Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Sundance Stories of Yore: Clerks

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Slacker  (1991)

    Clerks  (1994)

    Each day this week, Christopher Campbell will take a look back at a “classic” film that played the Sundance Film Festival. Today’s installment: Kevin Smith’s Clerks (1994).

    It’s only fitting to follow yesterday’s post on Slacker with the Sundance story of Clerks, since Kevin Smith was directly influenced by Richard Linklater’s film. And like Linklater, Smith nearly didn’t go to Sundance with his breakthrough indie, although in his case it was initially a matter of choice rather than rejection. According to Peter Biskind’s book Down and Dirty Pictures, Smith says about the decision, “We never even thought about Sundance. That was not a festival that we were meant for.”

    Instead, Smith and producer Scott Mosier figured their best bet was at the 1993 Independent Feature Film Market in NYC, where they disappointingly screened Clerks to an audience of only a few people. Incidentally, they might have had at least one additional significant viewer had Mosier not told Miramax acquisitions man Mark Tusk that his film was “not a Disney movie.”

    Of course, it’s not likely that Miramax would have picked up Clerks even with Tusk in attendance at that screening. Fortunately, as noted in John Pierson’s book Spike, Mike Slackers and Dykes and elsewhere, Sundance advisory committee member Bob Hawk did see the film at that IFFM showing, and he tirelessly fought to have it selected for the upcoming festival. So, in a way, Smith became a Sundance alum by accident.

    As for Miramax’s acquisition, that’s another great story. After the original rejection of Tusk at IFFM, Miramax had a few more chances to see Clerks. The first was through a tape sent to Tusk, through which he became a fan; then came a 16mm screening at the Tribeca Film Center in which Harvey Weinstein reportedly left after 15 minutes. It took the magic of Sundance, however, to get the film and the distributor to fully connect. Clerks became a hit partly on the basis of Smith’s story and his ability to entertain during the Q&As. By the end of the festival, Weinstein, who had made a surprise return to Park City that year, and who had been rumored to have left Sundance early, was reluctantly convinced by Tusk to attend the last screening and stay at least until the “blowjob stuff.” This time, apparently, Weinstein loved it. And when he met Smith afterward, he reportedly said something along the lines of, “Great fuckin’ movie, I want to put a fuckin’ soundtrack on it, and put it in the fuckin’ multiplexes.”

    It’s possible that Clerks is funny enough to have acquired fans on its own merits, as it appealed to Tusk upon his first viewing. But sometimes it takes the crowds of Sundance to show just how popular a film can be with a real audience. The subsequent buzz combined with the marketing of Smith as a personality and a filmmaker with an interesting story helped get Clerks a distribution deal, and it’s worked somewhat for others since, if only on smaller scale.

    Below is the NSFW scene from Clerks that Tusk promised Weinstein he’d enjoy.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • BASHIR, CLASS, MONKEYS make Foreign Film Oscar Shortlist

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    The Carpetbagger has posted the nine semi-finalists for the Best Foreign Film Oscar Nomination. Comparing this list to the list of 67 films submitted for consideration by their countries of origin, the only real notable omission I can spot is Italy’s Gomorrah; I’ve sen some bloggy chatter already lamenting the exclusion of Let the Right One In, but that film was passed over for submission by its home country of Sweden in favor of Everlasting Moments (which did make the shortlist). The full list, with links to the films we’ve covered (as you’ll see, we have a lot of catching up to do), after the jump.

    Revanche, Gotz Spielmann, director (Austria)
    The Necessities of Life, Benoit Pilon (Canada)
    The Class, Laurent Cantet, director (France)
    The Baader Meinhof Complex, Uli Edel, director (Germany)
    Waltz with Bashir, Ari Folman, director (Israel)
    Departures, Yojiro Takita, director (Japan)
    Tear This Heart Out, Roberto Sneider, director (Mexico)
    Everlasting Moments,  Jan Troell, director (Sweden)
    3 Monkeys, Nuri Bilge Ceylan, director (Turkey)


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • 10 Worst Sundance Sensations

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    The Big Sleep  (1946)

    Blade Runner  (1982)

    Heathers  (1988)

    Slacker  (1991)

    Boxing Helena  (1993)

    Mallrats  (1995)

    Garden State  (2004)

    Brick  (2006)

    SherryBaby  (2006)

    Juno  (2007)

    Paper Hearts  (2009)

    Getting ready for the Sundance Film Festival can be very exciting. As we await the event’s Thursday opening, we can’t stop wondering what will be the next big thing. Will this year’s hit be the highly-anticipated Michael Cera project Paper Hearts, or will it be something that we as of yet know nothing about?

    It’s easy to forget, however, that oftentimes the next big thing is also the next lamest thing. Sundance sensations, those films that are much-buzzed-about, that sell for a lot of money, that go on to be marketed like crazy and ultimately receive Oscar recognition, tend to lend themselves most easily to backlashes. Usually such derision is deserved, as in the case of the following ten films, each of which made a big splash at Sundance despite being bad.



    10. Brick (Rian Johnson; 2005 Sundance premiere)

    When Blade Runner was first released, critics attacked its novelty of combining film noir with science fiction. Yet when Brick arrived in Park City, its similar genre-bending mix of film noir and teen films was welcomed as the most original film in years. In both circumstances, critics were wrong, and while Blade Runner ultimately became a classic, Brick is retrospectively even sillier now than it was when it won a Special Jury Prize “for originality of vision” four years ago. Yes, the film is a fresh idea in theory, but it doesn’t really work on screen, no matter how much you want it to or think it does. It’s simply a novelty gag for film geeks who love noir — while not quite as enjoyable for fans of the teen genre. Is there really anyone who wouldn’t just rather watch a double feature of The Big Sleep and Heathers?




    9. Little Miss Sunshine (Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris; 2006 Sundance premiere)

    Never mind its impact on the culture of Sundance. The annoying “what will be the next Little Miss Sunshine?” idea was just a substitute for similar questions going back as far as 1990 (“what will be the next sex, lies, and videotape?”). The real problem with LMS is that it’s a decent dysfunctional family comedy that falls apart in the third act. On the positive side, it finally got Alan Arkin an Oscar. But on the more glaring negative side, it also got Abigail Breslin an Oscar nomination. Hardly worthy, also, of its Best Picture nod or its Best Original Screenplay win, the film’s success is the product of a terrific marketing team and moviegoers’ acceptance of cheesy endings — and has nothing to do with the quality of the film.




    8. The Brothers McMullen (Edward Burns; 1995 Sundance premiere)

    While the name Fox Searchlight is now synonymous with marketing the hell out of “indie” sensations like Little Miss Sunshine, Juno and Slumdog Millionaire, the specialty division has been overdoing it with unworthy films since the very first Sundance hit they distributed. The Brothers McMullen is not necessarily a bad film, but it isn’t anything special either. Some say the 1995 fest was the downward turning point for Sundance, whether because it showed us a major “sellout” who wasn’t actually as good as he’d been celebrated as being (Kevin Smith, who disappointed with his sophomore effort, Mallrats) or because a lackluster picture like McMullen won the Grand Jury Prize. And like Smith, Edward Burns ultimately revealed himself to be something of an embarrassment, talent-wise, to the reputation of Sundance alums.




    7. Garden State (Zach Braff; 2004 Sundance premiere)

    2004 was the year that indie quirkiness got out of hand at Sundance (see #3). Sure, Garden State got us all into The Shins, but it also got filmmakers too into a genre I call “homecoming of age” movies, those banal stories about twenty- and thirty- somethings who revisit their homes due to a dying or dead parent and involve themselves with wacky townies in the process. Any idiot can write a script of this type and fill it with quirky scenery and an obnoxious yet adorable love interest. Sundance must still be getting countless submissions of this kind of film, but unfortunately for the rest of the world’s idiot filmmakers, they aren’t TV stars like Zach Braff.




    6. SherryBaby (Laurie Collyer; 2006 Sundance premiere)

    Sundance has long been a haven for depressing films involving junkies and/or incest, but few have been as overrated as SherryBaby. Once again, it’s all about the star power, as the film might not have been so hyped had Maggie Gyllenhaal not been in the lead. Then again, it might have actually been a better film without her. Grandly over-praised for her performance as the easily played rehabilitating mom, the actress got undeserved kudos simply for being raw and despicable. Her Oscar snub was a relief, at least.




    5. Born Into Brothels (Zana Briski and Ross Kauffman; 2004 Sundance premiere)

    It may have won the documentary Audience Award at Sundance and the documentary Oscar a year later, but that doesn’t excuse Born Into Brothels from being a disgrace to nonfiction filmmaking. One of the most self-satisfying docs ever made, the film will forever be marked by its footage of co-director Zana Briski figuratively patting herself on the back during a fundraiser, with which she sinfully seeks sainthood for involving herself in the lives of her film’s subjects. If documentary was synonymous with charity, Born Into Brothels would indeed be a great film, but documentaries like this should merely be an inspiration to charity, not charity itself.




    4. Masked and Anonymous (Larry Charles; 2003 Sundance premiere)

    One of the most anticipated films of the 2003 festival due to a script co-written by Bob Dylan and an unbelievable cast including Dylan, Jeff Bridges, John Goodman, Penelope Cruz, Ed Harris, Luke Wilson, Mickey Rourke, Angela Bassett, Jessica Lange and many other big names, the very messy Masked and Anonymous therefore ended up the biggest disappointment of that year. Its worth was later defended and praised by such critics as Jonathan Rosenbaum, who included it in his 2003 Top Ten list, and Salon.com’s Stephanie Zacharek. But most of us are in agreement that it’s one of the biggest wastes of talent in years.




    3. Napoleon Dynamite (Jared Hess; 2004 Sundance premiere)

    Napoleon Dynamite’s inclusion on this list is likely to upset more people than Brick’s, but at least the Brick devotees can defend their fandom with more than just shouts of “It’s funny!” Because the thing is, Napoleon Dynamite is not comedy. It is merely quirky, which is not the same thing as funny. Jared Hess’ pop culture phenomenon does feature some highly original characters and situations, but his execution of these elements is obvious and uninteresting. “Gosh!” is neither a good punchline nor a good catchphrase.




    2. The Blair Witch Project (Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sanchez; 1999 Sundance premiere)

    It must be appreciated as much as attacked for its groundbreaking marketing campaign, and in many ways the film itself can be acknowledged for having a terrific premise with an almost perfect realization of that idea. But for the most part, The Blair Witch Project is a basic, amateur and poorly concluded effort that turned the appeal of indie simplicity on its head. Almost a decade earlier, when filmmakers saw Slacker and said “I can do that,” they were mostly mistaken. But The Blair Witch allowed every schmo with a digital camera to declare, “I can do that,” and be relatively correct in his or her statement. It’s okay for indie filmmaking to seem easy, but when it really is that easy, it degrades the truly talented.




    1. Boxing Helena (Jennifer Lynch; 1993 Sundance premiere)

    Cult appeal notwithstanding, Boxing Helena was one of the first really awful movies to be up for Sundance’s Grand Jury Prize. And although in the 17 years since, the festival has been easily criticized for allowing bad films with lots of buzz and/or big name talent to be included in competition, no film has been as unworthy as this. Had it starred original choice Madonna in the part of the titular amputee, Boxing Helena might have really deserved to at least become a midnight movie. However, with its lesser-name casting, it’s barely even good enough for Skinamax programming.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • 2009 Tech Predictions: Five Technologies That Could Go From Movies To Reality

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    As we crack open fresh calendars for a new year, we’re treated to a predictable rash of blog posts: 2009 technology predictions. I’ve read a number of these, and prognostications about Microsoft buying Yahoo make me want to light my laptop on fire just to cure the boredom. As an anecdote to lame, ‘what’s the next Twitter?’-style tech prediction lists, I’ve decided to make a list 2009 tech predictions entirely inspired by movies.

    2008 was the year in which widely available real-world gadgets were just as good as what James Bond had. Sure, Daniel Craig kicked some ass in Quantum of Solace, but his only real piece of tech was a phone with a camera and GPS! (Hope you got a good texting plan with that, James.) I predict this trend will continue in 2009. We’ll see even more real-world gadgets that used to be the sole domain of Hollywood special effects gurus. Sure, some of these technologies will require minor miracles to become a reality in the coming year, but others are closer than you think.

    Strength-Enhancing Exoskeleton Armor

    In Iron Man, Tony Stark creates a crude, internally-powered suit of armor to escape his terrorist captors. Once he’s safely at home in his billion-dollar laboratory, he hones the suit into a golden ass-kicking machine, and becomes Iron Man. This story isn’t that far from the truth. Rather than a single billionaire playboy, teams of research scientists are developing robotic suits that significantly increase the wearer’s strength. And the end goal is goal is the same: beating the hell out of terrorists. Almost five years ago, UC Berkley researchers announced a DARPA-funded project called BLEEX, the Berkley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton (pictured at left). If you’re thinking that giant backpack is full of the machinery that runs the thing, you’re wrong. That’s the 70 lbs. pack the wearer can hardly feel, thanks to his robot legs. Assuming secret military technology is always ahead of publicized military technology, and considering that the BLEEX is five years old, I think it’s safe to say that in 2009 President Obama will personally don an Iron Man suit and kill Osama bin Laden.

    Levitation

    Levitation in movies is usually some sort of magical or paranormal phenomenon, like Yoda using the force to lift Luke Skywalker’s X-Wing out of the swamp. But there are examples of technological levitation in fiction, especially flying saucers and other craft that can stay aloft without forward momentum. A technological version of the Force is still a long way off, but there are plenty of forms of levitation that are quite common. Magnetism can be easily harnessed to levitate certain objects, and just last week, scientists added another method to the growing list of levitation technologies. Harvard physicist Federico Capasso has effectively reversed the Casimir effect, which causes metal objects to become attracted to one another when they’re very close together. As exciting as this sounds, the reversal only works on extremely small pieces of metal. But it’s still a step in the right direction.

    Invisibility

    Harry Potter’s invisibility cloak relies on magic rather than technology, but this hasn’t stopped scientists from trying to replicate its effects. While one would hope that researchers’ interest in invisibility technology goes beyond their fondness for the boy wizard, they invariably mention Potter’s cloak in every news story about advances in invisibility technology. The development of meta-materials that can redirect lightwaves around an object have made steady progress in recent years. In a National Geographic article from November of last year, researcher Ulf Leonhardt claimed that invisibility cloaks are now “feasible.” Of course there are a few catches. The phenomenon alters visible light slightly while it bends it, and it can only work with specific shapes, meaning that a coat of invisible paint on a spy plane or a stylish cape are still out of reach. With the release of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince in July of this year, I’m sure Potter-loving invisibility scientists will pursue their study with renewed fervor.

    X-Ray Vision

    The most popular depiction of x-ray vision is of course Superman, but the Man of Steel doesn’t need a gadget to see Louis Lane’s underwear. There are examples of technological x-ray vision in movies, like the all-but-forgotten 1996 Schwarzenegger vehicle, Eraser. The film featured an advanced weapon called a rail-gun, which had a scope that could see through solid objects. X-ray vision, like levitation, has existed in certain forms for long time, but making it as practical as Superman’s vision is another matter. Thermal imaging goggles used by police and military can see through certain objects that block visual light because of their ability to see infrared light. A new technology being employed in security situations is terahertz imagery, which can see through fabrics and plastic. While the mail-order x-ray specs sold out of comic books in the ’60s were a sham, back in 1998 Sony sold thousands of consumer video cameras whose “night shot” feature allowed users to see through clothing, especially swim wear.

    Time Travel

    Debating the physical and philosophical effects of time travel is a favorite passtime of sci-fi buffs and people who edit Wikipedia entries. The scientific consensus is that Back to the Future-style DeLorean time travel is not possible, but Einstein’s theories of general and special relativity do allow for certain types of time travel. For example, the phenomenon of time dilation allows for something akin to traveling into the future. If there were twins, and one stayed on Earth while the other went on a long trip on a spaceship at nearly the speed of light, the traveling twin would be younger when he returned. From his perspective, his trip lasted one year, while his twin would insist that he’d been gone for ten years. So this means that the DeLorean would have to travel much faster than 88 miles per hour, and once they traveled to the future, they could never go back.

    There is another theoretically possible form of time travel, which involves constructing an infinitely long cylinder in space and rotating it on its longitudinal axis. This would bend space time around the cylinder, allowing a spacecraft to essentially fly back in time. But since there are no infinitely long cylinders laying around, time travel in 2009 seems unlikely. Unless a time traveler from the future decides to come back to 2009 and share his knowledge with us. He’d probably kill his own grandfather, too, just to mess with our heads.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • BIG RIVER MAN. Sundance 2009 Preview w/Director John Maringouin

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    They Live  (1988)

    Sátántangó  (2008)

    Running Stumbled  (2006)

    John Maringouin’s first documentary feature, Running Stumbled, was praised by Michael Tully as “a startling achievement” and “one of the stronger anti-drug pieces of cinema that has ever been made”; when it screened at the CineVegas Film Festival in 2006, Variety’s Robert Koehler favorably compared Stumbled to Tarnation. Now Maringouin is back with a second non-fiction feature, Big River Man, which premieres on Friday in the World Documentary competition at Sundance. Answering the 4 Questions We Ask Everyone, Maringouin talked about Bela Tarr, shooting straight to hard drive in the Amazon jungle, and being the beneficiary of Olivia Newton-John.

    Tell us about your movie: who did you work with, what did you shoot on, why did you make it? Give us the reductive, 25-word or less, “It’s like [pop culture reference a] meets [pop culture reference b]!” pitch, then explain what the quick and dirty sell leaves out.

    Big River Man was almost entirely shot using the HVX-200.  We were the first production to use straight to hardrive camera in the Amazon jungle. The film had a tiny crew.  Post-production was incredibly laborious (over 200 hours of footage).

    [Co-director Molly Lynch] discovered Martin [Strel, the Slovenian marathon swimmer] on TV after he swam the Mississippi.  After actually meeting him and getting to know his larger-than-life persona, the inspiration to make a film really clicked into high gear.

    If you funded your film through a “day job” or through working on projects that were not your own, tell us about that. If not, tell us a story from your past work life, before you became a professional filmmaker.

    After months of struggle and with time running out before the historic swim on the Amazon we were blessed with some real angels who came through with the financing.  My friend and publicist Mickey Cottrell connected us to Maria Florio who connected us to Olivia Newton-John.  All of a sudden we were on a boat going down the river.

    Have you been to Sundance before? If so, tell us your best moment (or worst, which ever is funnier). If you haven’t, what are you most (or least) looking forward to based on your impressions of the festival?

    This is our first film at Sundance but we have a few on the film who have either been there before or have worked there for several years so our expectations have been fettered by their experiences.  I’m always wary of unchecked enthusiasm (ie: hype).

    Let’s get hypothetical: You’re on death row. The night of your execution, you’re allowed to watch any two films of your choice. What would you pick for your last-night-on-Earth double feature?

    Bela Tarr’s Satantango and John Carpenter’s They Live.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Interview with Clive Young, Author of Homemade Hollywood

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    If you’ve been living under a rock for the past few years, or don’t have the internet available at home yet (which makes me wonder how you’re reading this), then maybe you’ve been obliviously to the explosion of fan films. These are movies produced with the intent of taking an existing property and breathing new life into it, with sequels, prequels, or “what ifs.” In some cases these films take on a life of their own, which was the case with the childhood friends who decided to make a shot-by-shot remake of Raiders of the Lost Ark with a VHS camcorder.

    Author Clive Young has put together a book that charts the progress of fan films (starting in the 1920s!), and how the internet and inexpensive filmmaking tools have taken these otherwise obscure short films and fan efforts into new arenas. We talked to Young about the fan film dabbling of Hugh Hefner and Andy Warhol, the distribution future of that Raiders remake, and why fan filmmaking is a boy’s club.

    How did you originally come up with the idea for your book?

    Back in the late Nineties, I created the first fan film website, Mos Eisley Multiplex, which was fairly popular, getting written up in USA Today, the Los Angeles Times and other places. I was fascinated by these filmmakers; unlike a lot of the indie movie provocateurs at the time, the people making these flicks really were outlaws. They were making illegal movies using copyrighted characters worth billions of dollars, so they could easily go to jail for their art.

    Because of the website, I started hearing from fan filmmakers all over the planet, interviewing them and collecting cool stories, and it was pretty clear that there was a book there, begging to be written. Unfortunately, no one I talked to in the publishing industry really understood what a fan film was, and the one house that was interested ultimately passed because they felt it wouldn’t be feasible without a CD-ROM of films packed in. Of course, that was impossible due to copyrights, so in effect, the book was killed thanks to bandwidth issues.

    Fast-forward 10 years, and today, CD-ROMs are ancient history, online video has gone mainstream, and for that matter, people all over the world know what fan films are now. I always felt it was “the great book idea that got away,” so I started pitching it again with a new proposal. Continuum Books ‘got it’ and 90,000 words later, the result is Homemade Hollywood.

    When did you see your first fan film?

    The first one I saw, I actually made because I had never heard of fan films at the time. Back in the late Eighties, I adapted part of Neal Stephenson’s first book, The Big U, for a film class. It was a little, five-minute movie about these two college roommates, Fenrick and Klein, who have massive stereo systems and hold sonic battles because they hate each other’s guts. In the book, it escalates to murder and evil pranks with cigars, but I couldn’t recreate that stuff without destroying my dorm room, so I went completely Hollywood and changed the ending. In my version, they discover their stereos were stolen and it ends with them sobbing in each other’s arms. I got an A-.

    What was the most surprising thing you found out while writing/researching the book?

    I was amazed to discover how far back fan films go. I figured that it was mainly an internet phenomenon and that maybe a few folks in made ‘em in the Sixties with Super 8 cameras. Instead, fan films go back to the silent film era. I found a 1926 Little Rascals one, made by con men in South Carolina who were fooling people into thinking they were cast in a real Our Gang movie.

    Another I early one I found was a 1936 fan film shot in Connecticut - Tarzan and the Rocky Gorge. The filmmaker, Robbins Barstow, made it with his brothers when he was 16 and he’s still making movies to this day! The Tarzan flick sort of became a family heirloom - they’d bring out the projector every Thanksgiving and show it, that kind of thing - and in 1974, almost 40 years later, they made a sequel, Tarzan and the Lost, Last Whale. It’s pretty wild to watch them back to back as one movie, they’re all 10 to 16; the next, they’re all pushing 50. He put the 1936 one on the internet and now it’s been seen by over 100,000 people, so something he made over 70 years ago for family and friends has taken on a whole new life.

    Fan films tend to be made from comic book movies and big adventure films. Were there any “quieter” fan films, like say, from Sense & Sensibility, or anything that you just didn’t include?

    There aren’t many quiet ones, and a lot of that comes down to the gender divide in fan production. Women are attracted to fan fiction, and they produce 99.9 percent of it, while fan films are almost exclusively a “boys club.” Generally speaking, guys like stuff that goes ‘Boom,’ so that’s what you find in fan films, whereas fanfic is often used to explore relationships between characters - material that would lend itself to quieter fan films. Ideally, female fanfic authors should write fan film scripts; we’d get far more well-rounded movies, and that’s happened in a few cases, like a movie I profiled in the book, Star Wars: Revelations, which was made by a husband-and-wife team.

    Have any of the directors become a big success story? Or are they on their way?

    It depends on how far back you want to go: in the 1940s, 16-year-old Hugh Hefner made fan films in his basement. In the Sixties, Andy Warhol made two fan films, about Tarzan and Batman, respectively, and the Batman one has never been found. More recently, Eli Roth, who made the Hostel movies, started out doing homemade remakes of Texas Chainsaw Massacre and Pieces when he was a teenager, and there’s also Joe Nussbaum, who made George Lucas In Love in 1999; he’s gone on to make a few teen movies and a direct-to-DVD American Pie sequel.

    When will regular audiences ever be able to see the shot-for-shot Raiders of the Lost Ark remake?

    The guys who made it screened it at Skywalker Ranch for ILM staffers, and during the Q&A afterwards, someone asked that. They said, “We dunno - ask your boss.”

    Realistically, I doubt it will get released on home video and that’s probably just as well. There are hundreds of kids in it, plus they got permission to shoot places for free and such; tracking everyone down to get contracts signed in order to avoid lawsuits would be nearly impossible. But that’s likely a good thing: the Raiders guys have traveled the world screening it in art cinemas, and I think that’s the best way to see it. The movie is cute by itself, but it comes alive when you’re watching it in a theater with 100 other fans hooting and hollering and having a great time.

    Have there been any instances where fan films have directly influenced big-budget Hollywood films?

    A lot of people think Sandy Collora’s Batman: Dead End inspired Warner Brothers to give fans a darker Dark Knight, but in truth, Christopher Nolan signed to make Batman Begins six months before Dead End debuted. At the time, Nolan implied in Variety that he was going to take a more serious run at the material, so it’s pretty clear that was already in place. On the other hand, I think Collora’s short - and the fans’ over-the-top reaction to it - proved that Warner Brothers was on the right track; if anyone at the studio was unsure about the new direction, Dead End probably calmed a lot of nerves.

    Fan films have exploded with the internet, and now with machinima in games they’re also taking off in another direction. What do you think the next step will be?

    There’s a lot of possibilities. I think machinima is going to be the fan film of the next generation, if it isn’t already. At some point, too, I suspect we’re going to see studios start to actively court fan filmmakers in order to boost interest in new franchises or revive old ones. There’s a lot of other aspects, too, which are all in my final chapter, “The Future of Fan Films.”

    What’s marketing like for these films? Could DVDs composed of fan films be sold in stores or online? (or are they already?)

    It’s mostly word of mouth on the net, but some big-budget fan productions, like Star Wars: Revelations which I mentioned earlier, and Star Trek: Phase II, a fan film series that George Takei and Walter Koenig have appeared in, actively pursue the mainstream media. Shane Felux, the director of Revelations, talked with newspapers and magazines all over the world and wound up doing interviews on CNN, CBS, MSNBC, G4 and CBC. Meanwhile, the Phase II guys do a lot of TV, and also put out a quarterly magazine about themselves in PDF format that’s just as slick as a licensed Trek publication.

    As for selling fan film DVDs, that’s a yes-and-no thing. Generally, it would be illegal unless the DVD was released by the copyright holder. Some parodies like George Lucas In Love have been legally released because they don’t use any copyrighted material, and there’s also been a few cases where DVDs containing fan films were allowed to be come out because they didn’t mention the flicks in their packaging; if they’re not selling it on the back of copyrighted material, apparently it’s OK. That said, every comic book convention has some guy selling bootleg fan films; don’t buy ‘em because they’re usually low-res Quicktime files that you can download for free, and they look like crap once they’re transferred to DVD.

    Do you have a personal favorite fan film?

    I have a lot of favorites! Since you asked about ‘quieter’ fan films earlier, you might want to check out a Star Wars one I love called Reign of the Fallen. Take away the special effects and it’s nearly one of those English costume dramas. On the other hand, if you want to see stuff blow up but still get a good story, I recommend Tomb Raider: Ascension. It’s a 50-minute Lara Croft movie where the first half is moderately quiet, not slow, but quiet and then the proverbial substance hits the fan. Either way, you can’t go wrong with these fan films; I’ve raved about both of them a lot on my fan film blog, FanCinemaToday.com.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog