Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Batman Fans Threaten Detractors

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Dark Knight  (2008)

    Two weeks ago, David Edelstein attracted ridiculously outsized ire from the fanboy community for daring to do his job––ie, give his considered opinion on the cinematic value of The Dark Knight. Still, even the most vocal critics of Edelstein’s criticism didn’t really do anything more hostile than declare his review to be “bullshit.”

    But other critics who reviewed the latest Batman film less than positively aren’t getting off so easily.

    Today Filmbrain takes a look at the increasingly hostile, threatening comments that have stacked up on the negative Knight reviews published by two of his friends (and mine), Jurgen Fauth and Keith Uhlich:

    Neither of their reviews was intended to provoke, nor were they playing the contrarian — they simply didn’t like the film. As of this writing there are 938 comments in response to these reviews. (Both at their sites as well as their links on Rotten Tomatoes.) Some go no deeper than Fag!; some are actually amusing - Keep your head in Little Women and Suffrage texts you pansy, but others are downright ugly.

    He then excerpts from a comment on Keith’s review, which begins, “You know, some people have been so enraged by your little opinion piece that they want you to kill yourself. Please DON’T!!! You know why, because I am going to have so much fun killing you myself!” It gets worse from there.

    Ultimately, Filmbrain concludes that such reactions stem from the fact that “The Dark Knight has become a religion, an opiate, and an ethos. It’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra for the post-literate set.”

    If it’s a “religion,” then it’s a faith based on psychotic delusion. This is really amazing to me, this idea that the audience can become so obsessed with a film that they’ll actually rise up en masse to physically threaten anyone who dares speak negatively about it. I guess it’s the best, cheapest marketing Warners could hope for––detractors are silenced, and they don’t even have to lift a finger. Which is, you know…pretty gross.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Telluride: The Widget

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Joe Leydon points to the above promo widget for the Telluride Film Festival. If you’re going to Telluride, you’ll eventually be able to use the widget to customize your schedule. If you’re not going to Telluride––and, considering the geographic and financial inaccessibility of the Festival, which is incidentally one of my favorites, I assume that’s most of you––the widget is nonetheless surprisingly packed with interesting content.

    There are videos from last year’s festival, including documentation of the tribute to Daniel Day-Lewis; there’s also a short on the festival’s 35 year history, featuring founding director Tom Luddy. You should be able to get your own widget by clicking the “customize and embed” code above. You’ll have to give your email address––be careful not to sign yourself up for Dell bacn.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Casablanca’s Contemporary Marketing Campaign

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    At Movie Marketing Madness, Chris Thilk points to a sample marketing presentation made by the ad agency Basement, based on this hypothesis: If all prints of Casablanca had been lost immediately after its initial premiere and had recently been found, how would you market the film today as a wide-release feature?

    Chris says the pitch looks “very real,” and he would know better than me, but I have to admit: some of the slides made me laugh out loud. Like the one where Casablanca is pitched as the perfect gap bridger between Sex and the City and an “Iraq War film” (”Casablanca is a romantic option for women; while still having entertainment for men — a shared experience for Valentines day”). And also the “Valentine’s Day Romance Generator” feature on the hypothetical Casablanca website, which allegedly “takes a woman’s idea, and transforms it into a man’s idea.” And also the “contingency plan” of having a Warner Brothers-signed top R&B performer do a cover of “As Time Goes By.”

    So…is this supposed to be funny, or practical? Both?


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Disney Racism. Clip of the Day

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Aladdin  (1992)

    Poor Disney. The studio tries to do good by finally producing an animated movie featuring a black princess (The Princess and the Frog, out Christmas 2009) and it’s still called out for being racist. Since this past weekend’s debut of the teaser trailer for the film, a return to traditional 2-D animation (can the new computer-assisted techniques still qualify these films as “hand-drawn” or “cel” animation?) after a five-year drought, blogs such as Vulture and Defamer have noted possibly offensive stereotypes in the movie.

    Well, what do you want? A return to traditional Disney films or racism-free films? As displayed in the montage featured as today’s clip of the day, most of our beloved Disney classics unfortunately have their share of racist portrayals. And let’s not forget some of the more contemporary Disney films, like Aladdin, which can be seen in this other YouTube clip as also being racist. So, perhaps Disney’s return to tradition is about more than just 2-D animation style. I’m not saying it’s a good thing. I’m just not all that shocked by it.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • In Search of a Midnight Kiss

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The best thing about Alex Holdridge’s In Search of a Midnight Kiss (trailer above) is its conceptual audacity: not only is it a film about walking in L.A., but it devotes much of its screen time to romanticizing corners and aspects of the city well-known to natives but rarely seen on film (and never as the backdrop for meet-cute one-night-stand cinema). As long as it sticks to being a visually stunning love letter to the much-maligned city, an inverse of the L.A. segment of Annie Hall, a filmic rehab from City of Quartz to a city of romantic fantasy––I can totally get on board with it. It’s when the actors open their mouths that I start to have a problem.

    Oh, there are other things to recommend this Before Sunrise update for the age of techno-cynicism. Its dreamy black-and-white cinematography is absolutely gorgeous, and its resolution (or lack thereof) is refreshingly messy and kind of a downer. It doesn’t require its mostly unlikeable protagonists––a self-pitying screenwriter (Scoot McNairy) (and a blousy blonde basketcase (Sara Simmonds) whose mutual New Years Eve loneliness leads to a Craig’s List-enabled meetup, and whose mutual armors of affectation threaten to preclude a hookup––to become significantly Better People for the purpose of narrative convenience.

    And then there are the demerits. The dialog tends to veer wildly between insipidly cute and unconvincingly “shocking,” and even giving allowances for the fact that the film made its festival debut at Tribeca 16 months ago, references to MySpace and Friendster seem outdated for its slice-of-hipster-life ambitions. And in order to buy the narrative leap that these two would actually spend a full day and night together after their inauspicious meeting, we have to assume that the male hero is not the person the film seems to say he is in its first thirty minutes––that, or he’s got a schizophrenia-inducing addiction to blonde damaged goods. Unfortunately, Nico complexes are best left to Philippe Garrell.

    Perhaps because of my misgivings, I was a little surprised to see that Kiss is currently rocking a 94% percent Fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes. In fact, a number of name critics have raved, including Andrew Sarris and Anthony Lane––both of whom would rarely even review a film this small unless it carried heftier thematic weight. That The New Yorker gave a Lane a full column for Kiss‘ consideration, a luxury usually only afforded to blockbusters and serious Oscar bait, is unheard of; of course, Lane uses the room to magically transform the film’s treatment of masturbation into a joke about “Onan the Barbarian.” Sarris also chose to focus on the scene where rudimentary Photoshop skills are put to the service of manual release; for the elder critic, the scene is itself a selling point, a correction to the fact that “movies have seldom approached this practice except in the fringe exploitation genres.” (I’ve already assigned Chris with the task of attempting to prove Sarris wrong on this count; he’ll present his findings by the end of the week.)

    But actually, I think the more revealing excerpt from Sarris’ review is his parting shot: “[As] a critic, I have never presumed to be intellectually superior to ‘mere’ love stories in the cinema,” he writes. I think this ties into something we’re seeing this a lot lately: as the average, female-fronted Hollywood romantic comedy has become cookie-cutter to the point of toxicity, film critics seem to take great pleasure in championing relationship films with lower budgets and lower stakes, which allow for a riskier, more acidic, and often male-oriented twist on cinematic love. Kiss takes enough risks to elevate it above its “mere” genre, and those risks seem to be enough to seduce critics who would ordinarily need an excuse to take micro-budget romance seriously.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • 10 Ways ‘Man on Wire’ Is Like “The Dark Knight’ — Only Better!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I Am Legend  (2007)

    The Dark Knight  (2008)

    Man on Wire  (2008)

    Both The Dark Knight and Man on Wire were phenomenally successful at the box office this past weekend. The former, a huge Hollywood blockbuster based on a comic book, broke the record for greatest second weekend ever and the record for quickest movie to break the $300 million mark. The latter, an award-winning documentary about a man who walked a tightrope between the Twin Towers, had the best non-IMAX per-screen average and the best opening for a documentary so far this year.

    But the two films have more in common than their box office achievements, and I detail ten similarities between them below. My reason for the comparisons––some of which are, I admit, a bit of a stretch––is not just for the amusement of highlighting parallels between a blockbuster and a documentary. Rather, I hope that this list will encourage the millions of people who saw The Dark Knight to also seek out and watch Man on Wire, which is by far my favorite film of the year, so far, and is quite possibly the best doc I’ve seen in years.

    Man on Wire certainly features everything that’s entertaining about The Dark Knight — save for a posthumous performance from Heath Ledger — though it does have a terrific posthumous performance by the World Trade Center. And it also appeals to moviegoers who aren’t into comic book movies (even those as non-comic-book-movie-like as TDK), too.

    1. Criminal Clowns - Man on Wire’s Philippe Petit and The Dark Knight’s Joker (Heath Ledger) are each a form of jester jailed for unlawful acts. Petit doesn’t kill anyone, of course, and The Joker exhibits no ability to juggle, perform magic tricks or ride on a unicycle. Yet the two clowns share a common bond: neither can really answer the question of why they do what they do. Sure, their respective motives may be labeled — Petit acts out of pure passion; The Joker is an agent for chaos — but not in any way that satisfies the police or media. Man on Wire’s inclusion of a hilarious press conference held by the NYPD wins points over The Dark Knight’s cliché use of anger-filled interrogation scene.
    2. Height-Induced Thrills - It may not seem in theory that Petit’s tightrope walks would compare to Batman’s IMAX-friendly skyscraper scaling, rooftop emoting, Skyhook airlifting and building-plunging Rachel rescuing, but I definitely felt more thrill watching the sequences in Man on Wire of Petit conquering the air between the towers of Notre Dame, the Sydney Harbour Bridge and especially the World Trade Center. Maybe it’s the reality of these events and the fact that there were no special effects used in the footage atop the Twin Towers that make them more exciting than anything in The Dark Knight.
    3. Heist Opening - The first six minutes of The Dark Knight is an incredible little heist film on its own — enough that it worked separately when previewed ahead of I Am Legend back in December. Similarly, Man on Wire details what seems like a bank robbery — or a terrorist attack — in its first few minutes before the opening credits. It’s hard to say which sequence is better, either on its own or as part of the big picture. I guess as a consolation prize, I should let The Dark Knight win this one, but after considering the continuation of the “heist” in Man on Wire, particularly the moments involving Petit and one of his accomplice’s lengthy dealings with a security guard on the top floor of the South Tower, it’s the documentary hands down (and 415 meters high).
    4. Response to 9/11 - One of the celebrated elements of The Dark Knight is the way it utilizes post-9/11 topics like surveillance, torture and other anti-terrorist measures. On the other end of the spectrum, Man on Wire appears to have been made because of the loss of the World Trade Center. The film is as much a love letter to the Twin Towers as it is a portrait of Petit and his high wire passion. Also, as noted above, some of the “heist” sequences parallel the Towers’ terrorist attacks, including the 1993 bombing. One thing that amazed me, though, was Man on Wire’s lack of direct acknowledgment of even the fact that the Towers no longer exist. A number of other documentarians would have surely put in a shot of Ground Zero or, worse, exploited the footage of the planes hitting the buildings for the millionth time. Filmmaker James Marsh, on the other hand, avoids even asking Petit about his reaction to 9/11 (such a question is almost as pointless as asking Petit why he performed his incredible feats).
    5. British Filmmaker - The Dark Knight was co-written and directed by London-born Christopher Nolan, while Man on Wire was helmed by James Marsh, originally from Cornwall. This is a rather insignificant connection between the films, and one birthplace doesn’t seem to have any benefit over the other. In my opinion, though, looking at just these two films, Marsh is the better cinematic storyteller.
    6. Medical-Related Fraud - One of the favorite parts of The Dark Knight is when The Joker is dressed in a nurse’s uniform, a masquerade used to gain access to a hospital room. One of the most amusing parts of Man on Wire is comparable: after Petit injures his foot and is forced to get around on crutches, he discovers that having a medical handicap gives him easier access through security. The fraud comes when he continues to take advantage of his injury and crutches even after he’s sufficiently healed.
    7. Disguises and Hiding Places - More generally, both films include a lot of disguises and fake-outs. The Dark Knight has obvious costumes like the Batsuit and the Joker face paint and other acts of deception and hiding that I won’t spoil. Meanwhile, Man on Wire has that crutches trickery, undercover schemes in which Petit and friends masquerade as journalists and one of the greatest scenes involving two guys hiding under a tarp that you’ll ever see.
    8. Girlfriend Who Has Difficulty Supporting the Decisions of the Hero - In The Dark Knight, Rachel Dawes (Maggie Gyllenhaal) and Bruce Wayne (Christian Bale) continue the discussion of how she can’t be with him as long as Gotham City (or Wayne) still needs Batman. In Man on Wire, we learn of the struggle that Petit’s girlfriend, Annie, goes through in dealing with the tightrope walker’s dangerous endeavors and, later, with the fame that comes with it. Due to the fact that Gyllenhaal is extremely lame in The Dark Knight, Annie easily wins this round.
    9. Characters - The Dark Knight employs one of the greatest living character actors, Gary Oldman, and allows him to be as normal and real a guy as Oldman can possibly be. In fact, as many characters there are inhabiting the film, The Dark Knight grounds them, portraying them as more realistic than comic book movies tend to do. In contrast, Man on Wire features some real people that are such characters, it’s hard to believe they really truly exist. One look at Barry Greenhouse, and you’d believe it if I told you he just walked off the set of the ’60s Batman TV series. And he’s not the only oddball in the documentary. It’s as if the two movies switched ensembles.
    10. The City as a Character - I don’t need to go too much into the way Gotham City is the real heroine of The Dark Knight, because our own Kevin Buist already did that quite nicely. But I will reiterate that Man on Wire is as much about the World Trade Center as it is about Petit — the WTC can be seen as the film’s heroine, I guess — and thanks to all the beautiful shots of New York from atop the Towers, you could say that in the documentary the city is also represented as a separate character. Maybe not as upfront as Gotham, but the Big Apple steals any movie she appears in.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog