Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Defending Boll: BlogNosh 05/28/08

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    • “I refused to sign the absurd online petition that was drafted to stop Uwe Boll from making more movies,” writes Alex Ross Perry at Tisch Film Review. “Not because I do not believe in the power of online petitioning to accomplish social change, but because of my genuine appreciation for the films of Uwe Boll.”
    • The IndiePix Blog brings word of Rooftop Panorama, a three-day series of panels, screenings and parties hosted Rooftop Films and co-sponsored by IndiePix and Shooting People. It runs from June 12-14; Rooftop Films kicks off their summer screening series this Saturday with a free screening of At the Death House Door in Fort Greene, Brooklyn.
    • Speaking of the devil: At the Death House Door co-director Steve James has published an essay called “The Decline of the Longitudinal Doc” at IFC.com. “For me, longitudinal docs are the most deeply satisfying form. Spending years following a story is the ultimate act of filmmaking discovery, because you don’t know where the journey is leading, no matter how perceptive you think you are,” he writes. “If you spend years filming people, they will grow to be something more than just a ’subject.’”

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • War, Inc’s Big Weekend

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    War, Inc.  (2008)

    According to indieWIRE, the John Cusack satire War, Inc made an impressive $45,714 on two screens in its opening weekend. Not exactly Iron Man numbers, but a much higher per-screen average than any other film in limited release. For the sake of perspective: Indiana Jones and I’m Vaguely Certain Shia La Beouf’s IMDb Profile Exaggerates His Height made less than a thousand dollars more per screen in its by all accounts sufficiently massive opening weekend; Cusack’s last film, the also war-themed Grace is Gone, made just $50,899 in its entire theatrical run.

    So this a victory for indie film, right? Yay! Except, of course, that the movie’s abysmally bad.

    Don’t just take my word for it––check out War, Inc’s page on Rotten Tomatoes, where its rating of 25% Fresh seems to have been inflated by the cherry-red plaudits of a couple of known blurb whores.

    Still, there’s something going on here, and I can’t quite put my finger on what it is. This can’t be a Peter Bart “the audience doesn’t care about critics” thing––and if it is, it’s the exception to the rule in a summer season in which the most critically acclaimed Hollywood product is also the highest grosser. Is there a segment of audience that’s finally ready to laugh at the idea of America as bumbling conquerors? As AJ Schnack points out, Where in the World is Osama Bin Laden? is experience a sudden up-tick in box office love, so maybe that’s part of it.

    Another theory: people love John Cusack. Especially girls. Well, okay––women, but Cusack has a way of making women revert back to girlhood. Girls especially love a specific brand of Cusack: this guy just has to put on a suit and drop his chin slightly and open his eyes wide and start convincing a reluctant woman (on screen) that she should abandon all previous life plans in order to do something foolish with him, and millions of women (off screen), who would probably otherwise have perfect control of their faculties, start to feel like their insides are melting and complain that they can’t quite think straight. That segment of the audience was probably so doped up on the pheromones bouncing off the screen that they could barely even notice War, Inc’s basic incompetency as a satire, a comedy, a romance or a political statement. And don’t cry for their poor husbands and boyfriends, who surely reaped the rewards of The Cusack Factor that night at home. It’s a win-win!


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • The Anti-Oliver Stone Doors Movie

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Doors  (1991)

    Love Her Madly  (2000)

    Shine a Light  (2008)

    U2 3D  (2008)

    Ten years ago, I attended a book signing for Ray Manzarek’s memoir, Light My Fire: My Life with the Doors, and I asked the author/keyboardist why he doesn’t just make another movie about The Doors. Manzarek had spent most of the event complaining about Oliver Stone’s 1991 film, and he did graduate from film school, so I figured he’d at least thought about the idea. But he responded by saying he had other films he wanted to make, from original scripts he’d written.

    I’m pretty sure one of the scripts he mentioned then became his 2000 film Love Her Madly, which has a nice exploitive title. And now according to Billboard, he’s got four more scripts, including one based on either the song or album L.A. Woman (the best driving album of all time, IMHO) and another that sounds suspiciously like the scene from Stone’s film in which the band and friends do drugs in the desert. But apparently he’s still not up to the challenge of writing something that will go against Stone and Randall Jahnson’s script for The Doors.

    Fortunately, he’s doing the next best thing — or, maybe really its actually the better thing — and consulting on a comprehensive documentary that will chronicle the band’s whole career. It’s unclear how involved he is with the project, but he told Billboard that he recently saw a cut of it and that it’s still six months away from being releasable. He also mentioned that it will be filled with footage we’ve never seen before. Most importantly, though, he stated that it’s “the anti-Oliver Stone. This will be the true story of the Doors.”

    From what I remember, the scene from Stone’s movie that’s most objectionable to Manzarek is the Andy Warhol party sequence, in which he, Robbie Krieger and John Densmore are portrayed as abandoning Jim. But whether or not it happened that way, the sequence (watch it above) is one of many great music video montages disguised as legitimate narrative in the film. And it should be appreciated as nothing more.

    Still, regardless of the fact that Manzarek should probably just let it go about Stone’s movie after 17 years (especially since he’s supposedly at least happy with Kyle Maclachlan’s portrayal of himself), and even ignoring the fact that this is all just his latest way of milking his old band for all its worth (not that I don’t encourage it with my buying his book and attending the “Doors of the 21st Century” concert), this new film sounds like a great idea. Aside from hopefully allowing Manzarek to vent some more, it comes at a time when rock docs are doing pretty well (of course, they have to when they’re either in 3D or directed by Scorsese). Plus, it might appease any fans who, like Manzarek, aren’t happy with The Doors.

    But are there actually a lot of people who like The Doors’ music who can’t enjoy more than two hours of scenes set to The Doors’ songs? I’m probably one of many Doors fans that will always love Stone’s biopic, despite its inaccuracies (or whatever else the problem). And I’m one of the many who will really appreciate this new nonfiction film, despite its probable lack of dramatization, sensationalism and Val Kilmer. Hooray for having different ways of cinematically telling (roughly) the same story.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Sarah Jessica Parker stars in “Taliban recruitment film”?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    If my Twitter stream is to be believed, I was the only female, 20-something writer in New York City who was NOT invited to the Sex and the City premiere last night. (Could it have been because of this? Or this? Or this? Hmmm.) Certainly, each picture Julia Allison staged at the event offers up at least 1,000 word on the matter, but who has time to do all that reading? Jeff Wells‘ take is much more succinct:

    The film is another Taliban recruitment film — a grotesque and putrid valentine to the insipid “me, my lifestyle, my accessories and I” chick culture of the early 21st Century. Guys everywhere — if you’re in a brand-new relationship, take her to see this thing. If she even half-likes it, dump her and walk away cold. Save yourself!

    Funny side note: I remember the moment when, as a senior in college, I decided that I could no longer in good conscience watch Sex and the City. It was, I think, the premiere of the first season to air after 9/11, and there was a scene where Carrie announced that she was going to help rebuild downtown by going shopping. It was such a direct aping of George W. Bush’s commerce-as-opiate for the troubled masses prescriptive of the time that it seemed like the ultimate sign that the show had cut loose the thread of critique that once seemed to be woven into its pornographic depiction of excessive consumption.

    We obviously couldn’t have hoped that the movie would have transcended the worst aspects of the show––at least, not after having heard Fergie’s theme song––but I honestly didn’t think it was going to go as far as this, to become the embodiment of not just what *I* hate, but Why They Hate Us.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Mommie Dearest Author Says Celebs Shouldn’t Adopt

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Mommie Dearest  (1981)

    Christina Crawford––adopted daughter of Joan Crawford, and author of Mommie Dearest, the woe-is-me memoir on which the Faye Dunaway camp classic was based––has always had a bizarre/brilliant way of promoting herself. This week, the woman who is only famous for having been adopted by a celebrity is promoting a 30th anniversary edition of her memoir about being adopted by a celebrity by saying that celebrities shouldn’t adopt. From The Guardian:

    “I have tremendous concerns about celebrity adoptions by people like Madonna and Angelina Jolie,” she said in an exclusive interview to mark the publication of a 30th anniversary edition of her memoir. “From the adoptee’s point of view, it is vitally important to know who they are, where they came from, or it can have profound medical and psychological effects.”

    Crawford alleges that her mother, who was one of the biggest film stars of Hollywood’s Golden Age, adopted her four children for publicity purposes…When asked if today’s celebrities are driven by the same motivation, she replied: “What do you think? Why are they so keen on getting the maximum newspaper and magazine coverage?”

    Of course, taking advantage of one’s relationship to a celebrity to attract media attention, and then using that opportunity to rail against how celebrities shouldn’t do things to attract media attention, is completely different. And none of this has anything to do with that new book about Joan Crawford, recently excerpted in Vanity Fair, which basically contends that Mommie Dearest was pure fiction manufactured by Christina in a desperate ploy for attention. Why can’t you give her the respect that she’s entitled to?!?!


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Spider-man, Italian Style. Clip of the Day

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Almost Famous  (2000)

    Spider-Man 4  (2010)

    For those who may have been out of town last week, it’s time to catch up on the first episode of Italian Spiderman, a wacky new series that spoofs Italian action films from the ’60s and ’70s (while pretending to be a forty-year-old print salvaged from the Atlantic Ocean). It premiered online last Thursday, but it’s more interesting today, since the Internet was all abuzz yesterday with the rumor (started by Latino Review) that Sony’s looking at both Patrick Fugit or Michael Angaro to replace Tobey Maguire in Spider-Man 4 and 5.

    But I say, why go for either of the kids from Almost Famous (Fugit and Angaro both portray the young Cameron Crowe character at different ages), when there’s Italian Spiderman? In fact, why bother making more Hollywood Spider-Man movies, when there’s Italian Spiderman?

    After watching the above episode, be sure to check out the trailer for the series and head over to the film’s MySpace page to hear the theme song and other groovy songs from the Italian Spiderman soundtrack.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog