Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • THINKFilm Not Releasing Momma’s Man

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Momma's Man  (2008)

    Anthony Kaufman brings news that THINKFilm has given up distribution rights on Azazel Jacobs’ Momma’s Man to Kino International. THINK announced their acquisition of the film in early March, about six weeks after the film was unveiled at Sundance.  Just last week, THINK’s Mark Urman told Kaufmann that they planned on going through with the release of both Momma’s and Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired, saying that if the company “didn’t think we could get what they deserve, I wouldn’t be proceeding with them. These films are not cash-intensive films. These films will get everything they need.” No word yet on whether or not the troubled company still thinks they can give Marina Zenovich’s doc what it deserves.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • LAFF: Finishing Heaven

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Finishing Heaven begins in a bodega. A tall, thin, older woman with fire engine red dyed hair and a drawn face saunters to a table in the back of the deli section to greet a shifty-looking mustachioed character with whom she is clearly very well acquainted. They kiss hello, and almost immediately fall into an argument about matters that date back nearly four decades. it’s a bizarre scene, for a lot of reasons, but initially, I couldn’t get beyond the setting: why are these two doing this in a bodega? They didn’t come for the food––she walked in with a half-empty venti Frappucino, and a wide shot reveals that the deli’s heat lamp trays are empty, thus signifying that it’s either very early or very late. If you were to meet an old lover to argue about old Warhol superstars and reminisce about Max’s Kansas City, would you really do it in front of the soft drink case at your circumspect corner grocery?

    Director Mark Mann presents us this scene with judiciously inserted explanatory on-screen titles, through which we learn that the man’s name is Robert Feinberg, and the woman’s is Ruby Lynn Reyner, and the two were a couple in the 70s and are now reuniting for the first time in over 30 years to talk about finally making some progress on Heaven, a film which he directed and she starred in but he never finished editing.  In spite of this exposition, overall it feels like we’re being thrown into a fire, and it’s exciting––sometimes you see things happening in Manhattan that you can’t quite explain and simply must accept, and you come to understand that it’s just one of the ways that the city humbles you into acknowledging that you do not control the universe. But then we cut to an exterior shot of the deli’s incongruously sunny exterior, and a title slowly fades up at the bottom of the screen: “Formerly Max’s Kansas City.”

    It’s a laugh line, but it’s also an object lesson in how the director will proceed to tell this story. He asks us to jump straight in to one aspect of his subjects’ lives, and just as we think we have a handle on what’s going on, he pulls out and unpacks another box, unveiling a further facet of who these people are and what their relationship is all about. It’s a film that, on the top level, is about two extreme personalities trying to finish a film, but on a deeper level, it’s about the way lives slip out of control, dreams slip out of reach, and the incredible way that massive egos can take repeated beatings and continually bounce back, worse for wear but still resillient.

    “I was really, like, a boy wonder,” Feinberg brags, explaining how he came, at the age of 22, to shoot 16 hours of “beautiful” 16mm footage under the tutelage of Martin Scorsese. It was 1970, and Feinberg and the then-gorgeous performance artist Reyner were “the Romeo and Juliet” of lower Manhattan. They met at Max’s; it was a one night stand that lasted five tumultuous years, all sex and art and fury and heroin in a halcyon swirl. But of course such beautiful horror couldn’t last––as Reyner put it during the film’s Q & A here last night, the couple was in Italy when Robert “said, ‘I’m leaving you and going to Brazil with another woman.’ And I helped him pack.”

    37 years later, Feinberg still has the footage, and it’s still unedited. The cans of films are just another lump of stuff in his hoarders paradise of a Northern California shack, ignored while Feinberg spends his days mopily chain smoking through various odd jobs. He’s fallen far from the days of boyish wonder. “I’m basically unemployable,” he deadpans. “I’m really happy when I get through the day and I haven’t fucked up too bad.”

    Reyner, though visibly ravaged by years of hard living, is doing a little bit better in terms of spiritual confidence, but her insistence that Feinberg move back to New York and finally finish the film isn’t an act of charity: for both of them, everything that’s happened since she helped him pack that suitcase has taken them further and further away from both their youthful dreams of art stardom and the notion of all-consuming love. Finishing Heaven isn’t really about finishing Heaven as much as it’s about the idea that most of us really only get a handful of really good years, where possibilities seem infinite and we can actually just live without hearing a clock ticking or falling into a pit of regret. And when those years run out, you can either deal with it and recalibrate your life expectations, or you can spend the rest of your life fetishizing that hottest moment. Robert and Ruby have been doing the latter, and as mortality starts to creep in to Ruby’s life, Heaven becomes a symbol of her desperate but also kind of heroic need to recapture that moment, even if remotely, even if just for a little while.

    But of course, Ruby and Robert aren’t in control of this document, and Mann and producers David and Laurie Gwen Shapiro aren’t in the charity business, either. It took Feinberg forty to years to figure out what he had in those film cans, and similarly, I’m not quite convinced that the filmmakers know exactly what they have here. The press notes reference the fact that the director and the producers had quite a bit of strife along the way to last night’s world premiere. They obviously think this is an important part of the story of the film if they’re going out of their way to let journalists in on it, but it complicates the already problematic issue of what this film is really about, where its meat is, what’s really at stake. The weight of the thing isn’t coming from Heaven, because Mann doesn’t work hard enough at convincing us that it would be a tragedy if it went unfinished. It seems clear that the director, the sibling producers, and each of the subjects are each trying to capitalize on this beast from their own individual corners armed with entirely self-serving agendas, but this battle between opportunists is just a lot less interesting than the story of Ruby and Robert’s lives as seen on screen.

    Ultimately, I wonder if my favorite thing that Finishing Heaven manages is even on the agenda of its makers. At first, it seems like it’s going to be a sort of remarriage comedy––as if finishing Heaven is just a pretense for these two starcrossed odd balls to get back together––but it ends up going much deeper. Mann slowly, carefully reveals that Ruby and Roberts lives just end up being too organically complicated to hew to the facile cliches of the crowd-pleasing relationship doc. Finishing Heaven, in its way, becomes a post-mortem on both romance and youthful romanticism, a bittersweet accounting of the havoc wrecked on fates by the passage of time.

    A “work in progress” screening of Heaven, now titled Heaven Wants Out, will take place here at LAFF on Saturday night. More info here.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • 10 Most Critically Acclaimed Action Movies of the Past 10 Years

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Over the weekend, Wanted had a 100% fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes.com. It’s since gone down to 81% (at the time of this writing — and with top critics it’s down to 67%), though that’s still pretty good for a movie that initially looked like just another Matrix knockoff.

    But will the good reviews make for great box office? Last night, while viewing the latest trailer in a theater with some friends, I mentioned that Wanted was receiving great reviews. Nobody believed me at first, and then they didn’t care; they still thought it looked terrible.

    Good reviews rarely help an action movie, and bad reviews rarely deter audiences from seeing them. However, if we look at the top 5 most critically acclaimed action movies, it’s clear that people do often prefer a good action film to a bad one. The next 5, on the other hand…

    1. The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King (2003)
      Rotten Tomatoes’ “T-Meter” score: 94% (top critics: 98%)
      All Time Domestic Box Office Rank: #9 ($377 million)
      Sample Critic Quote: “The film event of the millennium.” (Richard Corliss, Time)
      My Analysis: In terms of both reviews and gross, it is possible that, yes, this final LOTR film was the film event of the millennium only three years in. It even won the Oscar for Best Picture, as well as ten other Academy Awards. However, we do have a few hundred years left, and Corliss’ assessment is likely to be challenged one of these centuries.
    2. Casino Royale (2006)
      Rotten Tomatoes’ “T-Meter” score: 94% (top critics: 95%)
      All Time Domestic Box Office Rank: #133 ($167.5 million)
      Sample Critic Quote: “This is the best James Bond film in at least 17 years, and Daniel Craig might be the best 007 … ever.” (Eric D. Snider, EricDSnider.com)
      My Analysis: Most critics and audiences agreed that this was one of the best 007 films ever and that Craig was at least the best Bond since Connery. Still, it only grossed a mere $7 million more than Die Another Day, which was certified rotten by RT.
    3. The Bourne Ultimatum (2007)
      Rotten Tomatoes’ “T-Meter” score: 93% (top critics: 97%)
      All Time Domestic Box Office Rank: #62 ($227.5 million)
      Sample Critic Quote: “It is probably the best action films to date that doesn’t involved so much special effects.” (Wilson Morales, BlackFilm.com)
      My Analysis: I agree that it’s the best of the series and one of the best action movies in years, maybe even best to date not involving special effects, as Morales says. But really the only reason that Ultimatum is higher up on the b.o. charts than The Bourne Identity and The Bourne Supremacy is because people took awhile to get into the series, with many of Ultimatum’s audience having seen the previous two for the first time on DVD. Still, along with both Return of the King and Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, it’s one of the rare threequels that earned the highest gross of its series. Considering Return, that says one thing, while considering Indy, that says something else.
    4. Spider-Man 2 (2004)
      Rotten Tomatoes’ “T-Meter” score: 93% (top critics: 95%)
      All Time Domestic Box Office Rank: #10 ($373.6 million)
      Sample Critic Quote: “[It's sure to] join the upper echelons of action movies like Raiders of the Lost Ark, The Empire Strikes Back, and Die Hard.” (Jeffrey Overstreet, Looking Closer)
      My Analysis: If this sequel were switched in ranking with its predecessor (see below), it might say something more about reviews equaling revenue, but otherwise between the two installments, there is evidence that good superhero movies will perform better than bad ones. Just don’t pay any attention to Spider-Man 3, which is also pretty close on the b.o. charts, but which is pretty far below in RT ranking (62%, whole; 44%, top critics).
    5. Iron Man (2008)
      Rotten Tomatoes’ “T-Meter” score: 93% (top critics: 92%)
      All Time Domestic Box Office Rank: #26 ($305.9 million and counting)
      Sample Critic Quote: “It’s the best movie of its kind since the second Spider-Man movie four years ago.” (Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle)
      My Analysis: Fitting to LaSalle’s quote that Iron Man is just behind Spider-Man 2, and with only another $70 million to go in order to be just behind it on the b.o. chart. Unfortunately, as far as ticket sales show, it’s really only the best movie of its kind since the third Spider-Man movie one year ago.
    6. Spy Kids (2001)
      Rotten Tomatoes’ “T-Meter” score: 92% (top critics: 96%)
      All Time Domestic Box Office Rank: #309 ($112.7 million)
      Sample Critic Quote: “To sum up, if you want your children to someday appreciate the true art of cinema, Spy Kids is a terrific movie to start with.” (Bob Strauss, Los Angeles Daily News)
      My Analysis: If by “true art of cinema” Strauss means the kind of action movies that receive good reviews, then he’s right. Film critics love the well-directed spy movies (see #2 and #3). As for kids, they don’t care about reviews, which explains why Alvin and the Chipmunks made almost double what Spy Kids grossed.
    7. Out of Sight (1998)
      Rotten Tomatoes’ “T-Meter” score: 92% (top critics: 90%)
      All Time Domestic Box Office Rank: #1,395 ($37.6 million)
      Sample Critic Quote: “In a summer filled with mega-hyped disappointments, Out of Sight proves the undeniable value of story, characterization, and — most of all — intelligence.” (Mike McGranaghan, Aisle Seat)
      My Analysis: The mega-hyped disappointments of that summer include Godzilla, which made about $100 million more than this film. Of course, Out of Sight isn’t really an action-packed action movie, and it only starred George Clooney, who despite being a huge movie star has never really been that big a box office draw. Meanwhile, 1998’s biggest box office winner, the more-action-packed Saving Private Ryan (which RT apparently doesn’t consider to be an action movie), was also one of the five best-reviewed films of the year.
    8. Hot Fuzz (2007)
      Rotten Tomatoes’ “T-Meter” score: 90% (top critics: 92%)
      All Time Domestic Box Office Rank: #2,029 ($23.6 million)
      Sample Critic Quote: “Hot Fuzz is everything an action-comedy should be. It achieves through parody what most films in the genre can’t accomplish straight.” (Nathan Rabin, The Onion A.V. Club)
      My Analysis: The best action buddy comedy in ten years, yet it’s gross is hardly comparable to the box office success of the Rush Hour movies, Bad Boys II, Lethal Weapon 4 and … Starsky & Hutch? Even Jimmy Fallon’s Taxi performed better domestically.
    9. Rescue Dawn (2006)
      Rotten Tomatoes’ “T-Meter” score: 90% (top critics: 88%)
      All Time Domestic Box Office Rank: #3,970 ($5.5 million)
      Sample Critic Quote: “A potentially commercial audience-pleaser that retains all of the characteristic Herzog complexity and nuance, Rescue Dawn is an electrifying action adventure that clamps your nerves with jaws of steel.” (Rex Reed, New York Observer)
      My Analysis: Too bad more moviegoers don’t read Rex Reed, because that’s a mighty good sell. Unfortunately, Rescue Dawn suffered a double blow because of who directed it. Critics certainly overpraised it, just because it’s an Herzog film; audiences likely avoided it because of the same reason (not by name, but had it opened bigger right away, audiences wouldn’t have even noticed the art house connection and might have gone to see the new action movie starring “Batman”).
    10. Spider-Man (2002)
      Rotten Tomatoes’ “T-Meter” score: 90% (top critics: 85%)
      All Time Domestic Box Office Rank: #7 ($403.7 million)
      Sample Critic Quote: “Let the gauntlet be thrown: Spider-Man may be the best comic adaptation of all time.” (Todd Gilchrest, FilmStew.com)
      My Analysis: In terms of box office receipts, it is indeed the best comic adaptation of all time. But as we see by two titles above, it’s since been beat in terms of critical acclaim, just in this decade alone (and from earlier, at least Superman: The Movie has a better RT score). Still, it would almost be evidence that critics and box office can sometimes go hand in hand if it weren’t for that certified rotten movie that ranks just above it on the box office chart: Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Latvian Ghostbusters. Clip of the Day

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Ghostbusters  (1984)

    The Godfather  (1972)

    Top Gun  (1986)

    Wanted  (2008)

    Sorry, no, this is not a clip from or trailer for a Latvian remake of the 1984 classic. Instead it is merely a Latvian cover of Ray Parker Jr.’s classic theme song, performed by Intars Busulis and the cello trio Melo-M. And it now accompanies my other favorite movie theme covers, which include GNR’s version of “Live and Let Die,” the ska cover of The Godfather theme (by The Mudsharks), my brother’s snail-paced cover of Kenny Loggins’ “Danger Zone” (from Top Gun) and pretty much any cover of “The Neverending Story” (including Homestar Runner’s “The Neverending Soda.”)

    The reason I bring you this Ghostbusters theme cover (aside from my having just today discovered it, thanks to Fark.com) is because it (very) loosely ties in with the new movie Wanted. See, both the song and the movie involve the intersection of Hollywood and Eastern European artists (specifically of former Soviet republics). Because Wanted director Timur Bekmambetov is originally from Kazakhstan (yes, home of Borat), and he became successful in the Russian film industry before being wooed by Universal Pictures (though it’s not Bekmambetov’s English-language debut).

    And if that’s not a good enough reason to share the music video, then just watch it, because you’ll realize that it actually needs no reason for being shared. By the way, while I’m on the subject of the Ghostbusters theme, I need to ask: was I the only one who thought everyone in Parker’s music video was going to be in the movie? Although I loved Ghostbusters from the start, I was a little disappointed that Chevy Chase, Teri Garr, john Candy and others did not appear in the actual film.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Dreamworks’ Bought-and-Paid-For Freedom. Trade Roughage 06/26/08

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Dark Knight  (2008)

    • Though they’ve been carefully tasteful about the use of grotesque images of Heath Ledger in the marketing of The Dark Knight domestically, Warner Brothers execs say the actor’s death “had not altered the marketing of the pic internationally.” The film had an Imax premiere at CinemaExpo this week.
    • When Dreamworks inevitably splits from Paramount later this year, there’s a possibility that they’ll exist as a stand-alone inde...bankrolled on a billion dollars (yes! Literally!)
    • Silvio Berlusconi is taking away government-sponsored subsidies for Italian filmmakers. In response, Italian filmmakers are threatening to take their films away from the Venice, Turin and Rome Film Festivals.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog