Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • SilverDocs: Spike Lee

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Spike Lee physically showed up to accept the Guggenheim Honor from the SilverDocs film festival tonight, but mentally, for much of the evening, he seemed to be elsewhere. Maybe his recent squabbles with Clint Eastwood have taken a toll, but when asked to talk about his non-fiction films by Denver Post film critic Lisa Kennedy, the Oscar-nominated filmmaker was virtually unresponsive. Only two subjects seemed to draw out Lee’s fierce, super-quotable Frankenstein.

    One was Tyler Perry, who Lee didn’t quite slam, but definitely dissed by implication. “I’d love to see a great film anout Martin Luther King,” Lee said. “But I can’t do everything.” He paused as a smile creept across his face. “I gotta leave something for Tyler Perry.” This got the desired affect from the audience––laughs, claps, a few stray “ooooh!”s––and then Lee offered cryptic clarification. “I made the movie Bamboozled,” he said, as if that’s facetious evidence enouh that the master of the modern minstrel show would be the appropriate director for a serious film about Dr. King.

    The only other subject that could jolt Lee out of his slumping stupor on stage was Barack Obama, to which all conversational roads seemed to lead. Discussing his Hurricane Katrina epic When the Levees Broke, Lee referenced the current flooding in the midwest and said, “The infrastructure of this country is crumbling, and money’s going elsewhere.” He paused, then at quadruple the volume: “That’s gonna change, though…gonna be a real Chocolate City!” He went on to drop the news that his longtime editor Sam Pollard has been filming Obama throughout the primary season and has already captured 1,000 hours of footage for a documentary being produced by Edward Norton. When Kennedy began a question with the phrase, “If Obama’s gonna become president…”, Lee inturrupted. “There is no if! It changes everything…it’s gonna be Before Obama, and After Obama. And I’m gonna be at that innaguration, too.”

    As if often the case with Lee, where his off-hours personality rankles, his work is impossible to dismiss. Towards the end of the festivities, Lee presented the Cannes show reel for his next release, The Miracle at St. Anna, about an all-black brigade fighting Fascists in Northern Italy during WWII. Though you can rarely tell what a finished film will actually be like from those sorts of things, the Miracle reel certainly had one or two moments worth writing home about. In one scene, a lipsticked German vamp records a propaganda message to be broadcast to African-American soldiers. “The American white man is raping your wives and daughters,” she warns, almost in a sing-song. “There’s something wrong here,” one of these soldiers later confides to another. “I’m not a nigger here, I’m just me.” It looks like epic Oscar bait. It’s set for release in late September, so imagine we’ll see it at Toronto.

    Lee also let slip details on two sports documentaries he currently has in the works. The first, inspired by Zidane: A 21st Century Portrait, is a single game portrait of Kobe Bryant, shot before, during and after a game with 30 cameras; that one will air “on ESPN or ABC” at the start of next year’s basketball season. The other film would seem to be an even bigger deal for basketball fans: a documentary about Michael Jordan’s last year in Chicago, which Lee says he hopes to premiere next year at Cannes.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • 15 Films that Offended Religious Groups

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Devils  (1971)

    Hail Mary  (1985)

    Rosemary's Baby  (1968)

    Viridiana  (1961)

    Priest  (1994)

    Dogma  (1999)

    Submission  (2004)

    September Dawn  (2007)

    The Love Guru  (2008)

    This week we have two big-time offenders: Mike Myers’ The Love Guru, which has brought concern from Hindus, because the comedy seems to be making fun of the Hindu religion; and Ron Howard’s Angels & Demons, the “sequel” to The Da Vinci Code, adapted from Dan Brown’s bestseller. Earlier this week, the Vatican banned the latter production from all Catholic churches in Rome. The following statement from Father Marco Fibbi, spokesman for the diocese of Rome, was a favorite quote from the story: “Usually we read the script but in this case it wasn’t necessary. Just the name Dan Brown was enough.”

    Of course, these days, religious organizations taking offense to a movie seems so commonplace that news like this is hardly even considered bad buzz. Neither The Love Guru nor Angels & Demons will be too aversely affected by the protests or boycotts. Both films will merely be added to the following list of major offenders (in alphabetical order so as not to offend anyone who thinks one is more offensive than another), as almost a genre cataloging than an inventory of condemned.

    • Brokeback Mountain - Because of its promotion of “the homosexual lifestyle,” many right-wing Christian groups protested Ang Lee’s film. Most famously, it was pulled last-minute from a multiplex owned by Mormon businessman and Utah Jazz owner Larry H. Miller, though his motivation was not necessarily claimed to be religion-based. Despite there being hundreds of gay films throughout the years, because of its popularity, this one was the worst offender.
    • The Da Vinci Code - I already mentioned this above and in a recent post on movies that overcame bad buzz, so I’ll make it short: banned, boycotted and protested throughout the world due to its blasphemous (and fictional) allegations that Jesus and Mary Magdalene had a child together.
    • The Devils - Many of the following films were banned in Italy, but with Ken Russell’s blasphemous adaptation of Aldous Huxley’s “The Devils of Loudon,” there was also threat that stars Oliver Reed and Vanessa Redgrave would be arrested if they entered the country. The most offensive scene, labeled “the rape of Christ,” depicted a mock exorcism involving fully nude nuns masturbating with a large crucifix. The scene was removed prior to the film’s release, but there were plenty of other controversial sequences that led to protest. A very low-quality DVD of the film was released a few years ago with the “rape of Christ” scene put back in.
    • Dogma - I understand how comedy can be seen as offensive, especially in the case of stereotypical caricatures like the one in The Love Guru. But Kevin Smith’s religious satire is so silly and all over the place that I can’t imagine that viewers would take its contents seriously. Yet enough protests required the film to be disowned by Miramax/Disney and then eventually be released (courtesy of Lionsgate) with a disclaimer stating that it is merely “a work of comedic fantasy.”
    • Hail Mary - Jean-Luc Godard’s modern retelling of the Nativity was criticized by none other than Pope John Paul II, himself. He was quoted as saying that it “deeply wounds the religious sentiments of believers.” But even better was the response from another man who took offense to the film and decided to throw a shaving cream pie in Godard’s face at the 1985 Cannes Film Festival. Also this is probably one of the rare circumstances in which the filmmaker is the one trying to prevent Italian distribution and is actually unable to do so.
    • The Last Temptation of Christ - Like Dogma, Martin Scorsese’s film came with a disclaimer that noted it is not based on the gospels and is a work of fiction. But like the case against The Da Vinci Code, the idea or depiction of Jesus and Mary Magdalene getting it on is never forgivable.
    • Life of Brian - I can’t believe that anyone actually took offense to the joke about the three wise men initially approaching the wrong stable, but apparently that was one of the many blasphemous scenes in this Monty Python satire of the life of Jesus. Also: how could anyone be upset about the crucifix scene? Eric Idle’s song is just too catchy to mind its offensiveness.
    • The Message (aka Mohammad, Messenger of God) - Much of the protests against this epic movie, about the founding of Islam, came mostly because of pre-release assumptions. For instance, some groups thought Anthony Quinn was starring as Mohammad (or Muhammad), a problem both because the prophet is not permitted to be represented in human form in any medium and because Quinn is Mexican-American, not Arab (as noted yesterday, all it takes is facial hair to change that). Other preproduction rumors were that Peter O’Toole and Charlton Heston were up for the part of Mohammad. Of course, the prophet is never seen, and Quinn merely portrays his uncle, Hamza. Unfortunate, nobody told certain extremists, even when the film came out, and apparently many cinemas received phone calls with death threats. Also, a tragic hostage situation in Washington D.C. began the day The Message opened, leading to the death of a police officer and the non-fatal shooting of future-mayor Marion Barry. One of the demands of the hostage-takers was for The Message not be released.
    • The Passion of the Christ - A rare modern film about Jesus that didn’t seem to offend any Christians. Actually, of course it offended some groups, but their protests were clearly overshadowed by the protests from Jewish groups, who took offense to the movie’s apparent placing of blame for Jesus’ death on the Jews. Considering Mel Gibson’s later controversy involving his drunken, anti-semitic outbursts, the offense definitely seems to have more merit than initially recognized.
    • Priest - Five years before Miramax/Disney was forced to disown Dogma because of Catholic protestors, the Weinsteins distributed this “blatantly anti-Catholic” film about a homosexual priest. Of course, it was mainly criticized by people who hadn’t seen it, such as New York Cardinal John J. O’Connor, who likened the film to graffiti found on bathroom walls.
    • Rosemary’s Baby - There’s now a whole slew (I guess a whole subgenre) of horror films dealing with the occult, Satanism and the Antichrist, but this was the hit that pretty much started it all. And because of the parallels between Rosemary and the Virgin Mary, it’s possibly the most offensive to Catholics. Even the media used it against its director, Roman Polanski, when his wife, Sharon Tate, was murdered a year after its release; prior to revelation that Tate and the rest were killed by the Manson “family,” reporters speculated that it was the result of the Polanskis’ alleged satanism and some even claimed the tragedy was deserved.
    • September Dawn - Until last year, Jon Voight’ most offensive movie was probably Karate Dog, but in 2007 he starred in this alleged anti-Mormon propaganda (called such before the Church of Latter-Day Saints viewed it, of course), which portrays an historical incident in which a Mormon militia massacred a wagon train of emigrants. The greatest offense is apparently the claim that Mormon leader Brigham Young (played by Terrence Stamp) was directly involved. Another criticism was that Hollywood made the film to somehow affect Mitt Romney’s campaign for President.
    • Submission - Theo van Gogh’s ten-minute film criticizes the treatment of women in Islam and was apparently offensive enough that it led to the filmmaker’s assassination at the hands of a Dutch Muslim ma
    • The Triumph of the Will - While Leni Reifenstahl’s propaganda film is well-regarded and highly respected today by film critics, scholars and historians, many Jewish groups see its celebration as being “morally insensitive.”
    • Viridiana - Luis Bunuel made plenty of movies that mocked the Church, but this 1961 Palme D’or-winner was perhaps the most publicly protested by the Vatican and Spanish dictator Francisco Franco, who had it banned in Spain until after his death. Bunuel’s excellent plea of ignorance: “I didn’t deliberately set out to be blasphemous, but then Pope John XXIII is a better judge of such things than I am.”

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • SilverDocs Diary: Sleeping With the Past

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Tuesday was a travel day, after a final, sleepless night in Las Vegas (a note on that: if you love cinema but happen to be in proverbial Sin City when CineVegas is *not* in session, you must go to karaoke at Ellis Island. This is surely not intended as a slight on the programmers or filmmakers involved in the festival, but the karaoke video that accompanies “Bohemian Rapsody” in that casino bar is as least as good as the majority of short films to which my fellow jurors and I gave prizes. Lest you wonder if I’m joking, I can only say that there’s something about spending four straight days in a casino that makes distinctions between irony and sincerity seem meaningless.)

    Anyway. The trip from The Palms to my hotel in Silver Spring, Maryland was exactly 12 hours door to door. I intended to watch a screener of Andrew Jacobs’ Four Seasons Lodge after checking in, but ended up spending two hours looking at Cyd Charisse clips on YouTube, and by the time I put the screener on I had to turn it off almost immediately in order to crash. I only mention this because I went back to it Wednesday morning before a screening of Seaside, and it seems worth noting that it was a total accident that I spent my first day at SilverDocs watching two consecutive films about the refugees of international atrocities struggling to form a community within resorts that have seen better days.


    In Four Seasons Lodge, Jacobs spends a summer in the namesake resort in the Catskills, where every year a group of Holocaust survivors move into adjoining bungalows to party, reminisce, and revel in the binds of communal triumph over historical tragedy. These vacationeers began coming together because they commonly cheated death six and a half decades back, but by the time Jacobs gets there, the pain of the past is matched in potency by anxiety over a shortened future. The proprietor of the resort tells us that in the old days, this group would go through nearly a dozen bottles of liquor in a couple of hours, and home movie footage of the Lodge’s glory days bears out the notion of halcyonic midcentury revelry. But as the guests have aged (the youngest visitors are in their late 70s, because, as one woman tells us, “only teenagers made it…kids were sent to the ovens right away”), life at the Four Seasons has become more sedate. Wanting to retire himself, the owner announces that he’s planning to sell the Lodge at the end of One Last Summer.

    You’d have to be a real asshole (or maybe just deeply anti-Semitic; they amount to the same) to not  find some poignancy here: displaced from their nations by attempted genocide, most of them the oldest surviving members of their families, the yearly visitors of the Four Seasons are now looking dead on at, obviously, death, but first the destruction of their beloved community. If there are many great stories but few absolute gut-punchers in the film,  it would be hard to argue against this being an essential document, both a tribute to the pain of bearing witness and an embodiment of it. It’s impossible to watch it and not be acutely aware that there are only so many years left to get first-hand accounts of Holocaust horrors on film.

    Seaview does have those occasional gut-punchers (there’s an amazing scene where a subject, who refuses to appear on camera, describes his harrowing boat trip to Ireland from Africa while we look at eerily abstract reflections on water), but it’s not as thoroughly engaging as Four Seasons, maybe because the refugees who congregate at its central location have no emotional attachment to one another. It’s a portrait of a mid-century Irish resort that shifted gears around the dawn of the millennium, and now houses international refugees seeking asylum in Ireland. The resort functions as a semi-permanent waiting room, where refugees kill time on a miniscule government stipend whilst awaiting news on their asylum applications. Only a small fraction of applicants will be allowed to stay and work in the country; others will be deported, and some will stay in Ireland illegally or move on to a third location. The resort becomes a non-place, an existential holding cell where these refugees have little to do but contemplate the past and worry about the future.

    Interviewing individuals and families who have come to the resort from war-torn hotspots like Nigeria, Afghanistan and Ghana, directors Nicky Gogan and Paul Rowley hop a little too quickly from one subject to another. We rarely see the refugees interacting naturally with one another, and only get a sense of what their lives are like in this limbo from their direct, to-the-camera testimony. The rare scenes where Gogan and Rowley simply let lives unfold in front of their cameras are the most effective; I’m thinking primarily of a scene where kids and teenagers of apparently wildly different backgrounds gather to watch two former residents of the resort freestyle rap. When one closes his verse with the threat, “Mess with me and I’ll send you back to your country,” the crowd explodes. It’s a rare moment of organic levity in an otherwise extremely somber movie. Seaview is beautifully made, but its tightly-packed exposition can be tedious.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • How to Talk Like Christopher Walken. Clip of the Day

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Moulin Rouge  (2001)

    We’ve all seen enough Christopher Walken impersonations to think we could do one ourselves. We might even be able to copy those impersonations exactly — in fact that’s probably what most of the lesser acts do: copy the more famous impersonations done by Jay Mohr, Kevin Pollak, etc. But few of us would really get it precisely correct. To properly ape Walken, we need detailed instructions.

    Meet Naathan, an Asian-American posing as a British-Asian, who does a great Walken. And in this near-30-minute video from a couple years ago, he teaches us just how he does it. First, he displays a few different Walken voices, such as the whispering Walken and the “normal” Walken voice we mostly associate with the actor. Then, he isolates the ingredients of the impersonation, such as the New York accent, the exaggerated tonality, the pauses, etc.

    The best is that he points out where most people error. For example, he says that too many impersonators emphasize every word, which he claims is more Stephen Hawking than Christopher Walken. He also stresses the difference between doing Christopher Walken and impersonating Christopher Walken. And, after presenting what may be the only impersonation of Ewan McGregor’s singing voice in Moulin Rouge, he teaches us how to sing like Christopher Walken.

    [via Fark.com]


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Medicine For IFC. Trade Roughage 06/19/08

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    • IFC has picked up Medicine for Melancholy for day-and-date distribution. It’ll be released sometime next year; in the meantime, it’ll play in competition at the impending Los Angeles Film Festival.
    • Paramount is getting sued by Mario Puzo’s son, based on allegations that he wasn’t paid proper royalties on a video game based on The Godfather. He’s trying to make the studio stick to contract they made with his father seven years before his death, which was in turn intended to provide reparations for Paramount having gyped him when first buying the Godfather rights.
    • Sienna Miller will play Maid Marion opposite Russell Crowe’s Robin Hood in Nottingham. Sure, it’s an unnecessary retread of a beloved brand, but it should be a nice break for her after filming G.I. Joe, don’t you think?

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog