Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

Journey to the Center of the Earth With 5 Actors Who Shouldn’t Be Famous

Brendan FraserBrendan Fraser will be in two big mother movies this year, Journey to the Center of the Earth (opening Friday) and The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor. He belongs to a curious list of actors in Hollywood who keep showing up in big movies, despite the fact that they’ve never really made good on the promise of becoming good actors.

It goes like this: A young actor, in his/her first or second movie, shows so much promise they’re touted as The Next [insert famous actor name]. “Despite being only 19 years old, Brendan Fraser has exploded on the scene in School Ties blah, blah…” Then, in spite of of a string of movies like Blast From the Past, every single summer these actors show up in another overly hyped movie.

Below are five top call actors that inexplicably keep starring in big movies. In making this list I noticed a couple hallmarks to spot actors who fit the criteria. One, if they weren’t reading lines when we see them onscreen, you get the sense they’d sound dumb. Also, think about roles they’re famous for, then switch out–say–Ben Affleck as oil-driller-turned-astronaut in Armageddon with Brendan Fraser. Would the movie have really changed? At all?

Ben Affleck - I think there’s a lot of suspicion around how much he actually contributed to the Oscar winning screenplay of Good Will Hunting. Nonetheless, he’s got the Oscar and we’ll be seeing him play the All-American guy who can cry beer again in the star riddled, He’s Just Not That Into You.

Josh Hartnett - Here’s a common occurrence: A good looking guy is cast in a movie like The Virgin Suicides to play an insensitive, slightly dopey high school heart throb. Then, when said actor delivers so well in that role, people apparently think he’s acting.

Julia Stiles - I just don’t even understand how this one happened. In high school, she’d be the new girl everyone wants to hang out with until you actually hang out with her. With Ethan Hawke’s Hamlet and later O, there was a sort of “I can do Shakespeare” card trick that apparently still pays off. She’ll soon play Esther Greenwood in the adaptation of Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar (the equivalent of Josh Hartnett playing Holden Caulfield in Catcher in the Rye).

Ryan Phillipe - He got two shots to redeem himself with Gosford Park and Crash (along with runner up for this list, Matt Dillon), Ryan is best cast as “their father” to Reese Witherspoon’s kids.

Jon Voight - In case you’re thinking Brendan Fraser is the father of the inexplicably famous actor list, I present Jon Voight. For all the film-o-philes yelling, “Not Joe Buck! He was nominated for Midnight Cowboy!” I refer you back to the explanation in the first paragraph of this post, and also remind you that Marisa Tomei has an Oscar. I also offer the above clip that’s been on this blog before for your viewing pleasure.


Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

posted on Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:01 PM by SpoutBlog


Was this review helpful?
Yeah Yeah Nope Nope



Comment    Email me new comments.


pippin06
Posted Friday, July 11, 2008 8:27 AM

So why not include Marisa Tomei in your list of five? I agree with her and Brendan Fraser, and cautiously with Ryan Phillippe. Jon Voight has just had a hit-and-miss career. There are people like that. John Travolta case in point. For every Pulp Fiction, there's a Battlefield Earth. Is it because he's an overrated actor? I think that the choice of Voight was really random. Voight has had some horrible performances--not the least of which include siring Angelina--but she's got some talent herself, and she had to get it from somewhere. He's had some choice roles with convincing performances. He was great in Mission Impossible (the first one and the only good one), for starters. PS, all the movies I rattle off here are just off the top of my head in the morning before coffee, so I'm sure I could make larger lists, but I'm writing this under an undercaffeinated fog. I think the other three are guilty of choosing awful vehicles to showcase their talent; the movies (or the hack directors behind them) are kind of limited and, therefore, make the people with roles seem like the talent was overtouted. Also, in Affleck's case, the Oscar was won for screenplay, so that's not really indicative of acting talent, but I have examples on why I disagree with you with regard to him and the others: Dogma and Chasing Amy are two primary examples of good acting on Affleck's part. They are both Kevin Smith films, and they are both critically acclaimed Kevin Smith films (back when he still got acclaim). He's believable/convincing in both, as an angel with vengeance against God and a straight man earnestly in love with a lesbian. In Dogma, he's more believable than Damon, his angel partner-in-plenary-indulgence-crime. These movies came out just before and just after Good Will Hunting respectively. Now, he sucked in Jersey Girl, but that wasn't a great film (I mean, I think K.Smitty's to blame), and he's picked some really atrocious films most of his career that I don't think any actor could save (Reindeer Games? Armageddon? Gigli?). So I don't think it's fair to lambast Affleck, even though his personal choices make it so tempting. Julia Stiles is a great actress, and I wholeheartedly disagree with this one. 10 Things is a good little flick, sure, but she redeems some other films, like Save the Last Dance, which is overly contrived but still so addicting largely because she makes her character so sympathetic. Also, she was really good in Mona Lisa Smile, but that was a confusing movie by its very premise anyway, and she played the girl looking for a husband despite her gift for the law, so is she to blame? Josh Hartnett was one of my favorite parts of Sin City (when I otherwise wasn't thrilled with the flick). I think you might have just watched Pearl Harbor, since its two main stars appear here. And that was a snoozefest because of its horrible script. I really think it's perception combined with lousy films (as in, the whole thing is lousy). The difference is that people like Brendan Fraser and Ryan Phillippe and even Marisa Tomei were in films with potential, but their presence actually sunk the film to some extent (though I didn't mind Ryan in Gosford Park at all; I think that's a great film). Just my two cents.