Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • CineVegas: Memorial Day

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    I have no idea what to do with Josh Fox’s Memorial Day, a sporadically engaging––but far too simple-minded to be as troubling as it wants to be––hypothetical slice-of-life which exists to explain away Abu Ghraib via spring break. It seems to be consensus that this is, at the very least, the ballsiest film at this festival, although it certainly has fewer defenders than detractors. I found it to be alternately mesmerizing, infuriating, boring and eye-rollingly facile. I think it fails as a narrative film, even as it occasionally stuns as a work of pure cinema. And yet, I don’t think it’s dismissable outright.

    Executive produced by Michael Stipe, Memorial is the brainchild of a New York theater rabblerouser named Josh Fox, and is loosely based on his “traveling, site-specific theatre event” Death of Nations 1: The Comfort and Safety Of Your Own Home. Dressed in all in black with standard-issue hipster-lectual glasses, Fox rocked a frustrating evasiveness at the Q & A following the film’s CineVegas premiere; when asked to unpack his intentions, Fox responded, “I don’t really do that.” He did admit to being a tourist to the world his film depicts. “I’m from New York,” the first-time filmmaker said more than once, ultimately invoking an old Spaulding Gray line about living “off the coast of America.”

    The entire performance was off-putting: Fox seemed to set new standards for the indignant, coastal dweller seeking to condemn cultural forces with which he may have first or second hand experience, one minute expressing condescending horror at the kind of youthful debauchery that would be frat-like if those participating in it weren’t several social classes away from being able to go to the kind of college that even has frats, the next minute crediting his military adviser for helping him to understand that “war is fun.”

    Still, the filmmaker’s annoyingly reductive sensibility (embodied by a line from the film’s synopsis: “war is a party and partying is a war”) can’t invalidate the power of some of what he’s put on screen. The film begins with a stunningly hypnotic 20 minute montage, which takes us, through fragments in constant motion, into a Memorial Day weekend blow out in Ocean City, a military shore town in Maryland that doubles as a locus for bargain basement tourism. We follow a gang of young women, outnumbered by their slightly older-seeming male companions, as they drink themselves into oblivion, spew casual racism, cry, fight, rape––and capture it all via handheld consumer video. The gaze of the film, at this point, is firmly within the crowd: with the exception of one act of violence recorded from across the street through the magic of digital zoom, all the behavior seen seems to be a performance for the camera, and the footage is too intimate and invasive to be shot as though by an dispassionate observer. Shot on location amidst a real holiday weekend party not unsimilar to the apocalyptic Venice Beach perma-kegger that runs through Richard Kelly’s supposed fantasy Southland Tales, it’s choreographed amazingly well and acted (by members of Fox’s theater company and extras found on Craig’s List) sufficiently convincingly.

    For its first half, Memorial Day plays like an art film about the depravity that poor, uneducated, mostly white kids lapse into under the guise of merely having a good time, a digital verite indictment of the generational nihilism bred by Girls Gone Wild, The Real World and popular culture’s general evasion of moral consequence. But after a transitional scene, in which the location seems unchanged but characters suddenly appear dressed in fatigues, Memorial Day abruptly moves from the world of weekend warriors to an actual war zone. Our drunken racists and rapists––and their victims––are now charged with capturing and guarding anonymous Muslims, their unquenchable but blasé appetites unchanged.

    The rest of the film is given over to narrative reenactments of the imagery made famous by the Abu Ghraib scandal. Fox and his actors imagine the infamous leash incident as stemming from one soldier’s failed seduction of another. Actual memos outlining the rules of interrogation are read out loud and laughed at by kids who we’ve already seen obey nothing but their own unexamined ids. Human pyramids are built to scale. A repeated tableau features these uninterested prison guards discussion their personal exploits in front of a cage of hooded figures; in the most effective moment of this second half, the victim of a sexual assault from the first part of the film confides to a friend how the incident made her feel while a prisoner whose hood has come loose stares out from the background. She movingly describes combating the bad behavior of others with further bad behavior. She’s talking about her personal life, but Fox’s political metaphor is loud and clear.

    And that’s it. Virtually non-narrative, Memorial Day sets up the party zone as a moral equivalent to the war zone, hammers that connection home and then stops, content with offering an equation in lieu of an argument. But for all its faults, there’s implicit an implicit and surprisingly conservative critique wedded to that equation that can’t be easily dismissed.

    Nowhere do we see commanding officers condoning or interfering––the Iraqi prison is the same authority-free zone as the impromptu motel orgy. There’s an element of metaphoric fantasy here, for sure, but ironically, Fox’s chosen binaries feel slightly more wedded to a real critique than the works of the A-list filmmakers. If Errol Morris tells us that Abu Ghraib was documented by conflicted, innocent bystanders and perpetrated by good soldiers following the orders of our evil empirical leaders, and Brian DePalma tells us that said good soldiers are mostly being corrupted by/driven to commit attrocities by the pressures of a hellish environment into which they’ve selfishly been thrust by our evil empirical leaders, it’s amazing that the militantly anti-war Fox is the filmmaker whose point of view seems to hew most closely to the Rumsfeldian “few bad apples” theory.

    Of course, it’s total bullshit––Fox isn’t actually suggesting that the soldiers responsible for misdeeds at Abu Ghraib take any real personal responsibility. He’s merely reminding us that sexual violence is something they learned not at basic training, but at spring break.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • BlogNosh 06/16/08

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Speed Racer  (2008)

    • Reason number #379 to kick myself for not seeing Speed Racer in a theater: Daniel Kasman’s latest entry at The Auteurs. It begins like this: “Upon return from Cannes, I saw two movies in rapid succession. The films probably should not be combined into any sort of synthetic criticism, but it is too tempting to at least collide their names in the same piece: Jean-Luc Godard’s 1968 film with the Rolling Stones, Sympathy for the Devil (1968), and Andy and Larry Wachowski’s Speed Racer (2008) adaptation. The arena we are dealing with is dimensionality.”
    • The Happening is not just bad. It is more than awful.” At Hammer to Nail, Michael Tully finds the dark side of Avante Retarde. “The painful truth is that I had a blast while watching the film–again, not in the intended manner–but when it ended, and especially when I woke up the next morning, my delight at the preposterousness of it all was gone and all that remained was frustration and anger.”
    • Blatant self-promotion: Your Blogger and Glenn Kenny joined the House Next Door boys for an epic, booze-soaked podcast. This is just the first part; stay tuned for parts two and three, where I accidentally slap my wife while she’s winning an Oscar and then walk into the sea in order to allow her career to continue its ascent without the anchor of my humiliations.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • 10 Movies That Made ‘Get Smart’ Obsolete

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    The best time for a Get Smart movie would have been the late ’60s, when the original television series was still on the air. In fact, there was a theatrical Get Smart film in the works during the run of the show, but it was canceled when the theatrical release of Munster, Go Home! bombed at the box office. Many years later, in 1980, a Get Smart feature titled The Nude Bomb was released to theaters, but it also performed poorly.

    Now we’re getting a remake version starring Steve Carell in the role that was so iconically defined by the late Don Adams. Will it do the show justice? Reportedly the budget was $80 million, a significant amount of which was probably put towards pointless effects. But the best thing Warner Bros. could have done with that money is to give a large amount to series creators Mel Brooks and Buck Henry, who probably even today could churn out a better script than Failure to Launch scribes Tom J. Astle and Matt Ember.

    Despite its lack of original Get Smart talent, though, it could still be marginally funny. Yet the real problem is that it may be too outdated and obsolete for audiences to care. In the four decades since the show went off the air, there has been plenty of similar-themed movies, from spy spoofs to films with bumbling heroes. The following ten titles are the best evidence of why this new Get Smart movie is completely unnecessary:

    1. Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery - It’s interesting that Get Smart is going up against a Mike Myers movie this weekend, because in a way it’s also going up against Myers’ Austin Powers movies, as well. Sure, spy parodies have been around in spades since around the time of the first James Bond movie, but nothing has been as popular as this series, which of course includes the much bigger-grossing sequels, Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me and Austin Powers in Goldmember.
    2. Inspector Gadget - The original animated series was based on Get Smart and even featured the voice of Don Adams. Also like Get Smart, it was remade into a feature film with a different cast. However, it did find room to employ both Adams (as the voice of the dog, Brain) and Andy Dick (who had played Maxwell Smart’s son in a 1990s Get Smart series). Regardless, it was still a failure, both in terms of its box office gross and the way it ruined our childhood memory of the beloved cartoon. Perhaps if the Get Smart movie is good enough, then it could make up for Inspector Gadget (and its sequel), but it would have to be really, really good.
    3. The Pink Panther - You might say that Get Smart came about as a response to both the Bond films and the original Pink Panther movies, which featured a bumbling police inspector instead of a bumbling spy. The recent remake of The Pink Panther already showed us that some characters should really be forever remembered by their most iconic portrayer. In this case Steve Martin was nothing compared to Peter Sellers, while in the case of Get Smart, Steve Carell is only muddying the memory of Don Adams. Even if he does a good job, he’s just not the real Maxwell Smart. He should just be in another lame generic spy spoof instead.
    4. Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgandy - Want to see Steve Carell act clueless? Watch Anchorman again, because he can’t top his performance as Brick Tamland. “I love lamp.”
    5. The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad! - The show Police Squad was in a way like Get Smart, only with a clueless detective rather than a clueless spy (I guess it could be seen as more like The Pink Panther then?). Fortunately that series only took a few years to spin-off a feature film, and thanks to the genius of Jim Abrahams and the Zucker Bros., who are almost equal in spoofing ability to Mel Brooks, it is funnier than any single episode or film of Get Smart can be without Brooks’ involvement.
    6. Spy Hard - Leslie Nielsen starred as the bumbling detective in the Naked Gun movies and then later played a bumbling spy in this spoof. The result: if Nielsen hadn’t already supplanted the Maxwell Smart character earlier, he did so here, even if really, really poorly.
    7. The Man Who Knew Too Little - More clueless spy stuff, this one an underrated movie starring Bill Murray. It actually made less money than The Nude Bomb (even without an inflation adjustment), but I enjoyed it a lot, probably more than I’ll enjoy Get Smart.
    8. Johnny English - Yep, I’m still just listing the other recent spy spoofs. But, really, there’s a point. When even Rowan Atkinson has done the bumbling spy bit, it’s time to hang up on the idea.
    9. I Spy - Did I already point out that #s 6-10 are more spy comedies? And there’s a lot that I’m not even including! This one is significant because it’s also based on a hit TV series. And it was a huge bomb.
    10. Spies Like Us - The thing I like best about the original Get Smart, as well as a number of the films on this list, is that the incompetent hero isn’t really aware of how incompetent he really is. The best movie to utilize this premise, though, has to be Spies Like Us. But that movie came out toward the end of the Cold War, when spy stuff was seeming ridiculously outdated. Comparatively, Get Smart arrives post 9/11, when the fact that American intelligence is incompetent is not so funny anymore. I think that now audiences would much prefer to see more serious spy films, like the Bond reboot Casino Royale (note the significance of this film being kind of a remake of a Bond parody) and the Bourne Identity franchise.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Bad Ghost Lieutenant. Trade Roughage 06/16/08

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Happening  (2008)

    • The Happening had a much better opening weekend than expected (or is it feared?), coming in at third place with $32.1 million domestically, and actually beating The Incredible Hulk overall overseas. Meanwhile, Universal and Marvel insist that their superhero movie is a hit, even though it mad six million dollars less in its opening weekend than Ang Lee’s supposedly disastrous Hulk five years ago.
    • Werner Herzog’s “don’t call it a remake” remake of Bad Lieutenant has found a female lead in Eva Mendes, who previously starred opposite new Bad star Nicolas Cage in Ghost Rider. So, to recap: Werner Herzog is restaging an Abel Ferrara movie in New Orleans, with the cast of a comic book movie about a guy on a motorcycle with a fireball for a face. Sounds about right.
    • Everything is Fine, one of my favorite films from Cannes, won the grand jury prize in the New Directors sidebar at the Seattle Film Festival this weekend.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • I Dream of Better Effects. Clip of the Day

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Kazaam  (1996)

    Armageddon  (1998)

    Mulan  (1998)

    Toy Story 2  (1999)

    Enchanted  (2007)

    Last week it was announced that yet another screenwriter has been hired to pen a draft of the I Dream of Jeannie movie. This time it’s Rita Hsiao, who worked on Disney’s Mulan, Toy Story 2 and Enchanted. Reportedly there’s already been at least five writers on board, but apparently producer Sid Ganis (Duece Bigalow: Male Gigalo) wants the thing to be perfect.

    Well, how hard could it be to come up with a plot for the thing? Just combine the storylines from the TV movies I Dream of Jeannie: 15 Years Later and I Still Dream of Jeannie, both of which opened the series up to more drama and thrills, such as the tense outer space sequence from 15 Years Later seen in the video above. Just budget for some better effects, and that sequence could make the Jeannie movie a blockbuster comparable to Armageddon.

    OK, I’m joking, but only a little. The Jeannie movie really should venture into the space travel angle, putting Major Nelson and Jeannie in danger (in I Still Dream, with Nelson long gone on a mission, Jeannie finds out she can’t stay in the real world without a master). And why not also include the female astronaut that Nelson may be having an affair with? And then also have Jeannie shrug off her submissive role in order to become an empowered woman? Such a subplot may have been more relevant to the time of 15 Years Later (it aired in the mid ’80s), but there’s something still wrong about exaggerated female domestication another 20 years later.

    That reminds me of another plot idea: Jeannie vs. Kazaam (or Haji). In which the two genies battle over who has had it worse throughout history, women or blacks. Then in true versus-plot tradition, they finally unite in agreement that they should really be battling the greater evil: Major Nelson, the oppressive white man.

    One more thing: as long as I’m claiming devotion to bad ’80s TV movies and suggesting they be used as inspiration for the Jeannie script, here’s some more advice for Ganis: cast Mackenzie Astin and Nicole Eggert as Nelson and Jeannie, as nothing more than an homage to 15 Years Later. They may not be big names these days, but if there’s enough money spent on special effects, you don’t need the stars to be Will Ferrell and Cameron Diaz.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog