Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Tour Spout | Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Tenenbaums Blog

  • Insert "Bourne" Pun Here ______

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Casino Royale  (2006)

    With the exception of Wes Anderson’s films, few entries in recent cinema have been as exciting to watch as first viewings of the Bourne films.  Much has been critically made over the "spy with a conscience" that has already influenced major action films (namely Casino Royale), but the praise is wholly warranted.  The only other times that I have been wowed so much by an action sequence was the bridge scene from Mission: Impossible IIIFor the series' third and final (?) installment, director Paul Greengrass and his crew (especially cinematographer Oliver Wood and editor Christopher Rouse, both so key to the maestro's trademark mixed camera surveillance look) ante up by having three such scenes.  High octane is an understatement: with The Bourne Ultimatum, new standards in filmmaking have been set.

  • The Right Message, The Right Time, The Right Format

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Getting an audience to listen to a message that is critical of the Iraq War is not hard.  Political venues, water coolers, and street corners are full of disgust for the Bush Administration and countless citizens worldwide have Inauguration Day 2009 circled on their calendars.  The difficult task is presenting a balanced and informed yet still passionate cross-examination of this red-hot topic.  In a volatile, confusing time, Charles Ferguson’s new documentary No End In Sight is well aware of this challenge and ambitiously attacks this decade’s defining dividing point with the necessary goods.

    In order to present the argument at hand, one must go back to the beginning to see where things went awry.  Ferguson hinges his argument on four major points: the decision not to instill Martial Law after the fall of Baghdad; Paul Bremer’s subsequent decision to disassemble the Iraqi military; the poor planning of the amount of American troops needed to contain possible insurgencies; and the general lack of planning leading up to the invasion of Iraq.  By comparison, Ferguson notes that President Eisenhower and his administration planned the occupation of Germany for two years.  In the time the writer/director takes to reveal this factoid, past hasty decisions come to mind and it becomes clear why the U.S. has not been on the winning side of a war since 1945.

    No End In Sight wisely shifts the blame away from Bush alone to his entire administration.  The immediate finger-pointees are the Three Amigos and architects of the invasion: Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz.  Ferguson isolates this trio as a group that acted without military advising or assistance from anyone with extensive relevant experience.  From there, the only task was getting cabinet members such as Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell to buy into their ill-informed plan, which soon resulted in a snowball effect of head-nodding (the majority of U.S. citizens included).  For Powell and others who later resigned their posts, playing along meant helping the U.S. government appear unified and sturdy.  When they could no longer cope with being a part of such a corrupt machine, they bailed and their actions echo in the midst of subsequent and recent resignations.  

    The parties chosen to present the facts include authors of many recent books exploring the “why”s and “how”s of the Iraq War, a handful of respected journalists who were in Baghdad in early-mid 2003, and numerous government employees who were instrumental in the immediate aftermath of the fall of Baghdad yet abandoned soon after.  In gathering this group, Ferguson has assembled an essential nexus of interviewees to help tell the story. 

    For their abandonment, the aforementioned former officials grant Ferguson full access to their frustrations and as the truth is exposed by the people who were converted to puppets in roles for which they did not audition, the audience is granted a rare insider treat.  When a key player whose insight would have been additionally beneficial yet self-incriminating to the story is not included, their refusal to be interviewed is duly noted at the chronological point where their contributions would have been both most vital and personally damaging.  The one exception to a “guilty” party agreeing to be interviewed is Walter Slocombe, a senior adviser of Bremer’s Coalition Provisional Authority.  Despite his noble willingness to participate, the questions quickly become too big for Slocombe to handle alone.  He does his best to tell what he can and escape unscathed, but at the same time exhibits the false innocence filibustering that likely would have been seen from his absent colleagues.

    The result of these efforts is the mainstream film about the Iraq war for which truth seekers bewildered in the face of constant ill-informed patriotism have been waiting.  Michael Moore stirred up welcome attention with his sloppy, rushed Fahrenheit 9/11, but Ferguson’s message is leagues more balanced and, in turn, more informative.  

    No End In Sight
    is all of these things...and it is redundant.  Likely conscious of his repetition, Ferguson includes a clip, albeit a short one, from the PBS series Frontline, the Mt. Olympus of contemporary documentary programs.  The clip’s episode, titled “Truth, War, & Consequences,” features interviews with many of the same players of No End In Sight and in multiple ways beat Ferguson’s film to the proverbial punch.  With most of the story already told elsewhere, No End In Sight nevertheless exists as essential viewing based on its release date.  While Frontline’s message was just as educational and true when the episode in question first aired in October 2003, more people are now willing to listen to the story after taking more lumps from the Bush administration.  Ferguson is also likely aware of that story’s absence on the big screen and intelligently fills that void.

    Whereas Spike Lee’s When The Levees Broke used similar interviewee choices and stock footage to help successfully expose the government injustice of Hurricane Katrina and the New Orleans aftermath, Ferguson’s film also stands as an important cinematic chronicle of modern U.S. history.  And like the rebuilding of and aid toward the affected Gulf Coast communities is far from over, the Iraq war, true to Ferguson’s film’s title, has no end in sight.


  • The Path Often Traveled

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Roads to Koktebel plays like the sequel to The Bicycle Thief  transplanted in Russia.  The once entirely trusting son has now come to regard his father as an incompetent loser yet sticks with him because he knows no other way.  A few more years under him, the boy is old enough to know most of what’s going on and he can communicate with the father on a more adult level.  Often, that maturity means insulting the father in ways that a younger boy could not.  Then when the boy has taken all of his father’s failures and broken promises that he can handle, he assumes the adult role and strikes out on his own.  The only problem is that, just like any young boy who "runs away from home," he still behaves like a child, as seen most vividly in the scene where he grills the philanthropic truck driver about the sea’s whereabouts. 

     In a more conventional, though also more entertaining, father-son road movie like Road To Perdition, the lifelong distanced son grows closer to his aloof father through a series of life-changing events.  In Roads to Koktebel, the exact opposite happens, as is to be expected in a non-Hollywood film.  Whether the inverted storyline makes for a more moving experience depends on how much the viewer buys into the staples of art films.  Directors Boris Khlebnikov and Alexei Popogrebsky deliver all of the standard goods, including sustained shots on inanimate objects longer than the usual art film, and stick to their guns.  There's no question that the technical aspects of a good film are here, but what the film lacks is enough character development and, subsequently, a believable continuity of plot.

    While the story is slightly pretentious in its silence and overt artiness, Roads to Koktebel is nevertheless beautifully shot.  The rural Russian landscape is shown for all its wonder and muck, crossing captivating forests with dirty roads.  Throughout the film, interchanges of long to close shots 180 degrees from one another say more than most of the dialogue.  These shots repeatedly imply that what the boy and father want and need is far away, but they are somewhat stuck in place, continually only looking at what they desire.  Even when they occasionally interact with their distanced goals, things don't go according to plan and further setbacks occur.  This repetition of shots also mirrors their long journey and far away destination, which is only expedited by the brash solo decision of the frustrated boy.

    Then there are the obvious metaphors mixed into the sparse dialogue, most notably the boy's interests.  The boy becomes fond of gliders and albatrosses, seemingly because they can easily travel long distances with little effort and without much outside help.  Restricted by the disappointments of his father, he desires to be like these foreign flying objects and reach the titular goal.  

    Though the cinematography and metaphors supplement the lack of dialogue and background information, the film itself is largely unfulfilling.  If you want a largely silent, well-shot film with an emotionally powerful ending, see Vincent Gallo's The Brown Bunny.  Watch Roads to Koktebel  for its look, but don't expect much more. 


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<August 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2930311234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678


Categories
 


Advertisement