Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Let’s Recycle! BlogNosh 06/30/08

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    • Some thoughts on Vanity Fair’s Bright Young Hollwood thing: the only people I recognize besides for Jonah Hill and the kids from The Wackness are on this page, but that’s because I don’t watch Gossip Girl, right? Also: is Kat Dennings, like, wearing a bat suit?
    • There are some things in No Country For Old Men that look a lot like things from Raising Arizona. Discuss.
    • Considering similar lines in Wanted and Jumper that each put the audience member in the unfavorable position of being condescended to by a pretty-boy unlikely action star, Glenn Kenny wonders, “Have screenwriters become so defensive/resentful on account of churning out quasi-nihilistic, faux-convoluted, graphic-novel-mytho-Babel tripe like this that they feel compelled to lash out at the audience that laps their nonsense up?”

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • War Inc DVD Release Delayed

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    War, Inc.  (2008)

    An addendum on this post noted that War, Inc, the satire co-written by and starring John Cusack which I loathed but which has become something of a surprise spring hit, was scheduled to come out on DVD tomorrow after just seven weeks in theaters. I wrote:

    War Inc['s DVD release] is notable only because First Look’s ridiculously tight seven week window from theatrical premiere to DVD street date looks, in retrospect, like another in a line of smart moves designed to capitalize on the film’s surprise cult appeal. Of course, the film’s box office potency faded as its release expanded, and if it had done less well in its first weeks, this would look a lot like a dumping, but that’s fodder for another, far more bitter post…

    Ah, but then the target moved: shortly after that post was published, I got an email from David Hudson informing me that the film’s DVD release has been bumped to October. The move happened apparently quite suddenly––a number of outlets have published reviews of the film in recent days, ostensibly pegged to the original DVD release date, as the film’s theater count stayed steady this past weekend. Box Office Mojo currently has the title up as a release for tomorrow, although Amazon has changed their sales page to reflect a new release date of October 14.

    So why the sudden switch? It could be due to a combination of a number of factors: the film is still doing sort of okay in theaters (though it doesn’t look like it has the legs to grow beyond its current count of 33 screens, it only dropped about 12% last week, to earn a per screen average about equivalent to that of certified summer sleeper The Visitor); there also may be a case to be made that it’ll be easier to sell DVDs of a political satire in the weeks immediately leading up to the election, than in relative lull in the campaign season (and a holiday week, no less).

    But the exact thing that looked sort of brilliant about the seven week window plan––that First Look would be able to capitalize on more or less organic serendipity about the film, due to the fact that Cusack’s tireless talking head campaigning on its behalf has sort of worked theatrically, and would thus not have to spend extra money on a campaign surrounding the DVD––now looks like money down the drain. If the DVD reviews to come out in the past week are any indication (Steve Erickson called War, Inc a lowest-common-denominator comedy, the equivalent of a Larry the Cable Guy vehicle for readers of The Nation“), the distributor will once again be forced to rely on creativity to sell their DVD in lieu of critical support. And creativity costs money.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • “Doesn’t anyone just f*** anymore?”

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Wanted  (2008)

    The Women  (2008)

    Sex and the City  (2008)

    Two quotes just popped out of my feed reader and clubbed me over the head; when I came to, I recalled a couple of other soundbites from my week in LAFF that sort of seem related. First, from David Poland’s eye-roll at “Tom & Jerry On Crack cartoon” Wanted:

    Wanted is more like the last of big budget porn, throwing around endless style along with massive fake boobs and enough smoke to choke a Scott. Guys still get off on it - guys can get off on anything that tells them it wants to get them off - but one simply has to wonder, “Doesn’t anyone just f*** anymore?”

    We’ll get back to that. First, a digression…

    When I was at LAFF, I met an famous gay filmmaker at a party, and he started cattily joking about how a certain extremely famous married actor and actress are always going on shows like Letterman and bragging about how they “love to have heterosexual sex.” The filmmaker said this couple had to be covering for one another’s secret gay life, because no one who is actually having heterosexual sex uses the phrase “heterosexual sex” to talk about it.

    The actress in question is, totally coincidentally, a costar in Diane English’s much-feared remake of The Women, for which Nikki Finke says she singlehandedly convinced Warner Brothers to quadruple their marketing budget. Her reasoning as to why an extra $20 million or so of ads is going to pay off:

    Forget about the merits of the movie: there’s potential for box office moolah stirred up by some savvy Sex-exploiting, Even if the movie is no good, it could reach SATC’s two-quadrant audience with ad slogans like: “If you loved Sex And The City, then you need to see The Women who started it all.” … I bet women eager for another pic about female friendships and upscale lifestyles and urban sex will open The Women for a $20+M weekend.

    Ah, the old “bad sex is better than no sex at all,” argument. Might be more feasible if English herself hadn’t, just days before at LAFF, a) implicated herself as Finke’s top informant, and b) announced that her back-up plan for the film involves the sloppy math-dependent invention of a “fifth quadrant” for gay men.

    So the boys get their porn, the girls get theirs, and if they decide they’ve already had enough this summer, gay men will be graciously offered the scraps. Everywhere you look, Hollywood’s asking us to shout our heterosexual impulses from the rooftops––or at least, funnel them into the box office, “even if the movie is no good.” To answer David Poland’s question: no, I don’t think they do.

    Related: the TCM newsletter that just arrived in my inbox informs that the original The Women will be airing on the cable channel at 10pm EST tomorrow night. Preview it above.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Mad Men on DVD

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    War, Inc.  (2008)

    The most notable DVD release of the week* has to be the first season of Mad Men, which hits the street tomorrow just in time for newbies to get caught up on the AMC series before season two premieres in late July (it’s been available on iTunes for quite some time). I went on YouTube looking for clips from my favorite episodes and found the above fan vid, which focuses on Betty Draper (January Jones), the miserable model-turned-housewife of mysterious ad man Don Draper. I love it, if for no other reason than that it really draws out the way the show takes mid-century cinematic archetypes and weds them to real-seeming, endlessly multi-faceted characterizations.

    This clip specifically highlights Mad Men’s Hitchcock allusions: the slate-gray, Madeline Elster-esque suit that Betty wears to therapy; Don’s spying, here symbolized by his employment of a home movie camera like something out of a cross between Peeping Tom and Rear Window; and my favorite, Betty’s fateful encounter with a flock of birds.

    Betty is clearly based on the typical Hitchcock blonde-in-peril, a cool, vaguely shallow but anxiety-plagued beauty on the run from some kind of terror. Betty rocks the porcelain face with the furroed bros as well as Grace Kelly or Tippi Hedren, but she’s got virtually nothing tangible to fear (with the possible exception of her husband’s infidelities, but it’s made pretty clear that she’s certainly not the only girl on the block with that thorn in her domestic side) beyond her own sadness. She’s also got nowhere to go but the supermarket, and her only outlets for her tensions are sexual fantasies about door-to-door salesmen and a really weird relationship with the young son of the local single mom. It’s like a hypothetical sequel to North By Northwest, where Cary Grant’s character goes back to his normal work life in Manhattan and Eva Marie Saint’s moves into his suburban split-level and starts taking care of his kids. No wonder Betty drinks during the day.

    *Unless you count War Inc, which is notable only because First Look’s ridiculously tight seven week window from theatrical premiere to DVD street date looks, in retrospect, like another in a line of smart moves designed to capitalize on the film’s surprise cult appeal. Of course, the film’s box office potency faded as its release expanded, and if it had done less well in its first weeks, this would look a lot like a dumping, but that’s fodder for another, far more bitter post…


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Quantum of Solace Trailer. Clip of the Day

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Batman Begins  (2005)

    Casino Royale  (2006)

    The Dark Knight  (2008)

    If Sony’s looking to woo the people who loved Casino Royale, shouldn’t they have put all the action shots up front? Or am I the only guy who thought the last Bond film was a little underwhelming after that awesome opening chase sequence? Considering its ranking as the second best (as far as critics are concerned) action movie of this decade, I’m probably in the minority, but I was honestly bored throughout most of the movie.

    Fortunately, Quantum of Solace looks like it might have a little more action. It’s the usual 007 movie stuff — lots of running, speedboats, hand to hand combat — but better familiar spectacle than extensive poker sequences. And so, just as I’m super-excited about The Dark Knight despite being a little bored with Batman Begins, I’m looking forward to Bond 22 despite my feelings about the previous installment.

    The big difference between the two sequels, however, is that in Quantum of Solace, the good guy will probably be more interesting than the bad guy. But since we don’t really see much of Mathieu Amalric in this trailer, it’s too early to say that for sure.

    After watching the above teaser, go back, as I have done, and look at the original teaser for Casino. Notice any similarities? The first half is all serious, with Judi Dench as M dominating the audio. Then, in the second half, there’s a ton of action footage. Most of which is from the film’s opening sequence. Let’s hope the good stuff from the QOS teaser is a little more spread out.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Anti-Strike Activism From Temp X

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Have you been following The Hollywood Temp Diaries? It’s an anonymous Blogger blog with the tagline, “I am one of those barnacles on the hull of the good ship ‘Hollywood.’ These are my stories.” Good stuff, especially if you subscribe to that dirty secret that most Hollywood jobs are just as glamorous and exciting as, like, working anywhere else. The blog’s author, known only as Temp X, has been drawing a direct line between the impending SAG strike and total global apocalypse for awhile. A couple of days ago, s/he posted a “videotorial” to hammer home her/his case, and for people like me who haven’t been able to get it up to care much about an actor’s strike, it’s the perfect vehicle for impressing the seriousness of the situation. More here.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog