Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Tenenbaums Blog

  • Juno's Transformers: Humans In Disguise

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Juno  (2007)

    *Some JUNO spoilers ahead, so steer clear until you've seen it*

    Jason Bateman's Mark in Juno is not a creep. He's a repressed artist who rushed into a marriage before he was content with his accomplishments, making him appear immature and selfish. In being such a person, he is unfortunate, painful, and, most importantly, real.

    He has seemingly found a peer in Ellen Page's Juno, the younger female version of his music-loving self and carrier of his adopted child. They swap albums and bond over bloody horror flicks. The friendship is there and only when Juno reacts (as a 16 year old would and should) to news of his planned divorce does Mark fully realize that she is a teenager.

    Juno sees a utopic environment for raising a child, but Mark lives in a suburban prison, one that suffocates his true being. She pegs him as fit for parenthood because he's "old" and married, and this assumptive categorizing
    forces Mark to inquire about her true motives for visiting and perception of him. As she responds, youthfully admitting her fondness for his rock star wannabe life, he deconstructs his current existence consisting of a hidden room for his belongings, his valuables downsized to "stuff in boxes," and a feeling of surviving "underground." "This is what my life has become," he reveals with great disappointment. It is a life with complexities, as Juno puts it, "way beyond [her] maturity level," and therefore outside of her understanding. Her non-surprising coping mechanism is to insult his beloved Sonic Youth, tear up, and run away.

    Their private interactions are full of potential romance that might be explored in a lesser film. Silent, smiling glances of connection are exchanged on Mark's sofa and the two share an awkward dance. Plus, there is a level of sneakiness involved, since Jennifer Garner's Vanessa frowns on her husband "not contributing," especially when he's supposed to be working. Surprised by Juno's presence at their house, Vanessa suspects no foul play; only the possibility that something is wrong with their baby. Her one-track response is a testament to her maturity and readiness to be a mother, making her a near character foil for Mark. She wishes that Mark would conform to her adult standards, but each moment with him assures us that he won't.

    Instead of giving in to scandal with a young platonic admirer, Bateman's facial expressions and ultimately his actions reveal his true identity: an aspiring Kurt Cobain in need of growing up. During the dance, Juno buries her head into his chest. The screenplay ambiguously calls for Mark to "pull Juno as close as he can, given her expanding girth," but Bateman's eyes reflect an unscripted concern consistent with his characterization of Mark. Feeling close to Juno despite the danger of her vulnerability, he sees the moment as better than any for delivering news of leaving his wife. Instead of accepting his decision as a righteous move toward independence and future fame ("It's something I've wanted to do for a long time," he assures her), Juno revolts as she witnesses her child-rearing Eden crumble. Simultaneously, Mark's apparent peer relationship ends, as does his screen time.

    He doesn't invite Juno to follow him into bachelor life and even at her most desperate low, she wouldn't tag along. It's primarily Juno's naivety, fueled by a misinterpretation of Mark's desire for friendship that even raises rumors of infidelity. She may be the product of a broken and krazy-glued home, but she's no home wrecker. She understands and respects the sanctity of marriage and only innocently crosses minor boundaries that she didn't know existed. No one's life is destroyed or even harmed. Mark and Vanessa rid themselves of future strife by making a clean cut while Juno (and hopefully Mark) learn temporarily stinging life lessons that aid in their developing maturities. It's win-win even if it doesn't initially seem pretty.

    Serving as the connecting strings, it is the conventions of the predictable romantic comedy and infidelity drama that screenwriter Diablo Cody plays against. She explores social taboos but on a deeper level and through well-developed characters. Therefore, it's acceptable to guess that a character may behave a certain way based on cinematic precedence, but not OK to assume that a perceived stereotype defines Cody's characters. They are far deeper than the paper dolls of contemporary throwaway comedies, capable of surprising the viewer with genuine actions. Not only is Cody playing off the norm, she is continuing the tradition of fine filmmaking that craft honest characters who actually exist. As a result, real relatable emotions are explored instead of hyperbolic fantasies that poison audiences.

    Juno is the kind of film that intelligent viewers crave. It gives them relevant experiences that exist daily, not magazine assignments to falsely lure and leave a man in 10 days or women who are bridesmaids 27 times over. Little is taught by those movies other than Hollywood loves to portray alternate universes that distort reality. Instead, responsible viewers opt to find themselves in Cody's writing and the acting of Page, Garner, and Bateman. The joy of doing so is priceless. Accept no substitutes.

  • Shaky Hand Luke

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Bottle Rocket  (1996)

    Rushmore  (1998)

    A few years ago on the talk show circuit, Luke Wilson liked to note that he had contributed one of the most memorable lines in Rushmore.  Already cast as Dr. Peter Flynn, Luke was reading over the script written by Wes Anderson and brother Owen when he got to the restaurant scene after the conclusion of Max Fischer's "Serpico."  Luke's character comes to the dinner in O.R. scrubs and he thought it would be funny if Max asked what the clothing was, got the response, and then asked, "Oh, are they?"  Bill Murray's Harold Blume nearly gags on his whiskey after hearing the line and so do we.

    Luke played his part.  He saw an opportunity, went for it, and it worked.  Apparently, the experience gave him enough confidence to write a script of his own.  His first attempt is The Wendell Baker Story, a project that looks wildly appealing on paper.  Co-directed with brother Andrew, the film stars Luke, Seymour Cassel, Eddie Griffin, Kris Kristofferson, Eva Mendes, Harry Dean Stanton, Owen Wilson, and Will Ferrell.  The acting ingredients are there, but these Wilsons (Owen can obviously write) are no Afflecks behind the scenes.

    The script feels paper thin and as a result, these famous friends of the Wilsons are exposed for their true motives: merely paying a favor.  Surprisingly, it is Luke himself who is most phoning in a performance.  His do-good title character is an incomplete writing exercise, a by-product of inexperience (and possibly lack of talent) that plagues the duped supporting cast.  All of the Wilsons' weaknesses that have been seen in other directors' films are exposed to their full intensity fittingly at their own expense.  Unfortunately, it also makes the rest of the known cast look like painful caricatures of themselves (notably Griffin, Cassel, and Owen).

    The funny lines that made Luke extra cool on Lettermen are still there.  Wendell tells his business partner Reyes, "I feel like a million pesos."  Reyes replies, "That's like, 4 bucks."  But that's all Luke's got: a few memorable lines.  This failed Creative Writing 101 assignment only made it to the big screen on the Wilsons' clout and with the help of some overly kind Hollywood pals.  With the exception of a few Bottle Rocket-esque moments, this one is in Plan 9 From Outer Space league.

  • The Do's and Don't's of Short Films

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Shorts! Volume 1  (2003)

    Why make a short film?  There can be many valid reasons: not enough funds for a full length feature; more room for experimental filmmaking techniques without the potential for full length fluff; or, most commonly, the filmmaker wants to strongly convey a single idea in a more direct (a.k.a. shorter) format.

    While shorter doesn’t always mean better.  Those behind these films often use/abuse the medium to wax philosophical, cramming far too much into a matter of minutes and leaving viewers cut off with choppy endings.  The technical experimentation alluded to above can result in visual awe, but often the storytelling aspects are greatly lacking.  The running time may be considerably truncated, but the basic components of successful film language still must be present.

    The prospect of viewing 15 award-winning shorts from various celebrated festivals (including Sundance and Tribeca) was largely appealing, especially considering my excellent track record with the medium.  Admittedly, the majority of shorts I’ve seen have been made by Pixar, but after being impressed by Wes Anderson’s “Hotel Chevalier” last October, I had elevated confidence in the genre entering this review.  

    It is interesting that a single collection can show exactly what’s right and wrong with short films.  This is a hit or miss set whose memorable films, though in the minority, have enough appeal to make the disc worth viewing.  At least you have the choice of picking only the films you want to see and hopefully I can help you avoid the stinkers.

    What’s right: shorts that noticeably focus on and successfully communicate a concept by any number of creative means.  

    -“What’s Wrong With This Picture?” is a hilarious public service announcement barely lasting over a minute.  It is just the right length and doesn’t pretend to be anything but silly fun.  Similarly goofy is “Non-Abductees Anonymous,” a humorous foray into Christopher Guest territory that mostly works.

    -“Dad’s Dead” feels like a music video for The Streets.  The ultra-violence is augmented by a variety of appealing mixed media animation juxtaposed with real and distorted images.  The innovative gamble works here and results in the collection’s most visually intriguing offering.

    -“Ready” and “Pishadoo,” each averaging 20 minutes in length, showcase filmmakers who are most prepared for feature films.  “Ready,” starring Oscar-nominee and Dolores Umbridge portrayer Imelda Staunton, is the story of a woman who’s part of a family in which everyone dies on the eve of their 57th birthday.  While her ancestors have made fools of themselves attempting to dodge fate, she fully accepts her future and sets herself up for the most enjoyable last day possible.  “Pishadoo,” Italian-American slang for “botched haircut,” follows the latest in a long line of Bronx barbers who may not be right for the job.  Each offering is of high production value, featuring appealing characters and storylines that make proper use of an elevated budget.

    -“Tenth” is a super short, but effective, meditation on how random encounters can feel meaningless yet haunt one for the rest of one’s life.  In a wonderful display of dramatic irony, the concluding gut punch is nearly on par with the success of the next film.

    -Best of all is “The Chinese Wall.”  In 10 minutes, Dutch director Sytske Kok creates a well developed miserly woman deserving of disgust and empathy for her quick judgments and depressing life.  In the midst of her daily solo stewing in a Chinese restaurant, she unexpectedly offers to share her surprise birthday cake with those she’s been silently targeting.  As she gets to know each of them, none of her assumptions find truth and she is noticeably lifted from her fog of negativity.  When a new customer witnesses the unified sharing table, he lapses into the same incorrect judgments as the woman, leaving us with a beautiful mixture of hope and frustration.  In short: real emotions!  This film is the peak of what shorts can be and exactly why the below films fail.

    What’s wrong: shorts that try too hard.  Ever present are abrupt endings that kill any engrossing moods that have been carefully constructed up to that point.  When the credits roll, the only fitting comment is “Why?”

    -The jiggly rubber puppets of “Earthquake” will earn a quick chuckle, but it’s not strong enough to be sustained for even two minutes.  It belongs on YouTube, along with many of the following.

    -I’ve always thought that animated films of any length took a lot more time to create than their live action counterparts.  The genre’s representatives here (“Dreamscapes”; “The World of Interiors”; and “Fish Never Sleep”) feature animation of varying quality that nevertheless fails to get across a meaningful idea or, for the most part, any message at all.  Maybe hallucinogens are required to understand potential deeper meanings, but none came with the DVD.

    -The remaining films contain one or two elements that work, but fall into traps that plague shorts.  There are backwards motion sequences comparable to Coldplay’s “The Scientist” video (“In Absentia”); intriguing prep-school drama and a number of intriguing, but stifled, plot branches (“Coda”); an empathetic suffering lead character (“Sleep”); and, most painfully, quality acting but a wasted ending (“John and Mia”).  Despite having some strong features, each film feels lazy and unwarranted.  The now familiar cry of “Why?” can be heard here and it hurts more since glimpses of great promise can be seen from the respective filmmakers.

    The bad can make you cringe and swear off all trances of your ego, but there are examples of undeniable brilliance hidden in this group.  I recommend skipping to the good ones and, if you’re an aspiring filmmaker, checking out the bad ones to see what not to do.

  • Best Films of 2007: 1-5

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Zodiac  (2007)

    Gone Baby Gone  (2007)

    Hotel Chevalier  (2007)

    5. The Bourne Ultimatum
    With the exception of Wes Anderson’s films, few entries in recent cinema have been as exciting to watch as first viewings of the Bourne films. Much has been critically made over the "spy with a conscience" that has already influenced major action films (namely Casino Royale), but the praise is wholly warranted. The only other times that I have been wowed so much by an action sequence was the bridge scene from Mission: Impossible III. For the series' third and final (?) installment, director Paul Greengrass and his crew (especially cinematographer Oliver Wood and editor Christopher Rouse, both so key to the maestro's trademark mixed camera surveillance look) ante up by having three such scenes. Since The Bourne Identity was released in 2002, Matt Damon has elevated himself from “rising star” to a near sure thing and one of the industry’s best. His Bourne is many wonderful things, and as more of his memory has come back, he has proven not just to have a heart, but, especially in Ultimatum, to be more vulnerable and human than we expect a super spy to be. The result could be the best action film of all time and possibly the best series of its kind, replacing the smugness of Bond with more intrigue and high stakes adrenaline. High octane is an understatement: new standards in filmmaking have been set.

    4. The Darjeeling Limited
    The most linear Wes Anderson film since Bottle Rocket (in that the narrative “distractions” from attention-grabbing detail are greatly diminished), it nonetheless feels like (stealing one of the few worthwhile lines from the Anderson-produced The Squid and the Whale) “minor” Anderson. In the Indian-set tale of brotherhood found, Adrien Brody fits seamlessly into the Anderson world while a band of familiar faces (Owen Wilson, Jason Schwartzman, and Anjelica Huston) quote the script’s precious painful poetry with relaxed control. It was a treat to see Anderson largely accepted into the mainstream this year. After being somewhat recognized in his own American Express commercial two years ago, he really hit it big with his short Darjeeling “prequel” film Hotel Chevalier, available for free download on iTunes. The 13 minute film became so popular that it was added before Darjeeling in its wide theatrical release after Anderson and Fox Searchlight claimed for weeks that it would be cut after festival circuit screenings. Critics continued to be divided on Anderson’s work, but even haters noticed that his scenes of sustained emotion show a promise for maturity as a filmmaker. For us Wes disciples, we understand and welcome his need to grow, but trust that he will keep making “Wes Anderson films.” For us, he’s seemed mature for a long time.

    3. Gone Baby Gone
    The year’s biggest surprise comes from a family whose sons’ careers have taken distinctly different paths. Now, order in the Affleck household has finally been restored. It is Casey who is the real actor (which we’d only seen in small doses) and Ben who is the real writer (which we knew) and director (which we didn’t). Based on Dennis Lehane’s novel, the film begins in typical exciting detective story fashion and then after a midpoint “solution” it flips the genre on its head to spectacular results. As Casey investigates his native Boston streets for leads on a missing child, Ben’s technical work gives us hope, desperation, adrenaline, and heartbreak as we follow his brother’s relentless search for answers. Casey (who was by far the best thing in Ocean’s 13 and apparently wicked in The Assassination of Jesse James) has given his oath to a neighborhood family and it is his unstoppable desire to do the right thing that plunges him and us to dangerous depths of determination, all in the name of honor. With a crackling Departed-esque “Bah-ston” script and engrossing cinematography, Ben surpasses Clint Eastwood’s adaptation of Lehane’s Mystic River by great lengths. Thanks to a who’s who of famous friends (Morgan Freeman, Ed Harris, et al) in memorable supporting roles, Ben makes sure that his hard work is channeled by the right people. It’s been a good year for Boston, with near widespread athletic dominance and a Best Picture win for The Departed, and the luck of the Irish continues with a solid, gritty homage to the city by its new favorite family. Welcome back, Ben. We’ve missed you.

    2. Zodiac
    A film that came out so long ago that I’m not convinced it was actually 2007 still manages to stick with me more than titles I saw last week. David Fincher and his crew (most notably screenwriter James Vanderbilt and cinematographer Harris Savides) take the notorious unsolved case and let it play out in a manner that pulls us in the same way that magnetically attracted those obsessed by the mystery. Instead of taking the unrealistic approach that many Zodiac films employ of only following the killer, Fincher’s film shows how three San Francisco men’s lives were forever altered by their unrelenting quest for truth and closure. The wise narrative choice allows Boy Scout cartoonist Robert Graysmith, Inspector Dave Toschi, and investigative reporter Paul Avery’s characters to grow in remarkable depth as they continue to pursue the case after everyone else has attempted to forget about it. An understated Jake Gyllenhaal as Graysmith leads a perfect cast of “I know that face”s that effortlessly embrace their respective real-life 60s/70s personas. Each shot and piece of dialogue feels so consciously precise and full of importance that 2.5 hours of screen time have rarely passed with such smoothness and intrigue. I highly anticipate the Director’s Cut DVD (I know where $25 of my Christmas money is going) as no other film this year is more worthy of a director’s commentary. Fincher’s meticulous attention to detail made for such a tight film considering the magnitude of the project that it will be priceless to hear his take on the process.

    1. No Country For Old Men
    I realize that I am echoing the sentiments of critics nationwide, but there can be no other choice. Cormac McCarthy’s novel read like a screenplay, but the Coen Brothers’ meticulously faithful detailed adaptation and their expert knowledge of the language of film gives the literature its deserving visual presentation. No weak links are present here. Josh Brolin, capping a stellar year (Planet Terror and American Gangster), is excellent as a quiet Vietnam vet hunter and Tommy Lee Jones keeps his often loopy trademark acting in perfect check. Then there is Javier Bardem’s Anton Chigurh. The character was haunting enough on the page, but Bardem’s portrayal of the merciless bounty hunter is the perfect realization of the Grim Reaper, human only in that he bleeds, drinks milk, and has breakable bones. Alongside an already superb cat-and-mouse film are meditations on mortality and attempting to make sense of unexplainable evil, proving that No Country is far from the likes of simple Spaghetti Westerns. It’s about drug runners and gratuitous violence, but these are merely devices of the larger darker issues of the morally devolving world. Martin Scorsese’s The Departed held this spot last year, and this time another “comeback” picture from a talented director (in this case, directors) earns the crown. It is encouraging to see great filmmakers return to peak performance, especially since the sparks hint at soon and future greatness. It speaks extra volumes that even after reading the book, the film is still surprising and has so much to offer. Only the Lord of the Rings trilogy has offered similar literature-to-film satisfaction, and No Country will be likely rewarded with a similar deluge of Academy Awards in the new year

  • Best Films of 2007: 6-10

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Grindhouse  (2007)

    I'm Not There  (2007)

    Ratatouille  (2007)

    Into the Wild  (2007)

    Superbad  (2007)

    One year later, I still feel great about my top 5 films of 2006, especially The Departed in the #1 spot. However, since I hadn't seen a good deal of the Oscar-friendly pictures due to my minor market setting, homage must now be paid to Children of Men, Letters From Iwo Jima, and Little Children, each of which would have made last year’s Top 10 list had I seen them in ’06.

    This year was another stellar one for film, as seen by the long list of notable releases not to make the Top 10. Again, the list only includes what I've seen and I've missed a number of appealing flicks. I’m certain that There Will Be Blood and hopefully Juno and Sweeney Todd will be in my ultimate “Best of 2007” list. Others that I haven't seen are: Margot at the Wedding; Charlie Wilson’s War; Atonement; I Am Legend; Michael Clayton; Sunshine; Talk To Me; Paris Je T’aime; The Savages; The Kite Runner; The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford; Before the Devil Knows Your Dead.

    10. Superbad
    It nearly came down to a coin flip between this and Knocked Up, but then I thought about the appeal of both films: their heavy duty belly laughs and underlying heart. Superbad’s chuckles start with the fake 70s feel of the opening credits and only let up when we need it: to stress the importance of friendship. The best parts of Knocked Up are the scenes with the male housemates and Superbad takes that chemistry and humor and runs with it for an entire movie. Seth Rogen (finally riding high after his pair of criminally under appreciated TV series)’s and Evan Goldberg’s script is the undeniable star, but the hilariously awkward and real performances of Jonah Hill, Michael Cera, and Christopher Mintz-Plasse speak for my generation more than any other “teen” film. If Superbad failed to connect with anyone, it was because it’s uncompromisingly honest, which is no failure at all. This one belongs in the comedy pantheon of the past decade alongside South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut, Old School, The 40 Year Old Virgin, and Borat.

    9. Ratatouille
    After their third animated feature (Toy Story 2), Pixar established itself as the most consistent name in film. Five films and only nine years later (last year’s Cars and next year’s Wall-E suggest that the studio may be equalling Woody Allen’s production frequency), Ratatouille continues the tradition of all-age family excellence. With his story of an english-comprehending rat that is Paris’ best chef, writer/director Brad Bird proves that, along with studio best The Incredibles, he is the go-to guy in animation. Remy the rat’s taste for the finer things in life leads him from his garbage-noshing country family to the French capital and, with the help of the jovial ghost of famous chef Auguste Gusteau, is secretly allowed to pursue his life’s passion. Remy cooks to great success from under Gusteau’s bumbling grandson’s hat by pulling the young man’s hair to relevant marionette movements and the flow of images is more appealing than anything on the Food Network. In addition to the unsurpassed images, few “cartoon” films’ technologies are matched by the quality of their screenplays, an element that allows Pixar to distance itself from other companies and should shortly garner Oscar attention for its superb writing. The inspired choice of casting Patton Oswald as the voice of Remy, the cutest and bluest rat ever, and other talented names such as Peter O’Toole and Brad Garrett further the fact that Pixar is and will be the premier animation studio for years to come.

    8. Into The Wild
    Christopher McCandless’ true personal journey from apparently content Emory graduate to entirely separating himself from society is a fascinating story that director Sean Penn handles with extreme care. Emile Hirsch shows incredible promise in the lead role, completely committed to his character’s mission while physically wasting away at its expense. Hirsch is surrounded by an impressive supporting cast, including Catherine Keener, Jenna Malone, and Hal Holbrook in the “where the heck has he been” performance of the year. But it is another co-star that steals the show despite being largely misrepresented: Nature. The Alaskan wilderness is remarkable as is and doesn’t need Penn’s quickly spinning camera to showcase its wonder. It’s stunning by itself, just like the story when it’s allowed to unfold naturally. Only the two instances when McCandless speaks directly to the camera break the otherwise strong hold that Penn has on the viewer and subsequently force a reconnection with the engrossing mood. Adding additional backbone throughout is Eddie Vedder’s haunting musical score, an ideal accompaniment to the rugged landscapes and addictive personal determination. Though McCandless’ execution of his ideals were ill-conceived, his aspirations continue to be thought provoking. Penn romanticizes the young man’s voyage, which, considering McCandless’ tragic end, should only further inspire one’s independence and pursuit of happiness.

    7. I’m Not There
    By far the most interesting concept in years, Todd Haynes’ film splits the many facets of Bob Dylan into six distinct persons to best attempt to make sense of the man. The result is more of a meditation on our perception of Dylan, which is probably for the best, seeing that most folks have strong personal opinions of the bard. Fortunately, the meditation also includes a substantial amount of Dylan’s best work from throughout his career, comprised of a good balance of covers and originals. We’ve heard about each Dylan from a variety of sources (documentaries, his Chronicles biography, rumors, and the music itself) and each personality captures the excitement and heartbreak witnessed through these authorities. Of all the leads channeling the manly man, it is Cate Blanchett who connects the greatest in a faithful interpretation of Don’t Look Back era Dylan. In fitting black and white, she perfectly mirrors the pill-popping anxieties and authority-toppling bravado of the press-haggard star. Only those pro-Dylan need apply, but a great reward awaits them.

    6. Grindhouse
    The most enjoyable film experience since The Lord of the Rings’ Trilogy Tuesday and likely the most unique mainstream cinematic experience ever. But, since it was a commercial flop, apparently ADD audiences don’t have an attention span long enough to handle over three hours of awesomeness if it doesn’t involve Hobbits. That’s too bad because they missed a quality bad zombie flick (Robert Rodriguez’s Planet Terror) and an actual high quality Quentin Tarantino Film (Death Proof), plus a trio of fake ‘sploitation trailers in the middle to psych everyone up for the 2nd film after sitting through the full-length first one. Though the full product is a screaming success, I still think that Rodriguez feels duped. While he successfully turned out an enjoyable spoof and stand alone genre flick, Tarantino took the revenge/car chase film and elevated it beyond anything before it to craft the end-all of “grindhouse” films. If only more filmmakers could have this much fun.

  • Best Films of 2007: Honorable Mention

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Rescue Dawn  (2007)

    Eastern Promises  (2007)

    Rescue Dawn
    Werner Herzog’s film of Dieter Dengler’s true survival and escape from a Vietnam P.O.W. camp is a tale of two tales. Early scenes of peacetime military life feel staged and out of place, but once Dengler’s plane crashes, the story takes off in a major way. Christian Bale delivers another solid performance as Dengler, harrowingly depicting the daily torture of captivity, but the real surprise is Steve Zahn as fellow prisoner Duane. Zahn, finally in a non-goofy role, steals every scene that he’s in. His comedically googly eyes are ever present, though here they mirror a frantic need to survive in horrific circumstances. I may never be able to look at him the same again. Despite Duane’s authenticity, Herzog asks the audience to stretch themselves in believing Dengler’s characterization. Dengler is apparently so determined in his ways that he will yell at his captors immediately after being tortured as if he expects no consequences for his actions. If such action accomplishes anything, it’s only internal for Dengler. In interviews, Herzog has said that Dengler was a unique person and that Bale’s portrayal is entirely accurate. Without an explanation for his motivation and attitude other than “that’s just how Dieter was,” it’s hard to accept many of Dengler’s actions. Regardless of this shortcoming, the 4/5 of the film set in the jungle are some of the most powerful images of the year.

    Eastern Promises
    David Cronenberg’s latest thoroughly dark film builds on the intensity of his A History of Violence, though topping that film is going to take an extraordinary effort. Once again, Viggo Mortensen lends a strong performance as a Russian bodyguard keeping a powerful syndicate family together despite the reckless decisions of its spoiled son (Vincent Cassel) and corrupted leadership of its father (Armin Mueller-Stahl). The male triumvirate’s exceptional strength makes Naomi Watts’ phoned-in performance as the female catalyst all the more surprising, though her character’s general mundaneness rests more on the screenwriter than her. Promises also contains the most exhilarating sequence of the year in which Mortensen engages in a steam room brawl with a pair of knife-armed rival mobsters...while in the buff. Mortensen’s vulnerability couldn’t be captured in a better way and the technical fluidity of the scene is utterly mesmerizing. Though leading the league in throat slashings and eye stabbings, the cruelty throughout is thankfully redeemed by the end, a resolution that offers more hope than similar downers such as Seven. The surprise isn’t that the film is good. It’s that hardly anyone is talking about how good it is.

    American Gangster
    A battle of the titans that was billed for longer than any Don King promoted heavyweight fight ends up being singular showcases instead of the hopeful unified collaboration. Ridley Scott’s most focused film since Gladiator benefits from his commitment to an authentic 1970s setting just as much as its monster performances by Denzel Washington and Russell Crowe. What saves the film from being simply another Scarface is that once the inevitable drug lord (Washington)’s fall comes, it’s easier and more fascinating to deal with since the cop bringing him down (Crowe) is so appealing. Gangster hasn’t broken any social or cinematic barriers (Washington’s other film this year, The Great Debaters, does a better job of the social aspect), but following the pattern of Heat instead of The Mexican, it proves that the best way to use two superstars is to primarily keep them apart.

    Other notable enjoyable films: Ocean’s Thirteen; Shrek 3; Live Free or Die Hard; Sicko; Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix; A Mighty Heart; Hot Fuzz; Waitress; Stardust; The Simpsons Movie; The Golden Compass; Enchanted; The Great Debaters; and Knocked Up.

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<January 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789


Categories
 


Advertisement