Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Godard by Brody, x2 in NYT

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Why has the NY Times published two reviews of Richard Brody’s Jean-Luc Godard bio Everything is Cinema––less than two weeks apart, and two months after the book hit store shelves? Are film critics really so lacking in ways to fill their time that the Times has taken pity and allowed them just publish whatever at their leisure?

    I know, I know––too far. I retract. It just seems odd that the paper would give space to two pieces of criticism on the same thing, from two critics whose overall take on the thing seems to be not so far away from a shrug. At least the two reviews seem to enter the text from slightly different angles… Stephanie Zacharek, whose review was published July 13, took Brody to task for taking Godard’s later output too seriously, for giving his avant garde provocations an A for effort without spelling out the implied, “But, you know…a lot of that shit is just plain unwatchable.” This is an argument against a biographer incorporating his own soft spots in his historical argument. Which is fine, but the promotion of Godard’s lesser-seen films doesn’t seem like terribly dangerous, and Brody’s book has bigger problems

    Today’s piece, by Jeaninne Basinger (one of my favorite classical Hollywood historians, it must be said), ultimately gives the book a pass as being worth it for “the journey”––pretty much what Brody says of Godard’s post-1970s filmmaking––but she still can’t resist poking fun at the filmmaker called a “gasbag” by Zacharek. “If Mr. Godard were not a genius, he would be a college sophomore,” she says in an aside on his wilfull inscrutability. But rather than focus on Brody’s taste-based mistakes, she concentrates her energy on deflating his most laughable assertion: that Godard “has become almost forgotten.”

    In whose universe? The world of commercial cinema or the multiplex was never his territory, yet Madonna was quoted in Vanity Fair in May as claiming that her new iTunes film “was seriously influenced by Godard.” Surely this means there’s still some meaning to his name, even if the quoters might not be sure what it is.

    This is a pretty instructive observation: Godard’s actual work may not have become absorbed into pop cultural wall paper to the extent of something like Taxi Driver or Pulp Fiction or any of the other films it inspired, but the idea of Godard lives on as a badge of fashion for intellectual dilettantes. This is probably what Brody’s really getting at, even though he doesn’t articulate it: the idea that anyone thinks they know enough about Godard to get away with casually referencing him is a huge obstacle to his films actually being watched and for a serious conversation abotu them to be revived.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Random Guy at Comic Con. Clip of the Day

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Dark Knight  (2008)

    If you’re attending Comic-Con this weekend, don’t worry about missing out on any of the big events. Chances are, the random people in your vicinity are just as cool. Thanks to YouTube, just about any of the convention attendees may be minor celebrities. Take for instance Michael Agrusso and Brinna Li, the duo behind the hugely popular YouTube Channel appropriately named ItsJustSomeRandomGuy, which a New York Comic Con press release referred to as “a genuine internet superstar.” You’ve probably seen their videos, at least here on SpoutBlog, which feature Marvel and DC character action figures in brilliant parodies of the “I’m a Mac; I’m a PC” commercials.

    Speaking of which, last week they had another excellent episode satirizing the huge buzz over The Dark Knight. After that films gigantic opening, though, I’m a bit surprised there’s not a response from the Iron Man and Spider-Man figures. But I guess maybe they’re too busy with Comic-Con plans (Agrusso and Li, I mean, not Iron Man and Spider-Man).

    Anyway, as you can read in the video, ItsJustSomeRandomGuy is one of probably many webcelebs without an official presence on the convention floor, either in panel or booth form. So, if you’re like me and are a fan of the videos, keep your eyes peeled for them and say, “Hello.” And since I’m not attending, give them a hug from me, while you’re at it.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Netflix Gets Out of Production, IndiePix Gets In

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Last night, I started getting emails regarding Netflix’s decision to shutter their Red Envelope Entertainment division, which invested in co-productions, partnered with larger distributors such as Magnolia and IFC to give their acquisitions a boost, and acquired indie films for theatrical distribution on their own. Over 100 films were released under Rev Envelope since it sprung up in 2005, including a number of press darlings and minor hits such as 2 Days in Paris and The Puffy Chair. Hacking Netflix reported last night that Netflix would only be letting 4 employees go in the course of Red Envelope’s dissolution; this morning, indieWIRE pegged the number at 5, which was the entire division, including executive Liesl Copeland.

    The problem seems to be that Red Envelope forced Netflix to essentially compete against the Hollywood studios, indie arms and legit indies who supply the bulk of their content. Netflix will now focus its energy on moving content from those sources into digital distribution pipelines. Which will be awesome, once they finally broker a deal with Apple so that you and I can watch their G-D movies on our MacBooks and iPhones…

    Meanwhile, a related (if inverse) story broke at roughly the same time, concerning IndiePix.The digital and DVD distributor of indies and docs announced at BritDoc yesterday that Ryan Harrington, formerly of A&E Indie Films and thus an executive producer of huge-profile docs such as American Teen and Jesus Camp, will be heading the new Indiepix Studios, where he’ll exec the doc and narrative productions that company has invested in, as well as manage broadcast sales. In this indieWIRE story, Harrington notes  IndiePix’s “amazing technology that allows a person to download to own, and it can be burned onto DVD that is ‘DVD quality,’ and while that may be what they’ve been most known for, the company has been gradually upping its investments in films for awhile, most successfully with Billy the Kid.

    So: a company previously dedicated to digital delivery seriously expands into production just as a company with documented successes in co-production and distribution gets out of those rackets in order to focus purely on digital delivery. Once again, the restructuring of the indie film realm defies easy trend-izing, as all of us stand around throwing stuff at the wall and waiting to see what sticks.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Comic-Con Looms, Internecine Blog Warfare Follows

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Remember that interview that Variety EIC Peter Bart gave MTV in June, responding to the “boycott” of his publication by a handful of fanboy sites who insisted that the trade had repeatedly failed to properly credit their “scoops”? Variety’s Anne Thompson resurrected the debate and the Bart quote this morning in a blog post pegged to Comic-Con, where a gang of outlets of various sizes––including us––will be fighting to post the same material at the same time. If my post about The Watchman goes up 20 seconds after Cinematical’s, will I get in trouble for not giving them “credit” for “breaking” the story? What’s the netiquette??!!???

    She’s mostly looking at the divide between a “legit” outlet like Variety and the independently run sites like Film School Rejects, but I think Anne makes some good points about this stuff not being the black-and-white matter of thievery that some of the sites would like to believe. As far as I’m concerned, this is the key part of her piece:

    It’s not always cut-and-dry–sometimes everyone is chasing the same news and a given reporter may not be aware of what has broken online. A reporter isn’t always tracking down where something broke first, just the story itself.

    On the one hand, in saying that a Variety reporter tracking a story may not even know that it “broke” online, the implication is that Variety reporters have better things to do than obsessively read every little junket jockey’s blog looking for “scoops” to “steal.” Not something the puffed-up boys of the blogosphere want to hear, perhaps, but maybe not unreasonable.

    But the story also points to a difference in approach between the blogger and the journalist. Thompson notes that, in the case of the Collider/300 sequel incident that motivated the boycott, the Variety reporter dug up extra information that made the initial report richer and more valid. This is what bloggers do every day––taking over where one of us left off and taking things further––but when we do it, tracking the bread crumbs back to the start of the meme and being transparent about the trail is part of the process.

    At least, it is for good bloggers.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Hot in the City: Body Heat

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Body Heat  (1981)

    If there’s one film that epitomizes the power of environment over libido, it has to be Lawrence Kasdan’s directorial debut, the totally-80s noir Body Heat, which takes place during a Florida heat wave (does it get any hotter than that?) In fact the balmy weather is a character unto itself, so much so that Kasdan’s production designer Bill Kenney should have gotten top billing right along with the spectacularly sexy duo of William Hurt as smalltime lawyer Ned Racine and Kathleen Turner as the femme fatale Matty Walker, out to wield him as a weapon for murdering her wealthy husband. Never a moment goes by where the third character of heat and humidity isn’t enveloping the pair in a passionate ménage a trois.

    And never does a fry-an-egg-on-the-pavement summer in NYC go by when I don’t wonder why one of our many outdoor screenings doesn’t showcase this perfectly paced, edge-of-your-seat engrossing film. It can’t be because of any racy sex scenes since Kasdan shoots rather chastely, with the camera cutting away before anything explicitly raunchy occurs. Instead he chooses a lot of close ups of Matty’s orgasm-chasing face, Ned’s hands squeezing her butt cheeks and parting her legs, a couple of gratuitous glimpses of Turner’s tits, but that’s about it. (Bunuel’s erotic classic L’Age d’Or with its toe fellatio scene at the end is way more pornographic than anything Kasdan puts onscreen.) What’s so palpably sizzling is nothing less than the chemistry between the equally matched (in talent and animal sexuality) Hurt and Turner who, even while bantering double entendres fully-clothed, create enough buzzing electricity to counter a blackout.

    Kasdan announces his intentions straight from the start with a sultry saxophone score over the credits, which dissolve into a bonfire. Hurt’s Ned has just finished screwing a **** buddy who complains that it’s so hot that she just stepped out of the shower and is sweating again. “Is it still burning?” she wants to know as Ned ignores her in favor of the view from the window, the flames greedily engulfing the property across the way. From the shiny foreheads to the shots of ubiquitous fans and air conditioners, everyone from Ned’s colleagues (including a delightfully nerdy Ted Danson) to Mickey Rourke’s petty criminal (what else would he play?) is literally feeling the heat, talking about it like it were a mother-in-law on her yearly visit round to drive you mad. When Ned and Matty first meet on that sweltering summer evening she asks him to buy her a “cherry” ice to cool off. Naturally Matty spills the cold treat right “over her heart,” and feigning the gentleman Ned immediately offers to get her something to wipe it up with. “You don’t want to lick it?” she taunts, startling him as he walks away. Of course, by the time he returns from the men’s room she’s disappeared into the heat of the night.

    When Matty and Ned inevitably run into each other again at the local bar the conversation turns to the devilish blonde’s lamenting over her wind chimes not ringing, due to the hot air in lieu of cool breeze. She admits to not being especially bothered by the fact that her temperature always runs a couple degrees high – “around 100” – all the time. Matty’s eyes are coy, Ned’s hungry, but they both know that he’ll discreetly follow her home to check out those “wind chimes.” When they reach the dripping-in-riches mansion, Kasdan’s camera teases us with a shot of Matty’s knockout long legs extending from her tight red skirt as she slides out of her car. Like an original 40s noir dame she lives for the game itself, and after showing the hot and bothered lawyer her chimes she curtly kicks him out, locking the glass door.

    As the disappointed Ned heads to his car, a fateful wind causes the chimes to start tinkling, intensifying his lust and soon he’s like a wolf on the prowl, trying to deduce a way in as Matty simply stares through the panes with a look of insatiable arousal that dares, “How far will you go to have me?” Like a dog on a leash Ned obeys her body language, breaks his way in with a chair. Fragile glass shattered, they make out like their immoral lives depend on it (in the shadow of yet another lazy ceiling fan, hovering in the upper left corner of the screen from a low angle shot), culminating in sex on the red-carpeted floor.

    And from here on out the dangerous liaison takes a turn for the wet with Ned and Matty’s bodies shot slicked with sweat or relaxed together in an ice filled tub. The humid haze of fog that surrounds Ned as he stares longingly at Matty’s house, her husband’s car standing like a sentinel in the driveway, is forever near. But all this steamy screwing is just foreplay for the big “M” of murder, as Matty and Ned go over the devious plan naked and entwined upon a satin-sheeted bed. Once Ned does messily dispatch with the not-so-good hubby (Richard Crenna in a dazzling performance) with a slab of wood, he falls back exhausted, a trickle of sweat streaming down his neck like a drop of blood.

    But it’s not until a scene after the ruthless lovers have been nearly caught (as a result of Matty’s greedily changing of the will) does it become apparent that the bedfellows of lust and murder have consummated their relationship. Lying naked on top of Ned, Matty begs for him to believe that she truly loves him, delivering her “I’m bad, I know I’m bad, I wouldn’t blame you if you left me” spiel, all the while slithering up his own unclothed torso. Matty has literally used sex – their screwing sessions dually serving as covert criminal meetings – to carry out homicide.

    And since “orgasm” has been reached there is nowhere to go but down. As betrayal and deceit poisons the intercourse ends – as does the heat (Kasdan does a remarkable job of incrementally reducing the sweat on faces while increasing those breezes that rattle the wind chimes). Yet in the very last scene of Matty lounging on an exotic island, an unidentified man offers, “It is hot.” Her simple reply of “yes” as she adjusts her chic shades lets us know that her temperature is still running way above normal. And she doesn’t seem to mind one bit. On second thought perhaps a summertime outdoor screening/sex party would be more apropos.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Batman Escapes! Trade Roughage 07/23/08

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Wendy and Lucy  (2008)

    • Oscilloscope, the fledgling distribution label spearheaded by the Beastie Boy formerly known as MCA, has picked up Kelly Reichardt’s Wendy and Lucy, which premiered at Cannes to raves from some but measured praise from me. It’ll open at Film Forum on December 10. If his boys don’t try to push Michelle Williams for an Oscar nod the same year her baby daddy has a posthumous nomination all but locked down, Adam Yauch needs to check his head.
    • People are still spending money they don’t have on a movie they don’t need. Also: Christian Bale says he didn’t hit his sister and mom, and London police released him yesterday after questioning. Does that mean he’ll show up at Comic-Con to promote his new Terminator movie?!!?? You’re a horrible person for even suggesting such a thing.
    • Ted Johnson has details on the many film oriented events happening at the Democratic National Convention next month––or, as he calls it, “the Sundance of politics.” I think I might go and cover them. Would you like that?
    • Sophia from Golden Girls, ie Estelle Getty, has died.
    • Blah blah blah the guy who made Hancock, blah blah blah something about Hercules…?

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog