Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • LA MISSION. Sundance 2009 Preview With Director Peter Bratt

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    La MISSION, an American Spectrum film starring Benjamin Bratt and directed by his brother Peter, takes place in the Mission District of San Francisco, and tracks the relationship between an ex-con bus driver named Che (played by the former Mr. Julia Roberts), his son and a sexy neighbor lady who “challenges Che to reconcile the life he thought he had.” We asked Peter Bratt the 4 Questions We Ask Everyone, and his answers touched on everything from American Graffiti to Marvin Gaye to Ki-duk Kim. More after the jump.

    Tell us about your movie: who did you work with, what did you shoot on, why did you make it? Give us the reductive, 25-word or less, “It’s like [pop culture reference a] meets [pop culture reference b]!” pitch, then explain what the quick and dirty sell leaves out.

    We shot La MISSION on HD entirely on location in 26 short days. The core team was made up of myself, brother Benjamin Bratt (who was doing double time as lead actor and producer), and force of nature/producing partner Alpita Patel.

    The “dirty sell”: Imagine the old cars and music from American Graffiti (but with a bit more funk), the working class, ethnic flavor of Saturday Night Fever, and the soul searching of Peter Weir’s Fearless, and you have La MISSION.

    The real skinny: The story takes place in an urban Latino community, and centers on a violent patriarch (“Che”) who discovers that his only son (“Jess”) is homosexual.

    In the San Francisco Neighborhood that bears the film’s name, Che is a reformed bad boy of the street, who at middle age, finds beauty building classic lowrider cars. His son, and the friends he’s had since childhood, are at the center of his world. In many ways, Che personifies the dominant patriarchal culture that surrounds him, and like that culture, is at the threshold of great change. He is faced with a choice: maintain old habits and attitudes, OR adapt, grow and mature. In order to make this choice, Che is forced to stretch beyond his comfort zone; and it’s only from this place that he discovers what might be at stake if he doesn’t chose wisely. As a filmmaker living in an increasingly violent and dangerous world, I was drawn to the idea of transformation and the pain that often goes with it. I also wanted to fulfill a life’s dream, and make a movie with a Marvin Gaye jam in it!

    If you funded your film through a “day job” or through working on projects that were not your own, tell us about that. If not, tell us a story from your past work life, before you became a professional filmmaker.

    I worked as a carpenter before and after I made my first film. Before that, I had applied and was admitted to NYU film school. Weeks before I packed up and headed East, I sold my truck and all my tools, confidently thinking I would never need them again. It took me less than a semester to learn that film school wasn’t for me, and I dropped out and returned home to San Francisco with my chin on my chest. Carpentry was the only way I knew how to make a living, so I started all over again from scratch, buying and collecting tools as more jobs came in. After I saved enough to live on for a year, I held up in a work-for-rent, sub-basement apartment, read every “how to write a screenplay”  book  under the sun, and then sat down and  wrote the screenplay I would eventually make into my first feature. But the moral of the story is: “never say never…and most definitely never sell your tools!”

    Have you been to Park City before? If so, tell us your best moment (or worst, which ever is funnier).

    I’d been there once before, in the pre-internet days, with my film Follow Me Home. We got the film in the can for a little over a $200,000, but had to raise more for post. Needless to say, it was a long process that kept us busy almost up to the day we premiered at the Holiday One theater. I was very naïve and didn’t have an agent, a lawyer, a publicist, or any other veteran consultant, and my editor and I simply showed up with a 35mm print and NO promotional material. When we walked through town, we saw that nearly every other film team had postcards, one sheets, flyers, etc. Later that night, in a panic, we high-tailed it to Salt Lake and found an all night Kinko’s. We stayed up half the night making flyers and posting them throughout the streets and store fronts of Park City. Every morning we would rise at the crack of dawn, before the crowds filled the streets, and plastered any empty space we could find. This time around the team is a bit more seasoned, so I’m hoping to slow the pace down enough to enjoy my morning coffee.

    Let’s get hypothetical: You’re on death row. The night of your execution, you’re allowed to watch any two films of your choice. What would you pick for your last-night-on-Earth double feature?

    Good hypothetical. Rather than going with a couple films about family, friendship, or how sweet life is, I would be focused on meeting death and preparing myself for the ultimate journey. For that I’d want a road map to navigate the “hell worlds” I would surely encounter due to my evil ways. I would go with Jacob’s Ladder (based on “Tibetan Book of the Dead”) and the South Korean film that examines each stage of a person’s life, Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter … and Spring. Then get on my knees and pray.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Cinema Eye Honors 2009 Shortlist

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The shortlist has been announced for the 2009 Cinema Eye Honors. The list includes a number of titles that many felt were unjustifiably snubbed from the Oscars shortlist, some based on qualification quibbles, including Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired, My Winnipeg, The Order of Myths, Stranded: I’ve Come From A Plane That Crashed Into The Mountain, and Waltz With Bashir. Omitted: Dear Zachary, a number of Oscar shortlisted titles including I.O.U.S.A., and each of the top five highest grossing non-fiction films of 2008, including Religulous.

    I’ve pasted the full shortlist after the jump with links back to previous coverage of the films on SpoutBlog. Though I haven’t personally seen all of these, between everyone on the Spout team we’ve previously covered all but two.

    AMERICAN TEEN - Nanette Burstein, dir
    THE BETRAYAL (NERAKHOON) - Ellen Kuras & Thavisouk Phrasavath, dir
    ENCOUNTERS AT THE END OF THE WORLD – Werner Herzog, dir
    THE ENGLISH SURGEON – Geoffrey Smith, dir
    FORBIDDEN LIES – Anna Broinowski, dir
    IN A DREAM – Jeremiah Zagar, dir
    MAN ON WIRE – James Marsh, dir
    MY WINNIPEG – Guy Maddin, dir
    THE ORDER OF MYTHS – Margaret Brown, dir
    ROMAN POLANSKI: WANTED AND DESIRED – Marina Zenovich, dir
    STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE – Errol Morris, dir
    STRANDED, I COME FROM A PLANE THAT CRASHED ON THE MOUNTAINS – Gonzalo Arijon, dir
    TROUBLE THE WATER – Carl Deal & Tia Lessin, dir
    UP THE YANGTZE – Yung Chang, dir
    WALTZ WITH BASHIR – Ari Folman, dir


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Film Independent and Netflix Launch Indie Film Competition

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Kabluey  (2008)

    Netflix and Film Independent got a jump on the deluge of independent filmmaking news that will be coming soon via Sundance by announcing a new independent film contest today that will be chaired by Josh Brolin and judged by Brolin, Dan Jinks, Bruce Cohen, and Dustin Lance Black.

    The Netflix FIND Your Voice Film Competition is meant to foster new indie filmmakers, and it’s not open to anyone who has created and publicly screened a film more than 70 minutes long. The prize package, worth $350,000 consists of a $150,000 cash grant from Netflix, a camera package donated by Panavision, 25,000 feet of Kodak Color Negative Film or 10,000 feet of Kodak Color Intermediate Film, along with prints, dailies, and a digitial intermediate package from Deluxe, and EFILM.

    It’s an extremely fast-track competition, and entrants only have until February 9th to submit a script, budget, sample work, bio, and synopsis, which give filmmakers one month to get everything together. They’ll only be accepting 2,000 submissions, and those will be whittled down to 10 semi-finalists who will be asked to submit a two to three minute short film, and of those ten films, five will be chosen by the public via the web to move on. From the five finalists, the judging panel will select one winner.

    The upshot? Even if you’re lucky enough to have a script ready to go, you’re going to have to scramble to put all of this together and meet the February 9th deadline. It’s not for people who have a work in progress, or who need a few months to direct a short film for consideration, but rather for filmmakers who are ready to go tomorrow. Maybe you have a project you’ve been kicking around, but lack the funds to get it into production. This is your shot. While the final product will be available on Netflix both on DVD and via digital streaming, filmmakers will retain all rights to their finished work.

    Josh Brolin, who was on hand to introduce the project with Netflix’s Ted Sarandos and Film Independent’s Dawn Hudson, remarked that working in independent film has changed dramatically over the past decade, because it now “means working with directors like the Coens, Gus Van Sant, Robert Rodriguez, and Oliver Stone. I mean, no studio wanted to touch W., and when it was announced that I was going to be in that and in No Country, people [reacted] like ‘You mean… the guy from The Goonies?’”

    Thankfully, Brolin realizes that “I guess I’ll always be ‘That guy from The Goonies.’ Martha Plimpton was recently in a production of The Three Sisters, or something really classic like that on stage in New York, and at the end of the performance they come out and get a standing ovation, and everyone is cheering and everything. Then, from the back of the room, someone shouts out GOONIE! So, there you go.” At least he knows where his roots are. Sadly, I didn’t get to ask him about the possibility for a Goonies II. Maybe I should have pitched him my idea.

    He went on to explain that Robert Rodriguez constantly encouraged him to go out and make his own short film and not focus on how much money he needed to make it, so last year Brolin directed X for $17,000 starring his own daughter, “Because we were able to get her to work cheap.” He pointed out that although reaction to the film was very polarized, “People either thought it was the worst film they’d ever seen, or they thought it was a great directorial debut” it got him even more excited about independent film, and led him to donate his time to this project.

    Also on hand was writer/director Scott Prendergast of Kabluey fame, who was a protege of the Film Independent program. He wrote and directed Kabluey with a shoestring budget, and was able to get Lisa Kudrow, Teri Garr, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, and Christine Taylor involved in the project. “Basically, I’m here as proof that the program actually does work.” Kabluey ended up premiering at the 2007 Los Angeles Film Festival, and Prendergast now has a couple of films lined up to direct.

    Sadly, it doesn’t seem to matter how good of a film you make unless people see it, which is what this program hopes to achieve through its more than eight million subscribers. “When I was working on No Country, and we were between takes, Joel Coen walks by me and whispers ‘Nobody’s going to see this movie.’ I was like, why would he say that? Luckily, it was able to get some attention, whether peoople liked the ending or not.” Netflix and Film Independent probably hope that the same thing happens with whatever film comes out of this competition.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Sad Milestones in the History of 3-D

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Comin' at Ya!  (1981)

    These days, it seems like everyone is going on and on about “IMAX this” and “3-D Special Release that.” Even the lede to this article is so utterly bored by it that it resorts to one of the laziest tricks in writing. Just like the current state of gimmick cinema that is desperate to recoup box office by any means necessary.

    Okay, that’s a stretch, but the whole 3D craze is at a fever-pitch ever since we’ve apparently cured cancer and ended world suffering by electing Obama. So why not be happy I can see Watchmen in 3-D IMAX for $20? Why not be overjoyed at seeing Monsters Vs. Aliens as if the adorable cash-in characters are right in front of me? Because 3-D Film is ultimately depressing. It talks a good game, remember the disappointment of when the reds and blues wouldn’t mix that well and just gave you a headache? We’ll be damned if we can’t ruin 3-D for you.

    Night of the Living Dead 3-D

    While Romero’s classic take on racism and the undead has since shifted to public domain, that unfortunately means anyone can take the original script–verbatim–and modernize it in horrifying ways. Like texting “CominG 4 U Barb” and hyping up the brand new dimension of horror. The 3-D scares are choreographed to the point that you can figure out within the second a cut occurs what blunt object or gaping zombie maw will fly right at you. Watch out, there’s a joint coming at you!

    Notable Achievement: Aside from getting Sid Haig a paycheck, the title lies.


    Comin’ At Ya!

    Spearheaded by the Anaglyph image (read:the fuzzy red and blue image you see without your cardboard glasses), this film did nothing other than lower the bar to such a point that even the above montage of woodland creatures is more exciting. And utterly, devastatingly blurry.

    Notable Achievement: Pioneered the “OMG OBJECT NEAR FACE” effect parroted in every other film, ever.


    Terminator 2 3-D: Battle Across Time

    Fond memories of Universal Studios Florida aside, this was the pinnacle of 3-D spectacle in the 90s. It is full of loud effects and pseudo-freak outs.

    Notable Achievement: It is a 12-minute, $60 million theme park ride directed by James Cameron.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • DGA Nominations. Yawn.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Boyle. Fincher. Howard. Nolan. Van Sant. No alarms, no surprises. indieWIRE has the historical analysis that reminds us that last year, the DGA nominated Sean Penn for Into the Wild and the Academy swapped him out for Jason Reitman, but, you know … unless whatshername who was fired from Twilight makes a big surge super quick, it seems unlikely that anyone’s going to get an Oscar nomination this year for nabbing $100 million+ of teenage girl allowance. I’m gonna go out on a limb and say the Best Director Oscar nominations will probably look a lot like this.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Anti-war Films ARE Successful!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Cory Doctorow at BoingBoing is calling it “a masterful takedown” of “the right-wing myth that Hollywood keeps making anti-war movies that flop, proving how out of touch the Liberal Elite are with the will of the peeepul.” This post from Leverage creator John Rogers may be that, but it also points to something I’ve brought up many times before: the whole “Liberal Hollywood will spend untold sums of money to make sure we lose the war in Iraq and turn your children into godless eco-communists!” hysteria only floats when buoyed by willful ignorance of the stratification of the film industry. Different kinds of films are made, distributed and marketed in different kinds of ways, thus lending their ultimate market performance different kinds of expectations. I know when infidel propaganda like Taxi to the Dark Side doesn’t quite do the same business as good ol’ entertainment like Hannah Montana Topless With the Jonas Brothers in 3D, it’s tempting to say that America hates Alex Gibney. Except that America doesn’t know who Alex Gibney is.

    Rogers, who wrote the post in response to a conversation at Big Hollywood, the new Breitbart offshoot edited by John “Dirty Harry” Nolte, first uses budget vs box office breakdowns to demonstrate that films like In The Valley of Elah and Lions For Lambs, oft cited as proof that Americans aren’t buying what Liberal Hollywood is selling, actually made a profit. He then argues that many of the anti-war films that *didn’t* turn a profit are hardly either proof of a Hollywood conspiracy against the will of the people, or evidence that all of America has voted with their wallets against this kind of cinema, because they were neither produced by Hollywood nor released wide enough for most Americans to even get a vote. To excerpt liberally from Rogers on Redacted:

    FIFTEEN THEATERS for Redacted, for chrissake. Here’s a quick clue — when Hollywood wants to sell something, we make it as widely available as possible for purchase. Crazy, I know. What sort of marketing mumbo-jumbo is this?

    …an experimental film by DePalma costing, last I heard, about $5 million, this one pops up all the time in angry screeds, but … we’re really down in the weeds here. Fifteen theaters. Grace is Gone, released in 7 theaters? No End in Sight released in 2 theaters (made a nice bit of coin in DVD)?

    I’m going to assume Nolte isn’t arguing that because no one went to see a movie playing in two theaters in the entire country this is somehow proof nobody wants to see those kinds of movies. It’s like arguing that because all of America doesn’t eat at Mama Luigi’s in Brockton, Mass., America hates Italian food. He isn’t that stupid.

    “Stupid” isn’t the right word. Most arguments that “prove” American theatergoers have no interest in the propaganda that evil “Liberal Hollywood” is trying to shove down our throats purposefully ignore the fact that most movies with any sort of real, balls-out political agenda are either produced independently of the Hollywood studio system, and/or are made for so little money that they can break even fairly easily. And this goes for liberal or conservative films — as Rogers points out, we could talk about Stop-Loss and An American Carol in the same breath as evidence that overtly political films on either side are a simple waste of resources … if we were “the sort of fuckwit who tries to derive patterns off two lousy data points.”

    Rogers accuses Nolte and Big Hollywood of displaying a “childrens understanding of how Hollywood runs.” I say they actually do know better, they must understand basic concepts like relative gross well enough, but deliberately pretend they don’t in order make sure their rhetoric floats. Whatever gets you through the blog, right?


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog