Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • A Cappella Tribute to John Williams and Star Wars. Clip of the Day

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Star Wars  (1977)

    The song “Star Wars” by a capella group Moosebutter is nearly a decade old, but it’s suddenly becoming a hit thanks to the popular YouTube video “Star Wars - an a capella tribute to John Williams,” which has been showcased everywhere from StarWars.com to an NBC affiliate in Atlanta. The problem with the new video is that it makes its star, paid YouTuber Corey Vidal, seem like he’s the one responsible for both the song and its performance. He does give credit to Moosebutter, whose permission he received prior to making his clip, but it doesn’t seem to be enough. How many viewers actually read the info about the videos they watch on YouTube?

    Okay, so Vidal’s lip-syncing is entertaining, but I also thought it was him singing — all four parts — and so initially was impressed by that. Otherwise his talent is merely good memorization skills and simple composite editing. And for that he’s gotten 1.4 million views. In response, the guys from Moosebutter have put up a video of themselves, minus one member, performing the song live in 2005. That’s the clip I’m featuring instead of Vidal’s, and here’s hoping that it gets at least half the views as the clip that’s getting all the fame.

    And now I’ll say what I have to about the song: it’s kind of like the recently showcased clip of Shia LaBeouf being inserted into all of Spielberg’s earlier films. I think it might now be hard to listen to any of Williams’ scores without thinking of how Star Wars dialogue and plot points might be used as lyrics to the themes. Just as I’d love to see more of the Shia stuff, I’d love for Moosebutter to have a go at the tons of other Williams compositions from the past 30 years.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Barack Obama vs. The Vampires

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Twilight  (2008)

    The big love for Let the Right One In and high expectations over the impending release of Twilight has sparked some chatter about vampires as a symbolic narrative construct — or, as Jeff Wells puts it in a post condescendingly titled “Girls Vampire Club,” “the romantic whatchamacallit vampire metaphor.” At this point, it’s not even much of a metaphor: in the fifteen years between the birth of the Buffy franchise and the release of the two teen vampire films named above, the plight of the brooding but well-meaning undead has become so synonymous with teenage alienation that fiction about the convergance of the two “outsider” groups has just about run out of points to make. It’s become refreshing to see vampires function as unambiguous villians, an evil to be dealt with sans angst.

    And so you’ve got to give it up for Barackula, just a little bit, just for refusing to engage in the “vampires are romantic subjects too!” cliche. This short, online-only musical (which we first learned of months ago, before it went online, but only got around to watching after last week’s election) re-imagines a young Obama’s circa-1990 induction as president of the Harvard Law Review as song-and-dance-off between our hero and a clan of literally bloodsucking would-be lawyers. Its not exactly a game-changer as far as musicals go, but it’s exceptionally narratively tight and polished for what amounts to a dramatic user-generated campaign ad, and its anticipation of what would become the major themes of the campaign all the way up to Election Day is truly remarkable.

    Barackula’s setpiece takes place after the young Obama has been elected to the highest office in Harvard’s budding lawyer land. He shows up for what he thinks is an inauguration, but his befanged colleagues soon set him straight: it’s a “conversion” (is that what’s going on at the White House today?) Vampires, so often coded as cool rebels in teen-oriented media, are here the in crowd, the establishment, an ancient, elite group that’s so wary of Obama the outsider that they immediately set forth to make him One Of Them. When Obama learns that the vampire lawyers want to induct him into their “secret society,” he breaks into a funky protest song. Rather than either assimilate into or conquer his opponents, Obama suggests peaceful collaboration:

    We can talk about it, we can compromise…

    We don’t need any violence, we just need to unite…

    We can live together, mortals and immortals — conversion’s something of the past….

    As expected, this is not what the vampires want to hear, but I’ll let you see what happens for yourself rather than spoil it. I do think it’s worth pointing out that the villainous vampires in Barackula are not coded as Republicans — they even brag about being responsbile for the career of a certain “Arkansas governor and his wife” — but the political status quo in general. This young Obama is a potential hero who is charged with reforming a general culture of political toxicity, and like the real Obama, he does it by calmly refusing to engage the negative forces. It becomes necessary that here’s nothing sexy or sensitive about these vampires; this draining of angst from the vampire myth perfectly suits the no-drama Obama. The musical’s songs and choreography are largely unremarkable, but Barackula’s very existence is notable as an artistic snapshot of the obstinate optimism that the Obama campaign improbably sold to a majority of a depressed nation.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Josh Brolin’s Oscar Chances: Are the Hurdles Too High?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Nixon  (1995)

    Elizabeth  (1998)

    I Am Sam  (2002)

    Ray  (2004)

    Walk the Line  (2005)

    The Queen  (2006)

    I'm Not There  (2007)

    Milk  (2008)

    W.  (2008)

    It happened last year for Cate Blanchett. The actress starred in a biopic that critics ripped to shreds, a film that basically bombed at the (American) box office, and yet she managed to score a Best Actress nomination for her reprised performance as the titular monarch of Elizabeth: The Golden Age. Additionally, Blanchett earned another nomination for Best Supporting Actress the same year, for her portrayal of Bob Dylan in I’m Not There. Now Josh Brolin could achieve a similar feat this year, not just by earning separate nominations for playing the titular president of W. and portraying politician-turned-assassin Dan White in Milk, but also by overcoming the difficulty of earning recognition in a lead category for a film that otherwise is not very well regarded. Are Brolin’s hurdles higher than Blanchett’s, though? With all the praise he’s received for W., he’s still far from being considered a sure thing candidate, regardless of his worthiness or the Academy’s history of oftentimes ignoring the critics and the grosses when nominating dependable, standout actors.

    And boy, does Brolin stand out. Despite giving a strong, surprisingly grounded performance in W., the actor is almost in a world of his own in the film. The supporting players mostly miss their marks, whether through overshot caricature (Thandie Newton’s stroke-faced, alien-voiced Condoleeza Rice) or an apparent lack of effort (Scott Glenn looks bored and unrecognizable as Rumsfeld, while Toby Jones for some reason offers a Karl Rove who’s more huggable than slimy). Both problems may have been due to an unclear decision on the film’s intended tone, but regardless, the script is way too simpleminded, as if adapted from the sitting president’s Wikipedia page. Brolin is the only person who keeps the film interesting and engrossing by making the character his own rather than going for total impersonation. Some of his movements and inflections consist of outright aping, but his personalization allows for unpredictability in much of his execution. Certainly it’s a performance as good as Joaquin Phoenix’s in Walk the Line and Jamie Foxx’s in Ray. Perhaps if W. were about a musician-turned-president, with Brolin offering his own singing voice, his nomination would be more assured?

    So far it seems he’s hardly being considered. Sites ranking the actor’s chances in chart form include And the Winner Is…, which places him tenth in the running, Entertainment Weekly, which puts him alphabetically somewhere between ninth and thirteenth while calling him a long shot, Movie City News, which lists him seventh with a comment that he deserves the nom “111%”, and In Contention, which also puts him at seventh place. Hollywood Elsewhere’s Jeff Wells merely includes him as one of eight contenders for the lead actor category, which is at least more of an approval than the others.

    So what are those hurdles that are keeping him out of the fortunate five? As of this past weekend, W. is down to 17th place in its fourth weekend at the box office, and it hasn’t yet even passed the $25 million mark domestically. Not that a film needs to be a hit with moviegoers to make a difference with the Academy, though, right? This time last year, Elizabeth: The Golden Age was similarly fading from the interests of ticket buyers in its fifth week, having made a meager $16 million. And of the ten Best Actor nominees of the last two years, half came from films that grossed less than W. Then there are the film’s poor reviews, which have earned W. a Metacritic score of 56. Compared to Elizabeth: The Golden Age’s score of 45, that’s not actually too much of a drawback. And if the Academy can nominate Sean Penn for I Am Sam in spite of that movie’s reception (Metacritic score of 28!), it shouldn’t have any problem with a performance from a picture that at least somewhat pleased more than 50% of critics.

    Of course, Penn was and is an Oscar vet. So was Blanchett, who had already been nominated for the same role in the first Elizabeth. It wouldn’t be surprising if some Academy members voted for her Elizabeth: The Golden Age performance without even having seen the movie. Meanwhile, Brolin’s greatest film honor as of yet is being one-seventh of the SAG Award-winning ensemble cast of No Country for Old Men. Last year he may have deserved a double nomination for his lead performance in that film and his supporting bit in American Gangster, but he failed to garner the Academy’s notice. Though some people see Brolin garnering two nominations this year as a way of making up for his prior snubs, the actor’s lack of past favor shall also be a disadvantage for him. The best way for him to be locked for a nomination is to receive some tremendous love from the early determining critics circle awards. Unfortunately, that’s not likely to happen, because actors like Penn and Mickey Rourke are bound to fill the hearts of those awards’ voters.

    Another hurdle seems to be the role Brolin plays, though not necessarily due to the focal figure being so contemporary. The portrait of President Bush is indeed one of the most present-minded biopics in years. However, with a retrospective window of only five years in its most recent setting, W. is hardly any different than The Queen, a not-quite-biopic film that presents an Oscar-winning portrayal of Queen Elizabeth II set only nine years in the past. W. deals with a more touchy subject for Academy members, though, it being about a more disliked and derided leader who has actually been the president of most voters for the past eight years. And the same factors that are keeping audiences away from the film in theaters, regardless of what their politics may be, will probably similarly affect Academy voters’ hesitance to put on that screener DVD.

    If Academy voters aren’t willing to watch the performance now, though, perhaps they can give it the same twenty years they had between Nixon’s presidency and Oliver Stone’s biopic of that other unlikable president. Maybe in 2028 W. could be the innaugural film nominated in a much-needed future category that retroactively honors should-have-been-awarded performances?


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • The Guitar Director Amy Redford: The Media Diet

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Frozen River  (2008)

    The Guitar  (2008)

    In The Guitar, ex-Mike Figgis muse Saffron Burrows plays a terminally ill, freshly laid-off woman who holes up in a downtown loft near the Hudson and doggedly pursues one last series of good times, as represented by the shiny red guitar which informs the title, and sex with Isaach de Bankole and Paz de la Huerta. Not bad as far as final flings go. After making its debut at the 2008 Sundance Film Festival, with stops at Mill Valley and the Hamptons along the way, Amy Redford’s directorial debut opened on Friday in New York. We caught up with the fledgling film director (and Sundance chief’s daughter) to talk about her addiction to Family Guy, what made The Diving Bell and The Butterfly so special and what she’d like to do with Tom Waits.

    What films or television shows have you seen recently?

    I have developed an almost unhealthy addiction to Family Guy. I think it looks like there is some interesting TV out there these days. I haven’t had the opportunity to tune in as much as I would like. I have a 2 1/2 month old baby girl, and I sort of watch her like television.

    Which ones stuck with you and why?

    Frozen River stuck with me. I thought it was incredibly authentic and managed to have great momentum and suspense. I loved the complexity of those characters. Nice to see a great female anti-hero. Diving Bell and the Butterfly stuck with me. It was so stylistically fearless, and I saw it after I had finished my film. I appreciated the specificity, not to mention the courage of subject matter.

    Does your interest in them have anything to do with your own work as a filmmaker? How do the films that you think of as “influences” affect your own style and preoccupations as a filmmaker?

    I suppose it is really a mosaic of influences. I think that I am probably affected in one way or another by everything I see. I love films that give permission to create outside the box, in all genres. I think that the script really leads the way in terms of style. My next project is vastly different from the first, and I will probably be inspired by vastly different things than I was on The Guitar. Once you take a project on you sort of start to see the world through the filter of that subject matter. I like films that accomplish their task, whether it is Mel Brooks or Bergman.

    How often do you read fiction? Do you wish you read more?

    I tend to read fiction when I am promising myself that I wont “do” anything. I really wish I read more. I have a backlog of scripts right now, and I tend to feel guilty if I read anything else when I have the time.

    What would be your ideal literary adaptation and why?

    I am actually in the process of pursuing the rights to a book I have wanted for a long time. Last I heard the stipulation was that I wasn’t a “first time filmmaker”. I’m not anymore, so I am going for it. I’m too superstitious to say which book.

    What are you listening to recently?

    Bedtime with The Beatles, Pink Floyd Lullabys. My niece just sent me Ray LaMontagne, which I have been liking. Thank god for the youngins. They keep me a little more current.

    I’m involved in a project about Eva Cassidy so I have been listening to her a lot. I am also listening to a composer named George Antheil for another project called Face Value that I am attached to. I think I need to do more listening for pleasure.

    If you could collaborate with one musician on a film, who would it be and why?

    Tom Waits. He has a great sense of story telling, and character. There is a musical film that I have been helping out with, and I will beg him at some point to take a look at it.

    What would be the ideal pairing of filmmaker and musician for a concert film?

    Amy Redford and Tom Waits :)

    I think Fantasia hit the nail on the head. Great for kids, but also didn’t underestimate their intelligence.

    I think some great things could be done in documentary format. Looking at the reactions to Obama’s election around the world begged for something weighty to be played My first classical exposure was Mussorgsky’s Pictures at an Exhibition. I think that would be a good pairing of image and music.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • In New York This Week: Intimidad, Flaherty, Animation w/Beer

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Intimidad  (2008)

    A sampling of movie events happening around town this week:

    • Flaherty NYC will present its second monthly program of non-fiction shorts tonight at Anthology Film Archives. The lineup includes two pieces by Sylvia Schedelbauer and two by Alison Kobayashi. Pamela Cohn, who will moderate a discussion after the screening, describes Kobayashi as a “very young, Tracey Ullman-esque performance artist” who “does everything by herself–makeup, wardrobe, shooting, editing.” More info on the program here.
    • Also tonight: Rooftop Films is putting on a free showcase of animated shorts at Chelsea Market. I can’t find info on the specifics of the lineup, but the Rooftop website promises free beer.
    • David Redmon and Ashley Sabin are bringing one of my favorite non-fiction films of the year, Intimidad, to MoMA this Friday and next Wednesday. You can read my review of the film from SXSW here; more info at MoMA’s website.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • James Bond: For Your Ears Only, The Cheesiest Lines from Bond Movies

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Goldfinger  (1964)

    Moonraker  (1979)

    A View to a Kill  (1985)

    Licence to Kill  (1989)

    GoldenEye  (1995)

    • “Shaken, not stirred.”
    • “Hello, Moneypenny.”
    • “Bond, James Bond.”

    These are some of the classic lines you hear in nearly every James Bond film. Then there are lines that are unique to each film, and that stick with you after you’ve seen them. Lines like:

    • “No Mr. Bond, I expect you to die!” - Auric Goldfinger in Goldfinger
    • “Good choice, she is very sexiful.” - Tiger Tanaka in You Only Live Twice
    • “Now put your clothes back on and I’ll buy you an ice cream” - James Bond in For Your Eyes Only

    But what Bond movies excel at — besides action, intrigue, and sex — is pure, unadulterated cheese. These films have given us some of the cheesiest lines in the history of filmmaking, and the updated Daniel Craig movies are no exception. From Sean Connery on down, the actors in Bond films have had to deliver cringe-inducing dialog from time to time. We remember the worst after the jump.

    Goldfinger

    • Pussy: “My name is Pussy Galore”
    • Bond: “I must be dreaming.”

    Now, this isn’t exactly cheese per se, but it did establish the long-running gag of having women with names that drip with sexual innuendo. You could probably argue that Ursula Andress first established this in Dr. No as Honey Ryder, but there probably hasn’t been as blatant a name as Pussy Galore until Austin Powers met Alotta Fagina. Although Holly Goodhead from Moonraker might rate a close second, and you can’t forget Octopussy from… Octopussy. In the new Casino Royale they poke fun at this naming scheme when Daniel Craig’s Bond jokingly tells Vesper that her cover name is “Stephanie Broadchest.”

    Diamonds Are Forever

    • Blofeld: “The satellite is at present over… Kansas. Well, if we destroy Kansas the world may not hear about it for years. Perhaps New York, with all that smut and traffic… might give them a chance for a fresh start. Washington, DC. Perfect. Since we have not heard from them, they will hear from us.” - Blofeld in Diamonds Are Forever

    Admittedly, this is my favorite Bond film, and it pains me to include this line, but it just doesn’t work. Blofeld is a criminal mastermind, and preparing to obliterate a massive target with his diamond-powered superlaser, and this bit of cheese is the best thing they could come up with? Yes, he’s an evil arch-villain and all that jazz, but that doesn’t mean he’s coocoo for Cocoa Puffs. I wonder how people who lived in Kansas felt about this line. They probably either chuckled, or else swore off all Bond movies from that moment on. It’s just too goofy for a classic villain to be say before firing what amounts to a miniature Death Star. Even though the guy was bald and carried a white cat around, he was still a pretty creepy nemeis for Bond.

    On Her Majesty’s Secret Service

    • Bond: “This never happened to the other fellow.” - George Lazenby’s James Bond, directly to the camera

    When Sean Connery finally retired from James Bond duty, producers tapped George Lazenby to fill his shoes. In the opening scene of the movie, Lazenby’s Bond rescues a girl from drowning, carries her to shore, and then is attacked by thugs. Although he eventually beats them, the girl zooms off in her car, leaving Bond with only her shoes in his hands. Then he delivers the above line to the camera. In today’s terms the producers would have been texting each other saying “LOLZ! Get it?! OMG WTF! LMFAO!” Seriously, did we really need this line? Maybe in a tongue-in-cheek commercial or something, but not in the first film introducing a new Bond. It makes it all a bit too meta and goofy.

    The Spy Who Loved Me

    • M: “Moneypenny, where’s 007?”
    • Monneypenny: “He’s on a mission sir. In Austria.”
    • M: “Well, tell him to pull out. Immediately.”

    Of course, the scene then cuts to a scene of Bond in bed with a woman. Ah, the comic high-larity! Roger Moore’s James Bond films somehow gave themselves a license to cheese, with Moore himself often delivering some of the campiest lines. In this movie’s final scene, Bond and his female Russian superspy counterpart Triple X (nice name, eh?) are found in bed together by their respective bosses. When asked what he’s doing, Bond replied, “Keeping the British end up, sir.” It wouldn’t be his last trip into the cheese.

    For Your Eyes Only

    • The Prime Minister (on the phone): “Ah, Mr. Bond. I wanted to call you personally and to say how pleased we all are that your mission was a success. Thank you.”
    • Parrot: “Thank you, thank you.”
    • The Prime Minister: “Don’t thank me, Mr. Bond. Your courage and resourcefulness are a credit to the nation. Denis and I look forward to meeting you. Meanwhile, if there is anything I can do for you…
    • Parrot: “Give us a kiss, give us a kiss.”
    • The Prime Minster: “Well, really, Mr. Bond.”

    Continuing yet another tradition in the Bond movies of having Bond getting back into bed with a woman he’s met over the course of the film, this movie was no different. Except it continued Moore’s habit of cheesy lines at the end of the films. Bond puts the phone down near a parrot when the Prime Minister calls to congratulate him, and ends up speaking to the parrot. Were they saying that the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom was as stupid as a post and couldn’t tell when she was a talking to a bird? Still, as cheesy as it is, it’s still not as bad as…

    Moonraker

    • Sir Frederick Gray, Minister of Defense: “My God, what’s Bond doing?”
    • Q: “I think he’s attempting re-entry, sir.”

    At the end of this movie, the Minister of Defense calls to congratulate Bond on another job well done, and they dial him up on a space-age video phone to the space shuttle that Bond and Dr. Goodhead are in. Of course, they’re wrapped up in silver sheets and having some zero-gravity intercourse, which Bond must feel the urge to do every time he’s saved the world. In Q’s defense he’s looking at a graphical represenation of Bond’s flight, which still doesn’t forgive this ultra-cheesy line.

    A View To A Kill

    May Day: “Wow! What a view!”
    Max Zorin: “To a kill!”

    Easily my least favorite James Bond film, and it also has another pet peeve of mine in it: characters say the name of the movie script. Grace Jones’ May Day and Christopher Walken’s Max Zorin characters are hovering over Silicon Valley, about to see their plan work, and these are the two lines you get? Although you can’t really expect anything more out of this movie. Between Walken’s wild-haired Zorin, Grace Jones’ creepy May Day, and Roger Moore as James Bond in New York wearing a leather jacket to look “cool,” there wasn’t much to offer. Sadly, the Duran Duran title song was the best thing about this movie.

    License to Kill

    • Bond: “I guess it’s… a farewell to arms.”

    Timothy Dalton’s Bond was a good deal darker and grittier than Roger Moore, and he played the role in a much more serious manner. In this movie, Bond hands in his resignation and goes rogue in order to take down the killers who brutally murdered the new wife of his close friend Felix Leiter. M immediately strips him of his Double 0 status and demands he hand in his firearm. This scene would have a lot more impact if Bond could have managed it without the quip at the end. In Dalton’s previous outing as Bond, The Living Daylights, he refers to a female sniper, “Whoever she was, I must have scared the living daylights out of her.”

    GoldenEye

    Xenia Onatopp: “You don’t need the gun.”
    James Bond: “Well, that depends on your definition of safe sex.”

    Besides giving us a brand new Bond who represented a complete return to the joking days of Roger Moore with Pierce Brosnan, this movie also gave us another Bond girl with a sexual name, Xenia Onatopp. It also gave us new cheesy lines, like the one above. James Bond making a safe sex joke about a gun is certainly something you’d never experience back in the Connery days. Somehow Brosnan was able to pull off his glib remarks better than Moore ever did. Moore always seemed like he was about to crack up, but Brosnan kept it under a cool exterior. Although he did provide us with the cheesiest line in the history of James Bond movies…

    The World Is Not Enough

    James Bond: “I was wrong about you.”
    Christmas Jones: “Yeah, how so?”
    James Bond: “I thought Christmas only comes once a year.”

    People I know still groan and quote this line from the end of the film which finds Brosnan’s Bond and Denise Richards’ Dr. Christmas Jones in post-coital bliss. You had to know there was going to be some kind of a Christmas joke based on past Bond movies, but this one really was like a punch in the stomach. I remember thinking, “Oh he didn’t just say… he did. Holy crap, Pierce Brosnan, you’re dead to me.” I’ve probably mellowed out these past few years, but you just can’t buy Denise Richards as an extremly busty girl who dresses in short shorts and is trying to pass herself off as a nuclear physicist.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog