Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Oscar Documentary Shortlist Revealed

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    AJ Schnack has posted the Academy’s shortlist for the Best Documentary Feature nomination. As expected (at least, by me), Ellen Kuras’ The Betrayal, Werner Herzog’s Encounters at the End of the World, Errol Morris’ Standard Operating Procedure, and Sundance winners Man on Wire and Trouble the Wire all made the cut. It’s also nice to see a few smaller films on the list, including In a Dream and They Killed Sister Dorothy. But there are also a few notable omissions, including Religulous and Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired, both of which had their semi-secret shortlist qualifying runs at the Creative Entertainment Coliseum Quad on 181 Street in the nosebleed section of New York City. Coincidence?!?? Probably! (For what it’s worth, Expelled, Religulous‘ political polar opposite, also failed to make the cut.)

    The full list can be found here. Expect chatter and analysis in the days to come (probably not least from the snubbed Bill Maher).


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Rahm Emanuel, The Movie: 5 Charismatic Politicians Who Need Biopics

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Milk  (2008)

    The Gus Van Sant-directed, Sean Penn starring Harvey Milk biopic Milk opens next week, and it’s already generating controversy, especially in California in the wake of the Prop 8 debacle. Penn is certainly no stranger to playing politicians in the limelight; his Willie Stark character in All The King’s Men was loosely based on Governor Huey Long of Louisiana. While we’ve had a slew of movies about fictional presidents and politicians, we’d like to see more biopics based on some of the larger than life characters who have dominated the political world. From Rahm Emanuel to Pat Buchanan, here’s a look at a handful of political firecrackers who deserve their own Oscar-baiting biopic.

    Ann Richards

    Ann Richards

    This feisty governor of Texas was famous for her brash attitude and quotes like this one about George H.W. Bush, “Poor George, he was born with a silver foot in his mouth.” She was larger than life, sported a huge white hairdo, and famously posed on a Harley Davidson that was sent to her as a gift (she didn’t keep it). She weathered a brutal campaign for the governorship of Texas in 1990, in which she came from a 20-point deficit to defeat Clayton Williams Jr. She lost her reelection in 1994 to George W. Bush, after another bitterly fought race.

    After losing the election, Richards campaigned frequently for Democratic candidates across the United States, and frequently turned to Hollywood and her love of movies. She narrated the documentary Barbecue: A Texas Love Story, had a small part in Disney’s Home on the Range, and played herself in an episode of King of the Hill.

    Who should play her: I don’t think you can see anyone but Ellen Burstyn playing this role. Not only does she have an uncanny resemblance to Richards, but she’s a top notch actress who incidentally starred in one of my favorite Texas movies, The Last Picture Show.

    Emperor Norton

    Emperor Norton

    Easily one of the most colorful and eccentric character in U.S. history, Joshua Abraham Norton was a UK citizen who spent time abroad before settling in San Francisco and going bankrupt as an importer of rice from Peru. He went on a self-imposed exile, and then shortly returned to San Francisco where he declared himself Emperor of the United States. He would often make wild proclamations and demands, such as abolishing the Democratic and Republican parties, and forbidding Congress to meet. He was never taken seriously, and eventually San Francisco embraced him as their own.

    Soldiers at the Presidio gave him an old uniform, replete with gold epaulets, to wear, and he was often seen around town lecturing or greeting people on the streets. He eventually began printing his own money, which was recognized as legal tender in San Francisco, and he also adopted the title Protector of Mexico. When his uniform fell into disrepair, the city bought him a new one, and when he eventually died penniless, a group of gentlemen in the city paid for his funeral, and the newspapers ran front page headlines. Mark Twain based the King character in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn on Norton, and most people don’t even know about him.

    Who should play him: When I first moved to Los Angeles I worked at a film company who had a biopic in the works about Emperor Norton, and oddly enough Edward Norton was attached to the project. It sadly vanished into the cracks of development hell, but it would be fantastic to see this get resurrected.

    The Brothers Emanuel

    You might not have heard a lot about Rahm Emanuel until he recently accepted the Barack Obama’s offer to become his Chief of State, but he’s been raucous political figure for several years. He also has two brothers who have each risen to the top of their game in their respective fields: Brother Ezekiel received an MD from Harvard Medical and PhD from Harvard University in political philosophy. He also serves as chair of the department of bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. Brother Ari is a Hollywood super-agent, and the basis for the Ari Gold character played by Jeremy Piven in Entourage.

    As colorful as his brothers are, Rahm is the one to watch in the upcoming years. He’s already served as an adviser to President Clinton, headed the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, chairs the Democratic Caucus, serves on the powerful Committee on Ways and Means, served on the board of Freddie Mac, and is also currently as a congressman from Illinois. He’s a powerful figure in the halls of Washington, known for his bull-headed attitude and his “sharp elbows.”

    Who should play them: It’s no doubt that Jeremy Piven doesn’t have the chops or the ethnicity to pull off playing all three brothers himself, so we’d like to see some bold decisions in casting these roles.

    • Alexander Siddig as Rahm Emanuel: He was brilliant as Prince Nasir Al-Subaai in Syriana, and proven that he’s grown well out of his Star Trek: Deep Space Nine uniform.
    • Shaun Toub as Ezekiel Emanuel: Looking the complete scholar in this summer’s Iron Man, Toub can pull off the wise doctor and elder brother with no problem.
    • Ben Affleck as Ari Emmanuel: Ben Affleck has been trying to ride on pretty boy action star coattails for too long. We know the guy can act after seeing him in Boiler Room, so give him a role where he’s not trying to be Harrison Ford. A young and powerful Hollywood agent? We’d buy it.

    Pat Buchanan

    Pat Buchanan

    While it might not be popular to follow the lives of politicians that people love to hate, you usually end up getting some insights into their lives that you probably weren’t privy to before, like in Oliver Stone’s Nixon. Pat Buchanan is one of those people who are frequently a target in politics, and he’s been involved in politics since, coincidentally, Nixon’s presidency. He served as an advisor to Nixon’s campaign, and later as advisor to Gerald Ford, and Ronald Reagan. He was also the first host of CNN’s Crossfire, and has made a life for himself as a political commentator and writer, although it hasn’t won him a load of friends in the process — he’s more known for being a figure who instigates controversy.

    Buchanan his a very loud and outspoken critic of homosexuality, abortion, and even feminism, having once said in one of his columns that women “are simply not endowed by nature with the same measures of single-minded ambition and the will to succeed in the fiercely competitive world of Western capitalism.” While that was in 1983, he recently posted on his blog (branded as “right from the beginning…” on the front page) that “black folks” should be grateful for being taken from Africa as slaves and introduced to Christian salvation in America. You might love or hate the guy, but at age 70 he shows no signs of slowing down, and some people (like yours truly) would like to find out how he got this way.

    Who should play him: Ten years ago I would’ve said John Goodman would be a good choice for this role, but having become a huge fan of Paul Giamatti over the years, I’d love to see what he could do with it. Either him or Philip Seymour Hoffman. Maybe they could have a Buchanan-off between the two of them, winner take all.

    Nancy Pelosi

    Nancy Pelosi

    Contrary to Pat Buchanan’s claim, there are plenty of strong women in Washington. Do you really need much more evidence in a year that saw Hilary Clinton running for President, and the first appointment by a woman to the prestigious position of Speaker of the House just two years ago? Nancy Pelosi has been a longtime outspoken political figure, and she’s now third in line for the presidency, putting her right behind the vice-president. She’s also not afraid of standing up to opposition. When President Bush criticized Congress for being “inactive” this summer, Pelosi retorted by saying that Bush himself was, “a total failure, losing all credibility with the American people on the war, on the economy, on energy, you name the subject.”

    Pelosi said during her acceptance speech of the Speaker position that women had now finally broken through the “marble ceiling” in Washington, and has been very vocal in her opposition to the Iraq War. She’s also one of the richest members of Congress, thanks to her family’s real estate holdings, and her husbands stock in Apple Computer, which puts makes her one rich liberal. Her daughter Alexandra has directed the documentaries Journeys with George and Friends of God, and she recently published a book entitled Sneaking into the Flying Circus: How the Media Turn Our Presidential Campaigns into Freak Shows. While she probably wouldn’t be unbiased enough to direct a movie about her own mother, it would be interesting to see what she could do with it.

    Who should play her: Was I the only person who really liked Geena Davis in Commander in Chief? Sure, it was television, but she looked the part, and she’s definitely got some Pelosi hair going on. She’s tall enough to break marble ceilings on her own and could really pull this off as a comeback role. Hop to it, Davis.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Australia’s Oscar Chances: Does Oprah’s Endorsement Matter?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Color Purple  (1985)

    Titanic  (1997)

    Beloved  (1998)

    Alexander  (2004)

    Crash  (2005)

    Fahrenheit 9/11  (2004)

    Sicko  (2007)

    Australia  (2008)

    Marley & Me  (2008)

    The Reader  (2008)

    Seven Pounds  (2008)

    The Road  (2009)

    Oprah Winfrey can certainly create a best seller when it comes to books, and her pick of the presidential candidates is on his way to the White House. But can she get behind a movie and contribute to its success? 20th Century Fox seems to hope so, because the studio apparently allowed the talk show host to screen an unfinished cut of Australia in preparation for her November 10 show, which featured the film’s stars, Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman, as well as a live-via-Skype call-in from filmmaker Baz Luhrman. Fortunately for Fox, Oprah raved about the film, and now the media has latched on to the endorsement, creating some much-needed positive buzz for the Oscar-hopeful. Yet there’s a big problem with all the excitement: Oprah’s film recommendations have hardly been sure-fire champs in the past.

    Case in point: the first title I came upon while searching for Oprah-select cinema was something called Christmas in the Clouds, a 2005 indie that she chose as her “must see holiday movie,” in O magazine a few years back. The film barely grossed a quarter-million dollars in theaters, but even if her endorsement didn’t occur until its DVD release in November 2006, there’s still no proof of popularity from the rental charts of the time, and two years later fewer than 250 people have rated it on IMDb (not the best for determining how many people have seen it, sure, but such a small number of votes is still somewhat revealing). As for awards recognition, well, it received the Audience Award at the 2001 Austin Film Festival, and it was named the best Native American-themed film the same year at the Santa Fe Film Festival, but the majority of Academy voters probably never even heard of it.

    Okay, so that is an extreme example of a film that had not even one percent of the marketing budget of Australia. So, let’s take a look at some of the bigger releases that Oprah has recommended more recently. Well, there is Michael Moore’s Sicko, which she labeled “the one movie you must see this summer,” a few weeks prior to its barely wide release in June 2007. Considering its theater count and its genre, the documentary’s final domestic gross of $24.5 million was quite an achievement, especially since only two other docs have grossed more (including Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11, which will stay on top for quite awhile with its $119.1 million). Oh, and yes, Sicko earned an Oscar nomination, too.

    But did Oprah’s statement really have that much impact on Sicko’s success? What about all the other titles with Oprah connections that haven’t performed so well? Films based on her book club selections, from her inaugural title, The Deep End of the Ocean, to the recent adaptation of Love in the Time of Cholera, have rarely been blockbusters, and the three Academy nominations for House of Sand and Fog are hardly thanks to her love for and endorsement of that novel. Of course, film adaptations are not necessarily ever pegged to the praises of their source material, which is why Oprah’s name has not been linked to the expected Oscar contenders The Reader and The Road.

    Then there are the films she’s been directly involved with. Beloved, which she produced and starred in, earned a middling gross of $22.9 million. Its sole Oscar nomination was for costume design. Her more recent production, The Great Debaters, did a little better money-wise with $30.2 million, but it failed to garner the Academy’s attention. Ignoring the animated films she’s lent her voice to, you have to go back 23 years, long before she had the powers of influence she’s currently known for, to find something as big as Fox would like Australia to be. It was then that The Color Purple earned nearly $100 million and 11 Oscar nominations (none of which it won).

    As for films that Oprah simply promotes and recommends on her show, there is no clear certainty that she can influence either box office or the Oscars. She’s featured the casts from Crash and Brokeback Mountain, yet she’s also given time to publicize films like Alexander and Things We Lost in the Fire. Last week, after calling Australia “the film we needed to see,” she also helped to sell Marley & Me, a movie that might benefit slightly in increased ticket sales thanks to the appearances by Jennifer Aniston, yet there are no news reports mentioning anything but Aniston’s comments about her ex-husband. There’s likewise little media attention given to the fact that Oprah also apparently saw Seven Pounds, the Will Smith movie that, like Australia, has so far received no reviews. Was there no soundbite from Smith’s appearance earlier this month? Seven Pounds is also a mysterious Oscar contender with some needed positive buzz, though maybe Sony Pictures didn’t think to feed the press anything regarding Oprah’s connection to that film the way Fox has pushed them on the Australia endorsement.

    And what of Oprah’s praise anyway? She said, “I have not been this excited about a movie since I don’t know when.” How excited? And be more specific. Since forty years ago? Since Titanic? Since Christmas in the Clouds? Is this really the best movie of the year? Other than turning the expectations up a little higher following the recent negativity surrounding Australia, Oprah hasn’t really offered us anything except hope. So, a word to Fox: it’s about time you let the real critics see this alleged masterpiece so we can actually find out if this film has some real chances at an Oscar.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Star Trek Trailer is Confusing. Clip of the Day

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Watchmen  (2009)

    Star Trek  (2009)

    Twilight  (2008)

    After watching the new Star Trek trailer leaked on YouTube and coming away completely confused, I was happy to discover that the spot was receiving a proper, official release this morning. But after also watching the higher-quality version on Apple.com, I’m not any more enthused. It still looks cluttered with too much CG and potentially weak direction — kind of like the first Star Wars prequel, of which I’m also reminded thanks to that lame, child version of James “Siberius” Kirk. And it still lays on the characters and sets up the plot as messily as possible. Worst of all, it doesn’t at all pique the interest of a non-Trekkie like myself.

    I know, looking at the recent marketing of Twilight and Watchmen has informed me that the first trailer is for the fans and a later spot will be a better introduction to the characters and will feature more appealing elements for newbies. But I figured that teaser trailer we saw way back in January was the one for the followers. There’s not much time left to get me, a guy who has only seen Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (and only for the whales), fully excited.

    Oh yeah, I keep forgetting that this movie isn’t still arriving this Christmas, and so there’s plenty of time between now and May 2009 for Paramount to release another trailer that will woo me sufficiently. Hopefully presenting me with better views of both Winona Ryder (is that actually her laying down in the white outfit?) and villain Eric Bana (am I the only one who thinks that shot of him too much resembles Zachary Quinto as Spock?), not to mention the principal crew of the Enterprise (more Simon Pegg especially).

    However, if the trailers keep on seeming directed primarily at the Trekkies, Paramount might want to expect another disappointing box office take from the franchise.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • SITA SINGS THE BLUES Director Nina Paley: The Media Diet

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    For fans of relatively offbeat animation, 2008 seems to have been a banner year. Pixar produced perhaps their most acclaimed effort yet with Wall-E, which is drawing considerable heat for a best picture nomination. Ari Folman’s Waltz with Bashir thrilled and horrified audiences in Competition in Cannes with subject matter and personal introspection not usually broached by animated films. Yet the most satisfying animated film that surfaced in 2008 may well have been Nina Paley’s delightful Sita Sings The Blues, which marries the tunes of obscure 30’s blues songstress Annette Hanshaw to a retelling, by three hip, Gen-Y Indians, of the Indian myth Ramayana and a mildly autobiographical story of a Seattle-based female cartoonist loosing her husband to his job in India. The film, a nominee for this year’s Gotham Award for the Best Film Not Playing at a Theater Near You after an impressive festival run that began at this year’s Berlinale, screens at MoMA on Thursday and Saturday. Clearly a dedicated postmodernist, after the jump Paley discusses Sci-Fi channel’s Eureka, Lawrence Lessig’s Free Culture and the strange ambiguities of influence.

    What films or television shows have you seen recently?

    Whatever they had on the airplane. It was Virgin, and they charged $7.99 for movies, so I stuck with the free TV channels (I don’t have TV at home). The SciFi channel was showing a commercial-free marathon of Eureka which I had never even heard of before, but it was pretty good plane fare. Also some other station was playing Spiderman, but with tons of commercial breaks which made it kind of tedious to watch.

    Which ones stuck with you and why?

    Eureka because I saw like 5 episodes, without commercials.

    Does your interest in them have anything to do with your own work as an animator?

    Not in any way I can identify consciously, but I’m sure it does somehow.

    How do the films that you think of as “influences” affect your own style and preoccupations as a animator, if at all?

    So many people have asked “what are your influences” over the years. I now conclude my answer is: EVERYTHING. Everything I see, even if it’s just out the corner of my eye, is an influence.

    I’m one of those crazy free culture people who insist there are no original ideas; all creativity builds on what has come before. As an artist I pull stuff out of the hive mind, the culture that’s all around me. I’m so saturated in culture I can’t separate influences out, or keep track of each discreet one. Just as corals build complex structures from the calcium floating in the ocean around them, artists pull ideas and influences from the sea of culture, and organize them in ways that suit us.

    How often do you read fiction? Do you wish you read more?

    I read a lot. I prefer reading to watching TV. I also read nonfiction.

    What would be your ideal literary adaptation and why?

    Hmm. Free Culture by Lawrence Lessig would make a good movie, because people need to discuss this stuff and most can’t be persuaded to read a book.

    How, if at all, has reading informed your animation?

    It gives my mind an escape, something to do in “foreground” while my subconscious is solving problems in “background.” And it enriches me as a human being. My work is an expression of my whole being, so anything that touches me will in some way touch my art too.

    What are you listening to recently?
    I’m currently staying at a friend’s house in Oakland (I’m in town for the San Francisco Animation Festival). My hosts are cleaning up the kitchen right now, playing something on their boom box. I have no idea what it is, but I know I’m absorbing it and if I ever hear it again, it’ll sound familiar.

    I almost never sit down and consciously listen to music. But just walking around, I hear tons. Stores and restaurants pipe in music, people play it in subways and on the street, it’s on people’s cell phone ringtones, it blasts from the windows of passing cars, it’s in the background everywhere. I can’t close my ears. I may only hear snippets at a time but it sticks in my mind, somewhere, adding to all the other influences in
    there.

    I enjoy quiet. In silence I can play back all the junk my mind has collected, and really listen to it. I have a lifetime of music playing in my head constantly. The DJ is my id, or subconscious, or maybe God.

    Since I typed all that, my host’s soundtrack has turned to the Talking Heads, “Once in a Lifetime.” I’ve never owned a Talking Heads record, and don’t have an MP3 collection, but I know that song, and countless others.

    If you could collaborate with one musician on one of your own films, whom would it be and why?

    That would depend on the story, the idea behind the piece, and a lot of other factors. Right now I’m looking for a 30-second ditty on the theme of “copying isn’t theft.” Anyone have one or want to write one?

    If there were such a thing as an “animated concert film”, who would be the best subject?

    Live, from the Inside of Nina’s Head: God the DJ! That’s one long concert though.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Mark Cuban Charged with Insider Trading

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    According to WIRED and other sources, Mark Cuban, founder of 2929 Entertainment (which includes the eponymous production company, Magnolia Pictures, HDNet and Landmark Theaters), has been charged with insider training. FORBES has the filing, which contends that in 2004, Cuban became privy to the knowledge that Mamma.com, in which he owned 600,000 shares, was set to offer public shares at a cut price. Despite agreeing to keep the information confidential, the filing charges, Cuban sold his shares, and thereby “avoided losses in excess of $750,000.”

    For those of us who are SEC illiterate, Sillicon Alley Insider offers a detailed timeline of exactly what the Commission is alleging Cuban did. They conclude that “if the SEC’s reporting of the facts is true and complete, it certainly appears that Mark traded while in possession of material non-public information.”

    We’ll be refreshing Cuban’s blog all afternoon and wil let you know if he posts a comment.

    UPDATE! That was quick. Cuban now has a statement, signed by his lawyer, on his blog. It reads in part: “This matter, which has been pending before the Commission for nearly two years, has no merit and is a product of gross abuse of prosecutorial discretion…Mr. Cuban stated, ‘I am disappointed that the Commission chose to bring this case based upon its Enforcement staff’s win-at-any-cost ambitions. The staff’s process was result-oriented, facts be damned. The government’s claims are false and they will be proven to be so.’”


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog