Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • 10 Threequels That Took a Wrong Turn

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    The third part in Universal’s rebooted Mummy franchise takes the series in a new direction. Rather than set in Egypt and dealing again with the same old villain, Imhotep, The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor brings us to China and gives us a different sort of preserved corpse baddie. And it looks like the change could actually add some freshness to the franchise.

    Of course, history would hint that such a move for the Mummy movies is a bad idea. While it seems beneficial in theory to redirect the focus of a series with the third installment, especially if the first sequel was too much a repetition of the original (a la The Mummy Returns), in practice many threequels mistakenly alter things for the worse. These aren’t necessarily the worst threequels ever made (*cough* X-Men: The Last Stand); they’re just some movies that took their series in a completely wrong turn.

    1. Halloween III: Season of the Witch - Now viewed as an unfortunate detour in a long series involving the slasher Michael Myers, this misstep can apparently be blamed on John Carpenter and co-writer/producer Debra Hill, who agreed to a second sequel to Halloween only if it didn’t involve Myers. But what was the point? Sure, a franchise can work with unrelated sequels, but after two movies dealing with the same villain, it seems odd to switch it up so late in the game. Still, if this wasn’t such a terrible movie in general, it’s possible Halloween III could have worked as an intended beginning to an anthology franchise.
    2. Batman Forever - I typically like to consider Joel Schumacher’s Batman movies a separate series from Tim Burton’s, but the few returning cast members (Michael Gough, Pat Hingle) are evidence that this is indeed a threequel to the 1989 Batman. Not that you’d otherwise know it from the complete change in tone from dark to candy colored (never mind the recast Batman/Bruce Wayne). Hopefully Christopher Nolan will continue with the latest run so someone like Shawn Levy doesn’t take over and make the caped crusader silly again.
    3. Another Thin Man - Honestly, I could watch all of the Thin Man movies over and over until I die (Nora Charles is the most perfect woman ever written into creation), but this third installment of the alcohol-happy detective series commits one of the cardinal sins of sequels: it introduces a child. What fun is a couple of bickering, drunken lovers who also solve murders with a baby along for the ride? Even if the kid does end up being played by a very young Dean Stockwell by the fifth installment. The Mummy movies committed the same annoyance/error with the second movie (for Tomb of the Dragon Emperor the son is now thankfully an adult).
    4. Look Who’s Talking Now - While the Thin Man movies were good enough with a cute dog and didn’t need to add in a cute kid, the Look Who’s Talking movies were inversely just fine with cute, talking babies and didn’t need to add in talking animals.
    5. Crocodile Dundee in Los Angeles - Yet another threequel guilty of having a kid add-on. But it also commits the other annoying sin of relocating the franchise to a new setting. The rural meets urban fish out of water stuff doesn’t work nearly as much in L.A. as it does in NYC.
    6. Smokey and the Bandit Part 3 - No threequel is going to be good if the main star drops out of the series and the sidekick attempts to take the place of the leading man. Well, maybe it would be okay if Iron Man 3 starred Terrence Howard only as War Machine, and maybe this movie would have actually worked if Jerry Reed stayed in the big rig and it was titled Smokey and the Trucker. But as it went down, the substitution just made us miss Burt Reynolds more.
    7. Home Alone 3 - As far as replacements go, I don’t know what is worse, changing up the whole character and family, as was done with Home Alone 3, which basically just repeated the storyline of the original movie, or the made-for-TV Home Alone 4, which recast characters from the first two movies. Either way, Fox should have just continued the series with Macauley Culkin, despite the fact that he was growing way out of his cute years by the end of the second movie. Home Alone 3 should have brought John Hughes back to focusing on high school kids and made it like a mix of Home Alone and Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, in which a teenage Kevin throws a wild house party when accidentally left home alone. Again.
    8. Ghostbusters: The Video Game - I know that video games are surpassing the movies in terms of favored entertainment, but I’m pretty bummed that the third Ghostbusters movie has become a video game rather than an actual threequel.
    9. Superman III - Some of us may have a soft spot for both Richard Pryor’s appearance and the selfish Superman, but otherwise this threequel suffers dearly from having such lame villains. Especially after the awesomeness of General Zod and friends in part II. The wrong turn, though, is not just lame villains but the complete lack of Lex Luthor, a necessity for Superman movies for those of us who never read the comics and can’t get behind a pseudo Luthor like Robert Vaughn’s “Ross Webster”. Actually, I guess it’s not so much the lack of Luthor as it is the blatant substitution for him, as well as for the diminished use of Lois Lane. The franchise didn’t exactly get back on course by bringing Gene Hackman’s Luthor in Superman IV: The Quest for Peace.
    10. Friday the 13th Part 3 - It’s perfectly debatable whether or not this slasher series took a misstep when it gave Jason a hockey mask and made him an icon. Like a number of other horror franchises, this one became less scary and more amusing beginning with the third installment. Entertaining, sure, but a wrong turn for some horror franchises. It certainly didn’t help matters having that laugh track:


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Tom Quinn of THE NEW YEAR’S PARADE: The Media Diet

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    New Year Parade  (2008)

    From the looks of it, Tom Quinn is having a pretty remarkable year. He started off by winning the Grand Jury Prize at Slamdance with his positively Cassavetian take on a disintegrating South Philly Irish clan, The New Year’s Parade. This week, he became one of Filmmaker Magazine’s 25 New Faces in Independent Film. Although the director, writer, producer, DP, gaffer, editor, financier of this micro budget film doesn’t feel like an indiewood cop-out waiting to happen, we will certainly be seeing more from him soon. While we wait for Tom’s indie darling status to cement, I chatted with him for our Media Diet interview series about what he’s listening to, his plans to remake Darby O’Gill and The Little People and how he saw The Dark Knight like everyone else.

    What films or television shows have you seen recently?

    In the last month or so I’ve seen The Dark Knight, Hellboy 2, Gone Baby Gone and I rewatched Giant, Zodiac, Paranoid Park, and There Will Be Blood. I have tickets for The Last Mistress so hope to see that this week.

    Which ones stuck with you and why?

    As predictable as it’s become, I really enjoyed The Dark Knight. It was fun to see a true Hollywood blockbuster for a change that took me back to being a kid in the theater. Also, I hadn’t seen Giant in years and had a new appreciation for how epic it really is and how well-drawn the characters are. And I’ll watch any Van Sant film repeatedly.

    Does your interest in them have anything to do with your own work as a filmmaker?

    I like all kinds of films and I’m sure I learn from all of them. Some are just plain fun. Although my means and interests are very different than those of, say,The Dark Knight, I still take a lot away in terms of structure, form, and character. I think formally I’m most interested in Van Sant’s recent work because of their stripped down nature. He’s also doing interesting work with non-actors, which I’d like to do more of.

    How often do you read fiction? Do you wish you read more?

    I do wish I read more and have no excuse. I stood in an airport bookstore for 10 minutes yesterday holding a copy of The Road, only to put it down because I couldn’t justify the 15 dollars and had a copy of John Sayles excellent Thinking in Pictures (which I’d already read several times) in my bag. I had already read Eggers’ How We Are Hungry a few months ago and loved it. The Sun Also Rises is waiting to be finished.

    What would be your ideal literary adaptation? Or remake?

    For whatever reason, I recently got the idea in my head that I want to remake Darby O’Gill and the Little People. It was my grandfather’s favorite film and my mom had us sit and watch it every year as kids. I remember it freaking me out. But now there’s something really appealing to me about remaking my grandfather’s favorite flick, shooting in Ireland, actually exploring the themes of the film – especially that Reaper. Anyway, I just found out that the film had been based on a book, so there you go.

    How, if at all, has reading informed your filmmaking?

    Well, it’s all storytelling. I think even more than what I’ve read, the stories my parents told us before bed as kids really got their hooks in me. They would alternate nights: my mom telling stories of spaceships and leprechauns; my dad telling us the story of what we’d done that day, from waking up all the way through to bed. I figure that’s why I now enjoy mixing fiction and non-fiction forms in my films.

    What are you listening to recently?

    I’m terrible at searching for new music but just heard this dude Doug Paisley who’s incredible. A few staples fill my iTunes: The Pixies, Dinosaur Jr, Eastern Conference Champions (killer Radiohead-esque with a East Coast spin, with Greg from The NYP on drums), Jets to Brazil, Mudhoney, and Jawbreaker and a great band from Philly named Metroplex.

    If you could collaborate with one musician on a film, who would it be and why?

    Blake Schwarzenbach. He’d been in Jawbreaker and Jets to Brazil – both bands I love to death. He’s a great song writer, with a real narrative sense.



    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Toxie in Iraq

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    That Troma propaganda/war satire clip that Lloyd Kaufman showed at Comic-Con? It’s on YouTube, natch––and it’s apparently super old. Oh well––new to us! It’s embedded above.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • ‘W.’ Teaser Trailer. Clip of the Day

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    W.  (2008)

    If you still haven’t had enough goodies from Comic-Con, feel free to check out the bootlegged clip of the new traiiler for X-Men Origins: Wolverine. Personally, I’m ready to move on, and so here’s a look at another superhero story: Oliver Stone’s W. Or, as I like to call it, U.S.-President Origins: George W. Bush.

    It looks a little more serious than I anticipated. For all we’ve read and heard about the campiness of the script, the thing is now at least being marketed as a drama about a clash between father and son. Even the roll call of characters (captioned as such, rather than crediting the players) makes each part look less like caricatures than I’d expected.

    Kudos to the editors for allowing Richard Dreyfuss as Dick Cheney be the money shot. His casting was the most surprising, and it’s good to see that it’s not actually the most ill-fitting. Meanwhile, Ellen Burstyn somehow suddenly seems wrong as Barbara Bush.

    I’ll continue to say, however, that a movie about the relationship between Bush 1 and Bush 2 just doesn’t seem too appealing after the past eight years. And, again, I note that the paternal issues are dealt with just perfectly and hilariously in Harold and Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay. Sorry to repeat myself, but even though this movie doesn’t look as bad as I’d feared, the teaser doesn’t exactly offer any new hopes, either.

    [via /Film]


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Comic-Con 2008: Troma

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Game  (2009)

    The Troma panel at Comic-Con gets smaller every year, but the sense that you’re at a really fucked up family reunion never dissipates. “What I find is amazing about Lloyd, is that everybody is connected to him in some fashion,” said panelist Steven Paul at yesterday’s session. He gestured at the room––the smallest I entered all weekend. “I bet everyone here has acted in a Lloyd Kaufman film.”

    Not quite, but part of the reason to show up to this thing every year is to see which disparate characters Lloyd will rope into making an appearance. This year, there wasn’t a guest more unexpected than Paul, a producer on Ghost Rider, the visual effects producer on Karate Dog (!!!), and the man responsible for a number of upcoming “is that really necessary?” video game adaptations, including Castlevania and Tekken. What, exactly, was this guy doing on what Kaufman himself billed as “a panel of independent thinkers?” “I at one time was Steven’s teacher,” Kaufman boasted. “So there’s a little bit of Troma in the mainstream world!”

    Maybe more than a little bit. Seated on the far end of the table was Mark Neveldine, co-writer/director of the budding Jason Statham franchise, Crank. “You’ll have to excuse me, because this is the first panel I’ve been sober for,” Neveldine cracked with pitch perfect post-frat bravado––now that nerds are inheriting the earth, an awful lot of them look and sound suspiciously like recurring characters on Entourage. What’s this guy’s connection to Kaufman? He’s apparently Troma’s most dedicated plagiarist.

    “If you’ve seen Crank, you’ve known that I’ve stolen bits from Toxic Avenger, Terror Firmer, Tromeo and Juliet,” Neveldine says. And Poultrygeist, Kaufman’s recent fast food satire, which has been a minor hit in the cities brave enough to book it, is Neveldine’s “favorite film of like the past four years.” Neveldine even repaid his debt to Kaufman by casting the older filmmaker in both Crank 2 and his upcoming Game. Commenting on his late-in-life surge as a wanted actor (IMDb lists 20 credits for Kaufman for 2008 alone), Kaufman crowed, “That’s the benefit of having lips like a woman.”

    Neveldine came back: “And the ass of a 4 year old.”

    Lloyd beamed. “There’s the Troma influence!”

    Hammering home the fact of his DIY cred, Neveldine then brags that Crank 2 was shot on prosumer cameras––which, he says, are “bitchin’.” “I think everyone should grab one and go be a filmmaker.”

    What else you got, Lloyd? “We have some footage of Toxie, in Baghdad,” Well then! “Obama just came back, and Toxie was with him.”

    After a tech snafu––during which Lloyd grabs a loose A/V cable and mimes plugging it into his asshole––we’re introduced to the highlight of this year’s panel. Toxie in Iraq, a four-minute short (filmed in Patriot-Color!) that’s equal parts Troma propaganda and satire on war propaganda.

    “The Toxic Avenger windsurfs across the earth, to the desert of despair, to  kick some radical Muslim ass! ” says the classic newsreel-esque narrator. “When a radioactive mop proves ineffective against the sandjockeys…Theres nothing like a big, honking bazooka to say, ‘We come in peace!’” The closing sentiment: “Thats right, Toxie, teach a lesson to the cut and run crowd! Let the red, white and blue hang high–just like Sadaam Hussein!”

    Just like all of Troma’s triumphs, it’s dirty and scrappy and completely brilliant in its obstinate stupidity. “Satire is an art form that we have nearly lost, and Batton [Lash, the cartoonist who recently featured Kaufman and Toxie in his serial Supernatural Law) and South Park are keeping it alive," said Kaufman. "The problem is that most of the public doesn't get it." When a Troma product is firing on all cylinders, it convinces you––however temporarily––that contemporary culture is what's really toxic, and the the only appropriate anecdote is fart jokes and horrible, horrible puns. There's something beautiful about that. Utopian. It wears off almost immediately, but every year when I'm in that Comic-Con room with Lloyd and his insanely mismatched posse, I really do believe that they've stumbled on to some sort of answer.

    It's probably for the best that Kaufman is not pie-eyed enough to share that belief. There's a reason why the panels are getting smaller, why there was no sign this year of Toxie himself or the infamous Tromettes: in this cultural climate, a company like Troma can hardly thrive when they're spending so much time and energy fighting for their right to merely exist.

    In regards to the dying indie retail landscape (which he memorably railed against in this YouTube clip), Kaufman said, "Form the Troma point of view, we're effed. The indie video stores are gone, and unfortunately, most of the chains don't want to hear from Troma and I think it's the same from other [truly indie] companies. And American television…” As he trails, off, Kaufman makes a face that tells us exactly what he thinks of that.

    Ultimately, the aged filmmaker who arguably invented viral movie marketing calls for us to put our money where our mouths are to support independent artists. “No theater wanted to play Poultrygeist, but the fans kept bugging them, and then it did very well, it was the #1 screen in the country the week it opened. It played eight weeks in NY. It had to move theaters, because Indiana Jones and the Skull Fucker came in, but it hung on for eight weeks!” Some dreams still do come true.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Comic-Con 2008: Terminator Salvation dir. McG, Can He Save Us From a Remake Apocalypse?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Aliens  (1986)

    The Terminator  (1984)

    Charlie's Angels  (2000)

    Children of Men  (2006)

    McG and Bryce Dallas Howard, “This is our new baby, we named him T-600 McG-Dallas-Howard.”

    The world of Terminator fandom let out a collective groan when the news was announced that McG, director of the Charlie’s Angels films, is at the helm of the upcoming Terminator Salvation. The film, the fourth in the more than twenty year-old franchise, stars Christian Bale as John Conner. Bale unfortunately did not join the rest of the cast in promoting the film at Comic-Con. There was a press conference immediately following the big announcement panel, and the star of the show, surprisingly, was director McG.

    When asked about the overall feel of the film, McG said, “I’m tremendously influenced by Children of Men, hat’s off to that picture, I think it’s fantastic… By the same token, this isn’t designed to be an art picture, it’s for audiences the world over, so you’ve got to find a balance between that artistic take and what’s right for a film to be seen by a great many people around the world.”

    Many fans are concerned that McG’s take will further derail the franchise, rather than improving upon the rather dismal third film. McG seemed more than prepared to address these fears, making explicit his interactions with James Cameron, the creator and director of the first two films. “I did not want to move forward on this picture if Jim were like, ‘**** you, what are you doing?’ It’s very simple, I would have acquiesced and said, ‘You’re right, you’re the creator of what this is, and I respect that.’ And he was very encouraging, we talked at length about the story, we talked about Sam [Worthington], and most particularly, we talked about his experience on Aliens, and the idea that you can’t live in fear, you’ve got to move forward.”

    At this point in the press conference, two things were clear: one, McG can really work a crowd, and two, he’s very tuned in to the concerns of the fans. His biggest obstacle is the public perception that he’s a cocky young Hollywood director-for-hire with a weird nick-name who gets big studio films because the producers are scared of risking money on someone with more “vision.” McG was surprisingly frank about his own track record, and even spoke candidly about earning his stripes on lesser appreciated films. “I’ve talked to Bryce [Dallas Howard] about how you’ve got to be on Happy Days before you can be the great Ron Howard. Maybe you’ve got to be Spicoli before you can be Sean Penn, and maybe you’ve got to do some time on 21 Jump Street before you can grow into the boots of Johnny Depp. There’s nothing wrong with paying your dues, and I’m certainly willing to pay mine.” It’s funny. Even though I really think he practiced that little speech in the bathroom mirror the night before, it still worked on me. I believed him, he’s a Hollywood director who’s working his way toward material that has more substance, and Terminator Salvation is looking like it could be quite substantial.

    At this point McG resorted to some minor theatrics. He pulled out a model T-600 head with glowing eyes (pictured above) and said, “This is where it all happens. Inside this, the CPU will represent the rise of the machines to a place of complete dominance. We’re heading towards that place very rapidly, day in, day out. I’m looking at all the open laptops, I’m looking at all the digital cameras. All these things are very new, and just getting faster and more intuitive and more intelligent all the time.” At that point I started to become scared of my MacBook. This guys is really good. He’s like a snake-oil salesman, and I’ll admit it, I was buying hook line and sinker.

    Indulging this thread of promotional paranoia, a reporter asked if he thought the rapid pace of technological advancement was a good thing. He said, “Who here would suggest that humanity is in great shape?” An awkward pause fell over the room. Eventually nervous laughter filled the void, at which point something rather surreal happened. Bryce Dallas Howard, cheery and charismatic daughter of Ron Howard, started to laugh really loudly. Like a crazy cackle. She was probably laughing at the silence like the rest of us, but to me it seemed like she was some sort of sick Judgement Day Angel of Doom, chuckling as humanity plummeted into a hopeless apocalypse of which she was immune.

    Meanwhile, McG continued evangelizing against the machines, “Where does humanity begin and the machine world end? We can deconstruct the human genome so if your dad had high blood pressure your kid doesn’t have to. That’s kind of scary and amazing … Think about how much more quickly a computer can make a decision than our human mind can. And should that computer become aware, who knows?”

    I will go see Terminator Salvation as soon as it comes out, but I will also be terrified that the digital projector will find a way to kill me before the movie is over.

     


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog