Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Iraq Metaphors and Other Bondage Fantasies. SpoutBlog Week in Review

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

  • Friends and Money. BlogNosh 05/06/08

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    • The subject of today’s Friday Screen Test interview at DVD Panache is film blog hero David Hudson of GreenCine Daily. An excerpt, regarding something he learned from watching movies: “I’m going to have to be a little cryptic…I walked into the film in a state of torment, not even realizing that what was tearing me up was the need to make a decision. When I walked out, I realized that I was facing a choice that hadn’t been clear to me before. And I knew damn well which way I’d have to decide. And, sorry, but I’ll have to leave it at that. I will say, though, that, as is often the case is such situations, the movie wasn’t even a particularly good one!”
    • This Vanity Fair chart weirdly lumps Cannes in with a number of summer music events, including Coachella and the “Michigan Womyn’s Music Festival.” You’ll have to judge its accuracy for yourself, but I made it through ten days in the South of France without going near a yacht, a bellini nor cocaine. I swear.
    • Congratulations are in order for Friends of Spout David Lowery and Dia Sokol, whose feature projects (respectively: St. Nick and Sorry, Thanks; the latter stars another FoS, Wiley Wiggins) have been selected for IFP’s Independent Filmmakers Lab, which means they’ll also make the short list for a new $50,000 grant.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Kevin Smith: MPAA Made Us Pull Porno

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    About a week ago, a promo video started floating around for Kevin Smith’s upcoming Seth Rogen comedy, Zach and Miri Make a Porno. I didn’t write about it because, well, I have a hard time getting it up to care about new Kevin Smith movies. But I care about this! FilmDrunk alerts us to a post on Smith’s site, where the filmmaker explains that he was forced to remove the video from his production company’s movie news page because the MPAA insists on vetting all promo materials put forth by MPAA signatory companies, of which Porno’s distributor The Weinstein Company is one. An excerpt:

    Turns out all promotional material for any film financed/distributed by a signatory of the MPAA has to be signed-off on by the MPAA - including internet-only materials. I never realized this, as it’d never been a problem in the past: we’ve been doing ‘net-only teasers since Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back and nobody ever raised a red flag before (not even on the last flick, for which we also put up two ‘net-only teasers in advance of the rated trailer). But I guess since the teaser was so, shall we say, racy… a rating was in order.

    It’s obviously a bit of a shock that the MPAA is now in the business of rating web-only videos, but I guess if they have the jurisdiction to take down billboards, it’s not *that* surprising. But in this case, there’s a loophole: the video was also posted on this Guardian UK blog. It’s still there, and I can only assume that’s because England has its own ratings board, and the MPAA doesn’t have jurisdiction on the promotion of films outside of the United States. Is this our first glimpse at a post-ratings board future, where the universal nature of the internet renders any attempts to assert local standards of censorship meaningless?


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Adam Sandler Makes Us Dumber. Clip of the Day

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    My Fair Lady  (1964)

    Shampoo  (1975)

    Billy Madison  (1994)

    You Don’t Mess with the Zohan opens today, and it’s apparently a terrible waste. Boy, do I miss the days when Adam Sandler played stupid and immature rather than skilled and pretending to be gay. At least then it seemed okay that he was possibly making everyone in the room dumber just for having watched his movie. I guess it’s fair that with everyone else doing man-boy comedy these days Sandler is trying to do something with a hint of a political message, but personally I liked it better when he was the least mannish, most boyish man-boy to hit the screen since Jerry Lewis. Making shampoo and conditioner fight? Comedic genius, in my opinion. Making a modern day Shampoo? Not genius at all.

    Looking back at Billy Madison, possibly his least mature but most consistently hilarious feature, it now seems as though Sandler has gone through a My Fair Lady sort of transition. And just as with that musical I prefer Eliza Doolittle with a Cockney accent, with Sandler I prefer the gibberish. I also like when he sings in his movies, as in this other favorite clip from Billy Madison. So here’s an idea: cast Sandler as Eliza’s father, Alfred, in the just-announced film adaptation of the musical. I’d love to hear him sing “Get Me to the Church on Time,” and Mr. Doolittle isn’t meant to be the brightest bulb, either. And yes, before you leave that comment, Sandler is actually old enough to be Keira Knightley’s dad.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Sex and the City: Not Just For Rich White Chicks

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sex and the City  (2008)

    The most idiotic comment I’ve heard in reference to Sex and the City is, “Who wants to watch a bunch of old ladies having sex? Yuck.” (uttered by a 23 year old co-worker who looked like Wally Cleaver). The second most idiotic comment I’ve heard in reference to Sex and the City is, “That show’s just for rich white chicks.” What rot! There are armies of black women who adore the show and were doing cartwheels in anticipation of the movie. But there is some ambivalence, some trouble among the ranks…

    Susan Lyerly (comedian, 36)
    I’m very protective of the show because I was one of the first to really get into it. Most people got in on the second season. Back then, everybody was going for Ally McBeal. That was the hit at the time.

    The show completely changed the way I dress. Best I’ve ever looked in my life. Rich white people knew about stuff like Manolo Blahniks but I didn’t know about it ’til Sex and the City. Inside I feel like that hot, skinny blonde chick. Inside I’m Carrie, but the world doesn’t see that.

    Before, when you were over 30, you were supposed to dress like an old lady. Even those white Manhattan women dressed all drab like in a Woody Allen movie, khakis and bland colors. Style-wise, this show pushed everybody, I think, to take chances. It wasn’t just for young girls. Even the preppy chick on the show, they dressed her in interesting ways you wouldn’t expect from that kind of woman. Even the lawyer, Miranda, after they stopped dressing her so horribly, didn’t wear the typical stuff. It definitely made everybody think more about their wardrobe. You can still be fun even if you’re over 30. Back then on TV if you were 30, you were in the grave– but in the show they’re just beginning, which I think is how it really is in life. In our 20’s you’re all over the place. In your 30’s you’re just getting to know what you’re really about, want, will or won’t put up with.

    What about the, um… whiteness of the show?
    How many white friends do you have that are writers, curators, executives, whatever…? Not acquaintances, but real, true friends? It ’s just the way it is. New York is still pretty much segregated. Still, if the show were premiering now, there’d be more blacks in it.

    Why?

    Because people have started to realize now that black people have money. On TV you see P. Diddy, entrepreneurs. Not just the people who open the door for you. It’s not that kind of party anymore. Somebody must have complained.

    What do you mean, “complained”? And do you think putting Jennifer Hudson in the movie was a demographics thing?

    Well, I guess they never realized how many black people supported the show and when they did, they said, “Who’s the popular black of the moment? Jennifer Hudson!” If Halle Berry were the hot black right now, she’d be the secretary. It’s like when Salt and Pepa sang at that Frank Sinatra tribute, or when Jusin Timberlake presented an award to the O’Jays. As if he even knows their music–and the O’Jay’s were pissed!

    I appreciate the show or what it was and don’t try to make it more than it was. In a way, the people behind he show were being small-minded. But what about other minorities? I don’t know why black people would complain so much, because at least Miranda had a black boyfriend at one point.

    Blair Underwood.

    And Samantha had sex with one in one episode. That’s about as far as it would go in real life. New York City, for all its gays and liberation, is still segregated. What bothers me more is how we’re portrayed sometimes in these shows. There was one episode where the girls were waiting on line at a club and a black woman was there, all loud and cursing. The producers must have been, like, “Be black, be loud and curse.” But there should be a Sex and the City about black women in New York.

    What about that show with the bug-eyed daughter of Diana Ross?

    Girlfriends? That was LA. And it was a terrible show. Sex and the City is a great show. Girlfriends was, on some level, the black Sex and the City, but it was fake, a sitcom with a laugh track, where Sex and the City was real. The girls on Girlfriends didn’t even act like real black women. They were white women dipped in chocolate. The question isn’t, “Why not more black shows?” The question is, “Why not more real?”

    Janelle McNeil (Department of Health administrator, 19)
    My mother introduced me to the show, and that’s basically why I watch it now and why I want to see the movie. To me, they should show African-American women like that also. Why can’t it be us also? African-American women have that style, too. They should have given Jennifer Hudson a role as a professional woman, same as them, instead of being a secretary for Carrie.

    How have the show’s fashions influenced you? Shopaholism…?


    I’m not a shopaholic, I just like to shop. If I feel like treating myself, I will treat myself, but I don’t shop every day all day like the women on the show.

    But, still, don’t all the nice shoes and dreses take your breath away?
    It does take my breath away because I’m a female. I do love clothes. But I know I can’t live that lifestyle right now because I am young. But that’s what I’m working toward, that lifestyle.

    The problem I have is that they always portray white people to be like that and always portray young black people to be hood and like we’ll never amount to anything, never go far in life, but that’s not true. Even though my generation seems like it’s not going far, there are a lot of people around my age who really are trying to get into the same positions as those white people. I feel that America as a society, as a whole, shouldn’t just down black people because there are very intelligent black people out there, and the images that they show to these little kids is that white people are always the ones who are going to amount to something, they’re the ones who will make all the money. It’s not fair to our children. We’re in a very competitive world, and it’s not fair to them if we don’t show them something different.

    Annette Lathan (Teacher, 40)
    I watched Sex and the City once or twice, and it was diverting, entertaining. But as far as making unusual strides for black women, The L Word was the show to watch.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • When Back to the Future Nostalgia Goes too Far

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Look, I’m on the record: the first two Back to the Future films are my favorite blockbuster-and-sequel set of all time. And as maybe the most powerful cinematic treatment of the conflict between nostalgia (romance) and the true weight of history (responsibility) to come along since the dawn of the blockbuster era, it’s a no brainer that those of us who have seen it so many times that we could sing it like a song would look for new opportunities to wallow in our fandom. But somebody’s got to start imposing limits. Behold the following:

    Exhibit A: That Donnie Darko sequel that everyone’s mad about? One of its stars indicated to MTV News (via Indie Eye) that it’s actually more like a remake of Back to the Future 2. “It goes into all different dimensions, but it’s really about turning something around for somebody else, and being able to go back and have another chance…We just come back [in time] and change what happened in the first one.”

    …and the far more egregious Exhibit B: Whitney at Pop Candy alerts us to the news that ThinkGeek.com is selling a non-functional yet “movie accurate” replica of the Flux Capictor––for $249. In the movies, the Flux Capacitor is the plutonium-fueled gadget which makes time travel possible, but in real life, it’s apparently a glorified paperweight which makes shitty sweded Back to the Future remakes like the above possible. This is where normal, healthy nostalgia passes over to the point of capitalism-aided psychosis, and it just makes me sad.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog