Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Tenenbaums Blog

2 Years For This?

1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Under discussion:

Casino Royale  (2006)

Daniel Craig is back as James Bond, and he's not happy.

In Quantam of Solace, director Marc Forster's first foray into the 007 franchise, Bond remains noticeably stricken from his painful love affair with the now-deceased, double-crossing Vesper Lynd. "M" has her agent on constant surveillance and is ready to ground him at the slightest hint of professional weakness. He is a young double-0, after all.

Craig is once again solid, confirming his casting for 2006's series overhaul Casino Royale. He's tough, but vulnerable, not afraid to cap a room full of enemies, wreak countless structural and artistic damage, and then be haunted by what he's done. Bond's blossoming insomnia is a refreshing shift from the happy-go-lucky persona employed most recently by Pierce Brosnan. With a growing number of personal issues, it's worth wondering how disturbed young Bond grew up to be a beyond cool superspy.

Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric) makes an appealing, sniveling villain, but he feels like such a minor threat in the world of Bond baddies. His threat via influence is real, but he is far from imposing in person. Greene's pun-friendly environmental doomsday project is a timely plot device and audiences would be lucky if the rest of the film was that easy to follow. Instead, it's not, and if viewers don't know Casino Royale front-to-back before seeing the latest Bond installment, the plethora of references will cause confusion instead of intrigue. Perhaps having Paul Haggis as a screenwriter isn't such a good idea after all.

The action, always the series' main attraction, is there, but it feels poorly shot and edited, especially compared to Casino Royale. Notable sequences include sneakily ID-ing suspects at an opera, a high-octane boat chase through a crowded harbor, and escaping from a doomed cargo plane. Still, several scenes have a distinct "Jason Bourne was here" feel, and in a poor rip-off kind of way. All of these weaknesses point toward Forster and a simple explanation: the director of Finding Neverland is simply not adept in the art of action films.

Craig is a good enough Bond that he deserves more support. With the Bourne trilogy and the previous Bond film, big-budget action features have catapulted into unexplored territory. In Quantum of Solace, Forster & Co. are merely following a map instead of blazing their own trail.

posted on Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:43 PM by Tenenbaums


Was this review helpful?
Yeah Yeah Nope Nope



Comment    Email me new comments.


rjsprague
Posted Friday, December 05, 2008 6:00 PM

I agree with you on all of these points in one fashion or another, but at the same time I feel your rating of the film is a bit low. Some of the action sequences, namely the foot chase at the beginning, were extremely hard to follow. The plot sequence and brief dialogue could be confusing to people who hadn't seen Casino Royale, but why would you be seeing this if you hadn't seen Casino Royale already. I haven't watched Casino Royale in over a year, and I didn't feel lost for very long. Forster's weaknesses may simply be his personal style, which is obviously not for everyone, but I didn't feel it was shabbily done, just different. Greene as a villain felt similar to many villains in previous Bond films who weren't personally threatening, but they usually had henchmen, or small armies, who seemed at least modestly formidable. Interestingly enough a cornered rat, Greene, is a dangerous foe.

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<November 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2627282930311
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30123456


Categories
 


Advertisement