Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

The_American_Dream Blog

  • Mad Max (Part Three of Three)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Well we have seen numbers one and two now. One was really not bad for a low budget film and it was the spark that ignited the whole series for there on. Two was amazingly good action all the way and good story too with a strong backing for it. But three...

     

    SPOILER WARNING

    We meet up with Max again as he wanders blindly out of the desert and into Bartertown; a place in the desert were people can trade for anything and where law is decided by Tina Turner's character who prances about the movie in a scanty chain-mail dress (unfortunately it did not help her character to say nothing for her acting talent not that is is needed for this movie). 

    In Bartertown, Max is contracted to kill a man in the Thunderdome, a colosseum where "Two men enter, one man leaves." He is contracted so that the Turner character can regain her power over Bartertown (kinda amazing that she ever did have control as it would be impossible to take anyone with her hair seriously). Anyways I am gonna skip some here and move on to where Max gets banished form Bartertown.

    Max gets banished from Bartertown.

    After wandering in the desert with no water he is chanced upon by an adolescent girl who takes him to where all her comrades are who are also children. Here this movie turned from bad to worse. Anyway Max has to save the kids who think he is their savior from before the third world war. Well after quite some time with a lovable cast and tons of fun (this is sarcasum, the actual film is almost unbearable) we see the chase from the previous movie redone, this time with a train. SPOILERS END HERE

    And somehow a midget works into all that too.

     

    Now for the review. I really liked the second movie, but this movie was a total let down from that. We see the whole franchise just wiping out on what could have been a really good wave. And in that way it is an interesting snapshot of the death of a series. And well just to say it, it did not really die, it plummeted.

    Why do I say that, I can't just say that right. Well here it is. If we are watching them in order we are going to have a very clear and set idea about Mad Max and that is that he is out there, some kind of cowboy defender of the innocent, protector of the weak and all around good guy although he is always somewhat two faced and always looking for his gain. And well we don't see this here. We see this character in what is almost a "Hook" like setting (and we all know what kind of movie "Hook" is). This movie lowers Mad Max into the league of movies such as "Mouse Hunt" the afore mentioned "Hook" and "Matilda" all of which are in their own right good movies but that is not where Mad Max belongs and yet this movie pulls it off with everything including throwing one of the bad guys in poop.

    This movie also features a disconnected plot line. Sure you can have multiple stories in one movie "Sin City" is a great example of that. But one second Max is in Bartertown, the next he is hanging out with the kids? WTF.

    Okay, I am ripping on this movie allot maybe even too much but I am gonna keep going with it.

    We make it to the end of the movie with a chase as I have said is in almost every way like the one at the end of the second movie. Well if one has seen the second movie it makes this one almost a great time to nap. Just to throw a last thing at the movie I am gonna say this: Music for me does not always make the movie, but is sure as shit can ruin the movie like in this gem of a film, from beginning to end we our ears are ringing with the sounds of the 80's. Okay I'll cut it the slack that it was made in 1985.

    In the end, the series was ended very poorly to say the least. As I have spent up to now describing. It is all disjointed not only in plot but also from the two movies before it. And at the end one asks "What was the point of the midget?"

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Great way to leave the audience eh?


  • Mad Max (Part Two of Three)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Road Warrior  (1982)

    People often say that the sequels are never as good as the original.   And for allot of movies that is true, but not this one.

    We meet up with Max some time later, but this time we got a little bit of background to the setting before the real movie started. So right off the bat we are going well. And it is evident right away that the sheer scope of this movie is going to far greater than the first. With girocopters and new vehicles. With grander sets and more extras, this movie is going to be like nothing that we have seen before. And this movie was able to bare all that.

    Often when movies shoot up from humble beginnings to huge features they loose allot of what made the first one good, often the characters are not set up to take the weight of such a production. But in this case they are able to take it all and give amazing results.

    The story is rather simple. Max needs gas, because as we learn in the introduction gas is the most precious material now that it has all been spent in wars. And he is contacted by a group of oil refiners to help them get past a gang of oil pirates in exchange for oil Max needs.

    Again a simple plot but effective, just like the first Mad Max. Only this time, as I said, it is on a much lager scale.

    This Mad Max movie has some interesting features to it that separates it from the first movie. Namely that the look of the fist movie suddenly became so much more common on the screen with movies like "Blade Runner" that were arriving at about the same time.

    I have at this time stated my opinion that this movie is particularly good and I stand by it. And here is why. Out first movie is a film all about revenge for a just cause. But number two we see the rise of an epic. Something that is not often done. We have a real classic hero, a cowboy, a man with no name. And at the end he rides off into the sunset having committed a selfless act for the greater good. A movie like that is truly worth every minute of it. And it is golden. And so is "The Road Warrior".


  • Mad Max (Part One of Three)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Mad Max  (1979)

    We meet Max, a cop in the future where motorcycle gangs run rampant across the country side. The most gangish and rampant of these gangs is headed by a man known as Toecutter. The movie in the end has a really simple story; Toecutter kills Max's friends and family and so Max has to chase him down and kill him which he does.

    That is like one of the shortest summaries of a movie I think I have ever seen. That does not make this one bad. We have an action packed adventure with great characters and bad ass pyrotechnics. That is pretty easy to like. But this movie actualy gives more than what we see at first glance.

    But below that there is allot more to the movie and allot more important and interesting things. This movie came out in 1979. And we see something that was just beginning to take force, a new way of seeing the future or at least the first time anyone had seen this on film. What I am talking about here is the distopia. A distopia is as you may know or have guessed is the opposite of a utopia, in other words, a world that is not attractive and is in every way imperfect. This is not the first screen distopia really, "Logan's Run" had all ready came out as well as "A Clockwork Orange" both of which are distopias. But what Mad Max is, is one that is not only a distopia but also one agains the times. In the sixties and seventies came the huge rise in plastic. And that is reflected often in movies of the time. But in 1979 in particular we see a huge move against that in "Mad Max" and also "Alien". In these movies we get more metal. And more grit, nothing is really clean in these movies, and although that might sound trivial it is not in 1979 this is revolutionary.

    So "Mad Max" is really a very important movie by its self. As one can see it was truly revolutionary and opened the gates to other movies in the same style. It was also very culturally important. Here is a movie, made by people who's names have not really been herd, names like Mel Gibson. And they have put together a really good movie that makes allot of money. And after a few years they do it again. And that is really cool.

    So there is the undeniable truth in the importance of Mad Max. And it is not only important, it is actually well done. For the most part. There are down sides to this movie. The greatest of all is the setting. Well I just spent a lot of time telling you about the setting and how it was important. I should not really say the setting I should say the time. It is obvious that it takes place in the future but the back story of why the world is the way it is shown is a mystery. And one not solved until the second movie.


  • 2001: A Space Odyssey

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Kubrick is without doubt one of the greatest film geniuses ever to have lived. His ability to give social, political and even personal critiques in his movies along with beautiful colours and amazing shot composition is unbeatable. And of the great Kubrick movies there are few better to discuss than "2001: A Space Odyssey".

    That having been said I will now make a point of personal opinion. There is no such thing as pure Kubrick. Kubrick made many films and not one is really all that he ever contributed. If one wanted a list of movies that have the most Kubrick-ness in them the list would probably be "2001: A Space Odyssey", "A Clockwork Orange", "Barry Lyndon", "Dr. Straingelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb" and "Lolita". Well thats about every major Kubrick film ever. Wrong. Kubrick made attempts at horror ("The Shining") and war films ("Paths of Glory" "Full Metal Jacket"), but although these are recognized as Kubrick films they do not have the classic elements of his genius.

    But that is not what this review is about. This is a review of "2001: A Space Odyssey".

    This movie comes in three if not four distinct parts. And these are even shown in titles in the film. They are The Dawn of Man, From Earth to the Moon (this title is not in the movie), 18 Months Later, and, Jupiter... And Beyond the Infinite. Now anyone who has seen this movie knows that I have allot to cover here. But I have all the time you are willing to read this to cover it.

    The Dawn of Man

    This is without doubt a very well known part of the movie. You know that whole thing with that classic music and the monkeys hitting things with bones. Chances are you know it even if you don't know you know it. Well this part of the movie is really pretty much a spoiler for the rest of the movie. It tells everything an nothing, cause you would not know that you knew everything before you knew it and besides Cliffs Notes never get you anywhere in life.

    What is this part of the movie? Well I all ready kinda told you. It turns out to be monkeys hitting things with bones, but that is not the actual importance of this and there is really allot more to it than that. Cause what of corse happens when the monkeys pick up the bones is this; they are realizing the ability to utilize tools and this is a huge break through in consciousness. Which is after all what the Black Monolith is a symbol of. If you have not seen this movie (which is a travesty in its self cause it is amazingly important wether or not you like it and also cause it is just amazing) what I have just said probably washes right over your head. "Black Monolith," you'd say "what is he talking about?!?!" Don't worry just go watch the movie. Well let me just explain this really quickly, the Black Monolith is real and not real, I mean it is not really like there is this marauding, giant black slab of something that comes 'round periodically when we decide we want to hit things with things. The Monolith is the most important break through embodied artistically (which is something Kubrick was a master of). And when you see this part of the movie you will see all the artistry ever conceived in smashing bones. It is really hard to describe the beauty of the way it is done. How the bones spin in the air and are crushed. How the peccary falls to the ground and how the dawn of man dawns in this movie.

    Well you look at the DVD box and you see what looks like a Concorde flying out of a space station. And well what do the monkeys have to do with that? Well again going back to this consciousness thing this part of the movie foreshadows for what is to come in the next parts of the film. And that is why it is important. And that is why it is relevant. And that is why I am spending this time on it here. And we are going to get to space in a bit here.

     

    ****

     

    "Space. The final frontier. These are the voyages of the star ship Enterprise. It's five year mission to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life, and new civilizations. To boldly go where no man has gone before." And that is how "Star Trek" began in 1968, its last of three years on TV and the year "2001" came out. Space. What's out there? Well we don't know. But in 1968 we were about to find out. And it was in this mentality that Star Trek as well as "2001" where born in. And that brings us to

     

    From Earth to the Moon

    Now of corse it is obvious that this was soon to be a reality. But in 1968, to see a Pan Am flight to the moon would have just been awe-inspiring. But that is not the importance of this movie. What is then? What happens here in this part of the movie. Well this is the set up. Yeah the monkeys where not the set up really. This is. And we still have not gotten to the movie.

    Well this fellow goes up to the moon to check out this amazing archeological find, it is the first evidence of any other intelligent life in the universe. What is it? It is the deliberately buried Black Monolith. And it is what leads to the mission to Jupiter when it lets out a high frequency message to Jupiter. And that is when the movie begins. But not yet there is much to cover here too.

    Well that is basically all that really happens in this section of the movie. And although I have said that the movie hasn't started yet, it is, however, here that the tone and style for most of the movie to come is set. Here is where we see the visuals that even today are amazing. The spinning sense of gravity. Well it is hard to really hard to get zero gravity for the purposes of a movie, and besides isn't artificial gravity a cool idea. How does Kubrick get around this problem of space not having gravity? He does it by skewing our sense of what gravity is in every way. And I am not going to tell you just how he did it even though I know how he did most of them (they are just too cool to ruin, even though by reading this you are ruining the whole movie for yourself). Well what happens that skews gravity? Well a person just walks up a wall and into a room. And this goes on for the rest of the movie, and every time you are remarking "How did they do that?!?!" Well don't you know, I my self walk up walls all the time when I am taking a Pan Am flight to the moon.

    Although this is all well and cool I would like to pause for a minute to talk about shot composition. Cause here is some of the best in the movie. And I am afraid you would have to have my like whole commentary on the movie to fully understand how; when they are in the space station the reds of things like chairs standout against the hard and bright whites of the floor and walls of the station. You have just got to see the movie.

     

    ****

     

    Wow. Take a look at what you have just read. Or what I have just written cause that is relatively amazing too. This is allot of information and it is really small compared to the movie. And know, we still have allot to go. But hey the next part of the review is all about the actual movie, and that is what we have been looking forward too anyways.

     

    ****

     

    18 Months Later

    18 months later I have a problem with the movie. And it is a problem allot of people seem to have with this movie. A problem that enough people have that Mel Brooks is willing to take a potshot at it in "Space Balls". And it is the infamous huge ship passing shot. Yeah it takes a while for the ship to pass but you only have to watch it once and it is actually really important to the world of Sci-Fi so do try to stay awake through it.

    About that spaceship passing: Suddenly a ship passes. We have seen this a hundred times. Probably even a hundred times this movie alone. What makes this one important? To find out we are going back to the 50's. Back to the time of Flash Gordon. Here we see Flash and his friends flying around in a rocket ship. And this was widely accepted as what the future was to be. But then in 1966 things began to change. Star Trek flew on to the home TV's of thousands of households. And there was a non-arodinamc spaceship moving without rockets. And this movie was the next level. And it was because of this that we see the space ship we see in movies today. And that is the importance of the scene.

    Well I said that this section of the movie is the real movie and so it is. This is where the action is. A crew of five is aboard the ship plus a HAL 9000 (an almost human super computer). Three of the crew are in hibernation to conserve energy on the trip to Jupiter. Two remain awake incase anything should happen, their names are Dave and Frank. It is not long that HAL starts sabotaging the mission for reasons not even he can really explain. But HAL decides that all the crew must die and that he should complete the mission on his own. He sends Frank off into space and tries to leave Dave out there to but Dave is to quick, he is able to get back to the ship and shut down HAL in one of the most passionately performed deaths on film as HAL sings "Daisy".

    Again Kubick shows off his amazing talent for colour and style in the section of the movie as well. We see reds dashed with whites, a contrast to the whites with reds that we see earlier. And the same gravity skewing holds present. And the use of reflections on glossy surfaces begins. And then that continues for the rest of the movie.

    Yes that was rather brief for this review but there is no more to be said. And we need to get through allot more. And then actually review all of this.

     

    ****

     

    Well. I have been taking allot about the 60's, it is important with a movie like this. And I am going to have to explain some more now and this time it starts with three letters: LSD. LSD stands (somehow) for Lysergic acid diethylamide and it is what is called a narcotic. I am not going to linger on this but if you see the movie you will understand.

     

    ****

     

    Jupiter... And Beyond the Infinite

    This was the part that freaked me out the first time I saw it. And this is the part I like the least not only cause it freaked me out as a little kid but also cause it just makes no sense. Maybe it does if you have taken LSD. Because what happens is Dave has to go down to Jupiter. As was the mission. And as he goes down there there is this big laser light show thing and the Black Monolith showes up a few more times. And Kubrick again shows of his ability to use colours and lights to highlight a scene and make a really nice shot. Anyways Dave shows up in this room that is also very nicely composed for the camera. And the Black Monolith shows up. Then Dave turns into a giant cosmic embryo baby thing. LSD must make all the difference but I really would not know.

    Okay if that does not give my opinion enough I will restate it. I really like Kubrick. I really like this movie. I cannot stand this part of it. It makes no sense at all and really just kind ruins the whole amazing movie that you had to watch up to this. But over all it is an amazing movie. And you really must see it.


  • The Abyss

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Abyss  (1989)

    I am not going to just say this movie sucked. Cause that would not be totally true. It would, however, be mostly true.

    "The Abyss" is another James Cameron movie that is all in water. And once again he proves his mirth as a righter and basically puts a swear every other word. I have nothing really against swearing. But when the dialogue is along the lines of:

     

     "Sh*t, we on on this f*cking sh*t rig thing piece of crap down here and there is some god d*mn f*ucked up sh*t going on down here. Oh sh*t one of the crew people persons is dyeing, now we are really f*cked man." etc.

     

    it just gets really annoying.

    The movie is really not much to look at ether. Nothing really new or interesting happening in the art direction or photography (not that Cameron is really known for such pursuits in film). I will however mention the one really cool thing in this film. The one thing that made me really even know it existed. And that was the water worm monster Ed Harris face thing CGI whatsit. Lemme be the one to tell you... it was not worth it. Yes it was a break through at the time but you see it for like 2 minutes in 3 hour movie and in the end is seemed to have nothing to actually do with the movie. It was just kinda there.

    Well here is the plot. They are down there. They just are. Some kind of submarine crash at the beginning that they are investigating. Anyways while they are down there they see some flashy lights (just so you know when you see it what to do the audance is at that point supposed to be all like "Oooh what was that!" or as James Cameron would have it "Holy f*ucking sh*t! What the f*cking sh*t was that sh*it?!?!"). And then there is 3 hours at the bottom of the ocean where all this rather random and unrelated shit goes down randomly without much explanation. And I am sorry but that is it. That is the premise of the story.

    The ending is basically that there is the huge thing under the sea that has all these aliens on it. And that is what the flashing lights were all along but it took 3 hours to figure out that it would be prudent to check it out. But that wasn't even what they were down there for. at any rate at the end the spaceship (I am not making this up) comes out of the water and it is all purple and everything like that for some reason. And Ed Harris goes off with his former wife (in the movie).

    The movie was really bad. Boring. Lame. Poorly thought through. And Just yeah. But I see it worthy of my review  and it is undeniably an important movie to see. Just know, those are relatively wasted three hours.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<August 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2930311234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678


Categories
 


Advertisement