Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Emmys, Errol, Animal Killers: Doc News 7/19/07

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Several blurbs of note to report in the documentary world this late Thursday:

    ***Anthony Kaufman has the news that Errol Morris is blogging for the New York Times. Kaufman interprets Morris' first entry--a long consideration of photography, truth, interpretation and meaning--as "a sneak peak into what I expect are the theoretical underpinnings" of Morris' upcoming Abu Ghraib doc, Standard Operating Procedure.

    ***This is not a TV blog, so we won't waste time making obscene hand gestures about most of the Emmy nominations. However, it's worth noting that Spike Lee's Hurricane Katrina doc When the Levees Broke picked up several nods, as did two recent festival hits: Rory Kennedy's Ghosts of Abu Ghraib, and Stanley Nelson's Jonestown: The Life and Death of the People's Temple. A.J. Schnack has further details.

    ***John Anderson has a review of Your Mommy Kills Animals, a doc on the animal protection debate which begins a one-week Oscar qualifying run today. Calling it "a miraculously evenhanded treatment of a snarlingly divisive debate," Anderson also notes that the film also makes "it pretty clear that blinkered self-righteousness and unwavering belief in one's cause don't much differ, whether you're a member of the Animal Liberation Front or Al Qaeda. The corollary question is whether anything less than the most militant action will move corporations away from committing cruelty to animals."


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • From Boogie Nights to Bringing Down the House -- Clip of the Day

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Boogie Nights  (1997)

    Hairspray  (2007)

    New Hairspray director Adam Shankman is responsible for some of the most profitable/least watchable films of the past decade. But he started out as a choreographer, and below you'll find his best work: the disco dance scene from Boogie Nights:


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Fox Pulls Out of ComicCon: What Does it All Mean?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    This morning, word hit the web that 20th Century Fox has canceled its planned presentation next week at ComicCon. As you can imagine, this seems like kind of a big deal--at the very least, it's a curious move for a studio that has sunk quite a bit of time and money into a certain animated film that opens the same weekend, which they've announced that they're essentially keeping from critics. So what does it all mean? Here are three different theories from around the web:

    "Fox pulling out of Comic Con seems like another indication of a guarded, bordering-on-frosty attitude by Fox towards online journos and the film-geek community...A major distributor with almost nothing but supermall popcorn geek movies to promote ... yanks a personal-appearance panel out of the biggest movie-geek convention on the planet seven days before it opens? This is business as usual? Do the math." -- Jeff Wells

    "Fox has become a major player when it comes to fighting movie piracy (they're one of the studios who wanted to ban advanced screenings in Canada), and so perhaps it's not a question of whether their footage is ready -- but, instead, has to do with them being afraid that same footage will be on YouTube within the hour." -- Erik Davis, Cinematical

    "What I've been told is that after last year's Borat presentation, which had that scene of Borat and friend fighting in the nude, relations between San Diego Comic Con and Fox were strained...they said the cost of a couple hundred grand just wasn't worth it when they could just release all the stuff on the internet." -- Devin Feraci, CHUD

    Even though CHUD claims to be getting their info from a "Fox insider", I personally think their explanation makes the least sense. The studio's going to have to produce clean trailers at some point; it's unfathomable to me that they'd scrap a long-planned presentation at the last minute because they can't get them together in time. Meanwhile, Wells is pissed that he's having trouble with a Fox publicist; it's probable that the studio has it out for bloggers and online critics, but they've got to be smart enough to know that probably 75% of the typical ComicCon panel aud is under 18, and therefore both extremely valuable demographically and not at all threatening in terms of bad press. And piracy/video sharing is definitely a concern...but of all the studios set to present at the Con, why would Fox be the only one concerned enough to bail?

    I think the truth probably lies somewhere near the CHUD tipster's final point: for whatever reason, Fox has probably decided that a ComicCon presentation is just not a cost effective way to promote their content. And if that's the case, and any of the films they were set to promote next weekend end up hitting big without the ComicCon push, you have to wonder if the studio would bother going back. Could this be the beginning of the end of ComicCon as a major shill-case for studio product?


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Fish Kill Flea and the Doomed Economies of Subculture

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    El Topo  (1970)

    Half-Cocked  (1994)

    Radiation  (1998)


    Aaron Hillis sent me a screener of the film he co-directed, Fish Kill Flea, several months ago. I watched it on a Sunday afternoon, shortly after returning to Queens from a trip to suburban New Jersey, where my boyfriend and I sometimes go to raid forgotten thrift shops and record stores. On that trip, I had picked up a handful of obscure DVDs, including a circa-1936 mystery serial starring Bela Lugosi, a Japanese bootleg of El Topo, and the 2-disc release of Suki Hawley and Michael Galinksi's first two films, Radiation and Half-Cocked. I watched Half-Cocked and Fish Kill Flea back-to-back, and took a chunk of notes considering one film in light of the other, which I never published. Fish Kill is making its New York premiere this weekend, so I thought I'd revisit those notes.

    I knew very little about either film going in, but it turned out be an accidentally appropriate double feature. Both are anthropological documents in a way, speaking to the idea that subcultures need to be documented before the disappear; both films offer a scrapbook-like vision of scene that no longer exists. Fish Kill Flea is a more literal document, a quietly stylized portrait of the final days of flea market in upstate New York. Half-Cocked, though nominally a fiction film about a gang of kids who steal a van and pretend to be a band on tour in order to mask their getaway, clearly functions as a symbolic gesture of self-preservation on the part of the filmmakers, who were themselves touring indie rockers in the mid-90s.

    At their core, both films are ultimately about a ragtag group of outsiders who try and fail to live outside the real-world realities of contemporary capitalism. Fish Kill Flea is an elegy, not just for this one flea market, but for the almost-completely-dead American phenomenon of small, self-contained economic systems. The era of small business, mom and pop, one-to-one transactions, independent salesmen leaving their fingerprints on their products and, by extension, their community--that's all vanishing, to be replaced by homogenous big box superstores. In a series of man-on-the-street interviews in Fish Kill Flea, visitors to the soon-to-vanish flea market seem universally confused to hear what's set to replace it. Even if the march of mainstream culture is a foregone conclusion, the question of why the community might need "another Home Depot" seems honestly bewildering.

    When it comes to the inevitability of mass culture takeover, both films feel like wistful attempts to stop time. Fish Kill is strongest texturally in its montages of still images, in which the film literally functions as a scrapbook. The fact that these stills, in terms of sheer beauty and oddness, eclipse most of the moving imagery in film is fitting: the subject's glory days exist only in still frames. The images could hardly be more evocative--I could imagine a whole film sprouting out of that one shot of the kid cowering from the monkey with the shotgun--but their relationship to the flea market's current fix isn't spelled out. The past is a pastiche, the present is a muddle, and we're able to fill in the blanks with our own lived experience of late capitalism.

    These are films about doomed micro-economies. Neither the DIY indie rocker nor the flea market vendor needs a lot of money to keep going, but that's part of the problem: neither is able to produce or consume on a scale large enough to fit into contemporary capitalism. And the films themselves circulate within their own micro-economies: produced on shoestrings, exhibited largely at sub-mainstream venues, they're endeavors entered into without hope of profit. As an audience member, I'm of course conscious of the fact that I'm only able to make these connections between the two films because I seek out the kinds of alternative economies--film festivals, suburban indie video stores--that both films both celebrate and exist within. (The fact that I'm fortunate enough to be able make a living making these connections is also amazing, and in fact part of the reason why I'm only writing about this now is that I was working for what is essentially the Home Depot of internet content at the time I saw these films, but that's neither here nor there.)

    At the end of the day, I'm really a capitalist: I like money, but I also passionately believe in free markets, to the extent that I want to see economies of every scale succeed. If you're in the same boat and you're in New York, do your part by going to see Fish Kill Flea this Saturday at Rooftop Films. For more information, check out the Fish Kill Flea website.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Dziva Vertov Reloaded

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Dziga Vertov's 1929 silent Soviet classic The Man With a Movie Camera has outlived the grand majority of films from its epoch to become a staple of film schools and retrospectives, a landmark of personal/political documentary and even a kind of style guide for avant garde filmmaking and design. Now, British artist Perry Bard is putting together a "global remake" of the film, to screen at the UK Big Screen touring film festival in 2007-2008.

    Bard is using his website to solicit collaborations from around the world. He's posted every scene from the film, as well as thumbnails representing each scene's beginning, middle and end. The basic idea is to have volunteers pick a scene from the original to re-interpret by creating their own footage. Within those parameters, Bard is encouraging experimentation:

    Use what you have at your disposal. If you don’t have a video camera, a succession of still images will work. Text is also o.k. The database will reflect the shape of the wired world on the 21st century stage...Vertov’s footage was shot in the industrial landscape of the 20’s. What images translate the world today? e.g. instead of the mining scene if you’re living in Silicon Valley you might film inside Apple headquarters, etc.

    This approach makes a lot of sense. Not only was the original Movie Camera a love letter of sorts to collaborative labor, but as a one-man movie studio using a prosumer technology to document his vision of the world, Vertov sort of prefigured the YouTube generation by about 85 years.

    If you'd like to participate, all the relevant info can be found here. Bard says he'll start accepting submissions in August, but you're advised to keep it clean--he reserves the right to "eliminate inappropriate material."

    [Via Michael Z. Newman on Twitter]


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Terminator 4 Has Problems the Governator Can't Fix: Trade Roughage 07/19/07

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    ***The Independent Feature Project is expanding the Gothams, the New York-based fall awards show that often out-indies the Indie Spirits. This year the actual awards ceremony will move from Chelsea Piers to BAM in Brooklyn, and related events will include a series of screenings devoted to Gotham honoree Mira Nair, to take place at the IFC Center.

    ***Cineville, the production company behind 90s indie classics such as Gas, Food, Lodging and Swimming with Sharks, is merging with DVD disributor Westlake Entertainment to form a new indie studio called Keystone.

    ***Yes, there's a Terminator 4, and yes, several companies are fighting over releasing it.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog