Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Tenenbaums Blog

  • Enlist Now!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Annapolis  (2006)

    In The Catcher in the Rye, Phoebe Caulfield tells her brother Holden that their brother D.B. is out in Hollywood writing a movie about the Annapolis Naval Academy. Holden quickly exclaims that D.B. knows nothing about Annapolis, therefore why would he do such a phony thing as write about the place? 55 years later, D.B. has finished his script under the alias David Collard and the result is called simply... Annapolis.

    A somewhat staged documentary, the film is also a recruitment tool for the Navy. Tyrese Gibson’s Cole, an officer seemingly on hire from the Marines, also provides a plug for that branch of the military.

    But the story extends far beyond the Academy grounds. James Franco, as Jake Huard, personifies the everyday American and his story represents the possibilities inside one and all. Anyone can come from obscurity and make it into a prestigious establishment such as Annapolis. Then, if you have enough determination, you can quickly rise to the top of the recruits’ ranks, earn the respect of all of your former adversaries, and get the girl (who wanted you from the beginning). Better yet, you can earn a tear-restraining nod of approval from your father, which transcends those previous glories for most of Annapolis’ sawed-off male audience with “Daddy” issues.

    In Annapolis, we see a screenwriter at the top of his game, hunkered deep in intertextuality as he makes one allusion after another. Brilliantly disguised as a military drama, “Collard” again draws on his literary roots. Also in The Catcher in the Rye," Holden, himself a military school student, recalls a student who was insulted to his emotional limit and then jumped out of his dorm window. “Collard” pays respect to J.D. Salinger by having an obese African-American follow suit. However, the screenwriter’s heart is far more compassionate than Salinger’s as he allows the recruit to live following his fall and also give Huard inspiring words to give him the necessary final push to greatness. In this moment and other notable ones, the soaring string arrangements by Bryan Tyler only further lift the audience’s heart in the midst of this inspirational tale.

    Riding the recent popularity of high-profile boxing films, such as Million Dollar Baby and Cinderella Man (as if the genre ever took a break!), Annapolis continues the tradition of greatness in the ring. Will the underdog Huard gain enough weight to fight his rival in the Academy tournament? Will he become his equal after one school term with no prior experience? And will he get the chance to meet him in the finals? Surprisingly, the answer to all of these questions is “yes.” I continue to clutch my seizing heart as I write this.

    “Collard” (clearly a pen name. No one has the same last name as a vegetable) is also keenly aware of the cinematic greats who have come before him. At one point, Huard and company are forced to do an alarming amount of push-ups in a consistently falling rain. Though he is able to answer all of Cole’s Annapolis trivia, Huard is still forced to remain by himself and do up-downs. Tipping his hat to Stanley Kubrick, “Collard” has the rest of Huard’s class rejoin him and in an act of solidarity perform their unnecessary up-downs. The DVD subtitles may reveal one of the budding midshipmen whispering “I am Spartacus.”

    Also, the filmmakers were able to coax Sylvester Stallone’s stunt double from the Rocky films to make a cameo as the referee in the championship match. His gracing of the film symbolizes the last bit of icing on the cake and solidifies Annapolis’ status as the next great boxing picture. “Collard” would do well to begin writing his Best Original Screenplay acceptance speech now.

  • "Code" Cracked

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The adaptation of The Da Vinci Code is an important issue that deserves close attention. The film is the most high profile adapation since the Harry Potter movies, but let's face it: those pictures are largely for children. Critics and audiences are responding negatively to what was supposed to be a huge summer blockbuster (Stephen King claimed it was a can't miss), and such a phenomenon needs to be explained.

    I read the novel two summers ago and enjoyed it. Despite being manipulative (a cliff-hanger at the end of every chapter? a jumpy plot to keep you reading until the cliff-hanger chapters met up with their respective characters?), it was an interesting story and a very cinematic read. Perhaps adapting the book this soon was a mistake. An incredibly large number of people know the story and need to be surprised by the film to avoid a "visual re-reading" of the novel. Here inlies the reason why the film is largely a failure, but the screenwriter is not to blame. Akiva Goldsman's script is an excellent adaptation. All of the major plot points and interesting moments are preserved and the book's integrity is honored in the screenplay. Passages like Ian McKellen's Holy Grail analysis of "The Last Supper" (the most intriguing section of the novel and film), which are being attacked as overly didactic or long-winded, are necessary to translate the book's intentions. Without them, the title is irrelevant.

    The problem is Ron Howard's direction. He takes a faithful adaptation and does nothing to excite the audience. The excitement is there in the script, but Howard refuses to play with interesting camera angles, editing, or suspenseful music. Instead, he films "The Cinderella Man Code": a good story, but too smooth and safe to be anything close to a thriller. What's interesting is that Howard knows how to do suspense: Ransom, much of A Beautiful Mind, and even Apollo 13. In the latter, the audience can read an encyclopedia entry before seeing the film, know how it ends, yet still feel tense watching. With such an exciting story before him, why did Howard not take advantage of countless cinematic possibilities to make an engrossing thriller?

    Being familiar with the action, I needed a different experience. Instead, I was left with 2.5 hours with no sense of immediacy or much danger. The viewers who will benefit most from watching Howard's film are those who have neither read the book nor listened to the overwhelming national negative criticism. The story will be fresh to them, and maybe there will be a hint of suspense to keep them intrigued. However, the viewers who have read Dan Brown's work are out of luck.

    I propose a plan to create a proper adaptation of The Da Vinci Code similar to the podcast FilmSpotting's recasting of Elizabethtown. When Jay-Z released his "Black Album" in 2003, many critics and underground hip-hop artists felt that his lyrics were excellent but that the music (beats) were lacking. Jay-Z soon released an acapella version of that album and allowed anyone from hip-hop producers to high schoolers with an editing program to add their own backing music to his lyrics. The results were impressive and some were applauded more than the original, including Danger Mouse's "The Grey Album" (combining the Beatles' "White Album").

    What if Goldsman allowed for his script to be filmed by any director who wished to do so? The resulting films would definitely have the ability to pack more of the needed punch than Howard delivered. What would David Fincher, Paul Greengrass, or Quentin Tarantino do with this material? I'd like to find out.

  • X/Y Men

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    If nothing else, X-Men: The Last Stand provides an important message for the throngs of teens and pre-teens who comprise the majority of its ticket sales. When Iceman and Pyro have their face-off, Pyro tells his rival, "You should have stayed at the academy." His comment provides the needed catalyst to turn Iceman into a giant popsicle and head-butt the flamethrower. "You never should have left," Iceman retorts. "Stay In School" is all over this movie and should convince any on-the-fence grade schoolers to continue their education.

    The relationship complications between Rogue and Iceman could have been avoided without Rogue being cured of her mutant "disease." In the presence of the mutant cure child, other mutants' powers are temporarily deactivated. Iceman should have befriended the cure child. If he was in a room with Rogue and Iceman, Rogue would lose her ability to steal mutants' powers and she could touch Iceman without fear of her boyfriend's death. If the couple wanted to get risky, the cure child could go hide in a nearby closet. Love crisis averted and they could go back to being mutants outside of the cure child's presence! Instead, Rogue turns herself into a useless human while Iceman can still chill.

    Also, like any good homosexual, Ian McKellan ended up in San Francisco.

  • Potholes

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Easy Rider  (1969)

    Easy Rider is a much overhyped film. Peter Fonda and especially Dennis Hopper's performances are highly unprofessional and give the impression that they are largely portraying themselves. An interesting drinking game would be to take a shot every time Hopper says "man."

    Jack Nicholson, however, deserves all the credit that can be bestowed upon him in a performance that helped catapult him into a 3 Oscar career.

    The film largely consists of Fonda and Hopper cruising on their choppers to a wonderful rock soundtrack shot against beautiful landscape. But this combination is not enough to qualify as a great film, or even a film at all. A more appropriate title would be an "extended music video" courtesy of The Band, Hendrix, Steppenwolf, Harley Davidson, and Laszlo Kovacs' cinematography.

    Still, the film deserves credit for being groundbreaking. When Easy Rider came out in 1969, no film had attempted to capture the contemporary sex, drugs, and rock 'n roll culture. Instead, light films starring pin-up idols and depicting a fantasy world that no longer existed dominated the cinema. Easy Rider said that it was OK to show people as they really are and changed the content of the films that followed. The flash cuts are also very European and refreshing, signaling the onset of the American Auteur.

    Despite the film's innovations, should it have been viewed as classic of its time and still be revered today?

    Perhaps a more relevant question: Have certain films of recent years whipped the masses into a frenzy for their supposed freshness, yet lack basic content that quality films possess?

  • Abandon All Hope

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Chasing Holden  (2001)

    I purchased Chasing Holden on DVD in fall 2005 when my thesis concerning J.D. Salinger in film was much more broad than the final product. When the movie arrived, I knew I was in trouble: the type at the top of the cover said, "Starring DJ Qualls of the hit The New Guy."

    This is the worst movie I have ever seen. Plan 9 From Outer Space was at least cohesive. Besides a scene of sudden, unnecessary profanity that Qualls' character spits before returning to his subdued "nice guy," there are many other inconsistencies. The most notable example is when Rachel Blanchard's character shoots at Qualls when he enters their hotel room. She mistakes him for the sleazy, stalking hotel manager and blasts a bullet just over his head. Instead of freaking out, he lazily says something like, "Whoa! Watch your aim," and then goes back to being "the cool guy." Holden Caulfield may have been manic-depressive, but do the script and acting need to be bipolar?

    It's a shame that this movie (don't call it a film) is so bad. The premise is intriguing and Qualls has emerged into an interesting actor, most recently in Hustle and Flow.

    However, the true shame is that "Mystery Science Theatre 3000" is on longer on the air. Their roast of Chasing Holden would have been priceless.

  • Babble About Babel

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Babel  (2006)

    Babel is not the best film of the year, but is definitely the most ambitious one. Screenwriter Guillermo Arriaga and director Alejandro Gonzalez Innaritu once again play with intertwining storylines from seemingly isolated characters, though on a much greater scale than they did with their previous films Amores Perros and 21 Grams. (A budget=4 storylines instead of 3.) The result is similar to a better built and more imaginative version of Crash. Primal fears are again addressed, the chief difference being that Innaritu's film leaves the audience feeling as if they have emotionally survived a sledgehammer attack to the knees. In terms of catharsis, the film is a monumental success on par with "King Lear."

    That said, the final cut of the film is a disappointment when compared to its trailer. The basic conflict of each vignette is set up and the suspenseful 3 minute preview coupled with knowledge of Innaritu's past films allows the viewer's mind to explode with imagination. Yet when the credits roll, what actually played out feels light in contrast to what could have been. Is the film handicapped from its potential suggested from the trailer? Possibly, but the previews for 21 Grams also piqued the imagination and the film lived up to its potential and provided many surprises.

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<July 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
24252627282930
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234


Categories
 


Advertisement