Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Michael Moore vs. CNN, Round Two: Win, Lose or Draw

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    So you know how yesterday I posted about Michael Moore's appearance on CNN, and my basic take was, "Michael Moore's just looking for attention/I don't think the Gupta piece was that bad"? Well, yesterday afternoon, Gupta admitted to getting one fact wrong in his piece: he misquoted a number used by Moore in Sicko in regards to per capita health care spending in Cuba. Later, Gupta appeared on Larry King Live opposite Moore. The first of three parts of that segment is embedded below.

    In this segment, Moore says his people spoke with Gupta's people on June 29th about inaccuracies in the piece; The Huffington Post posted email evidence of that conversation shortly before Larry King Live last night.

    Was it irresponsible for CNN to re-run a clip that they knew contained inaccuracies? Sure. But post-CNN apology, what is Moore trying to achieve by continuing to beat this dead horse? It seems to all boil down to an issue of linguistics: Moore is upset because Gupta's piece said he "fudged facts." In reality, Moore probably didn't really "fudge" as much as selectively included statistics that bolstered his argument, and omitted facts that contradict or confuse his stance on the issues. CNN isn't guilty of libel, per se; can you sue a TV network for an imprecisely worded voiceover?

    Bloggers have almost unanimously*** taken the filmmaker's side. "[N]o nonfiction filmmaker is scrutinized in the way that Moore is. Hell, no journalist is scrutinized the way Moore is (oh, but if they were)," writes A.J. Schnack. "If [Moore's] right about nothing else (and even if his appearance last night bordered on the wild-eyed, which I'm not saying it did), CNN has plenty to answer for." Rachel Sklar is more blunt: "Does it compromise my journalistic objectivity to say that Dr. Sanjay Gupta is a dick?"

    At this point, it seems as though CNN is just embarrassing themselves by letting Moore and Gupta argue in circles. It's easy to peg Moore as the winner in all this--not only does he get the satisfaction of having made a major news organization look bad, but he gets hours worth of free publicity for his film--but the flip side to Moore’s triumph is the agony that is watching CNN dig their own grave.

    **UPDATE: It's not all sunny skies in the blogosphere for Mr. Moore. When forced to choose which of the two great Satans to side with between CNN and Michael Moore, conservative bloggers are showing a surprising surfeit of sympathy for the cable news giant. "While I can agree that our media establishment does not always serve the public interest well, listening to Michael Moore rant and rave about them is rich," writes Pam Meister. Allahpundit calls Moore a racist and accuses him of beating on an easy target; Libertas also plays the "Mike's a bully" card--"For Moore to get in a battle of wits with Wolf Blitzer of all people… That’s like getting in a kicking contest with a newborn kitten — Blitzer has been The. Dumbest. Person. On. Television. for years now"-- but shows more passion for jabbing at Sicko's box office numbers.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Eight Things

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Goonies  (1985)

    Gremlins  (1984)

    Two for the Road  (1967)

    Zabriskie Point  (1970)

    Pulp Fiction  (1994)

    Monster House  (2006)

    I've been tagged by FilmSnob to participate in the Eight Things meme that's been going around. All the cool kids are doing it, and it's Friday, so why the hell not? But in the interest of keeping things around here *somewhat* on topic, I will try to keep this semi-film related. First, the rules:

    Rules:

    1. We have to post these rules before we give you the facts.

    2. Players start with eight random facts/habits about themselves.

    3. People who are tagged write their own blog post about their eight things and include these rules.

    4. At the end of your blog, you need to choose eight people to get tagged and list their names. Don’t forget to leave them a comment telling them they’re tagged and that they should read your blog.

    Now, the things:

    1) I have never seen the following films: Gone with the Wind, Lawrence of Arabia, The Goonies or Gremlins.

    2)When I first moved to New York, I was broke, working full time and going to school at night. I came up with a crack-pot scheme to track down Peter Bogdanovich and convince him to let me be his personal secretary. I was totally ready to put it into action, until a roommate talked me out of it.

    3) I've walked out of far too many films in tears--films that could not in any way be construed as tearjerkers--films like Dodgeball, and Independence Day. I think there's actually something wrong with my eyes; they tend to tear up when I stare at any kind of screen for a long stretch of time. This is just one of many reasons why, like FilmSnob...


    4) I prefer to see films alone. Another reason: I get extremely claustrophobic in movie theaters unless there is at least one empty seat next to me.

    5) I have dressed up as the following fictional characters for Halloween: Holly Golightly, Sally Bowles, Marla Singer.

    6) Speaking of Sally Bowles: I'm such an unrepentant Judy Garland fanatic that I give a pass to pretty much everything Liza Minnelli does. With the possible exception of Arthur 2: On the Rocks.

    7) I have a ton of VHS tapes that I rescued from bargain bins with the intention of burning them to DVD, but that, due to my own stunning laziness, are just sitting on my shelves collecting dust. Some of these include: Where the Green Ants Dream, Two For the Road and Zabriskie Point. I hate myself for being this lazy, but the self-loathing just breeds more laziness.

    8) When I was in ninth grade, I went to see Pulp Fiction with a guy named Gil, who went on to direct Monster House.

    Now that that's over, I beg for attention from tag the following bloggers to participate in the meme: Aaron Dobbs, Michael Tully, Ariel Waldman, Tom Hall, Wiley Wiggins, Gabe Rivera, Randall Bennett , Jason Calacanis, and Virginia Heffernan.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • FilmCouch #28

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Dingo  (1992)

    Alien Visitor  (1995)

    The Tracker  (2002)

    Ten Canoes  (2007)

    I've decided the most inspiring filmmaker since John Cassavetes is Rolf de Heer (Ten Canoes, The Tracker, Epsilon, Dingo). If there's a filmmaker alive devoted to the belief that some films must happen and he/she is just a conduit for some bigger change, it's de Heer. And the story behind Ten Canoes ( in theaters now) is remarkable.




    Download FilmCouch #28 or subscribe in the iTunes store (search for "filmcouch" or click here to launch iTunes) and a new free episode will download every Friday. Join the FilmCouch group


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog