Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • W Movie Release Date Draws Fire From Obama & Bush Fans Alike

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    I had MSNBC on for a while in the background while I was working yesterday, and they were giving what seemed like an inordinate amount of attention to the trailer, released over the weekend, for Oliver Stone’s W. Most of the talking heads were just mocking the trailer and Stone, but gossip reporter Courtney Hazlett had an interesting observation. Noting that Stone is pushing his crew through a (probably ill-advised) grueling seven month production and post-production schedule, Hazlett predicted that crowds might come out just to see a finished product produced under such duress. With a gleam in her eye, she said, “It could be a hot mess!”

    Leaving the wildly off-base assumption that moviegoers actually care about the conditions under which a film is produced aside, it’s interesting to see W’s rush to release as a selling point, especialy since so many bloggers are, in the wake of the trailer release, saying the exact opposite.

    At Salon, Alex Koppelman predicts that with Stone’s history of historical revision, the film is sure to become a hot punching bag on conservative talk radio in the weeks surrounding the release. So close to the election, he says, “it could prove unhelpful to Barack Obama and Democrats. I would be more excited to see the film on Nov. 17, with the election in the rearview mirror and the era of Bush retrospection unofficially and unapologetically under way.”

    It’s a fair point, one Ryan Adams at Awards Daily takes up as well. “In the final days before the election we should be focused on the future, not poking ditto-heads to make them spew up the news cycle.”

    Of course, since said conservative partisans have already begun their cries of “No fair!”, there is the possibility that they’ll exhaust themselves before the movie even comes out, no matter when that might be.

    No, probably not.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Watchmen Whoops! Snyder Slips, Billy Corgan Wins

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Watchmen  (2009)

    Ah, accidents of synergy. Zach Snyder set the first trailer for Watchmen to a Smashing Pumpkins song called “The Beginning is the End is the Beginning.” That song, which was originally released as part of a rarities and b-sides contract fulfiller in 2005, is currently the 75th most purchased song on iTunes. Because of this Watchman-related mini-comeback could potentially give a boost to his recently-resurrected, currently recording band, Billy Corgan says he’s hoping Warner Brothers will allow him to release the trailer as a music video, even if it might go against the interest of the Pumpkins faithful (”My fans seem to be confused when the outside world appreciates our work, so I can only imagine this terrifies them,” he told the L.A. Times.)

    So, yay! Good for Billy Corgan! Bring back the 90s by any means necessary, right? Well, hold on just a minute: Snyder might have used this song by accident.

    The Playlist links to a CinemaBlend report from Comic-Con, where Snyder “admits that the use of the Smashing Pumpkins song “The End is the Beginning is the End” was an ironic reference to Batman and Robin, given that it’s pretty widely considered the worst superhero movie ever.” “The End is the Beginning is the End” was used in Batman in Robin, over that film’s closing credits. But that’s not the same song as “The Beginning is the End is the Beginning,” to which Snyder set the Watchmen trailer.

    Who knows how such a thing could have happened––don’t they have internal fact-checkers on staff at the studios to hold ironic musical references in trailers to some standard of accuracy?––but I guess Billy Corgan wins regardless. Not only is he making money off a forgotten three-year old track, but he managed to confuse a hot shot Hollywood filmmaker with his needlessly convoluted titling schemes! The 90s ARE back!


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Harry Potter Half-Blood Prince Trailer not a Trailer? Clip of the Day

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    After watching the new teaser for Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, I personally had no comment. Having stopped reading the series somewhere in the center of the previous book, I didn’t feel I had any authority on the matter. The only thing I thought while watching the clip was that it seemed more like one of those annoying prequels that comes after a series to humanize that series’ villain with an origin story (y’know, like the Star Wars prequels and Young Hott Hannibal (wait, that’s not what it was titled?). And until I read an interesting trailer analysis on MTV Movies Blog this morning, I thought that couldn’t actually be the case.

    Actually, MTV’s look at the teaser began last night with a frame by frame analysis, in which Shawn Adler reveals his expert knowledge of J.K. Rowling’s text by pointing out the myriad ways that David Yates’ film is different from the book, from a previously reported added-in scene to little changes within adapted sequences. My favorite observation:

    0:43: Our first glimpse at young Tom Riddle, the boy wizard who would grow up to be Voldemort. Surprisingly, I’m more interested here in Dumbledore, who is costumed differently than in the novel, where he was described as wearing “flamboyantly plum velvet.”

    OK, now for Adler’s continued thoughts, from the blog. He notes that both the book and this film are indeed about the background of Tom Riddle/Voldemort/He Who Shall Not Be Blogged About. Surely there’s more, though. Obviously there’s the stuff set in the present. So, perhaps it’s more The Godfather Part II than Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones? As if the Potter fans care about such comparisons. Well, neither do I, really. My primary interest in Adler’s analysis is on the film’s marketing rather than the film itself:

    This first trailer, in fact, isn’t really a trailer at all — not in the sense that we’ve grown accustomed to, anyway. Most trailers tell you about story. This trailer, conversely, tells you about character, the character of the young orphaned wizard who grows up to be the most powerfully dark sorcerer or all-time.

    A trailer that isn’t a trailer in the traditional sense? Sign me up for more. Half-Blood Prince teasers, I mean. Or more character-centered trailers. As for the actual movie, well, I can take it or leave it.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • That Sexy Psychopath: Malcolm McDowell in “A Clockwork Orange”

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    When I received the press release announcing The Film Society of Lincoln Center’s series “Lindsay Anderson: Revolutionary Romantic” (running from 8/15-8/21) I thought, well, that should be a fascinating retro. But then I noticed that Anderson’s quintessential discovery Malcolm McDowell would also be on hand to premiere his and Mike Kaplan’s Never Apologize: A Personal Visit with Lindsay Anderson and I thought, well, that should be…hot!

    For over 20 years I’ve had a thing for McDowell – or, more precisely, the proudly nihilistic Alex he brought to life from the notorious Burgess book, if not as much so for Mick Travis, the embryonic Alex he created in Anderson’s classic trilogy. I first saw A Clockwork Orange around the age of ten (note to liberal academics attempting to enlighten their young offspring through art films – Kubrick? Not a good idea) and again later in high school. It was this teenage viewing of McDowell as the violent anarchist leader of a group of hoods, who is ultimately “rehabilitated” by an equally sadistic society, that stuck with me. So much so, that as all the other chicks in my small town dressed as Wonder Woman or Elvira or some similar character with adolescent sex appeal for Halloween, I anointed myself leader of my own band of droogs, eyelash and codpiece included. If you could overlook the raping and pillaging, Alex was one undeniably steamy paradox: a brilliant, sophisticated thug with precise lilting diction and a taste for Beethoven. And I wanted to be a – nonviolent – troublemaker outsmarting evil authority, too!

    McDowell devoured his lead role with an animal intensity so enthralling as to inspire copycat crimes that caused Kubrick (upon receiving death threats) subsequently to pull his masterpiece from distribution in England. McDowell’s Alex was Mick Travis on psychopathic steroids, a lethal piece of rough trade annihilating his prey, a flesh-and-hot-blooded embodiment of Iggy Pop’s “Lust for Life.” (In fact, his stunning portrayal in the 1971 film gave visceral voice to what would culminate in the Sex Pistols’ “No Future” ethos.)

    From the opening moment where Kubrick focuses his all-seeing lens in a close up of Alex’s penetrating gaze, and then slowly pulls back to reveal the futuristic (yet laced with the Swingin’ Sixties) Korova Milkbar with its “milk plus” pouring from the stone pussies of pornographic statues, McDowell’s Alex has you firmly in his grasp. For the next two hours he will take you along for the unapologetically conniving, scheming, brutalizing ride of ultraviolence and make you revel in the glory of his hedonistic hell. Yes, he’s the mastermind behind the agonizing rape at Home – but he does it whilst “Singin’ in the Rain,” with the glee of a child on a roller coaster . Kubrick shoots the scenes of the gang in the stolen car, flying along as if at an amusement park––which, of course, the world is to them. McDowell knows exactly where Alex’s powerful appeal lays: in his pathologically insatiable appetite, in his living life as one never-ending thirst to be quenched.

    The scene in which Alex picks up two Lolitas in a music shop before taking them back to his flat for a bit of the old “in-out in-out,” that infamous fast motion ménage a trois set to the “William Tell Overture,” exemplifies his predatory MO. Dressed to the hilt like a dashing prince, Alex saunters through the joint like he owns it, stopping to inquire about an order he’d placed. His attention soon falls on the popsicle-sucking (“A bit cold and pointless, isn’t it, my lovely?”) jailbait pair who he promptly, shamelessly, places himself between, getting uncomfortably up close and personal while dispensing more witticisms like Pez candy. By the time he’s taken a slow taste of the brunette’s cold treat he’s taken vampire-like possession of the duo as well. The invitation to his pad to hear “angels’ trumpets and heaven’s trombones” is merely a formality. Alex is sexy because he’s cocky, fearless, and most importantly, intensely and unabashedly sexual.

    Indeed, watching McDowell’s performance one begins to understand how cult leaders and serial killers could have so many females wanting to bed them. Bad boys with high I.Q.s and their own set of rules, rebels writ large, all belong to the seductive brotherhood of Alex. I’d venture to guess that Kubrick’s film would not have been nearly as controversial – nor horrorshow – had he cast a less charismatic lead. Then again I also would not be fantasizing about a now elderly gent who once rocked my young punk world.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Batman to Beat Titanic? Trade Roughage 07/30/08

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Dark Knight  (2008)

    • Will The Dark Knight surpass Titanic to become the highest grossing movie ever?!??!? No, probably not. Meanwhile, expectations are being cut on how much money Tropic Thunder will realistically be able to pull on its R rating.
    • Universal has expressed strong interest in taking on co-financing and distributing duties on Quentin Tarantino’s Inglorious Bastards.
    • Jack White and Alicia Keys have recorded the theme song to the upcoming James Bond film, Quantum of Solace. It’s the first duet in Bond theme song history!

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Comic-Con 2008 Complete Coverage

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]