Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Wither Mumblecore? Already?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    story.jpgThe New Talkies festival is barely underway (as I type this, the first screening of Hannah Takes the Stairs is scheduled to begin in about 2 minutes), and already forces more powerful than you or I are contemplating a mumblecore backlash. I’m still trying to actually write about the movies before heading out to IFC’s Hannah premiere party (which, if Twitter is to be believed, is shaping up to be the event of the season for people like me who rarely leave the house), but while I’m busy with that, here’s a round up of the circulating wariness. I’m sure I’ll have more concrete thoughts on the health of the meme over the course of the next week.

    • Stu has a long makings-of-the-movement piece over at The Reeler, including the now-obligatory “don’t call it a movement” quote from Andrew Bujalski. “I feel like the things that these films all have in common are the least interesting things about them. It’s the differences that make them interesting. You read the synopses — ‘These are films made cheaply about young white people talking to each other.’ And of course it sounds excruciating. And there are plenty of films that fit that description that are excruciating. The things that make the films good are not that.” Also: Joe Swanberg worries about a post-Pulp Fiction-esque wave of imitators.
    • Anthony Kaufman says we’re killing Mumblecore by talking about it. “If these films are hyped, they may be doomed. One of the joys of stumbling upon a charming or sophisticated or funny low-budget ‘mumblecore’ film is just that, stumbling upon it, whether given to you on DVD by a friend or the filmmaker himself or walking into one of them unknowingly at a film festival.” Still, he has his own entry into the hype ring: a Mumblecore video primer.
    • In a semi-positive review of Hannah in the New York Times, Matt Zoller Seitz says we’ve already killed Mumblecore by hyping the filmmakers to the point where they’re now able to get real jobs. “Hannah plays like an incidental swan song, a signpost marking the point when mumblecore became a nostalgic label rather than a present-tense cultural force, and its most acclaimed practitioners moved on to bigger things.” The implication is that, right at the breakthrough moment, right when the masses are maybe starting to care, the filmmakers are moving on to studio work and leaving their audience behind. But Kaufman says Seitz is just thinking of himself: “If Seitz is right, and Hannah already marks the movement’s premature passing into obsolescence, it may only be because he wants it to stay something that he caught at a film festival and is not reviewing for The New York Times.”

    Originally posted on:Spoutblog

  • The Super Awesome Adventure of Bill Murray — Clip of the Day

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Inspired the news that Bill Murray was stopped in Stockholm on suspicion of drunkenly driving a golf cart (yes, seriously), I just spent an hour on YouTube watching fan tributes to the former Ghostbuster. It’s amazing how many of these somehow involve Bill Murray successfully or unsuccessfully attempting to save the world. The clip above is my favorite–I just think it’s really funny that even with the Power Rangers egging him on, our hero just isn’t very good at flying–but there’s also this clip, in which Bill Murray “rebuilds the WTC in godlike miracle.” And really: on some level, isn’t Lost in Translation just a little girl’s fantasy of Bill Murray rescuing her from adulthood? Especially if you assign any merit to this interpretation of the final scene.

    Is the idea that Bill Murray will bail us out of catastrophe just ingrained in the collective consciousness of our generation? Has everybody really seen Ghostbusters as many times as I have? Or is it more of a Groundhog Day, “he’s A god, he’s not THE God” type of thing?


    Originally posted on:Spoutblog

  • Body of War: Trailer, Website, Eddie Vedder

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    I got a press release this morning about the new website for Body of War, otherwise known as “the Phil Donahue doc“, otherwise know as one of the most highly anticipated of the many highly political films set to debut at the Toronto Film Festival. Unfortunately, it looks like I won’t be in town when it makes its debut — the premiere (which will apparently involve a live performance of songs from the film by Eddie Vedder) is on September 11, and I’m leaving on the 10th. I can stand to miss the Vedder, but I am disappointed that I won’t be able to see the movie or Donohue’s sure-to-be impassioned Q & A.

    The website has pictures, a full synopsis and a trailer (embedded in a lesser-quality YouTube version above), which features one of the two songs Vedder wrote for the movie.


    Originally posted on:Spoutblog

  • Toronto Lineup, Oz Redux: Trade Roughage 08/22/07

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Grand Illusion  (1937)

    Spawn  (1997)

    Juno  (2007)

    • 3621228348a05f027510e010l.jpgindieWIRE points to the 17-page PDF detailing the 349 films that will unspool at next month’s Toronto International Film Festival. New details just announced today include a special screening of Grand Illusion presented by Peter Bogdanovich, who will in turn be presented an award for his film preservation efforts; Jason Reitman’s Juno, scripted by blogger Diablo Cody; and several Reel to Reel program additions, including a Joy Division doc by Grant Gee and a Lou Reed doc by Julian Schnabel.
    • This is what the DVD format wars have wrought: Michael Bay came home from a dinner party and wrote a drunken blog post saying he wouldn’t do Transformers 2 unless Paramount starts releasing movies on Blu-ray. Cue massive internet scandal. Then the next day he was like, “Whoops. I really shouldn’t blog after midnight. HD DVD rocks!”
    • The people who brought you Spawn and A History of Violence are partnering to bring “a revisionist take” on The Wizard of Oz to the screen. Don’t let that logline turn you off right away–Michael Fleming’s Variety story is actually fascinating. “Conversations with [Todd] McFarlane and [Josh] Olson make it clear that they are still working out the tone of the film,” Fleming writes. “McFarlane has a vision of Oz that is a dark, edgy and muscular PG-13, without a singing Munchkin in sight. That was clear with a toy line he launched several years ago that featured a buxom Dorothy and Toto reimagined as an oversized snarling warthog. Olson has something a little tamer, and PG, in mind.”

    Originally posted on:Spoutblog

  • Hannah Takes SuperBad

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    hannahnytimesscreencap.png

    Welcome to MumbleWeek!


    Originally posted on:Spoutblog