Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

The Paxton Log

  • VOTE

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Transformers  (2007)

    Hairspray  (2007)

    If you've read my recent blogs on MySpace or notes on Facebook you know I am currently taking a break from reviews. However I have decided I will in fact write one during the month of July. The twist is I won't be choosing which film it will be for; you will. So click here or on the posters below and vote for your pick. You have until next Saturday (June 30th) to choose. Thanks for voting!

    The choices are the films shown below: 'Hairspray', 'Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix', 'The Simpsons Movie', & 'Transformers'

     


  • Not Just Another Penguin Movie

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Surf's Up  (2007)

    First they marched, then they danced, & now they surf!  In the latest film to feature penguins as its stars 'Surf's Up' takes us on a fun and wild ride alongside the headstrong teen Cody Maverick, voiced by Shia LaBeouf.  Don't let the fact that this is yet another movie with the flightless birds deter you from giving it a chance.  Where as 'Happy Feet' relied on song and dance to carry itself, 'Surf's Up' focuses more so on story and laughs while it makes a huge splash in the vast ocean of recent CGI family flicks.

    Everything begins with an interview with Cody in his hometown of Shiverpool, Antarctica.  For the next hour and twenty-five minutes the same camera filming him in the interview will follow him on his journey to and on Pen Gu Island for the tenth annual Big Z Memorial Surf Off.  For those of you not familiar with penguin culture, it's a surfing competition held in the honor of legendary pro surfer, Big Z.  By winning the surf off Cody believes he'll gain the respect of his fellow family members and local residents back in Shiverpool.  Once he meets Geek; a penguin hiding away in Pen Gu's forest he begins to learn that being first doesn't always make you a true winner.

    'Surf's Up' may not be filled to the brim with musical numbers by vocally and rhythmically talented penguins, but it has enough great characters (some of which aren't even the black and white birds) to blow 'Happy Feet' out of the water.  The standout favorite is Cody's best bud, the aloof Chicken Joe, voiced by Jon Heder.  He's so fried, he could be put into a KFC bucket and be ready to serve as is.  The crazy clucker is nothing but a walking, talking load of laughs.  The other notable favorites are three children penguins named Katey, Smudge, & Arnold.  Every time the funny little guys start talking you can't help but love them.  Most of the other characters are pretty likable, but none compare to the comedic poultry or wee ones.

    Most of the humor actually comes from the setup of the film.  With it being in cinéma vérite style we see the good, bad, & side-splitting aspect of all the characters.  The only sequences I never really found funny save for one were those with business-driven beaver?  No, maybe it's an otter.  Whatever the hell that damn furry thing was voiced by James Woods, was pretty annoying.  Why he is even congregating with the birds is still a mystery to me.

    Now for the part I pretty much bring up in every review of a digitally animated film: the visuals.  It appears like there's just no limit to the level of progress that animation continues to have.  Last month 'Shrek the Third' raised the bar again with stunning facial expressions and detail.  Here 'Surf's Up' raises that same bar even higher with its amazingly realistic backgrounds and settings.  From the smallest leaf in the forest, to the drops of water dripping off Cody's forehead after a wave washes over him, the realism is unbelievable.  Two big thumbs up to Sony Pictures Animation on this one.

    I think anyone who sees this will get more than they went in expecting.  It's not just another penguin movie and it's certainly not only about surfing such as many were complaining.  It's plot may slightly be similar to 'Cars' but it does its own thing telling it's story with continuing hilarity and heartfelt throughout.  I can't deny that this fun, cutesy family film had me smiling almost the entire time.  I'm sorry Mumble, but there's a new penguin in town and his name is Cody.

  • The Good, The Bad, & The Bottom Line of 'Hostel: Part II'

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Hostel Part II  (2007)

    Oh, the horror!  No, I can't believe it either, but here I am doing another review for a sequel.  Up this week is the follow-up to last year's much hyped, only mediocre "stomach churning" splatter-fest 'Hostel'.  In 'Part II' the roles have been reversed (in more ways than one as you'll see after viewing it) as the victims this time are young women.  Upon changing plans the three ladies end up traveling to Slovakia after persuaded by the gorgeous model from their art class.  One by one they are kidnapped and taken to the oh so familiar place visited last year where a world of torture and pain awaits.

     

    The Good
    - The victims whom are played by Lauren German, Heather Matarazzo, & Bijou Phillips each do a great job with their roles.  Even though the three characters have similar traits seen in various other horror films, all three personalize them making each their own and more realistic.

    - Instead of primarily getting to know only the women, we get a better understanding of the those paying to torture via Todd and Stuart played by Richard Burgi and Roger Bart; both from ABC's 'Desperate Housewives'.

    - 'Hannibal Holocaust' director Ruggero Deodato makes a cameo as one of the twisted torturers who is what else, a cannibal!


    The Bad
    - The most shocking scene in the entire film isn't even one of the torturings.  It's actually one that's quite questionable as being necessary or not.

    - The switch from wimp to bad-ass by Stuart isn't believable at all.  It's 50% Bart's fault and 50% Roth's reason for the sudden change.

    - The ending quoted as being "one of the most shocking endings people have ever seen" by Roth himself isn't anything new.  The same thing was done better in 1978 by Meir Zarchi in 'I Spit On Your Grave'.  Even though I knew it was coming when I saw it, it still had me feeling uneasy.  Here it just wasn't executed well.


    The Bottom Line
    It's easy to see Roth did try to show some growth here.  Unlike many sequels, it doesn't appear like he made this solely for profit.  There actually was more to be told; that being the more in-depth look at the view held by the torturers.  Unfortunately, like the first, this one didn't measure up to the hype.  It started out pretty good at the start, but fell flat in the last thirty minutes.  He hasn't shown any interest in doing a 'Part III'.  I may be a little crazy for saying this, but I hope he does.  There's one last thing to be explained and that's the creation of the whole "business".  So I say, go for it.


  • Spread the word.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Fantastic Four  (2005)

    The follow-up to 2005's 'Fantastic Four' has officially been rated PG. All intense actions sequences have been removed and replaced with an ultimate battle royale of words between the four heroes and their new enemy, the Silver Surfer. So on June 15, be sure to go check out 'Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer' only in theaters! It's sure to enhance your vocabulary and absolutely suck.





    (click the small posters to see their full-size versions)

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<June 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
1234567


Categories
 


Advertisement