing a Golden Age comic book character to life. There are some problems with performances, possibly due to the script, as well as the movie is slow running.

    There are some good performances in the movie, but there are some scenes where the performances are not that strong. One of the best performances is from Campbell, with Timothy Dalton a fairly close second. If you ask me, Dalton was born to play roles like "Neville Sinclaire", a suave but evil villain.

    One thing that this movie does perfectly is the period costumes and vehicles. It really gives the feel of 1938. I personally liked the look of "The Rocketeer" costume. The jacket looks really nice, and the helmet/mask is simple yet futuristic.

    The action scenes were pretty poor in this film. One of the climatic scenes at the end was the only good action scene in the entire movie. The rest are mostly "The Rocketeer" flying around and a few fairly good chase scenes.

    The character development was not the best in this film. When this film came out, I don't recall ever hearing that it was based on a classic comic book. In fact, I don't think the majority of the movie-going audience was aware that it was a classic comic book.

    The flying special effects are pretty much dated now. In some of these scenes, you can pretty much tell that green/blue screen effects are being used.

    The violence is kept to a minimum. Most of the violence is fist fights, and a little gun play. There is also little to no foul language, this is a Disney film after all.

    One thing in this movie that is a must see is the authentic looking "Nazi propaganda" film which shows the origin of the jet pack. If anything, this is one thing that is a must see. It's done in such a way that it will give you a chill down your spine with the visuals in it.

    As for the music soundtrack, it's nice but not very memorable in my opinion.

    I would have to say that this would probably be a good third choice to rent if your first choice is unavailable.


  • This film shows that wrestling is not as "fake" as its detractors say

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Beyond the Mat  (1999)

    For over a century, the world of professional wrestling has entertained its fans, and been the target of people who say it's "fake" without making a logical reason as to why they say it's fake.

    This documentary, marketed as "The film Vince McMahon DOESN'T want you to see," follows professional wrestlers from the independent circuit (local/regional promotions that put shows on in the area the company calls home) and two of the biggest professional wrestling promotions in the late 1990's, the World Wrestling Federation (renamed World Wrestling Entertainment not too long after the release of this film) and Extreme Championship Wrestling (which was bought out by the now-WWE a few years after the release of this film), and wrestlers who are no longer in the spotlight.

    The film does not have budget of a major Hollywood release, and it shouldn't. It's not about the glitz and glamor the fans see, it's about the men and women who put their bodies and lives on the line every time they step inside the "squared circle" (the ring).

    The film focuses on just a few wrestlers. Namely Mick Foley (wrestling under the name Mankind, the reigning WWF World Champion), Terry Funk, 1980's star Jake "The Snake" Roberts and to a lesser degree, Jerome Young, who wrestled in ECW (and still wrestles as) New Jack. It also focuses on to indy (independent) wrestlers, one of which I've heard of in magazines and online. It also features Darren Drozdov, who was literally hired in front of the film's cameras and given the gimmick (character) known as "Puke", based on the fact that he was able to make himself vomit at will (I kid you not! He is shown demonstrating this "skill". However, he would later be repackaged as Droz. At the end of the movie, it is briefly mentioned that he was paralyzed during a match three months after filming wrapped. Eight years later, he is still in a wheelchair.)

    It doesn't present the wrestlers in their respective characters, it presents the persons behind the characters. It shows Foley as a loving family men who is a big kid, It shows Funk nearing one of his numerous retirements (he is notorious for returning to wrestling after retiring). And it shows Roberts as a drug addict (he is shown lighting up a crack cocaine pipe on camera).

    You get to see the behind-the-scenes business of three promotions, an independent promotion, the WWF and ECW. It shows Foley discussing a pay-per-view match with Dwayne Johnson, who was known as "The Rock" (this is Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson who is now an actor who starred in such recent movies as "Gridiron Gang" and "The Scorpion King"). You get to see ECW as it makes its debut on Pay-Per-View Television debut, which includes an incredible inspirational speech by then-owner Paul Heyman. And we get to see the backstage aftermath of the Mankind/The Rock match, which literally brought Foley's young daughter to tears to the point that Foley's wife has to remove her children from their front row seat and bring them backstage (Foley received multiple shots to the head with a steel chair in the match, which is shown through the film crew's camera).

    Another wrestler the film focuses on is one of Foley's longtime friends, Terry Funk. Funk, a second generation wrestler whose brother Dory Jr. also wrestles. We get to see Funk as he goes to the doctor, who advises him to get knee replacement surgery. This prompts him to announce his (one of many) retirement at the reception of his daughter's wedding. We then follow him around he begins to wind down his career. We see him, and his family, at the debut ECW PPV, ask a wrestler who never made it as a major star to referee his final match, to the post-match ceremony at his retirement show where ECW owner Heyman declares Funk the ECW World Heavyweight Champion for Life.

    The show also touches on other major names in the business at the time, but doesn't focus on them like Foley, Funk and Roberts. There are brief segments on Jerome Young (better known as New Jack), Joanie Laurer (better known as Chyna) and a few others. There are also interviews with other major, and not so major names, the weirdest having to be with Matt Hyson (known as Spike Dudley). Hyson was a wrestler with ECW, which was known for violent, bloody matches. We learn that Hyson's previous job was a third grade teacher, and he was an English major who loves Shakespeare. As he is bleeding from the forehead, thanks to an injury sustained in the ring prior to the interview, the movie's producer asks him to recite his favorite line from Shakespeare. Hyson then recites a line from memory -- as blood pours down over his face.

    The most uncomfortable, and saddest segment features 1980's star Jake "The Snake" Roberts. Robets had hit rock bottom at the time this documentary was filmed. He has become addicted to crack cocaine, and is shown smoking the drug shortly after meeting up with his estranged daughter in an uncomfortable reunion. He has had a hard life. A result of rape of his then 13-year old mother, who has a strained relationship with his father, a well-known wrestler who never reached the height of fame Jake did. Years later, in a WWE-produced DVD retrospective on his career, Roberts blasted how he was depicted in this film, to the point of bad mouthing the producer and Terry Funk.

    What this movie does not address is the "wrestling is fake" debate. That is mostly because it show's what pro wrestling is -- entertainment that takes a toll on the bodies and lives of those in the ring. After seeing Foley, and Mr. McMahon (Vince McMahon's stage name) being stitched up after a show, you may reconsider how "fake" wrestling is.

    The only downside of this film is that wrestling fans are the only ones most likely to buy or rent this movie. However, I suggest that people who do not watch wrestling (especially the ones who say "wrestling is fake") view this movie if you ever come across it on television along with the documentaries "Hitman Hart: Wrestling with Shadows" (which puts Vince McMahon in an even worse light than "Beyond the Mat") and the television documentary "The Unreal Story of Professional Wrestling" (A&E still airs it from time to time) to better understand the true nature of the business.


  • Lots of action for a kids movie

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Jumanji  (1995)

    In 1969, "Alan Parrish" (Adam Hann-Byrd) and the object of his schoolboy crush, "Sarah Whittle" (Laura Bell Bundy) play an unusual game -- which sucks "Alan" into itself. 26 years later, two children (Kirsten Dunst and Bradley Pierce) move into the abandoned "Parrish" place and find the game, called Jumanji, in the attic.

    As the two play, they release a now adult "Alan" (Robin Williams) from the game, along with some wild animals and carnivorous plants -- and one mean hunter (Jonathan Hyde, who also plays the father of "Alan") who wants to kill "Alan."

    This is very much a special effects movie. In just about every scene is CGI and animatronics creatures. When it comes to the CGI animals, they are obviously computer generated. Look closely at the hair of the monkeys -- it is obvious that it's not realistic looking. Also, the shots of the human cast merged into scenes with CGI creatures are inserted near perfectly. After over a decade since this movie was originally released, it's still hard to tell where the human cast members are inserted from being shot in front of a green screen.

    Although the performances are pretty good from the entire cast, the characters are not developed greatly. They are only developed enough to understand their backstories. At least two characters have the least amount of development, and are used only to advance the scenes they are in.

    One thing this movie does well is action. It gives just enough of a break to take a little breather. The action is fast paced, and shot nicely.


  • Not the best way to end the trilogy

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Robocop 3  (1993)

    The "Omni Consumer Products (OCP)" has tightened its grip on Detroit, to the point that the police department is now a division of the company. With the help of OCP's new Japanese owners funding everything, it appears that the dream of tearing down Detroit and replacing it with the advanced "Delta City" will finally happen. However, there are a citizens who have taken it upon themselves to fight using any means necessary -- including using violence and weaponry.

    To tighten their grip on the citizens, "OCP" employs "Rehab Teams", which are basically military police headed by a maniacal leader named "McDagget" who employs even greater violence to try to bring the rebels to his brand of justice. However, after the death of his partner at the hands of the "Rehab Team" lead by "McDagget" himself, the rebels have a new partner in their fight -- "RoboCop" (Robert Burke).

    This is not the greatest way to end the cult favorite movie trilogy. It is probably the most forgettable of the entire series in fact.

    Although the story is pretty good, the script is not the best. And because of the weak script, the performances are only fair.

    The one thing that seriously hurt this movie is that it is PG-13, while the others were rated R. Because of the rating, the action sequences are very much less violent than the other two, and the language is toned down quite a bit. I believe they were trying to market "RoboCop" to a more broader audience at this time. They released a cartoon series for television, and had "RoboCop" come to the aid of a professional wrestler known as Sting in a heavily hyped appearance on a World Championship Wrestling pay-per-view telecast (the PPV was even titled "Capitol Combat '90: The Return of RoboCop"). If you ask me, this was a serious mistake like when they turned "Rambo" into a cartoon.

    Another problem with this film is that the budget is lower than the previous instalments. The first movie was known for the incredible special effects, make-up and obvious stop-motion effects. In first movie had major splatter when the "bullets" hit their target, that was obviously missing in this film.

    None of the performances stood out, with a slight exception of Burke, who takes over the title role from Peter Weller. There was also some problems with the development of the new characters introduced in this movie.

    Sad to say, I can only recommend this one if you happen upon it on HBO or On Demand. It's not the perfect movie, but it is pretty much watchable.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<May 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
262728293012
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31123456


Categories
 


Advertisement