Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Criticism: What is it Good For? BlogNosh 08/20/08

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    • Mike Everleth passes on a philosophical Jonas Mekas quote on the purpose of critics/criticism: “If the critic has any function at all, it is to look for something good and beautiful around him, something that can help man to grow from inside; to try to bring it to the attention of others, explain it, interpret it — and not to clutch at some little pieces of dirt, or mistakes, or imperfections.”
    • David Edelstein jumps into the Remembering Manny Farber fray, with a personal anecdote. “Once I made the mistake of saying I thought a film was ‘about’ something. ‘About…’ he said, softly, and glanced at Patricia. ‘How can we say what a film is ‘about’? There are so many things…’”
    • Critic Robin Wood does the impossible: he narrows the entire Criterion Collection down to ten favorites.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Michel Gondry, Comic Book Misogynist?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    It’s super-old news that Michel Gondry has published a comic book called We Lost the War But Not the Battle. In fact, Vulture published frames from the book almost a month ago –– which, ironically, we missed while we were at Comic-Con. But due to a confluence of forces through which you probably don’t hare to hear about, today I stumbled on Jog The Blog’s review of the book, which very much piqued my interest. An excerpt:

    There’s certainly a winsome appeal to Gondry’s curly graphics, and anyone who draws their own back-of-issue merchandise ad gets a smile from me. The story, however, is also about what I’ve come to expect from the solo Gondry (more solo than usual, this being a comic), chock-full of knotty thematic threads and some determined immaturity, this time with an added splash of over-the-top misogyny, underplayed narratively so as to become disquieting nonetheless.

    A bit of a surprising “splash”, considering I’ve always found Gondry’s work to be rather worshipful of women, even if it’s always really about adolescent boys. The the rest of the post basically spoils the plot of the book, but it’s a great read. Suffice it to say, “blood is spilled, sexual organs are unveiled, and Mia Farrow appears to **** the main character, which I think is funny?” if you’re still interested (or, more interested?) you could buy We Lost The War here for $5.99.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Dennis Hopper and the Natural Progression From Hippie to Conservative

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Easy Rider  (1969)

    The Trip  (1967)

    California may have spent the last five years under the rule of a Republican movie star, but news that major industry players are anything but super-lefty liberals still seems to strike many as a surprise. Responding to a story in which it’s casually mentioned that Dennis Hopper is expected to attend the Republican National Convention, Defamer’s Kyle Buchanan writes, “Did we miss the memo that said the countercultural director of freaking Easy Rider was a Republican? We’d assumed his appearance in the right-wing Zucker film An American Carol was a strict paycheck gig…”

    I’m not sure when the “memo” first went out, but Hopper has been a registered Republican for over 25 years. This 2005 interview is the most concise story that I could find on Hopper’s “conversion” from, as he puts it, being “probably as Left as you could get without being a Communist,” to believing in “the idea of less government, more individual freedom” and voting “on the straight Republican ticket.” In that story, Hopper mentions palling around with then-Senator John McCain, of whom he said, “That’s the kind of guy I’d like to be president.” (Hopper has since flirted with supporting Obama, but if he’s attending the RNC I imagine that attraction has cooled off.)

    Hopper is the living embodiment of that old adage about how if you’re not liberal at 20, you don’t have a heart, and if you’re not conservative at 40, you don’t have a brain (and those of us who are socially liberal and fiscally conservative at 28 simply have no candidate). That 2005 interview says Hopper is “still part of the counterculture” because of his political beliefs, and that might be true if you consider him alongside other aging 60s icons. But in terms of that generation as a whole, simply moving from the far left to the middle right with age doesn’t make him much of an anomaly.

    As far as An American Carol goes, the much fretted-over satire of Michael Moore from newly converted “9/11 conservative” David Zucker, Hopper’s participation might still been motivated more by a paycheck than by politics––after all, Paris Hilton’s in the movie, too––but it might be safe to assume that it was a small paycheck, considering that the independently financed and distributed film has a reportedly low budget, and Hopper is billed pretty far down on the cast list.

    In terms of finding that perfect storm of the ideologically defensible sell-out, Hopper’s much-mocked side gig as an Amerprise spokesmodel actually makes a kind of sense. In one of these ads, Hopper even ties his former, Easy Rider-associated, counter-cultural hero self to his paycheck-cashing, Republican-voting current incarnation.

    All of the ads are set to a brightly-orchestrated version of the Steve Winwood-penned hit “Gimme Some Lovin’,” which was a hit for Winwood and the Spencer Davis Group in 1967 (the year Hopper starred in The Trip, the acid-sploitation flick scripted by Jack Nicholson and directed by Roger Corman). In the “Flower Power” ad, Hopper stands in a field of sunflowers in front of a Rider-reminiscent Western backdrop. After telling us that those who say dreams “are like delicate little flowers” are “WRONG!”, there’s a cut to Hopper set far back in the field. “I want to make my own movie!” he says, well, dreamily. The ad closes with Hopper intoning, “Flower power was then. Your dreams are now.” The message: the world in which he made Easy Rider no longer exists. Grow up. Having money is no longer a contemptible spoil of The Man––you ARE The Man. Oh, and start a retirement portfolio with Ameriprise.

    Hopper is the poster boy for the 60s cultural revolutionary who, when “the drugs that were free suddenly weren’t free anymore [and] the party was over,” put aside their youthful ideals and refocused their big appetites on power, wealth and mainstream commercial consumption. It’s not surprising that this icon of the anti-establishment has come over to the conservative side. What’s surprising is that more stars of his generation haven’t likewise decided that fortunes are more important to protect than hazy memories and followed him over.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Josh Brolin’s Bush Impersonation. Clip of the Day

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    W.  (2008)

    After watching the trailer for Oliver Stone’s W. a few weeks ago, I had the impression that the George W. Bush biopic wasn’t going to be an impersonation fest. Of course, we only really got to hear James Cromwell as George H.W. Bush, and he didn’t seem to be bothering to sound like anything other than himself — not that I was expecting him to do Dana Carvey doing the senior Bush, but a bit of a change in voice, in order to make me not feel I’m watching the junior Bush getting yelled at by L.A. Confidential’s Captain Smith, would have been appreciated.

    Fortunately, as we can now see in some new behind the scenes footage courtesy of Access Hollywood, Josh Brolin is making an effort to sound like the man he’s portraying. Maybe it’s not so perfect that he’s mistakable for the real deal when you listen to the audio alone, but at least he doesn’t just sound like Josh Brolin, either. The video also gives us additional glimpses of Toby Jones as Karl Rove and Elizabeth Banks as Laura Bush. The latter can be seen studying actual footage of the President (and likely the First Lady) and practicing mannerisms, and thankfully providing a tiny bit of playfulness to an otherwise too-serious looking set.

    Now, when do we get to hear Banks speak? And, for that matter, when do I get my anticipated impersonations of Condi, Colin, Karl, Don and Dick?


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Carson Mell in SF

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    The Wholphin Blog alerts us to the news that Carson Mell will be screening a program of his animated shorts and music videos a week from tomorrow in San Francisco. Mell is producing some of the most cinematic (in terms of narrative scope and point of view) indie animation around right now. His Chonto, a former Wholphin DVD pick, screened at Sundance this year. I saw it when I was on the shorts jury at CineVegas and absolutely loved it, but my fellow jury members had their own favorites and compromise was inevitable. You can watch a trailer for Chonto above. The Chonto issue of Wholphin was also a topic of an episode of FilmCouch.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Neurotic Libertine: Vicky Cristina Barcelona and Polyamory

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Queen of Bad Sex Catherine Breillat could learn a thing or two from Woody Allen. Not only is his latest celluloid psychotherapy session Vicky Cristina Barcelona a phenomenal work of intellectual porn, but it also happens to contain one of the sexiest, most hysterical and poignant portrayals of polyamory to come along in a long, long time. Allen actually gets that those of us who choose to live outside of hetero monogamy are not voracious sex addicts lacking in morality – on the contrary, we simply abide by a different set of desires and ethics than that of the mainstream.

    Watching the sexual roundelay involving Diane Keaton/Mia Farrow substitute muse Scarlett Johansson and Allen stand-in Rebecca Hall as the American tourists Cristina and Vicky, who become sucked into the fiery passionate and oftentimes downright dangerous world of Barcelona artists Juan Antonio and his ex-wife Maria Elena, played by Javier Bardem and Penelope Cruz (for my money the two sexiest European stars to grace the screen since Mastroianni and Sophia Loren), I realized it was the first time I’d ever wanted to jerk off to a Woody Allen film. This is the master of neuroses on Viagra. Spain seems to have reinvigorated Allen, and it’s a joyous thrill to behold. Simply put, the director’s upped the endorphin factor, leaving me hot and bothered and hysterically laughing all at the same time.

    That Vicky Cristina Barcelona could be this incredibly arousing and simultaneously laugh-out-loud funny is a testament to how far Allen has grown as a filmmaker in recent years. Unlike gloom-and-doom Breillat, Allen suddenly has discovered that comedy can be lusciously sexy – he’s finally taken some big risks, pushed himself beyond preconceived notions and his own comfort zone, much like his script forces his protagonist tourists to do.

    Casting Bardem and Cruz is the smartest move he’s made since using breezily sexy Keaton. And by employing these Almodovar darlings, along with the hot tamale director’s DP Javier Aguirresarobe (Talk To Her), production designer Alain Bainee (Kika) and costume designer Sonia Grande (the upcoming Broken Embraces), Allen has managed to create a quintessential “Woody Allen film” sprinkled with Pedro spice. The film’s pacing itself is like sex, from slow foreplay to passionate fucking to basking in the afterglow of getting what you wanted (for now). The opening credits accompanied by a playful female voice singing an addictive tune like a siren’s call (Giulia y Los Tellarini’s “Barcelona”) and the sultry Spanish guitar, Barcelona’s romance captured in languid camerawork, images of breathtaking architecture and of the nighttime cafes enveloped by the fever heat of late summer––all of these elements are as perfectly composed as any of Allen’s mash notes to Manhattan, but unlike that film, Vicky Cristina Barcelona emits a visceral sensuality from beginning to end.

    Add to this an accurate portrait of a relationship (Maria Elena and Juan Antonio’s) turning from creative passion into Frankenstein’s Monster, and Allen’s film approaches existential thriller. As Juan Antonio coolly seduces and Maria Elena sharply sizzles they devour one another with primal intensity, and transform into a volatile chemical equation. In fact the idea of “sex as chemistry” is alluded to by Juan Antonio, who claims Cristina as the missing ingredient that will serve as both buffer and lover for the couple. Juan Antonio’s allure is his no bullshit candidness; not a fake macho forwardness but a vulnerable, heart-on-sleeve directness. His frankness is what makes him so hot. And not only is he fully aware of the power of honesty, but he knows how to wield it, shamelessly shoving that appeal into the faces of Vicky and Cristina, and the audience’s.

    The scene in which he first meets the twenty-something tourists, called over to their table by Cristina’s flirting eyes, is downright hilarious. After an all too brief introduction, Juan Antonio (in his deadpan serious manner, as if offering to buy the next round of drinks) says he will take the women to see his favorite sculpture in the Asturian town of Oviedo – requiring a quick plane ride followed by a weekend stay in which they will eat and drink fine food and wine, then all make love together. (Oh, and they’re leaving in an hour by the way.)

    But the same element that makes this scene so laugh-out-loud funny––Bardem’s impeccable comic timing/Juan Antonio’s straightforward presumptuousness––is also what makes the scene so fucking sexy. What innocent abroad wouldn’t want to have her brains fucked out by a hot and horny sex bomb offering a once in a lifetime adventure? (I for one most assuredly would have responded, “We’re leaving in an hour? Why the long wait?”) And indeed, once in Oviedo Cristina agrees to join Juan Antonio in his room – after he’s assented to her one condition of “you’ll have to seduce me.”

    Leaning against the wall his shirt just barely unbuttoned, Juan Antonio lazily opens the door for Cristina with one hand while cradling a glass of wine in the other. When she says she’s just there for a quick drink and then she’s going to leave, he abruptly and candidly asks her if she’d acted in the short film she’d written and directed. Puzzled, she replies that she did. His response, “I hope you were more convincing in that short film,” is both funny and wildly hot because he’s cut to the core of Cristina’s desire with a Zorro swipe, undressed her with one line.

    And even while Allen employs the twin beauties of Barcelona’s art and its environment as seductive characters––Gaudi’s architecture represents both Vicky’s infatuation (she was drawn to Barcelona after falling in love with his Sagrada Familia Church) and Maria Elena’s mantra of “only unfulfilled love is truly romantic” (Gaudi’s life’s work was this unfinished church)––he also remains hyper-attentive to the nuances within the flesh-and-blood characters he’s created. Allen is both respectful and nonjudgmental of every form sex and love may take. As Bardem observes in the press notes, “I think there are different aspects of love…Love is as different as the people who feel it. I’d say I guess the movie wants to show some of those relationships with love in different people, different minds.”

    Whether it’s Vicky and her fiancée, Juan Antonio and Maria Elena, Juan Antonio and Cristina, Juan Antonio and Vicky, or even Juan Antonio, Maria Elena and Cristina––Allen patiently listens to his characters, allows for open minded discovery, like a skilled documentary filmmaker coaxing interviewees. Refreshingly, Vicky Cristina Barcelona even concludes on the very adult notion that there is no such thing as a “right” way to love. As Allen himself is quoted, “Some things work for some people in some situations. One can’t preconceive these things and one has to be more flexible when it comes to love.” Claro que si!


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog