Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Tour Spout | Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Deciphering Charlize Theron’s Role in ‘Hancock’ (Spoilers)

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Hancock  (2008)

    It’s been almost two weeks and Hancock has grossed almost $350 million, so it’s time to start the academic discussions — with spoilers, of course (anyone who wants to avoid knowing the “twists” should discontinue reading now). Maybe it’s just the film scholar in me, but I have been desiring a good analysis of the film’s allegorical meaning since viewing the less-than-perfect superhero movie last week. While others may feel that the movie is hardly worth reading into (especially over-reading, as I’ve always felt my M.O. to be) or that it’s too obvious that the first half is really about the role of the U.S. as a superpower, I’m nevertheless eager to figure it out.

    Basically, I’ve been wracking my brain trying to understand where the allegory goes, or was meant to go, once Charlize Theron’s character is introduced as Hancock’s super-powered wife. Does she somehow fit in with or in response to Hancock’s representation of America (the patriotic name, the eagle emblem on his uniform, etc.)? I’m still at a loss, but I’ve come up with 5 possibilities (some a lot less likely than others) for what screenwriters Vincent Ngo and Vince Gilligan intended for her character to be.

    1. The United Kingdom - So sue me if part of my reasoning is inspired by Theron’s role on Arrested Development, in which she also seemed to be harboring a secret from beau Jason Bateman (if only Hancock had stolen Jeffrey Tambor from Hellboy II, it could have been considered a reunion), but if Hancock represents America, then Mary (Theron) is some other superpower, right? I don’t recall any hints that she signifies the Soviet Union, so she must be a stand-in for the British. Is her desire to be a housewife representative of a desire by the British to no longer be a world-stomping empire? Is Mary’s defending of the French boy a nod to Britain-France relations in contrast to U.S.-France? But then is the movie also saying that the UK and the U.S. are less powerful when united together? History would say otherwise.
    2. Hillary Clinton - In at least two separate reviews, I’ve seen Will Smith/Hancock compared to Barack Obama. So, I guess that would mean Charlize Theron/Mary is Hillary Clinton, though of course the domesticated preferences don’t fit. Still, despite the fact that Hancock was mostly filmed before the heat of the Democratic race, I can see where the Hancock vs. Mary battle, after which both characters are weaker, could be a parallel for the Clinton-Obama fight for the nomination, which seemed to be harming the Democratic party overall. And I guess we should also assume that if Hillary is somehow chosen as Barack’s running mate, the team-up will be disastrous for them both.
    3. Womanhood - Like her African American counterpart, Mary represents the struggles of her kind throughout the world, throughout history. And whenever they were united, says their back story, they faced harsher discriminations. Of course, it’s a stretch that Mary is an allegorical representation of women’s rights, especially considering Hancock could barely be analyzed as representing civil rights. But there’s something there regarding the strengths of both race and femininity in time of political correctness, affirmative action, etc. And it also ties into the Clinton/Obama allegory since both candidates were so defined, respectively, by gender and race.
    4. White Womanhood - Margeaux Watson at Entertainment Weekly might not agree with the generality of #3, so just for her, here’s the specific. Because in the current issue of EW, Watson complains about the casting of Theron as yet another white love interest for a black leading man. Perhaps Watson would be okay with a Nia Long or Gabrielle Union being cast in the (hopefully) inevitable sequel, in which a black woman superhero/god/angel is discovered, and Hancock dates her until he discovers she’s the villain (which is what I had presumed Theron to be when going into Hancock).
    5. The Virgin Mary - Don’t you know that anytime a character is named Mary in a movie that she represents the mother of Jesus? Could a sequel reveal that Mary and Hancock have a child out there, one who is more superhuman than superhuman? Perhaps played by Keanu Reeves? I guess since the superduo are said to be 3,000 years old that they were around for at least a millennium before Mary, but Hollywood magic could always suggest that Mary was in fact around for a long time prior to her immaculate conception.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Goliath on IFC VOD

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Goliath  (2007)

    If you listen to this week’s episode of FilmCouch, you’ll hear me tell a sad story about why I no longer have my most beloved cable channels like Turner Classic Movies and IFC, and what happens to a girl when she’s hungover from her birthday party and is forced to lie on the couch all day without her premium channels (hint: it involves both Michael Ian Black and Kathy Bates. Be afraid.) But thankfully, I *do* still have the ability to pay Time Warner extra money for movies, so the next time I’m curled up in a fetal position on a Saturday afternoon, I’ll be able to watch David Zellner’s Goliath, which just debuted on IFC’s VOD-only Festival Direct service. Back at Sundance, Kevin Buist interviewed David and brother Nathan, and Joe Swanberg went shopping with them.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Raunchy Red-Band ‘Choke’ Trailer. Clip of the Day

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Choke  (2008)

    I knew the whole red-band fad would come to this: Fox Searchlight is promoting the latest trailer for its Sundance-pickup Choke as “the raunchiest red-band trailer EVER.” Well, I don’t know if I agree with the statement — maybe if Fox hadn’t censored the sex scenes with “Big Screen Only” banners — but something about this latest spot makes me more interested in the film. Could it be the nudity? Or the swearing? Or maybe it’s simply the greater exposure to the coarseness we’ve come to expect from Sam Rockwell. And here he appears more depraved than usual.

    On the film’s adults-only website (also available to kids who know how to pick the age-restriction locks), there are also four new promotional videos featuring strippers reading passages from Chuck Palahniuk’s novel, on which the movie is based. They’re pretty funny if you’re still into the dumb stripper stereotype (I prefer the smart MENSA strippers/porn stars like Asia Carrera, of course). Also on the site, you can kinda learn how to do the Heimlich Maneuver.

    Choke won a Special Jury Prize for its ensemble cast (including my current celebrity crush, Kelly Macdonald) at Sundance this past January. It opens in theaters nationwide September 26.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Spike Lee Continues Lobbying for Obama to Replace Jesus Christ

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Remember last month at SilverDocs, when Spike Lee declared that the election of Barack Obama would “change everything…it’s gonna be Before Obama, and After Obama”? He repeated himself virtually word-for-word at a press event last week at the Television Critics Association conference, where he showed up to shill his upcoming Kobe Bryant doc for ESPN. Lee also predicted that the candidate’s election will change Hollywood’s attitude about race, and argued vehemently against a SAG strike.  Some excerpts from the event, delivered to us by Kevin Kelly, follow after the jump.

    Q: In this age of Barack Obama and the country talking more about race, do you feel the entertainment industry is more open now than it has been in the past on subjects involving African-Americans?

    A: Well, I don’t know necessarily so, but I do think that this November – excuse me – he’ll take the oath January 20th. When that happens, it will change everything. It will change the whole dynamics. I think that is going to be the most historic moment – one of the most historic moments in American history, world history, and you’ll have to measure time by before Obama and after Obama. So I’m very excited. It’s an exciting time to be alive now, and I think that with him coming into this position it’s going to affect art, sports, everything. Everything is going to be affected by this seismic change of the universe.
    Q: How do you think it will affect film and television and maybe the changes that have already started to happen?

    A: Well, I think it’s going to affect it for the better because I think – I know for sure – I have been coming back and forth from New York to L.A. for 22 years to make films. The gatekeepers are not people of color, and that’s how things are going to change because there’s only a few people, we are talking about cable , network, and the studios, to decide what films are going to get made, what films don’t get made, what goes on TV, what doesn’t. And I think the biggest change will be when the change is reflected amongst the gatekeepers, the people that make those decisions.

    Q: You’ve been very outspoken about your desire to make a Jackie Robinson biopic yourself, and about the conditions under which such a biopic should be made. What are your thoughts about being on a panel with the biopic being made and you’re not involved?

    A: Well, I’ve been at peace for a long time. In fact, it’s not just Jackie Robinson. I have a trilogy of films I’ve tried to make back after Malcolm X, but nothing got made because of financing. Jackie Robinson was first; Joe Louis was second, and most recently was James Brown. In fact, I thought for sure that James Brown was getting made because I was coming after Inside Man. Inside Man made over – just under $300 million worldwide. So I thought, “Yeah, I’m in there,” but that wasn’t the case. So, you know, Rachel Robinson is a very dear friend of mine, and I want her to see this film. She wants this film made. I mean, she’s got to be 85. You know, up there. So she’ll be very happy when this film is made.

    I’m just going to be a real moviegoer like everybody else. You know, I’m happy that the film was getting made. I’m not the type of person saying, “If I can’t do it, F it.” That’s not the way I am. I’m glad it’s getting made, and it’s a great story, and it should be made. I’m happy that ESPN is doing it.

    Q: You’re in the unique position of seeing the union arguments from all different sides – you’re a producer, you’re a director, and you’ve acted in your own films – so you hold multiple cards. Can you weigh in on what you think is going on today in terms of the producers setting a deadline and the fact that they’re in these meetings later today to discuss it with the SAG leaders?

    A: Well, here’s the truth. I would say the majority of the people in SAG don’t work – the majority of the SAG members don’t work as actors. So it’s not really going to hurt them if they vote for a strike, but I hope it doesn’t happen because I think that – if you realize it’s not just when the writers were on strike, it’s not just the writers, it affects the whole industry. It does down to the person who does catering. It goes to the valet that parks the cars. If people aren’t working, they’re not going to go out to lunch, not going to come in and park their car. It affects everybody. And in this country economically, we’re in bad shape – people are losing their homes, their jobs. I mean, it’s terrible. So hopefully people won’t be selfish. I just think it should be worked out. Think that they need to read the newspapers and see the state of the economy and where we are as a country.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Hell and School. Trade Roughage 07/14/08

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    • Variety says Hellboy 2 “did hellacious business in debuting to an estimated $35.9 million.” This seems to be a compliment. Meanwhile, Meet Dave bombed, and Journey to the Center of the Earth made a very respectable $20 mil on just 854 3D screens.
    • Richard Linklater, Mike White and Jack Black will collaborate on a sequel to School of Rock, and it’s got what’s destined to rival Babe 2: Pig in the City for mockable sequel titles: School of Rock 2: America Rocks. Where’s the exclamation point?
    • Terribly Happy, a Danish crime film, took the top prize at the Karlovy Vary Film Festival over the weekend. Man on Wire took the documentary prize, and there was also a “special mention” for Bigger, Stronger, Faster.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

 


Advertisement