Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Spike Lee Wants Barack Obama To Do The Right Thing With Sarah Palin

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Jungle Fever  (1991)

    And the right thing sure ain’t any sort of riff on Jungle Fever. Spike was in Toronto promoting both his film Miracle at Saint Anna and the relatively new online film festival Babelgum, where he serves as “the ultimate jury.” Meaning, he picks the final winner.

    We caught up to ask him what he thought about vice presidential nominee and hockey mom Sarah Palin, and it looks like he wants a showdown between Barack and Sarah.

    “I think with that speech…when she said that speech it allowed Joe America to go after her. None of this stuff about how you can’t go off on her because she’s a woman. The stuff the she spoke, he should go after her hard. It’s time to take the kid gloves off.”

    Can we assume that Spike is ready for some Democratic mudslinging? If he doesn’t ultimately direct the definitive Obama biopic with Denzel Washington playing a prominent role, then there is no justice in the world.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Sarah Diamond, ex-Slamdance Chief: The Media Diet

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    It’ll be a bit strange at Slamdance this year without one of its most familiar faces. For eight years Sarah Diamond was a fixture at the little festival at the treasure Mountain Inn, the the upstart answer to Sundance’s Geoff Gilmore, only without the girth and goatee. She recently stepped away from Slamdance to pursue a career in law; she’ll be at Harvard this fall. Now with her media consumption opened up to things beyond Slamdance submissions, we caught up with her to talk about Flannery O’Connor, Project Runway and why Werner Herzog should let the Bad Lieutenant remake slide and make a movie about the Smiths instead.

    What films or television shows have you seen recently?

    Project Runway, and I can’t wait for Real Housewives of Atlanta to start.

    Which ones stuck with you and why?

    Mystery Diagnosis is also great. If you’re going to watch TV you may as well indulge yourself.

    How have your film viewing tastes and routines evolved since before becoming a festival programmer and after you stopped?

    My tastes have involved after seeing so many great and different types of films. Now that I am no longer with a festival I will take that experience with me. But my tastes are the same.

    How often do you read fiction? Do you wish you read more?


    I definitely don’t read fiction enough especially since I have a MFA in creative writing. Whenever I need a fix I pull out a Flannery O’Connor short story collection though

    What would be the ideal literary adaptation and why?
    Severin’s Journey into Dark would be great. It’s very dark and takes place at the collapse of the Hapsburg Empire.

    How, if at all, has reading informed your taste in cinema?

    Great work is great work. Reading an outstanding book is a perfect compliment to a powerful film. Reading a Donald Barthelme story and then watching a Douglas Sirk film is a pretty amazing way to spend an afternoon

    What are you listening to recently?

    The Chills, Skip Spence, Disco Inferno, Clan of Xymox

    What would be the ideal pairing of filmmaker and musician for a concert film? Why?

    Werner Herzog and The Smiths, just because they are both so fucking amazing. A great blend of adventure and brutal intimacy all under a blanket of eccentricity.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • 10 Careers That Need to Backtrack to the ’90s

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Babylon A.D.  (2008)

    Lakeview Terrace  (2008)

    Surfer, Dude  (2008)

    Righteous Kill  (2008)

    The Women  (2008)

    September is often used as a dumping ground for movies, but this year it also appears to be a dumping ground for once-great or once-promising talents who’ve lost their way. I’ve taken note of at least 10 individuals (actors, actresses and a couple filmmakers) who have new films out this month (I’m counting the Labor Day weekend, too) who are due for a visit from the Ghost of Movies Past.

    More specifically, these people need to backtrack to the ‘90s, which is when most of them did their last truly great work. Perhaps they need to take a look at that earlier work and remember what it was they used to do. Or perhaps they just need to get advice from the Coen brothers, who similarly hit a slump in the new millennium, but who are now back on track with a few more Oscars in hand and a new comedy, Burn After Reading, which looks to be more in line with their ‘90s classic The Big Lebowski than their 2000s missteps Intolerable Cruelty and The Ladykillers.

    Nicolas Cage (guilty September 2008 release: Bangkok Dangerous)

    It could be argued that Cage made just as many worthless movies in the ‘90s as he has in the ‘00s. Also, considering his box office success with Ghost Rider and the National Treasure movies, plus his excellent Oscar-nominated dual role in Adaptation, it’s debatable that he’s “lost his way.” But it’s clear to me, at least, that he currently lacks any concern for the quality of his work, as evidenced by this month’s Bangkok Dangerous, which makes even Con Air look well crafted by comparison. In the ‘90s, Cage was doing much greater work for Scorsese, Lynch and even Michael Bay, and he won an Oscar for Best Actor, too. Unless he starts caring about the roles he chooses, he’s more likely to one day receive lifetime recognition by the Razzies than a lifetime achievement award from the Academy. Who he needs to work with again to get it back: the Coens; Uncle Francis (Ford Coppola); Scorsese; even Michael Bay would be good.

    Neil LaBute (guilty September 2008 release: Lakeview Terrace)

    He directed Nic Cage in the terrible 2006 remake of The Wicker Man, placing him a long way in the wrong direction from that promising playwright/filmmaker who gave us the wicked men of In the Company of Men and Your Friends and Neighbors in ’97 and ’98, respectively. With 2000’s Nurse Betty, LaBute began working from other people’s scripts, which actually wasn’t too bad considering his next fully self-authored work, the 2003 adaptation of his own play, The Shape of Things, was a one-note disappointment. This month he attempts to rise up from his 2006 disaster with Lakeview Terrace, again from material he didn’t write, and it could be decent. But despite my rejection of Shape, I’d prefer he return to the kind of mean-spirited stuff he wrote himself a decade back. If anyone else, though, I’d say he could potentially do well adapting something by Bret Easton Ellis. Who he needs to work with again to get it back: himself; Aaron Eckhart.

    Mathieu Kassovitz (guilty September 2008 release: Babylon A.D.)

    It may be hard to imagine, but the guy who helmed the critically panned new sci-fi movie Babylon A.D. was once honored as Best Director at Cannes. The year was 1995 and the film was La Haine, a powerful black-and-white French drama about three hooligans from the low-income outskirts of Paris. On Rotten Tomatoes, it is rated 100% fresh by critics; Babylon has a nearly inverse score of 7%. Kassovitz, who has also done fine work as an actor (Amelie; Munich), recently claimed that the movie is bad because of alterations made by 20th Century Fox rather than because of his work as a director. Well, fine, but the guy’s previous film, Gothika, was pretty shitty too (how it received a RT score of 73% or earned $150 million is beyond me). What he needs to work with again to get it back: French dialogue; independent distributors.

    Vin Diesel (guilty September 2008 release: Babylon A.D.)

    The star of Babylon A.D. is also in need of a ‘90s backtrack. Between Saving Private Ryan in ’98 and both Boiler Room and Pitch Black in 2000, I believed Diesel was to be this generation’s greatest action hero, one who could actually act, too (he seemed like he could then, anyway). But the guy’s been a real loser in the action and the acting departments since 2002’s xXx. Diesel made a recent try at quality work with Sidney Lumet’s Find Me Guilty, but it’s possible audiences don’t want to or simply can’t take the actor seriously enough. It’s probably too late for him, now, although he should see some increase in audience size with his return to the Fast and the Furious franchise next year. Who he needs to work with again to get it back: Spielberg.

    Meg Ryan (guilty September 2008 release: The Women)

    Can you reverse the effects of collagen implants? Ryan, who was such a cutie as a staple of ‘90s romantic comedy, now looks so creepy with all the work she’s had done on her face that it’s no wonder Picturehouse had to be so excessive with the Photoshop in the poster for The Women (though Ryan is at least slightly more recognizable than Annette Bening). To give Ryan’s doctors credit, the actress’ downturn may have actually had more to do with that misguided affair she had with Russell Crowe while making 2000’s Proof of Life, which was pretty much the beginning of her career slump. Who she needs to work with again to get it back: Tom Hanks; Nora Ephron.

    Jason Biggs (guilty September 2008 release: My Best Friend’s Girl)

    Yeah, it’s a shame that Biggs’ greatest achievement was American Pie, but that movie truly is a masterpiece compared to most of the films he’s appeared in since. However, my hope for him to backtrack to the ‘90s isn’t so he’ll recall what made him a star in a ’99 gross-out comedy; it’s to make the plea that he return to sitcoms. Before he was the pie-fucking kid, he was a semi-regular on the early ‘90s series Drexell’s Class. While I never saw the show, which only lasted 18 episodes, I do think Biggs is better suited for television, mainly because I’d rather not see his face on the big screen any longer, especially as yet another embarrassment-prone comedic sidekick, as he is in this month’s My Best Friend’s Girl. Hopefully one day he’ll get out of the cinemas and realize he’s this generation’s Jon Cryer, who eventually found his place in a lame yet popular series. Who he needs to work with to get it back: ABC; NBC; CBS.

    Woody Harrelson (guilty September 2008 release: Surfer, Dude)

    Following the signoff of Cheers in the early ‘90s, Harrelson seemed on track to be one of this generation’s most prestigious actors, on the level of Sean Penn and Russell Crowe even. Yet after wowing us in Natural Born Killers and then receiving an Oscar nomination mid-decade for The People vs. Larry Flynt, he kind of left the spotlight to appear in less-prominent films (like his other release this month, Battle in Seattle) and some less-prominent roles in major releases. He’s at least working a lot (8 releases in 2008 alone) and showing up in great movies like No Country for Old Men, but I have to wonder what he’s thinking by being in Surfer, Dude. OK, so he’s good in the occasional comedy, including this year’s Semi-Pro, but he’d far more respected if he cut back on the quantity of films and concentrated on the quality ones. Who he needs to work with again to get it back: fewer filmmakers; an agent that can get him bigger, meatier roles.

    Matthew McConaughey (guilty September 2008 release: Surfer, Dude)

    I guess it’s not surprising that McConaughey ended up in a movie called Surfer, Dude, but I still wish he’d stayed the course of films like Lone Star, A Time to Kill, Amistad and Contact instead of the sorts of romantic comedies and adventures he’s done since the turn of the century. He was even obnoxious in Tropic Thunder. Personally, I enjoyed him in 2002’s Reign of Fire, but otherwise he’s been a real disappointment this whole decade, and reuniting with his EdTV costar Woody Harrelson for a dumb surfing comedy may well be the biggest upset so far. Who/what he needs to work with again to get it back: Spielberg; Grisham novels; Jodie Foster.

    Cole Hauser (guilty September 2008 release: The Family That Preys)

    Like McConaughey, a number of fellow actors from Dazed and Confused have experienced slumps this decade, including Ben Affleck and Hauser. I honestly once believed the latter to be one of the most promising newcomers of the ‘90s. I guess it could be difficult to make a prestigious career out of only playing bad guys, but with his performances in Higher Learning and All Over Me, he seemed perfectly suited to try. Unfortunately, his villain from 2 Fast 2 Furious was a lot less than I thought him to be capable of. And he hasn’t really wowed me in anything else this decade, either. It’s possible that appearing in Tyler Perry’s attempted crossover film, The Family That Preys, will be a good career move, but I’m highly skeptical. Who he needs to work with again to get it back: Richard Linklater; Ben Affleck.

    Al Pacino (guilty September 2008 release: Righteous Kill)

    I’m picking only one of the two veteran actors united for this month’s Righteous Kill, because I’d probably be saying the same thing about each. Despite their being accepted as two of the greatest actors of the 20th century, neither has seen Oscar recognition since the early ‘90s, and neither has been very good at choosing quality roles lately. But at least Robert DeNiro has tried to do more interesting things with his career, whether it be appearing in broad comedies or returning to directing. Plus, it seems like he tried to backtrack a bit by re-teaming with his Wag the Dog director, Barry Levinson, for What Just Happened? He probably shouldn’t have just dropped out of Martin Campbell’s Edge of Darkness, but whatever. As for Pacino, he seems even more tired and passed his prime than DeNiro does, and I don’t believe he’s even tried to give a great performance in anything since 2000. The fact that he appeared in Gigli is the biggest disappointment, although it’s somewhat understandable since he was reuniting with the guy who directed him finally toward his first Oscar. His upcoming portrayal of Salvador Dali in next year’s Dali & I: The Surreal Story proves he has potential to do something unpredictable, but I’m honestly expecting another unfortunate ham effort. I’d love to see him and DeNiro paired up for an actual Scorsese movie rather than a film that’s pretending to be one (was there any other reason for the Righteous Kill trailer to feature “Sympathy for the Devil”?). Who he needs to work with again to get it back: Lumet; Coppola; DePalma.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Film Critics & The Audience: Peeing on the Professionals

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Lost Highway  (1997)

    This is the year that print film criticism went on life support, online film critics drafted sober eulogies and the rest of the world yawned distractedly while poised over the plug. Into the ill-attended open grave my colleague Lauren Wissot just tossed a meditation on film culture titled, “The Movie-Going Public.”

    I dig it because it dares to take filmgoers as seriously as it does cinema itself. Further, it manages, mostly by way of example, to pee all over the very notion of a professional film critic. I use don’t use the term “pee” lightly but with great care, thinking of readers like Anonymous, who responded to Lauren’s post with, “You’re not an elitist. But you are crass, vulgar and unprofessional… Manny Farber is rolling in his grave.” I want Anonymous, if he or she is reading this, to imagine Mr. Farber howling in pain from the beyond at my using such a crude bathroom word as “pee” in reference to the profession he devoted his life to. But another dead 20th Century critic is probably grinning in his grave. James Agee: “I suspect I am, far more than not, in your own situation: deeply interested in moving pictures, considerably experienced from childhood on in watching them and thinking and talking about them, and totally, or almost totally without experience or even much second-hand knowledge of how they are made. It is my business to conduct one end of a conversation, as an amateur critic among amateur critics. And I will be of use and of interest only in so far as my amateur judgment is sound, stimulating,
    or illuminating.” (Props to Ryland Walker Knight.)

    This here’s a meritocracy, in other words. In Farber’s and Agee’s day, when middle aged white men in bow ties manned the helm at the big city arts pages, Agee’s “amateur critic” demurral was like a feudal lord calling out to the serfs, “I’m with ya, brother!” Nowadays, despite its enduring status as “that most bourgeois profession” (to quote Armond White’s recent review of a David Lean retro, film criticism is now anybody’s game, an unruly mob rather than a collegial/catty private club. Good.

    Okay, back to Lauren’s main subject: the audience. Lord, how I miss the Cineplex Odeon Worldwide Theater on Manhattan’s Midtown West. It was a lovely second-run theater that, in the mid-to-late ’90s, showed movies for $3 a few months after their initial release. It was a beautiful experiment because arthouse, foreign, mainstream Ho’wood and indie films all screened there for the ridiculous sum of $3 per flick. Because of this Big Mac price, people would see whatever flick happened to be starting when they wandered in, and on any given afternoon, the place was packed with wanderers of every description: high schoolers, Wall Streeters, working stiffs, B-boys, bluebloods, film geeks, off-duty cops, cabbies, dopefiends.

    I remember watching David Lynch’s Lost Highway with just such a mixed crowd, 200 people spellbound for over 120 minutes and later shrugging, cursing, arguing and giddily dream-analyzing the movie in the lobby. (”What the **** did we just watch?”) I remember a similar packed house taking in Peter Jackson’s Heavenly Creatures. What a thrill to watch a group of rowdy homeboys simply silenced by that film’s elegantly tragic, sun-dappled final moments.

    This is the moviegoing public. They are not all stupes or feebs and they don’t need any professionals telling them (us) what’s appropriate viewing for their respective castes. We, the crazies who still love to write about film, should focus on talking back to the filmmakers as audience members, not culture cops, in a dialogue as intimate and unashamed as pillow talk. Lay it all on the table. The only people who should be excluded from this discourse have already excluded themselves– the ones who think movies are just something to pass the time, petty distraction, kid’s stuff. The fucking professionals.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • The Real Ghostbusters III. Trade Roughage 09/05/08

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    • Or is it technically Ghostbusters IV? Columbia Pictures has hired writers Lee Eisenberg and Gene Stupnitsky, both of TV’s The Office, to script a new installment of the Ghostbusters series, which was previously thought to be hitting a final note with an upcoming video game (which Dan Aykroyd led us to believe was pretty much “Ghostbusters III”). The Hollywood Reporter claims that while the new sequel may involve the original cast, the main focus will be with a rookie cast of Ghostbusters.
    • Paul Bettany, who played a kind of precursor to Charles Darwin in Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World, will actually portray the famous evolution theorist in the biopic Creation (formerly titled Origin), scripted by Master and Commander’s John Collee and to be directed by Jon Amiel (The Core). Bettany’s real wife, Jennifer Connelly, will play Darwin’s wife/first cousin, Emma.
    • Albert and Allen Hughes will finally follow-up their 2001 period-set From Hell with the post-apocalypse-set Book of Eli, which will star Denzel Washington as a man “who must fight across America to bring society the knowledge that could be the key to its redemption.”
    • Tarantino’s Inglorious Bastards script is pissing off the Germans.
    • According to Variety, as long as male audiences aren’t too busy with the new football season or summer leftovers, Nic Cage and his latest crapfest, Bangkok Dangerous, should top the box office this weekend.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • FilmCouch #86: Happy-Go-Lucky and Adam Resurrected, Telluride 2008

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Hardcore  (1979)

    Secrets & Lies  (1996)

    Affliction  (1997)

    Vera Drake  (2004)

    Adam Resurrected  (2008)

    Happy-Go-Lucky  (2008)

    Revanche  (2008)

    Tulpan  (2008)

    The Telluride Film Festival is what Sundance would be if it took place in heaven. Every year the tiny mountain hamlet hosts four days of hassle-free cinema paradise. There were grumblings about the lack of American films, but we still found plenty to love. Mike Leigh (Secrets and Lies, Vera Drake) came with his delightful new movie, Happy-Go-Lucky. He sat down for a disgruntled yet insightful interview. Paul Schrader (Affliction, Hardcore) seemed as blow away as we were by his latest film, Adam Resurrected, starring Jeff Goldblum.

    (Subscribe to FilmCouch–Spout’s weekly movie podcast–in the iTunes store or to our RSS feed and an episode will download each Friday)

    0:00 - Intro, Telluride faves: Waltz with Bashir, Revanche, The Good, the Bad, and the Weird, Tulpan, The Rest is Silence.

    7:04 - Happy-Go-Lucky, with Mike Leigh interview.

    19:52 - Adam Resurrected, with Paul Schrader interview.

    filmcouch-86


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog