Comic-Con coverage on Spout
Advertisement

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Spike Lee to Direct Film Shot on Cell Phones

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    BloodRayne  (2006)

    Sorry for the double-shot of Spike Lee news today — Karina gave us word earlier on his being honored by SilverDocs — but at least I’ve managed to squeeze an obligatory Uwe Boll mention into the post, too. Now you’re probably wondering: what could the director of Do the Right Thing possibly have in common with the director of BloodRayne? Well, here’s your answer: they’re both encouraging the democratization of movies.

    Lee is doing so more intentionally, though, by teaming up with Nokia in order to “direct” a film entirely shot by everyday people on their cell phones. According to Reuters, the film will consist of three acts, each made by a separate cameraphonographer (my lame term for the competing cell-phone filmmakers). And according to Lee, there’s no need for you to be trained in the craft to enter:

    “Aspiring filmmakers no longer have to go to film school to make great work. With a simple mobile phone, almost anyone can now become a filmmaker.”

    Nokia will narrow down the contestants’ submissions to 25 videos, which will then be narrowed down to 10 by people voting online for their favorites. Then Lee will choose the three winners from those 10. Isn’t this kind of like a democracy where we vote for our top five Presidential candidates and then some politician gets to pick the actual commander-in-chief? For more info, check out Nokia Productions.

    Meanwhile, someone has set up a whole blog devoted to something called “The Uwe Boll Movie Challenge,” which is inspired by the latest YouTube rant from the much hated filmmaker. The criteria is as follows:

    To compete in the Uwe Boll Movie Challenge, you must create a short film that meets the following guidelines:

    * It must be made at home.
    * You must use ketchup.
    * You must use a little brother.
    * You must not use some bullshit nickname out of the internet.
    * You have until May 16th.

    Apparently there is no prize for this one “unless Uwe Boll decides to provide one.”

    (via Defamer)


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Eli Roth Surrenders to Your Kids

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Lost in Space  (1998)

    Mission to Mars  (2000)

    The Pacifier  (2005)

    Transformers  (2007)

    Hostel  (2005)

    Invincible  (2006)

    Hostel Part II  (2007)

    The Game Plan  (2007)

    Nim's Island  (2008)

    Cloverfield  (2008)

    It happens eventually to every filmmaker and actor associated with R-rated movies*, and now Eli Roth, the “torture porn auteur” who gave us Hostel and Hostel II, is making the transition to family-friendly fare — in order to make the kids happy, of course.

    No, it has nothing to do with the money, which comes more easily with younger-targeted, lower-rated releases (especially when your last movie disappoints). It has to do with the realization that kids don’t have enough movies made for them, and they’d apparently like to see what Eli Roth’s talent is like. Only, up until now, they haven’t been allowed. As Roth defends the move:

    “Everyone I know has been saying ‘When are you gonna do a movie my kids can see?’ And finally, I’m gonna make a movie that 13-year-old kids can see.”

    The movie, which Roth is still scripting, is described as being inspired by Cloverfield and Transformers, with all the “mass-destruction” and “chaos and pandemonium” that would entail. But it won’t be too scary, as it’s being planned strictly to receive a PG-13 rating. Roth says he feels “like he pushed the violence in R rated movies about as far as [he] can push it,” and that he’s “bled out.”

    However, he isn’t completely done with the gore and promises that the unrated DVD version of this planned PG-13 movie will feature some gratuitously violent scenes shot specifically to be left on the cutting room floor. Hey, as long as the hypocritical studios allow it, that’s a brilliant idea.

    * Here’s a sampling of others who did it for the kids:

    • Mark Wahlberg on making Invincible: “It’s a movie my kids can see - my nieces and nephews. I haven’t had that. None of my nieces and nephews have seen Boogie Nights, thank God! I haven’t made too many PG movies.” (via IMDb/WENN)
    • Jodie Foster on making Nim’s Island: “I was dying to do something lighter and I was excited about a movie my kids could see.” (via Just Jared)
    • Gary Sinise on making Mission to Mars: “I can take my kids to it and that’s a nice thing to be able to do. They’ve been asking me when I’m going to do something that they can see.” (via The Cranky Critic)
    • The Rock on making The Game Plan (by way of reporter Marshall Fine): “Meanwhile, he’s just happy he’s finally made a movie that his 6-year-old daughter can see (”She sat all the way through it,” he notes). Like Joe in “The Game Plan,” Johnson found that parenthood required adjustments to his life that he never imagined himself making.” (via NY Daily News)
    • Gary Oldman on making Lost in Space: “I wanted to do a movie my son could see.” (via Entertainment Weekly)
    • Vin Diesel on making The Pacifier: “I needed to do a film that my niece and nephew could see. I needed to do a film that my godchildren could see. I needed to do a film that would dispel the fact that the only movie I’ve ever done was “Iron Giant” for these toddlers.” (via MTV)

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Sex And The City Theme: Oh, the horror. Clip of the Day.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Women  (1939)

    Sex and the City  (2008)

    The theme song for the Sex and the City Movie, performed with heavy pitch-shift assist by the girl from Kids Incorporated who wasn’t Martika, is the embodiment of everything that has become loathsome about the franchise.

    The aesthetics are godawful––the theme song from the television show is injected with helium and then laid over a beat borrowed from various hip hop hits of the early oughts, then finally zapped with that radio-friendly glitter sound that I think has been scientifically proven to melt brains––but it’s the vapid lyrics, and Fergie’s roboticized delivery of them, that truly turn the song into a celebration of the zombification that the show devolved into celebrating in its last few years. It’s straight-facedly about consumer gluttony in place of human connection, a fashion-forward Dorian Gray story in which women appear younger as they become richer and actually older. Life as a VOGUE spread with no end is a fairly sick fantasy, but at least in terms of “women’s pictures”, it has historical precedent (The Women, anyone?) and is thus cinematically tolerable. But you’ve got to wonder what’s on the screen if the brand geniuses think they need a plot song dance anthem to drive the message home.

    A sampling of the song’s lyrics:

    “Shopping for labels, shopping for love!”

    “I’m not concerned with all the politics…all I know is that I’m always happy when I walk out the store.”

    “Stop chasing those boys and shop some more!”

    “Relationships are often so hard to take! A Prada dress has never broke my heart before!”

    “Men they come a dime a dozen, just give me them diamond rings!”

    “I know my credit card will help me put out the flames…”

    Oh, I see––it’s like a takeoff on “Diamonds Are A Girl’s Best Friend,” except now that we can get our own lines of credit, we don’t actually need men at all anymore. Because people are interchangable with luxury goods, and in terms of emotional weight and physical pleasure, sex is equivalent to spending money you don’t have on things you don’t need. Don’t think about the credit crisis, girls, and certainly don’t think of anyone born with a penis as a human being. You’re empowered!

    The song is obviously targeted at young girls/teens, decades younger than the characters on screen and probably too young to have participated in Sex and the City the first time around, who have probably caught the sanitized version on TBS. So is this assault on taste actually dangerous for our impressionable youth? No. God, what I’d give for popular culture about adult single women that could truly pose some kind of threat to modern mores (or, really, anything). But this is what dominant teen girl culture is all about right now––the fantasy that a boyfriend is a partner in branding, and that magazine interns can afford condos and Chanel purses––and there’s just something really troubling about these kinds of perma-adolescent cultural touchpoints being scooped up by a brand about women in their 40s.

    Via Celebitchy.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • SilverDocs: Spike Lee to be honored

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    I’ve been making plans travel plans for the next couple of months this week, and it looks like in mid-June I’ll be making my first trip to SilverDocs. And look: they’ve just made their first major program announcement:

    Spike Lee, the Oscar-nominated director of Do the Right Thing, will be honored at this year’s Silverdocs film festival for his documentary work including When the Levees Broke, on the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, organizers said on Wednesday.

    Lee will screen excepts from his documentary works and discuss his career on June 19 at the Charles Guggenheim Symposium, which recognizes top documentary filmmakers and is a centerpiece of the June 16-23 festival.

    More from Reuters and at the SilverDocs website. I’ll be in town from the 17th-23; will you?


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Today in IMDb Anarchy: Another Stakeout

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Another Stakeout  (1993)

    Forget about comedians making a funny videos to plump up their IMDb profiles––the new hotness is skipping the video, and taking comedy directly to IMDb. On his Tumblr, comedian/Human Giant star Paul Scheer implores The Internet to join him, Adam McKay (writer/director of Anchorman and Talladega Nights) and several of their friends and colleagues in mobbing the message boards attached to the IMDb entry for the questionable classic, Another Stakeout. “Come join us and help us turn this movie into a giant cult hit for absolutely no good reason,” Scheer writes. “Let’s forward this e-mail and flood the site to the point where there are Another Stakeout festivals and conventions and midnight showings with people in costume saying lines along with the movie ala Rocky Horror Pic Show.” Why Another Stakeout and not just Stakeout? Scheer clarifies: “The first one was pretty good but like the Godfather 2 (or is the Godfather 2 like Another Stakeout?) director John Badham got it right the second time around.”

    Threads on the Another Stakeout page which look like the handiwork of Scheer and gang include: Van Sant to helm shot-by-shot AS2 remake?!?!?, How many AS-related tattoos do you have?, and Another Stakeout suicide club!. wherein tommyxtommy bemoans that AS fans “do not have a recognized place in the world!” The solution? “Wemust killourselves!” Sic.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • How to Write Film Criticism? Stop Reading It.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    I woke up this morning to a feed reader full of stories about film criticism, many of them blog posts in response to the latest bit of polemic from Armond White. It’s a prolonged screed against contemporary critics––young, old, print, web––anyone by Armond, essentially. Most of it just reads as noise, and since I’ve decided to put a moratorium on talking/writing about What Happened In Queens, I can’t respond to White’s not original complaint that the MOMI institute (which he did not attend) seeks to turn young critics into shill bots for studio films. I also can’t comment on his suggestion that the Institute itself is “a project seemingly designed to further confuse the profession,” although I will admit to being, before, during and after the Institute, confused about my profession. And I do suspect that all of our circular, internecine fighting about this stuff is, at least for me, making the confusion worse.

    So it’s a relief to come across the second half of Rotten Tomatoes’ interview with critic Nathan Lee, and find an answer of sorts. You want to write film criticism? Stop reading it. Go look at art and get laid. The relevant quotes after the jump.

    I find most film writing almost…unreadable. And the longer I write, the less of it I try to read. I think that keeps me a better writer. I’m reading all the time, but I can learn more about the movies I’m seeing this week from reading a great 19th century novel than I can from whatever XYZ critic has to say this week about whatever. I think another problem with movie writing is that it’s insular, especially Internet writing. It’s so narrow and insular and just about movies, and I think to be a really good writer and film critic you need a range. You need to know what’s going on in painting, you need to know what’s going on in music, you need to read books, and get laid, and go to restaurants, you know what I mean?

    I do go to restaurants.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

 


Advertisement