Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Comic-Con 2009 Coverage Begins. Today in Film Bloggery 07/23/09

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    SpoutBlog is sitting out this year’s San Diego Comic-Con International, but that doesn’t mean we’re not paying attention to the geek mecca from afar. In a way, we get to have a more sane perspective without all the screaming and crowdedness (between Twilight and Johnny Depp, it’s apparently madness). Plus, we’re checking out all of the direct coverage, and I do believe we’re getting a more comprehensive experience this way.

    I’ve selected some of my favorite coverage from the last 24 hours so that you may share in the appreciation as a fellow outsider (or maybe you’re there and want to see what others have seen/heard). Check out all the best comments, videos and links after the jump:

    • Kevin Kelly at Cinematical introduces some photos of last night’s Preview Night with a quote that makes us feel alright about not being there:

      Crowds of people crammed everywhere, moving at near-cattle speeds. It’s almost enough to drive you nuts … until you remember it’ll be much worse when the show is actually in full swing.

    • Kristopher Tapley at In Contention gives us a bird’s eye view of the Con crowd, to which John at The Movie Blog responds:

      …the line ups for things are just far too insane to even consider going to panels for (especially when I can just find out everything that gets revealed at the panels online 5 minutes after they’re done)…Uggg… no thanks.

    • Rob Bricken at Topless Robot complains about a certain crowd in particular:

      Here’s the worst part at the moment — Twilight. I really don’t have any problem with SDCC having a Twilight panel, and it’d be cool if there was some way to harness all those screaming teen girls to get interested in the other aspects of Comic con, although I don’t think much of an effort has been made in that direction. But! At 6pm last night, several thousand peopls weree camped out to see the Twilight panel that will be shown this afternoon. The the Twilight fans have effectively taken over Hall H, meaning if I wanted to see the Disney panel with Tron 2 — and I really, really did — I would have had to get in line… yesterday at 6pm. This does not make me happy.

    • Devin Faraci at CHUD.com thinks the anti-Twilight crap is stupid and counterproductive:

      I’ve heard people complain that these girls (eww) will keep ‘real’ fans from seeing Avatar footage. But these girls slept outside all night and will probably buy Avatar tickets in December… who are the ‘real’ fans anyway?

    • Kyle Buchanan at Movieline gets the scoop on the reality of Twilight-Avatar synergy while interviewing the first person in line:

      “We’re here for New Moon, but I’ve got to be honest,” Ara told Movieline. “I’m excited for Disney 3D — we’re big Tim Burton fans, so Alice in Wonderland, I want to see that. And James Cameron’s Avatar, we’re looking forward to.”

      Did my ears deceive me? Was Comic-Con’s most devoted New Moon fan also excited for Avatar? This was like a fan of Seth Rogen also liking Entourage, or something!

    • As for the actual panel, Steven Zeitchik at Risky Biz Blog addresses the lack of eloquent speech from the Twilight cast:

      Pattinson noted that this year’s Con would be different than last year — when “Twilight” came out of nowhere to become the talk of the show — because this year all the expectations meant “you actually have to have something to say.”

      The “Twilight” cast may not live up to that obligation. Then again, judging by the Team Edward and Team Jacob encampments outside the Convention Center, it may not matter.

    • Jeff Wells at Hollywood Elsewhere should incite some fangirl attacks with this plastic surgery encouragement for a certain Twilight actor:

      If I was Lautner I would have the schnozzola re-shaped. I’m sorry but it’s an On The Waterfront longshoreman’s nose, or a nose belonging to a Russian wheat-farmer. If he’d come up through the ranks of old 1930s Hollywood studio system the moguls would have said “cute kid but fix the nose.”

    • Kevin Coll at Fused Film shares his enjoyment of fangirls orgasming:

      The rest of the panel was somewhat underwhelming due to the fact the trailer we saw was the same that leaked yesterday. However many fans and screaming girls had a simultnaeous orgasm when Johnny Depp walked out on stage to greet everybody. Pretty cool when he entered the room.

    • The Playlist celebrates some of the ridiculousness of Comic-Con coverage:

      A banner for “Jonah Hex,” starring among others Josh Brolin and Megan Fox has been spotted and photographed at Comic-Con. Last time this happened three or four nerds site got into an online tussle about who shot and posted the photo first and then therefore had the “exclusive.” Let’s hope this amusing bickering happens again.

    • Alex Billington at First Showing made me very happy with purely speculative news regarding another Roger Rabbit movie:

      Today at the Disney panel, Zemeckis was asked if he would go 3D (or CGI) if he ever did make a Roger Rabbit sequel. “I will tell you this - if that ever does happen, the 2D animated characters will remain 2D. They will not be dimensionalized, but that doesn’t mean other parts won’t be in 3D,” he said at Comic-Con today. However, he also said “I can neither confirm nor deny” whether or not something like this (as in another Roger Rabbit movie) was even happening. This is great to hear from the man himself, because I’ve heard people express concern over the idea that he’d convert Roger Rabbit into a CGI character nowadays.

    • Seth Abramovitch at Movieline also made me happy with a report of Daft Punk’s involvement with the newly titled Tron Legacy:

      Tron Legacy director Joseph Kosinski described his meeting with Daft Punk as being a “mysterious pancake breakfast in L.A.” And yes, they were wearing the helmets. Asked if they tour in support of the soundtrack, he said there would definitely be Daft Punk Tron-themed events on the horizon.

    • Christopher Monfette at IGN also made me excited by interviewing Joe Dante about making his upcoming 3D horror flick The Hole:

      “I find that when it’s done well, it’s immersive. It makes you feel like you’re in the room with them, going through the experience with them. Of course, there are things that have to jump off the screen, because it’s expected and hard to avoid. You want to be able to get a sense of depth. So if you look at pictures like Up or Coraline — which are just as good in 2D – the 3D just gives them that little extra connection that you don’t get.”

    • Dustin Rowles at Pajiba notes that you can almost experience the Con through Twitter:

      If you check Twitter at the moment, Comic-Con is the top trending item. But if you actually check the tweets, 85 percent of them come from people who are there, twittering about what they are doing (e.g., showing you their photo album, which right now mostly involves standing in long lines). The other 15 percent, of course, are twittering: “Shut the **** up about Comic-Con already.”

    • Finally, here’s the best thing I’ve seen from Comic-Con so far, courtesy of Kevin Kelly at Cinematical: a video of Michel Gondry rapping with his son accompanying on beat box, about The Green Hornet:


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Todd Solondz, HIPSTERS Added to Toronto Lineup

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    indieWIRE has news of dozens additions to the lineup for the 2009 Toronto International Film Festival. Most interesting to me: the world premiere of Todd Solondz’s Life During Wartime (guess that rumor that it had been retitled Forgiveness was bunk) and Hipsters, the Russian musical whose Cannes market guide summary famously promised to “never leave the audience indifferent.” Oh, and they’re also showing movies that people think are legitimately good, like A Prophet and An Education. More at the link.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • 10 Screwed Up Movie Orphans

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    10 Screwed Up Movie Orphans

    When it was just the Adoption Community protesting the marketing of Orphan, a hackneyed horror flick about yet another evil adoptee, it was merely another minor controversy incited by a select interest group. But now members of the U.S. House and Senate have gotten involved with a letter campaign to Warner Bros. condemning the studio’s seemingly anti-adoption advertisements for and message in the film.

    Is this really necessary after so many years and so many stories containing fucked-up orphans? Sure, Hollywood has given us too few Annie types in cinema over the past few decades, but certainly ‘80s television made up for this history with the likes of Diff’rent Strokes, Webster, Small Wonder, My Two Dads, Punky Brewster, et al. And adoptions were on the rise for most of that time, only dropping slightly in recent years, possibly due to the dwindling economy.

    That isn’t to say we agree with cinema’s consistent misrepresentation of orphans or adoptees, so to expose the unfair reputation of parentless kids, we take a look at ten types of screwed-up orphans, which potentially keep more people from adopting them. Check out our list of characters and films after the jump:



    The Wild Child

    Reason for not being adoptable: dirty, smelly, can’t speak, doesn’t understand human language or, worse, etiquette.

    Examples: “Tarzan” (numerous Tarzan films); “Mowgli” (numerous Jungle Book films); “Victor, l’enfant sauvage” (The Wild Child); “Nell Kellty” (Nell)

    The story of the orphan raised in the wild has been around for a long time (see myths from Ancient Egypt and Rome), though most film examples are adapted from either Edgar Rice Burroughs’ Tarzan novels or Rudyard Kipling’s Jungle Book stories. Feral children have existed in real-life, too, but the concept has become so steeped in legend and fiction that we never take the claims seriously (it doesn’t help that many have been hoaxes). And it’s hardly plausible that any potential adopters would worry about acquiring a kid raised by apes or wolves. However, if some brave prospective parent finds a kid in the wild, it might do them well to view a more realistic exploration of the type in Francois Truffaut’s The Wild Child.



    The Alien

    Reason for not being adoptable: strange powers, threat of alien invasion and/or abduction.

    Examples: “Tony Malone” and “Tia Malone” (Escape to Witch Mountain, et al.); “Kal-El”/“Clark Kent”/“Superman” (Superman, et al.); “Stitch” (Lilo & Stitch); “E.T.” (E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial); “Gonzo” (Muppets from Space)

    There are few of this type that appear human, and therefore prospective adopters may not think of the possibility of getting an extra-terrestrial through adoption. It’s interesting that the recent Witch Mountain movie, Race to Witch Mountain, didn’t concentrate on the orphan aspect as much as the original, but then Disney isn’t as big into orphans as they used to be. The fact that Tony and Tia don’t even know they’re aliens at the beginning of that first film is key, because it could have allowed real-life wannabe parents to be even more wary. In the decades since, most alien orphans have been more like pet adoptees, but there are probably some foster parents out there who keep a close watch for super powers in their new dependents.



    The Superhero

    Reason for not being adoptable: strange powers, vigilantism, antisocial behavior.

    Examples: “Bruce Wayne”/“Batman” (Batman, et al.); “Kal-El”/“Clark Kent”/“Superman” (Superman, et al.); “Peter Parker”/“Spider-Man” (Spider-Man, et al.); “James Howlett”/“Logan”/“Wolverine” (X-Men, et al.)

    To some extent, we can throw in “Harry Potter” and “Luke Skywalker,” but really if we’re going to strictly focus on screwed-up orphans, we should basically concentrate on Bruce Wayne, as he’s the one who grows up with the most psychological issues. Then maybe Wolverine, then maybe Spidey, while Superman primarily fits in the alien category above. Anyway, the orphan-turned-superhero seems to have more antihero and vigilante tendencies than the well-adjusted kids, and in Wayne/Batman’s case, it is likely his orphan status that caused him to remain such a man-boy, living the double-life of a bachelor and a crusader with “so many toys.”



    The Hallucinator

    Reason for not being adoptable: sees creatures and/or other imaginary foreigners.

    Examples: “Pete” (Pete’s Dragon); “Albert Franklin” (Bogus)

    Most movies involving imaginary friends don’t center on orphans, but the two examples listed seem particularly concentrated on the idea that adoptees and abused foster children will probably see and talk to giant dragons or giant Frenchmen in order to cope with their situation. To be honest, we might have preferred being a slave to Shelley Winters than crazily hallucinating cartoon creatures, but then again living in a lighthouse with Helen Reddy and Mickey Rooney sounds cool, too. Oh, but so does hanging with Jim Dale and Red Buttons. Man, no wonder that poor orphan was insane with all those lovable actors to have to choose from. Meanwhile, Haley Joel Osment got a step up when he went from seeing Gerard Depardieu to seeing dead people.



    The Orphan Who Doesn’t Understand Love

    Reason for not being adoptable: cold heart, naiveté, inability to relate to others.

    Examples: “Unity Blake” (Stella Maris); “Luisa Ginglebuscher” (The Good Fairy); “Will Hunting” (Good Will Hunting)

    This type can also be labeled “the melodrama orphan,” and may crossover with other categories. Mary Pickford’s “Unity” (also portrayed later by Mary Philbin and others), for instance, becomes a murderess. Margaret Sullivan’s “Lu” daydreams so much of fairy tales that she may as well have an imaginary friend. And Matt Damon’s “Will” is pretty much a mathematics superhero. But they all have in common the difficulty to love and be loved due to that figurative wall they’ve built around them after losing their parents. Lu has the most interesting issue, in that it reflects a fault in the Freudian idea that girls choose husbands who remind them of their father. Orphans, of course, aren’t familiar with their dads, so this becomes difficult for her.



    The Orphan with Other Issues

    Reason for not being adoptable: being an orphan is the least of his/her problems.

    Example: “Agrin” (Turtles Can Fly)

    It would be very difficult for any prospective adopter to change his/her mind about orphans after seeing the great Kurdish film Turtles Can Fly. Anyone who didn’t want to take care of these kids (not that this is the intention of the story) is a heartless son of a bitch. The same kind of terrible soul who doesn’t cry for the animated orphans of Grave of Fireflies or want to rescue Ricky Schroeder (and maybe a koala to boot) from The Earthling. Still, that said, there’s something very unpleasant about young Agrin, though her status as an orphan isn’t so much to blame. There’s also the fact that she’s a Kurd in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, she’d been raped and impregnated by a soldier and she gave birth to that bastard’s child. It’s not that much a surprise that she despises the kid, though it is shocking and horrifying what choices she makes in the end.



    The Orphan Who Grows Up to Be a Serial Killer

    Reason for not being adoptable: he/she’ll kill you and many others one day.

    Examples: “Hannibal Lecter” (Hannibal Rising, et al.); “Billy Chapman” (Silent Night, Deadly Night); “Annakin Skywalker”/“Darth Vader” (Star Wars, et al.); “Erik Lensherr”/“Magneto” (X-Men, et al.)

    It would be one thing if movies simply alleged that orphans are evil, but it’s far worse for orphans to be exploited as an excuse the way they are in many origin stories. Oh, let’s forgive Hannibal “The Cannibal” and Magneto because their parents were killed by Nazis. Or, if we don’t forgive them, let’s at least explain their pain by pointing out that they lived the hard knock life of an orphan. Sure, usually it’s Nazis or a man dressed as Santa Claus or Tusken Raiders who are really to blame for the violent futures of these unfortunate kids, but don’t think people don’t associate serial killers with always having orphan pasts thanks to what they’ve seen in the movies.



    The Orphan Who Doesn’t Mean to Grow Up to Be a Serial Killer

    Reason for not being adoptable: he/she’ll accidentally kill you and others someday.

    Example: “Jean-Baptiste Grenouille” (Perfume: The Story of a Murderer)

    Yes, Jean-Baptiste (Ben Whishaw) ultimately becomes an intentional serial killer, but not in the same way as those in the above category. He’s no slasher or world-dominator. He’s merely out to produce the perfect perfume, and killing virgins just happens to be the means to that end. Besides, he’s already fucked up before he sets out on his mission by being a curse to everyone he meets. Whether he’s inadvertently suffocating plum sellers or simply encountering multiple characters who soon die darkly comic deaths (Dustin Hoffman’s being the saddest, mostly because of the architectural damage).



    The Horrific Problem Child

    Reason for not being adoptable: he/she’ll kill you and others very shortly.

    Examples: “Rhoda Penmark” (The Bad Seed); “Damien” (The Omen, et al); “Esther” (Orphan)

    As if it weren’t bad enough to assume that your adopted child will grow up to be a murderer, there are also those movies that present us with orphans who are demonic creatures from the get go. It’s so much more difficult to accept the idea of a kid killing people, especially if they superficially seem like little angels, which is why The Bad Seed was such an anti-adoption movie way before Orphan — and even way before the original The Omen — came about. The only way to ensure that your child isn’t this fucked up is to be certain he or she isn’t the offspring of a serial killer or Satan. Of course, if you aren’t aware that your kid isn’t your own you have little hope in being prepared for raising the antichrist.



    The Comedic Bad Seed

    Reason for not being adoptable: annoying, sadistic, annoying.

    Example: “Junior” (Problem Child, et al.)

    Truthfully, if there was one film that made us wary of adopting, it was Problem Child. And if there were three films and a television spin-off, they were still the Problem Child franchise. At least if you somehow got a “Rhoda” or a “Damien” you’d have legal reason to kill or incarcerate the kid when you realized he/she was evil. With Junior (Michael Oliver), the boy is just an obnoxious and destructive nuisance. He may do some illegal things, but otherwise he’s just a fucked up, annoying brat who almost provides an argument for justified child abuse. John Ritter should have beaten some order into that ginger, and he would have been applauded for doing so. And then he should have kicked Gilbert Gottfried’s ass, too. Although, he should have known better than to adopt a kid from a guy like Gilbert Gottfried in the first place.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog