Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Chipmunks 2 Trailer Stops Just Short of Rodent Erections. Today in Film Bloggery 06/30/09

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Yeah, it’s that kind of day where the teaser trailer for Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel is the most interesting thing to talk about. Well, honestly, it’s not the most interesting thing I’d like to talk about (though I realize I should have included the first movie in our “Creepiest Kids’ Movies” list), but not enough blogs are commenting on the latest racism evident in Disney’s upcoming 2D-animated film The Princess and the Frog (heck, hardly enough blogs are commenting on this). So instead of a discussion of racism in a kids’ movie, here’s a discussion of highly sexualized chipmunks in a kids’ movie.

    Karina kind of foresaw the Chipette-debuting sequel “appealing to a young male audience’s latent lust for a trio of tarted-up little girl chipmunks” a year ago, and now this teaser is proof that the Alvin and the Chipmunks franchise has gone from being influenced by Pink Flamingos to being influenced by Porky’s (or some other horny teen comedy). But while we actually had to see shit-eating in the first film’s trailer, at least we didn’t have to see any chipmunk erections in this spot. Meanwhile, some concerned people are fearing that this movie will encourage more lookalike couples. Really? Are lookalike couples that bad? Or is the real concern that the movie somehow will inspire kids to dress in drag? Is the tagline “Munk Yourself” some kind of reference to a transsexual narcissism fetish?

    Check out the film blogs’ reactions to the trailer after the jump:

    • Vince Mancini at Film Drunk admits those computer-animated Chipettes turned him on:

      It isn’t quite as strange as the infamous poop-eating teaser from the first movie, but it is a little creepy to see rodents making eyes at each other accompanied by slow jams, and it’d definitely go in the spank bank if I was a furry.   Ha, just kidding, I’ve pleasured myself to it three times already.

    • Mike Sampson at JoBlo.com feels a little guilty after watching this:

      When I was a child, I had a somewhat inappropriate crush on Brittany, the lead Chippette. The new trailer for ALVIN AND THE CHIPMUNKS 2 makes that crush a whole lot more inappropriate.

    • Mark at I Watch Stuff is surprised yet thankful there are no erect penises in the trailer:

      When Alvin and his cronies unexpectedly run across their female counterparts–mirror images of themselves wearing ineffective skirts–the boys naturally get pretty turned on…Gross, but relatively restrained in comparison to the feces-eating in the original film’s trailer. I was fully expecting to be shown a trio of erect chipmunk penises.

    • Katey Reich at Cinema Blend wishes the Chipettes were more than just objects for the male chipmunk gaze:

      First of all, the chipmunks still look creepy. Second of all, there’s still no reason for them to be voiced by name actors (Justin Long, Jesse McCartney and Matthew Gray Gubler). And third, the Chipettes don’t get a single line? Really?

    And here’s the teaser, courtesy of MTV Movies Blog:


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • 10 Greatest False Deaths in Movies (SPOILERS!)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    10 Greatest False Deaths in Movies (SPOILERS!)

    Are you tired of all the false rumors of celebrity deaths (today it was Rick Astley)? And are you tired of all the jokes that Michael Jackson is really still alive somewhere, hanging out with Tupac, JFK and Elvis? So are we, but we thought we’d take both the obnoxious death hoax trend and the idea that MJ faked it so he could live in peace and out of debt as inspiration for something more worthwhile: a discussion of favorite false deaths in movies.

    The device is quite popular, especially in thrillers and horror flicks, and it can be employed as a plot starter or in a twist ending. James Bond has done it, as has Sherlock Holmes. Whether someone fakes his/her own death or is simply mistaken for dead, the actual deed or the ultimate reveal can end up terrific cinema. In fact, it was very difficult for us to narrow our favorites down to ten. It’s a shame we had to leave out memorable scenes from Heathers, Hero and many other movies. Certainly you’ll disagree with some of our exclusions, too, so feel free to name them in the comments section.

    Just beware; there may be SPOILERS after the jump:

    10. Irene Dunne Survived the Shipwreck in My Favorite Wife (1940)

    Nick’s wife, Ellen, has been missing for seven years after a shipwreck and is presumed dead. Of course, just when he finally declares her deceased and tries to move on by marrying someone else, Ellen returns, having been only stranded on a desert island all those years. Madcap screwball comedy ensues. The hilarious reveal comes early on, though, when Ellen (played by Irene Dunne) shows up at the new couple’s honeymoon hotel and causes Nick (Cary Grant) to do a stunned and tilting extended take while an elevator door slowly eliminates his view of his supposed-to-be dead first (and favorite) wife (Dunne). The situation was slightly combined with Hitchcock’s Strangers on a Train for the plot of Throw Momma from the Train, except that the (ex-) wife who ends up actually alive in that film was not nearly so beloved.




    9. The Body on the Floor is Not a Corpse in Saw (2004)

    We aren’t exactly fans of the franchise (we’ve only seen this first installment), but the reveal at the end of the original Saw is amazing. Throughout the horror film, which is set primarily in a dirty bathroom occupied by two chained-up men forced into a morality game, there is a seemingly dead corpse lying in the middle of the floor. But ultimately the body gets up off the ground and turns out to be the mastermind, the “Jigsaw Killer.” Do we buy that anyone could remain that still for so long? Not exactly, but it’s a neat trick and plot twist nevertheless.

    8. Rock Hudson is a Human Reboot in Seconds (1966)

    Sometimes we wish that Hollywood would come along and reboot our lives the way they reboot film franchises. Seconds is kind of like that, as it involves a company that gives people second chances by faking their deaths and transforming their appearance. The film’s protagonist goes through the process of becoming a “reborn” and receives the face of Rock Hudson, which is a pretty good deal no matter how much the service cost. But in a kind of It’s a Wonderful Life way, the character decides that he wants his old life back. Unfortunately, unlike George Bailey, he’s technically already gone through with the “suicide,” and it’s not so easy for a change of heart.

    7. Jack Nicholson Swapped Identities in The Passenger (1975)

    Somewhat akin to the concept of Seconds, only less sci-fi, a TV journalist (Nicholson) assumes the identity of a dead man who has been staying at the same small African hotel, and he reports his own death instead. A word of advice learned from this Michelangelo Antonioni film, though: when picking a new life, choose one that isn’t so criminal and hated as a gunrunner. Also, don’t be surprised if your wife comes looking for the person you’re pretending to be in order to find out what happened to “you.”

    6. The Dead Woman Wasn’t Laura in Laura (1944)

    It’s a common narrative idea to have a detective become obsessed (even fall for) the dead woman whose murder he’s investigating. It’s not as common, though, for that woman to suddenly show up alive, the way Laura (Gene Tierney) does in Otto Preminger’s classic film noir. Where has she been all this time? Oh, up in the country where there are no newspapers or any other means of her hearing that she’s apparently been killed. And the body that was found dead in Laura’s apartment? Oh, that was another woman Laura’s fiancée was seeing on the side. The revelation scene here is great because both the detective (Dana Andrews) and the non-dead character are in shock — he because she’s alive and she because she’s “dead.”

    5. Jerry Orbach’s Assassination is Staged in F/X (1986)

    Mobster’s deaths are often faked in the movies, but in this film the feds get smart and hire a special effects artist from Hollywood to make the assassination look realistic. The twist here is that for a while the artist (Bryan Brown) thinks the supposed-to-be fake shooting was real after all, and he has been framed as the killer. But then it turns out the mobster (Orbach) is indeed still alive. But then he’s killed for real. But then the effects artist takes on the guy’s identity, so it seems he’s still alive. The movie isn’t really as confusing as it sounds.

    4. The Floating Body is a Special Effect in April Fool’s Day (1986)

    1986 was a good year for movies involving deaths faked by fictional special effects artists. In this prank of a slasher film, based somewhat off Agatha Christie’s novel And Then There Were None, nobody really dies. We find out in the end that everyone’s murder has been faked with great detail by a hostess and her hired effects team. Technically that means that April Fool’s Day counts for more than one false death, so we picked the inaugural death as the single false death, because it is the one that sets the fear and mystery in motion (well, really, the guy crushed by the boat does this, but he doesn’t “die,” so we can’t use him). The movie was remade last year for a direct-to-video release, but apparently there are a few actual deaths in that one.

    3. Kim Novak Only Plays One Person in Vertigo (1958)

    We never fully bought this Hitchcock classic when we were young, and even though we grew to love it and appreciate it, the premise is still a little ridiculous. Obviously Judy Barton is the same person as Madeleine Elster, who seemingly jumped/fell to her death from a bell tower earlier. She’s played by Kim Novak, too, and looks so much like the other person, even if her hair and clothes aren’t the same. But people in movies (even James Stewart) don’t always recognize disguised persons so easily, especially if they think they saw the person die. Of course, that minor issue can be set aside for the sake of the story and its themes, but just barely.

    2. Arnold Schwarzenegger is Digitally Killed Off in The Running Man (1987)

    One year after F/X and April Fool’s Day, Arnold Schwarzenegger appeared in this sci-fi action flick about a violent game show that kills off convicted criminals for the entertainment of civilians. And like those two movies, it employs the idea of special effects for false deaths. When it appears that one particular contestant (Schwarzenegger) can’t lose, the show’s host (Richard Dawson) stages the guy’s gruesome death using CGI. Of course, the unstoppable running man can do more than not lose, he can win, and that consists of killing the game show host and proving that he’s alive and innocent to the viewers at home (or wherever). Never mind that there’s a second person (María Conchita Alonso) whose death is faked in that CGI sequence; if she hadn’t been with Schwarzenegger she would have died for real anyway.

    1. Harry Lime is Hiding in the Shadows in The Third Man (1949)

    Probably the most famous reveal ever that a character is living, Harry Lime (Orson Welles), who supposedly died of a broken neck after being hit by a truck, stands in a shadowed doorway but is identified when a spot of light briefly illuminates his face. This one couldn’t possibly be a spoiler for anyone due to how iconic it is.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • KAMP KATRINA on DVD

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    David Redmon and Ashley Sabin are releasing their second feature, Kamp Katrina, on DVD today via their Carnivalesque Films imprint. I wrote about the film nearly two years ago when it screened in New York, and described the film’s exploitation of the odd beauty of low grade imagery, a stylistic trope which the directors have expanded on in ther subsequent features, Intimidad and Invisible Girlfriend:

    Kamp Katrina is shot cinema verite style on prosumer digital video. The roughness inherent to the format produces unexpectedly exciting effects. As co-directors Ashley Sabin and David Redmon buzz like flies around the action in the tent city, their handheld cameras are set to low shutter speeds to compensate for a lack of natural light.The resulting image is slightly slowed, tinted neon pink, and at times, it almost seems to float off the screen. The hallucinogenic spin brought by the video amplifies the feeling that post-Katrina New Orleans might as well be on another planet, in as much as it resembles the “normal” American city.

    The DVD package includes two essays: one on the movie itself by Stuart Klawans of The Nation, and another byJeff Ferrell on the notions of “cultural criminology” and the “carnivalesque.” The latter doesn’t directly reference the movie in the case, but instead provides theoretical backup for Redmon and Sabin’s wider project.

    You can buy Kamp Katrina at Amazon or via the Carnivalesque web site.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • PUBLIC ENEMIES Review

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    PUBLIC ENEMIES Review

    Virtually since the production of Michael Mann’s Public Enemies was announced, various parties have expressed concern that the video fetishism of Collateral and Miami Vice would make a less than appropriate presentation format for a glammy gangster piece set in the 1930s. If *only* Public Enemies looked more like Miami Vice — if only Mann had brought back cinematographer Dion Beebe for a third consecutive collaboration/experiment in pushing the limits of what high quality digital video can do. Lensed by The Insider cinematographer Dante Spinotti, Public Enemies is a drab looking film, its shaky-cam aesthetic coming off as less considered — and far less explicable — than that of any number of indie dramas employing similar run-and-gun techniques on a millionth of this film’s budget. Add in a wildly uneven performance style, an unnecessarily attenuated running time and a sound mix that’s problematically muddy even after evidently excessive after-the-fact dubbing, and the result is a severely miscalculated marriage of style to subject. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: Public Enemies is essentially a really expensive mumblecore film with ADR and guns — and the M-word comparison is not merited solely by its conspicuous form. It’s also a film in which the world of work and general era-appropriate social consciousness is conquered by an emphasis on love. And that, in the end, may be the only thing Public Enemies does right.


    Johnny Depp plays John Dillinger, the Robin Hood of Depression America, on the lam from a fledgling FBI led from a desk by J. Edgar Hoover (an unrecognizable Billy Crudup) and on the ground by Agent Melvin Purvis (Christian Bale, on growling Batman autopilot). Dillinger meets a girl named Billie (Marion Cotillard) in a Chicago nightclub and decides, on the spot, that she’s going to be his girl; she resists a bit but he’s kind of a bully, and she kind of likes it, so soon they’re having epic, virtually abstract sex. Then there’s a bunch of shooting and running around — half the time, I couldn’t figure out what was going on, partially because I could barely see it, partially because I could scarcely understand the dialogue, much of it mumbled and/or drowned in score — but eventually Billie ends up in jail. She won’t snitch on “my man Johnny.”  Spoiler alert: Batman finds him anyway.

    Depp interprets Dillinger as a nattily-dressed gentleman murderer/celebrity thief with a fraction of the winking zeal he brought to the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise. If those films stand as examples of how rote genre exercises are sometimes the best vehicles for balls-to-the-wall star power, Public Enemies has the inverse problem: the style and structure of the film mutes its megastar, reducing him to an image mostly devoid of personality. This is not necessarily an unexpected direction for Mann: Miami Vice, though arguably more inspired by the music video-as-emotional-placeholder ethos of the original TV series, featured two lead performances that worked on a purely visual level … in large part because Colin Farrell and Gong Li were both tasked with linguistic challenges that they could not meet. Casting women who cannot speak English intelligibly seems to be a growing trademark of Michael Mann films: in Enemies, Cotillard tries out a handful of accents, none of them convincing for an American coat check girl circa 1933. Increasingly, Mann seems to be making movies that might be better off silent.
    As far as I could tell, Public Enemies tells us that there’s a Depression going on in two ways: with very occasional visual reminders, such as an image of a hobo slumped in front of a palatial bank that Dillinger is about to rob, and with a title on the screen. Otherwise, this is pure 1930s movie escapism, which would be fine if Spinotti’s camera was up to the task of capturing the contrast between the glitzy dance halls where Dillinger plays and the scrappy climes in which he hides. Instead, both poles are flattened out, and whatever tension could conceivably be milked from a story with a long-proscribed ending collapses in kind.
    But there is one area in which Public Enemies nods to the gangster movies of old that does succeed. The gangster myth, especially as manifested in the 1930s flicks that reinforced the fame of someone like Dillinger in his own time, only works if the gangster and his lifestyle are linked to love and desire. Being sexy is not something that Johnny Depp has to work at; this is something that just requires Johnny Depp to show up. Though Cotillard is not convincing as a US Citizen, she would have to work much harder than she does to be unconvincing as a woman in love with Johnny Depp. The romance between Dillinger and Billie does what gangster romances are supposed to do: it humanizes the criminal and demonizes the cops and the feds who are trying to keep the lovers apart. The best moments in Public Enemies — a brutally violent interrogation scene in which Billie is humiliated in virtually every way short of rape, a scene where Dillinger takes a casual walk through the office of the men who are trying to jail him — have a kind of surreal quality, in which the boy and girl, embolded by a passion that’s making them crazy, are driven to test what they can get away with. It’s because of these moments that Public Enemies can’t be called a complete failure, or even a must-avoid. It’s not a bad film, it’s just badly made.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Transformers 2 Blows Critic-Audience Divide Wide Open. Today in Film Bloggery 06/29/09

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Leave it to Michael Bay to turn something already big into something bigger. No, I’m not talking about the “life-size” IMAX version of Optimus Prime. I’m referring to the gap between critic and general audience tastes, often referred to as the “critic-audience divide.” We’ve already seen it get worse this year via terrible yet popular movies like Paul Blart: Mall Cop, but given the $201.2 million grossed by Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen over its first five days, we film writers are feeling the coming apocalypse soooo much more. Remember how last year we thought The Dark Knight made so much money so quickly due to the fact that reviews were so great? Eh, that probably wasn’t the truth after all.

    Of course, a success like Transformers 2’s doesn’t exactly prove critics are worthless, only those who function simply as a thumbs up/thumbs down sort of recommendatory guide. Plenty of critics should continue to be worth reading if they’re otherwise good reads and create or allow for discussion without merely saying a film is good or bad. One of my favorite kinds of critic, for instance, is the kind that may turn me onto a film despite him/her having disliked it, as some scathing reviews of Transformers 2 have almost done.

    A reader commented on my previous post about Transformers 2 with the claim that all our negative reviews helped the movie be so successful. If that’s the truth, maybe we should start using negative psychology and trash the great little films we really love. Or, we can just stop worrying about the majority audience liking different things as us and enjoy all the death threats we get from mainstream moviegoers when we disagree with them. Isn’t it often better for our sites’ traffic to stir up contention anyway?

    Oh well, here’s another crop of critical whinery after the jump:

    • Steven Zeitchik at Risky Biz Blog responds to TF2’s success with something he calls the “Fool-ometer”:

      We knew the reviews would be fetid. And we knew the box-office would be smashing. But we didn’t know the box-office would be this good and the reviews this bad…[so] we came up with a little measuring tool to gauge just how much audiences disregard critics on a given pic. We call it the Fool-ometer, and it quantifies the gap between audience and critical approval.

      It’s a simple formula. To come up with a Fool-ometer score, we took a film’s opening weekend and compared it to its reviewer approval (we used Rotten Tomatoes). So a blockbuster that was well-reviewed, like “Iron Man,” scores in the range of a 1 — in that case, the $98 million it earned opening weekend is just about one time the the 93% of critics who approved. That’s the sort of number you want. “Dark Knight” is slightly higher, but that’s mainly because it earned so damn much.

    • Peter Travers at The Travers Take also compares the disappointing success of TF2 with other blockbusters, including Star Wars: Episode III: Revenge of the Sith:

      …the runner-up position in my book goes to Revenge of the Sith, the final and most futile attempt from clumsy director and tin-eared writer George Lucas to create a prequel trilogy to match the myth-making spirit of the original Star Wars saga he unleashed in 1977. I’d still watch Sith five times than endure another five minutes of Trans 2. But that’s just me.

    • Dustin Rowles at Pajiba seems disappointed with the world’s moviegoers:

      It’s just a goddamn shame that “It doesn’t look good, but I’ll see it anyway,” is worth so much more in box-office dollars than: “That looks amazing, and I’ve heard great things. Maybe I’ll see it on DVD.” What the hell is wrong with this country’s mindset? There are a couple million folks who only venture out of their house once a year to see a movie, and they’ve decided that Revenge of the Fallen was the one movie worth seeing.

    • John Cairns at Film School Rejects is mad at some specifically located American moviegoers:

      I’m mad that folks in middle America are giving a free pass to all this outrageousness when they didn’t give a free pass to Indiana Jones 4 or these other movies. There were people bitching and complaining about that fridge-nuking, and about  Watchmen and Terminator Salvation and other movies for all kinds of things, and to various degrees these movies took a hit at the box office as a result – not so much in the case of last year’s Indiana Jones movie, but definitely with these other two.

    • JoBlo.com uses a lot of quotation marks and exclamation points sarcastically in its box office report:

      I think TRANSFORMERS 2’s record-shattering opening over the past 5 days has, at the very least, proven one thing: when it comes to summer “blockbuster” movies, film critic reviews don’t matter for shit!!…it seems as though “regular audience” members (you know, those who actually matter!!) could care less, and just wanted to check out a film offering some uber-escapism.

    • Eugene Novikov at Cinematical foresees things getting worse in the wake of such success:

      Well, don’t we all feel a little silly. Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, the movie that received the most hysterically negative reviews of 2009 opened to by far the year’s biggest numbers…I hope everyone is looking forward to Transformers 3, where Autobots will discover fart jokes.

    • Robert Humanick at The House Next Door anticipated the divide in his review of TF2:

      I’m sick of this notion that movie critics don’t like to have fun. Like any broad accusation, it’s pure cop-out, especially when founded on the basis of but a handful of films, as is usually the case. Though a minority opinion in my circles, I liked the first TransformersTransformers: Revenge of the Fallen is to its predecessor like a medieval torture chamber is to a playground, but that won’t keep many from swallowing it hook, line and sinker, quickly and indiscriminately…I mourn the volume of human life being wasted on this thing. If the film makes $100 million this weekend and tickets cost $10 a pop, that’s ten million viewers and a total of twenty-five million hours, not including previews, travel and the time spent earning the wasted money. If the average person lives to be 75, that’s 38 lives. This seems to me a crime…

    • Rob Bricken at Topless Robot is kinda glad at least that TF2 didn’t better TDK in its opening:

      I have to admit that if Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen had out-grossed The Dark Knight, I would have found it very depressing. Hell, it still kind of bums me out that a movie with almost zero coherence — but plenty of action — got so damn close. Surely no one out there thinks that TF2 was better than Dark Knight, right?

    • Dan Hopper at Best Week Ever notes that the TF2 gross isn’t too bad in perspective with the week:

      Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen grossed $112 million this weekend, which isn’t the saddest or most surprising pop culture story of the past week, but still…

    • S.T. VanAirsdale at Movieline responds to Paramount’s data measuring audience approval, which notes moviegoers favor TF2 over even Star Trek:

      Right. Like you have to guess who sent the press such “notable facts” from inside Paramount — the same studio, of course, which Bay infamously scolded via e-mail for neglecting Fallen while Star Trek took top marketing priority. Naturally the same LAT excerpt wound up posted this morning on Bay’s own Web site, its last sentence bolded for emphasis like a middle finger to critics, Paramount and anyone else with the slightest lack of faith in him or his masterpiece.

    • Robert Fure at Film School Rejects lashes back at the pretentious and whiny film critics:

      …critics, with their delicate sensibilities and fragile egos, choose to insult the audience.  Choose to insult their own readers.  They insist this movie is so bad that anyone who goes and watches it is an idiot.  An idiot.  Well, my friends and colleagues, at least 70% of the people who walk out of Transformers walk out of it with a big smile plastered on their faces…In the end, the joke is on you.  You think you’re big and bad and important, but the box office shows the truth – you’re just an asshole with a microphone.  So shut the **** up and let me watch these robots fight each other or I’m going to transform past my boiling point.

    • The Playlist doesn’t think anyone should be surprised:

      Critics are obviously scratching their heads, but Bay is laughing all the way back to the bank and Paramount shareholders are probably pleased as punch. It’s a bit sad that a spectacle this dumb is rewarded so well, but it’s not like any of us weren’t expecting it.

    • Brad Brevet at Rope of Silicon wrote up a lengthy response to an AP story about the movie’s “critic-audience divide” and seems in agreement with the comment I received:

      Here’s the deal, audiences were going to see this no matter what. Reviews only helped raise the awareness. Good or bad, it didn’t matter…They are merely a tool for awareness and conversation starters. Critics see a movie, audiences see a movie and the film is discussed and its place in history is decided down the line.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • 10 Hottest “Cougars” in Movies

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    10 Hottest “Cougars” in Movies

    Apparently three-time Oscar nominee Michelle Pfeiffer has been relegated to playing only “cougars.” The slang term has been used heavily to describe the actress’ latest character, a Parisian courtesan who has an affair with a pretty boy half her age (Rupert Friend). But just prior to appearing in Chéri, which reunites her with the Dangerous Liaisons writer-director team-up of Christopher Hampton and Stephen Frears, Pfeiffer starred in two direct-to-video releases in which she similarly ends up with a much younger guy. In Amy Heckerling’s I Could Never Be Your Woman she falls for Paul Rudd, while in Personal Effects she has an affair with Ashton Kutcher (ironic since Heckerling’s film takes shots at Kutcher’s marriage to real-life “cougar” Demi Moore).

    The term “cougar” has some negative connotations, which is a shame given all the movies we see in which an older man romances a younger woman and think nothing of it. But it’s good to see Pfeiffer still getting work at her age (51), especially in roles celebrating the idea that older women can still be desirable. And in our opinion she’s every bit as desirable as she was at age 25, when she broke through with her sexy appearance in Scarface.

    Below we spotlight ten other actresses/characters who’ve shown us that aging women can still be very attractive to young men.


    10. Margaret Whitton as “Vera Prescott” in The Secret of My Succe$s (1987)

    At 37, Whitton is a little young for this list, but she seems much older in the traditional role of the sexy boss’ wife who falls for an employee (Michael J. Fox) at her husband’s company. Things are a little more complicated than normal because she’s also the young man’s Aunt, though she doesn’t see the harm since they’re only related by marriage, not blood. Personally, aunt or not, we’d have gone for the kinky Whitton over the boring Helen Slater. At least she’s not his mother.



    9. Jennifer Coolidge as “Stifler’s Mom” in American Pie series (1999 - 2003)

    Having your own mother come on to you is totally wrong (even if you’re French), but your friend’s mom is another story. Coolidge was the original MILF, or at least the woman who popularized the term. Despite being under 40, the character (whose first name is revealed to be “Janine” in the second installment) is still classifiable as a “cougar,” even if it was Finch (Eddie Kaye Thomas) who technically seduced her. She certainly fits the term in the sequels, at least, when she’s over 40 and coming back for more.



    8. Isabelle Huppert as “Erika Kohut” in The Piano Teacher (2001)

    We may not be able to count her incestuous mother character in Ma mère as a “cougar,” but Huppert definitely fits the bill in this Michael Haneke film, in which she plays a piano teacher who becomes obsessed with her 17-year-old pupil. Teacher-student relationships are one of the more common for “cougar” movies (see also Jacqueline Bisset in Class and Cate Blanchett in Notes on a Scandal for more such educational “cougars”), but music tutors tend to be the hottest, due to the kind of close contact involved. In this film her character is quite awkward (she still lives with her domineering mother) and the whole masochism thing can be very discomforting, but Huppert has a way of being sexy even in the most abnormal of ways (that mud scene in I Heart Huckabees shouldn’t turn us on as much as it does). Just as long as she’s not hooking up with her son.



    7. Lauren Hutton as “Countess” in Once Bitten (1985)

    As a seductive female vampire, Hutton’s character is an obvious play on the term “vamp.” But now that we have the term “cougar,” she is retroactively classified as that too, since she specifically seeks out virginal young men like Jim Carrey. As a vampire, she’s also the closest thing to a real cougar, since she takes a bite out of her victims partners.



    6. Cloris Leachman as “Ruth Popper” in The Last Picture Show (1971)

    We’ve mentioned older women who were the boss’ wife and older women who were teachers, but Leachman’s Oscar-winning role in The Last Picture Show crosses the two by being the teacher’s wife (well, her husband is the high school basketball coach). She may be depressed, but she’s also quite sexy and doesn’t deserve to be treated as bad as she is by her teenage lover (Timothy Bottoms). Of course, part of our consideration of Leachman’s hotness has to do with her real-life persona — foul mouth, semi-nude magazine covers and all.



    5. Bebe Neuwirth as “Diane Lodder” in Tadpole
    (2002)

    We may have been weird for having a thing for “Lilith” growing up watching Cheers, but there’s something very attractive about a domineering older woman when you’re a teenage boy. And yet in Tadpole Neuwirth is only a second choice for 15-year-old “Oscar” (Aaron Stanford), who is actually in love with his stepmother (Sigourney Weaver). Supposedly Oscar only has sex with Diane, his stepmother’s best friend, because he was drunk and she was wearing the stepmother’s scarf (and therefore smelled like her). But we can’t believe any sober kid would pass up Neuwirth’s advances, especially not after she gives him a massage.




    4. Karen Young as “Brenda” in Heading South (2005)

    To be fair, Young shares this slot with Charlotte Rampling and Louise Portal, her costars in Laurent Cantet’s film about three middle-age women who go to Haiti to have sex with young locals. But Young is the hottest (not necessarily because she’s the youngest) of the trio, probably because she’s the more reserved one and therefore has the most room to open up and get wild with the concept of sex tourism.



    3. Jane Seymour as “Kathleen ‘Kitty Kat’ Cleary” in Wedding Crashers (2005)

    We’re not sure when or where the term “cougar” originated, but we likely first heard it when used to describe Seymour’s character in this movie. Her nickname, “Kitty Kat” has to be a reference to the term, too. In any event, she’s a hot older woman (also a MILF) who just “had her tits done” and won’t let her younger prey (Owen Wilson) out of the room until he’s felt them. This could be the extent of her interest but it has to qualify, as it is a form of seduction. Also, Seymour is super hot for being in her 50s, even if her character is a bit creepy.



    2. Kim Basinger as “Marion Cole” in The Door in the Floor (2004)

    Talk about a hot woman in her 50s, Basinger is like Pfeiffer in that she still looks as good now as she did in the ‘80s. As “Marion Cole,” she’s somewhat an amalgam of other “cougar” roles, including the unlisted (but referenced) maternally incestuous ones. She’s also kind of the boss’ wife. Her young lover is her (temporarily separated) husband’s assistant, who has been hired because of his resemblance to their dead son. But complicated and disturbing motivations aside, no kid could say no if ever seduced by a “cougar” as hot as Basinger.



    1. Anne Bancroft as “Mrs. Robinson” in The Graduate (1967)

    Obviously the top spot on the list goes to the original “cougar,” “Mrs. Robinson.” When we think of young men being with older women we immediately recall the famous seduction scene from The Graduate. Indeed the seduction of “Stifler’s Mom” in American Pie occurs while the song “Mrs. Robinson” plays on a stereo. Of course, at a mere 36-years-old, she’s a tad young to be considered a “cougar,” but there’s no debating that she not only belongs on this list but belongs in the top spot — and not just because its so iconic and pioneering a role. Bancroft was extremely hot. Just watch that seduction scene one more time. Or look at that single iconic leg of hers.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog