Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • BlogNosh 02/18/08

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    • *Blush*??????New York Times blogger David Carr has called our Oscar party “the white hot social center” of the Oscar-party landscape. If you’re in New York that night, you simply must stop by. Details here.
    • “If you???ve seen Daniel Day Lewis??? portrayal of a greedy, sinister oilman in There Will Be Blood, it???s just another example of the Hollywood left???s contempt for capitalism.” That’s Tonight Show producer Dave Berg, speaking at a meeting held to try to rally Hollywood’s Republican troops against Barack Obama. Via Wilshire and Washington.
    • David Edelstein is worried that Juno will win Oscars in just about every category it’s nominated due to better choices splitting the vote. “As one of the few critics to dislike Juno, I would be devastated,” he writes in the first of what will apparently be a series of bloggy exchanges with Lynda Obst. “But weirder things have happened in these silly awards.”
    • From The Department Of Questions That Don’t Need To Be Asked: Jeff Wells wonders, “Is there anyone who doesn’t suspect that Harold and Kumar Escape From Guantanamo Bay will somehow play fast and loose, water down or otherwise make light of that deplorable situation?” Commenters to proceed to argue whether or not Gitmo detainees should be transfered to domestic prisons.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Surgically Doing Away with Typecasting

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Varsity Blues  (1999)

    Karate Dog  (2004)

    ronlester.jpgAs a former fat guy, I have to salute actor Ron Lester, who went on the Today Show yesterday showing off his slim figure (see the segment here). You may remember Lester as the really, really fat high school football player “Billy Bob” from Varsity Blues, or his identical character from Not Another Teen Movie. Back in 2001, he lost 315lbs. — 43lbs. of it extra skin that had to be removed — and even lost 2 inches worth of height (thanks to the weight lost from his head). He did this by gastric bypass surgery and it was primarily for heath reasons, but damn if he doesn’t look much better, too.

    The problem is, according to the person submitting this story to Fark.com, he may now be handsomer but he may also have cost himself his acting career. Obviously he had been employed in the past for his physique more than his acting talent, and now he’s missing that thing that guaranteed his being hired (his only significant movie post-surgery was Karate Dog). Certainly he’d rather be alive, though, than typecast. It’s not like he just went out and got plastic surgery thinking he’d be better off in an industry obsessed with good looks. But I did immediately think of Jennifer Grey and Meg Ryan as two prime examples of how physical changes, which were intended to be favorable, ended up more damaging career-wise. (more…)


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • 1930s Makeup

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    30smakeup.png

    Cory Doctrow at BoingBoing points to this scanned article from a 1933 issue of Modern Mechanix, which goes inside the Hollywood makeup studio of the era. Much of the story concentrates on how Boris Karloff (as you know, my classic horror movie hearthrob) was made up to look like Frankenstein and The Mummy, but my favorite part is the headline screencapped above.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Trailer of the Day: Redbelt

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Toy Story  (1995)

    Sgt. Bilko  (1996)

    Redbelt  (2008)

    David Mamet should always employ lowbrow comedic actors in dramatic roles. Think back to how great Steve Martin was in The Spanish Prisoner. Yes, Martin had done serious performances prior, but he was at the time coming off a long string of duds — most recent was Sgt. Bilko — and the film was a welcome change, at least for his fans if not himself, as he never seemed intent on repeating the variation again (too bad, because he could find Bill Murray-like success, in my opinion).

    This time Mamet has cast Tim Allen, an actor barely thought to be employable in anything but mainstream, family-friendly comedy. Unlike Martin, he’s a guy who has never really been in the favor of critics (his Rotten Tomatoes average is 42% compared with Martin’s 64%, and he’s fortunate to have the Toy Story boosters). Therefore, it will be interesting to see Allen appear in Mamet’s Redbelt, a fairly serious-looking drama set in the world of Ultimate Fighting (which, like Allen, could use a respectful filmmaker like Mamet in order to get more cred with the highbrows). He’s apparently only playing a Hollywood movie star, so he’s not being asked to stretch too far.

    Another thing that will be interesting to see is how much Redbelt is actually like a Kurosawa film, considering such a comparison was made by Mamet last year. The film opens in select theaters April 25.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • SXSW Preview: Present Company

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    For Keeps  (1988)

    For today’s SXSW Preview, we’re taking a look at Present Company, the latest film by Frank V. Ross. Frank, who appeared in this episode of Butterknife, had two films in last summer’s New Talkies program at the IFC Center, and like Quietly on By and Hohokam, Company is a lo-fi character study about the everyday traumas survived by young people far removed from urban hipster culture. This time around, Ross takes a look at Christy and Buddy, two young parents who are raising an infant whilst living in Christy’s parents’ suburban basement. Check out the trailer above, and Frank’s answers to the 4 Questions We’re Asking Everybody below.

    Tell us about your movie. Who did you work with, why did you make it? Give us the reductive, 25-word or less, “It’s like [pop culture reference a] meets [pop culture reference b]!” pitch, then explain what the quick and dirty sell leaves out.

    I don???t know why I made it. But I know now why that material kept my attention finally. Originally this movie was the Susan Smith story meets, I dunno, some shitty movie about a band with a horrible title. I wanted to make a picture about an unwed couple with a baby living in parent???s basement. It???s around me, it???s relevant, and with consequence. The deal breaker was wanting to make a movie with Tamara [Fana], once she was part of the deal we were able to see the picture for what it was supposed to be. She said the imagined circumstances were her nightmare???watching how she played it was a joy.

    So now I guess it???s For Keeps meets Scenes From a Marriage sans-all the talking. Which leaves out the passive-aggressive relationship; and the fact that it???s a comedy of sorts. They don???t hate each other, they think they???re funny, they get along every now and then but they just don???t love one another despite having a baby???that was an accident. Bound by the obligation. Characters not having a strong enough personality to be themselves around different groups or individuals and almost never doing the right thing in circumstances.

    “This meets that” always leaves out way more then can be measured and takes away from how hard we work at trying to make something new. I hate you for asking me to do that. But love that you asked.

    (more…)


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • There’s indie, and then there’s indie.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    At his new Salon blog, Andrew O’Hehir asks:

    Are the Indiewood movies gradually sucking money and life out of the genuine independents, meaning smaller distributors without a big studio’s marketing muscle behind them?

    Answer: Yes.

    Glad we could sort that out.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog