Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • 5 Independent Films That Dared Open Independence Day Weekend

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    5 Independent Films That Dared Open Independence Day Weekend

    July 4th weekend is typically reserved for huge blockbuster releases, particularly those starring Will Smith and/or showcasing America as a force not to be messed with (against aliens or the British). Very, very rarely does an independent release even bother trying to go up against the studios during the big holiday. For example, the only option for an American indie we have this weekend is IFC’s wrong-holidayed I Hate Valentine’s Day, which is uneventfully the second Nia Vardalos movie in a month. And this year we don’t even have the usual sort of event movie debuting on July 4th weekend. There’s just Public Enemies and Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs. Boring.

    Isn’t it ironic that independent films can’t open on Independence Day? It would make sense for there to be a number of good U.S.-produced indies opening this week, going up against the big guys with their American spirit (including their disregard for broad, worldwide marketability) and evidence of the American Dream come true. Wondering if there have ever been great independents released at this time of year, we took at look at the last 30 years of cinema and found only a few significant titles.

    See what little (American) films bucked the 4th of July weekend release system after the jump:

    The Decline of Western Civilization

    Distributor: Nu Image Films
    Release date:
    July 1, 1981
    Studio offerings:
    Stripes; For Your Eyes Only; The Great Muppet Caper; Dragonslayer; S.O.B.

    Leave it to the punks to infiltrate America’s birthday tradition. This first installment in Penelope Spheeris’ music documentary trilogy focuses on the L.A. punk scene and features live performances by X, Fear, The Germs, Black Flag, Circle Jerks, The Bags and Catholic Discipline. It actually didn’t have much simultaneous studio competition, as Blade Edwards’ Hollywood satire S.O.B. appears to have been the only other new film debuting for the holiday weekend. This is likely because a lot of blockbusters opened the weekend before. Interestingly enough those releases include a subversive comedy lampooning the U.S. military (Stripes) and two films that are a bit too catered to Anglophiles (the 007 installment For Your Eyes Only and the London-set Great Muppet Caper) considering what we celebrate this time of year. No wonder the great American hero Superman held onto the box office crown (with Superman II) for his third weekend in a row that Independence Day.

    Surf Nazis Must Die

    Distributor: Troma Entertainment
    Release date: July 3, 1987
    Studio offerings: Innerspace; Adventures in Babysitting

    It was somewhat appropriate for Troma to open this low-budget genre flick over the holiday weekend because it features a hero named Washington who battles a bunch of Neo-Nazis led by a guy named Adolph. And obviously the surfing stuff makes it ripe for summertime. The problem is, we’re not 100% positive that Surf Nazis Must Die actually hit theaters on this date (as the IMDb lists it), because Janet Maslin’s New York Times review points out that it opened in NYC in October of that year. And Box Office Mojo has no record of the film. Troma didn’t reply to our email request, either, so we’re just going to believe that it debuted so perfectly this weekend 12 years ago. If you were one of the few moviegoers not keeping Dragnet and Spaceballs in their lead spots over that holiday weekend and remember the truth, please do let us know.

    Slacker

    Distributor: Orion Classics
    Release date: July 5, 1991
    Studio offerings: Terminator 2: Judgment Day; Problem Child 2

    This seminal indie opened a day after the holiday, but its time of release was certainly intentional. Richard Linklater’s debut is a piece of Americana and displays a side of this country that Hollywood never could. Filled with bohemian characters, many talking about anarchy, conspiracy theories and other subversive topics, the plotless film fits in with the initial theme of Independence Day: revolution. And in a way it also started a revolution for independence in the film industry due to how influential it was on American filmmaking over the next decade. Slacker may not have reached the amount of people T2 did, but it reached the right people at the right time. Linklater must have remembered how successful he was at releasing an indie for Independence Day, because 13 years later his Before Sunset debuted in theaters on July 2 up against Spider-Man 2.

    Who Killed the Electric Car?

    Distributor: Sony Classics
    Release date: June 28, 2006
    Studio offerings: Superman Returns; The Devil Wears Prada

    Another film subversively focused strictly on an American issue, the documentary Who Killed the Electric Car? takes on the U.S. auto industry (specifically General Motors) and the U.S. government as its sort-of enemies while depicting the short history of GM’s EV1 electric car and mourning the vehicle’s demise. The film is primarily a protest of Washington and Detroit’s lack of concern for global warming and energy efficiency and seeks a revolution in both the Capitol and American car manufacturing. Again Superman won the 4th of July weekend box office, even though this time he didn’t specifically represent the American way.

    The Wackness

    Distributor:
    Sony Classics
    Release date: July 3, 2008
    Studio offerings: Hancock

    Last year, Sony’s specialty division went for another 4th of July opening with an indie alternative to bloated blockbuster superhero fare. This time it wasn’t a documentary, though. It was, however, another interesting look at a specific part of America (and Americana) at another interesting time. Set in NYC in the summer of 1994, The Wackness is not a protest but a celebration of a certain freedom we still don’t actually have in the U.S.: the freedom to smoke marijuana. And being pro-pot, the movie has a connection with the annual Smoke-In that occurs in Washington, D.C., every 4th of July. Also released the same weekend was the documentary Gonzo: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson, about the very American, very subversive, very revolutionary writer.

    Other Independence Day indies include Day of the Dead (1985), The Clearing, Twist of Faith (2005), Strangers With Candy (2006), Joshua (2007), Diminished Capacity (2008) and the already mentioned Before Sunset (2004) and Gonzo (2008).


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Asteroids Arcade Game Adaptation Baffles. Today in Film Bloggery 07/02/09

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    It’s an appropriate week for Universal to announce they’re making an adaptation of the classic Atari game Asteroids, because chances are the thing will end up opening on a 4th of July weekend. Just like Independence Day and Armageddon. Actually, as far as I can tell a movie of that arcade game could very well be a sequel to Armageddon. Except that Universal won the four-studio bidding war, and Disney did not (I’m unsure if Disney was even one of the bidders, which also included Fox and Sony). But Disney should go ahead with Armageddon 2 anyway in order to give us another summer like that of ‘98. DreamWorks can also get in the game with a Deep Impact sequel, but it’d probably have to be distributed by Disney, so that might be an issue.

    I have to concentrate on when this thing will be, because focusing on what this thing will be is futile. And that’s the primary reaction to the news today: what the hell will an Asteroids movie be about that will fill up a feature-length running time? And why did four studios fight over such a simple property? Check out some of these reactions from the film blogs after the jump:

    • Erik Davis at Sci-Fi Squad reminds us of why this was such a hot property:

      the object of the game was to navigate this space ship through an asteroid field and shoot down whatever crazy flying object got in the way. That was it — no storyline, no insane graphics — just a bunch of glowing dots on a screen. Obviously the cinematic possibilities are endless (ahem, sarcasm)

    • Marc Bernardin at Entertainment Weekly’s PopWatch references the Armageddon connection:

      Couldn’t Universal — who won that four-way bidding scrum — just make a movie about noble men and women tasked with blowing up rocks from space without needing a game to base it on?

    • S.T. VanAirsdale at Movieline compares the project to another hot property of yore:

      Atari’s thrilling story of a triangle and its mission to clear the cosmos of flying rocks. Long considered by Hollywood’s development community as the unadaptable Benjamin Button of classic video games…

    • Dan Hopper at Best Week Ever notes that people won’t have the attention span for it:

      The movie will be remembered fondly by children from the 80s, but they’ll get bored and switch over to the Q-Bert movie after one quarter.

    • Mark at I Watch Stuff thinks the studios picked the wrong video game:

      I can’t help but think this is a mistake. Not the idea of making a movie based on a game of flying around shooting asteroids, but making a movie based on a game of flying around shooting asteroids that isn’t Sinistar . At least then you’ve got an extremely antagonistic villain: [embedded YouTube clip]

    • Mike Sampson at JoBlo.com also wishes the studio would adapt a different game:

      I won’t get into how moronic this idea is (why get into a bidding war when you’re essentially creating the plot from scratch?), but if you were going to adapt an early-80s-era video game into a movie, why not GALAGA? That at least has something to it. Or just take the money that you spent to get “Asteroids” and put it back into BIOSHOCK a movie based on a game that actually has an intriguing storyline…

    • Alex Billington at First Showing is sure most of the other early arcade games will hit theaters in no time:

      For the longest time, it was always a joke that one day someone would adapt Asteroids. Now it’s really happening. I’m sure this means movies based on Tetris and Frogger and Pac Man won’t be too far behind either, right? God damn you Hollywood! Is there any hope for this movie?

    • John at The Movie Blog is flabbergasted at the idea:

      ARE… YOU… FUCKING… KIDDING ME!?!?!?!

      You had to pay MONEY for the rights to a story about… well… NOTHING??? It’s a triangle shitting out little dots hitting rock like objects. You’re going to build a MOVIE around that? Seriously?

    • Vince Mancini at FilmDrunk is also annoyed and amazed:

      A F*CKING BIDDING WAR.  For a movie based on three dots that shoot one dot at other small clusters of dots.  If you can think of anything stupider than this… someone in Hollywood will pay you a lot of money.  GREAT NEWS, EVERYONE, TOM CRUISE JUST SIGNED ON TO PLAY BLINKING LIGHT NUMBER FOUR!  SOMEONE FINGER MY ASSHOLE SO I KNOW I’M NOT DREAMING!

    • Dustin Rowles at Pajiba is almost as shocked:

      This move makes absolutely no sense to me. If you just call your movie Asteroids (as five other movies have already done), no one is going to know it’s not based on the game unless you tell them it’s not. Is brain damage contagious? And does everyone in Hollywood have it? This is completely shitballsian.

    • Sean at Film Junk believes the plotlessness of Asteroids makes this even more ridiculous than most game adaptation ideas:

      I mean, we all know that big screen adaptations of video games are usually doomed from the start, but when you’re dealing with a game as simplistic as Asteroids, well, I really don’t know what to say.

    • Steven Zeitchik at Risky Biz Blog believes the plotlessness of the game is a good thing:

      “Asteroids” has about as much plot and backstory as a Cinemax special feature. Which means that, without the conventions of modern videogame storytelling to slow it down, it may actually work.

    • Ross Miller at ScreenRant sees this adaptation as one of the least offensive of late:

      Still, of all the board game, toy and video game adaptations in the works, I think Asteroids is probably one of the most harmless. Since there’s no real story to the game, there’s no real story to ruin either. But nonetheless, it’s still irritating to see this Hollywood trend continuing at full speed.

    • Annalee Newitz at i09 wonders what the game’s plot was originally and suggests a great idea for a mash-up:

      Why were you shooting the asteroids? Were they controlled by aliens? Were you trying to break them up so you could mine them for nickel in their cores? It was all an 8-bit mystery…Couldn’t they just combine Battleship with Asteroids so we could have a plotless tale of shooting that spanned skies and sea? Doesn’t that sound awesome?

    • Andrew Mack at Twitch made up the perfect (and likely) plot synopsis:

      Aliens have redirected asteroids from the belt in orbit around the Sun, that one between Mars and Jupiter, and they are launching them at Earth, hoping to wipe out the human race from a distance. It’s up to the Asteroid Defense Human Defenders [ADHD - get it?], a collection of young, hot, thrill seeking space pilots to intercept these Asteroids before they become Meteorites and plunge into the soft recesses of our fragile Earth. They’ll be doing some plunging into some soft recesses of their own because they are so young and hot and thrill seeking. Either an Asteroid will get through their defenses, kill millions, and one of the pilots will have this big emotional moment where they torture themselves in grief only get their vindication when Earth can finally launch an assault on this Alien race and these pilots will be asked to lead the charge once they arrive at the belt. Or, one of their pilots will die, planting themselves on the front side of a massive Asteroid, and everyone will have a joined emotional moment then everyone can get their vindication when Earth can finally launch an assault on this Alien race and these pilots will be asked to lead the charge once they arrive at the belt. There will be lots of special effects and lots of explosions [which you must have even though there is no sound in the vacuum of space] and I wouldn’t be surprised if it is done in Real 3D. After all, it’s Asteroids damnit!

    • Craig Kennedy at Living in Cinema may have gotten ahold of the script already — even if he’s joking, this is probably it:

      Apparently they’ve already written the screenplay and one of our Universal insiders sent over a few pages. Here’s an excerpt:

      Player 1: Blip… blop… blip … blop … blip … blop… pew pew pew pew pew boom… blip… blop.. blip.. blop.. blip.. pew pew pew pew pew pew pew.. blip.. blop.. blip.. whoop whoop whoop pew pew pew whoop whoop pew pew pew pew whoop whoop whoop pew pew pew pew pew boom… blip blop blip blop… boom.

      Player 2: Blip… blop… blip… blop…

    • Amos Barshad at Vulture offers his plotmaking services to the project:

      As you’ll recall if you enjoy fun, the game consists of a triangle shooting at asteroids moving vertically down the screen — and that’s it. So, guys, if you need a hand with that screenplay or anything …

    • Kyle Buchanan at Movieline jokingly suggests some casting ideas for the adaptation. Here is one of the proposed stars:

      Natalie Portman as High Score
      Like the High Score itself, Natalie Portman carries a whiff of unattainable prestige, and if Universal added her to the film’s cast, it would be a Twin Galaxies-worthy coup. It may seem like a lot of work for the actress — after all, she’d have to be on-screen at all times — but isn’t Portman due for some outer-space atonement after the Star Wars prequels?


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • TWO LOVERS on DVD

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Two Lovers  (2009)

    T

    his review was originally published in February. Two Lovers is out on DVD this week.

    Rarely has movie love been handled with both the dreamy indulgence and the cynicism that James Grey pulls off in Two Lovers. It’s a pity that the film, which premiered nine months ago at Cannes and is now rolling out on VOD and in theaters via Magnolia, has been pegged in time as the allegedly final film of star Joaquin Phoenix. In this meditation on class passing and infinite adolescence, set mainly in Brighton Beach with a few giddy sojourns to Manhattan, Grey creates a mood pocket, as it were, that’s distinctly out of time. Working off a series of contrasts that’s very true to its New York setting, Two Lovers is implicitly concerned with the way romantic relationships give us an opportunity to slide back and forth across class lines; if that motion temporarily offers the potential for an erasal of personal history, our ultimate stations in life can’t be escaped.

    Gwyneth Paltrow and Phoenix both play adults who allow older men to pay their rent. For Paltrow, it’s a stock slimeball married guy who keeps her Michelle, an aging if well-bred bad girl, stashed in an apartment in The Old Neighborhood –– part easy alibi (his mama lives nearby), part obvious fetishistic class regression/emotional slumming (his mama lives near by). In Phoenix’s case, the older man is his father, an Israeli-born dry cleaner who wants to ensure his own comfortable retirement by making sure his wannabe photographer son Leonard hooks up with Sandra Cohen (Vinessa Shaw), the daughter of a business partner. Too bad Leonard is constantly running off to answer text messages from Michelle, whose bought-and-paid-for pad is visible from his childhood window. He can gaze lovingly, creepily at his shiksa goddess’ blonde head floating behind a barred window across a courtyard while his too-close mom (Isabella Rossellini) spies on her son from just outside his bedroom door.

    Leonard begins relationships with both women simultaneously, and much of the film is devoted to the ways in which he immerses himself in the pleasures offered by one to ameliorate the disappointments of the other. The dry cleaner’s daughter says she wants to “take care” of Phoenix, but she probably shouldn’t––at worst unstable and immature and at best just something of a bore, he’s a 30 year-old boy who has moved back in with the ‘rents after a failed engagement and multiple suicide attempts. In turn, Paltrow (more impressive than she has been in years cast against type as a cannily manipulative roiling ball of need) exploits Leonard’s proximity (emotional, physical) as a salve for the constant pain wrought by her married boyfriend’s distance and seeming indifference.

    A film about emotional extremes, Two Lovers plays out in visual extremes. Grey very consciously color codes his spaces to correspond to his narrative’s alternating moods. All grey and green and drained of light during the narrative’s darkest points, Two Lovers shifts into chromatic overdrive when its bi-polar protagonist is closest to manic oblivion. A crucial clutch scene that might under other circumstances seem like a romantic high is marked as anything but by Grey’s choice of palette: there’s almost no color on the screen beyond the white-gold wisps of Paltrow’s windblown hair dusting the frame. Since this scene comes after a pair of less-ambiguous low moments (a suicide attempt, a miscarriage), all rendered in the same lightless matte, we know to read what the characters see as a moment of unexpected ecstasy, as in all actuality a third flirtation with death. It’s horribly bleak. It’s also beautiful.

    The film’s tone can be somewhat contradictory, and it’s hard to say whether Grey is saying that his obviously troubled protagonist’s ability to seduce two gorgeous women (and, most problematically, that he stuns both ladies into a state of something like love via swift administration of his dick) makes for comedy or tragedy. Maybe both: Phoenix himself, starting at the moment of seduction and carrying through to the end of each such scene, seems like he’s playing a completely different person. It’s a dramatization of the transformative nature of sexual attraction.

    In the film’s second to last shot, Phoenix locks a single, tortured eye on the camera from behind the embrace of the woman who he’s just, by default, given a diamond ring. It’s a single shot that undercuts any possibility that this apparent traditional romantic happy ending is in fact what it seems. It would be difficult to look at that image and still believe that anyone in this movie has actually been in “real” love since they stepped on screen, to not feel a cynical, momentary jolt that romantic love itself is never really more than a collision of circumstance and impulse, a way of taking care of a need via the most readily available means. It’s a testament to the childish madness of infatuation, and maybe even true love’s impossibility. Happy Valentines!

    This review is a rethink of some thoughts I posted after seeing Two Lovers for the first time at Cannes; a second viewing this week outside of the pressure and exhaustion of the film festival cleared up some of my questions about the film. Sometimes that happens!


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog