Comic-Con coverage on Spout
Advertisement

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Four Eyed Monsters: Have You Signed Up Yet?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    There was a great article in yesterday's edition of Variety, in which Anne Thompson talked about relationship between blogs (like this one) and the ever-expanding world of online film distribution. You've probably heard about Spout's efforts, which are detailed in the story, to help Susan Buice and Arin Crumley of Four Eyed Monsters distribute their film in full for a limited run on YouTube. If you haven't yet started a Spout account, there's still time for your signup to help Arin and Susan get to their goal. Just visit this page to get started. And once you've signed up, you can talk about the movie, YouTube, and the future of movies/the internet/the universe here.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Steve Carell: There is No God But Allah, And Muhammed Is His Prophet--Clip of the Day

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Islam Vs. Christianity on "Even Stephen"

    Add to My Profile | More Videos

    With Steve Carell hitting theaters today as a modern-day Noah to Morgan Freeman's God in Universal's biblical gamble Evan Almighty, I thought it would fun to look back on a time when Mr. Carell made a living by playing devil's advocate ... almost literally. In this clip of Carell and Stephen Colbert's recurring Daily Show segment Even Stephvens, the two breakout stars debat Islam vs. Christianity. Colbert, who is a practicing Catholic in his personal life, argues for the Christian God. Carell's response? "Stephen, what part of 'there is no god but Allah and Muhammed is his prophet' don't you understand?"

    With all of the effort to sell Evan to faith-based groups, you've got to wonder why this little artifact hasn't sparked a totally overblown backlash.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Stephen King Prefers Hostel 2 To The Shining

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Picture 12.png

    Everyone's talking about an interview given by Stephen King to the Los Angeles Times, in advance of today's opening of 1408, a thirller starring John Cusack and based on King's short story (David Hudon rounds up reviews here). In the interview, King has big praise for so-called "torture porn" auteur Eli Roth, as well as some pretty harsh criticism for the highest-brow film adaptations of his work. To quote extremely liberally:

    Eli Roth is a tremendous talent...There's something going on in "Hostel 2" that isn't torture porn, there's really something going on there that's interesting on an artistic basis. Sure it makes you uncomfortable, but good art should make you uncomfortable. [..] If you've got a movie where some girl gets cut in half, like in Hostel 2, here's the thing, we don't want that to happen to her. We get to understand a little bit about who she is, the character is pretty well drawn, she's lonely, she doesn't really know how to make friends and somebody's nice to her and she ends up in that situation and is going to be killed by somebody who's paid to do it. But we don't want it to happen. And if you put us in the situation, here's a chick in a slasher movie and we know she's going to get carved up and that's what we came to see, well, that puts you in the same position as some psycho out there cruising the interstates of America looking for road kill And that to my mind if immoral. [...] I don't like movies that are cold. I don't like movies that approach it like an exercise. A movie, for instance, where say Jack Nicholson and his wife are trapped in a hotel and you don't feel any love between them, you don't feel any caring, it just becomes sort of an exercise. And that bothers me. I think things should be hot, they should be involving, and you should feel a real sense of love and caring for the characters and want them to get out of there. It goes back to the slasher porn thing, I don't want to go to a movie and root for the people to die. I want to go to a movie and root for them to live.

    The author himself might rank The Shining towards the bottom of the roughly 12,000 Stephen King cinematic adaptations made over the past 30 years, but I'd imagine that most film fans would disagree. To that end. IFC's Alison Willmore has mocked up this handy chart. Iinspired by New York Magazine's Approval Matrix, it places 20 King films (including a certain Kubrick flick) in the proper quadrant based on its overall crap factor in relation to the director's artistic aspirations.

    In terms of convergence between art and brilliance, Willmore places The Shining on top, while King's sole directorial effort, Maximum Overdrive, lands squarely in the realm of unambitious crap. But it's not all bad news for Uncle Stevie (as King obnoxiously refers to himself in his Entertainment Weekly column)--at least his movie beat out all seven Children of the Corn flicks.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Sicko Settles For Comedy

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sicko  (2007)

    sicko-poster-425.jpg
    No contemporary documentary director has as recognizable a formula as Michael Moore. Pick an issue, find a few sympathetic folks to tell tear jerking stories related to said issue; pick a boogeyman to shoulder the blame for the subject's tears, and then hunt down that boogeyman and force him (I *think* it's always been a him) to confront his own culpability. That's the ultimate moment of a Michael Moore film, right? The part where the populist warrior confronts his ideological enemy (or, at the very least, a symbol of his ideological enemy) and either reduces him to a simpering idiot, or gets the camera crew forcibly ejected from the building?

    At first, Sicko comes off as the ultimate distillation of the Michael Moore formula. At times the filmmaker even seems to be pushing his "regular dude" persona into the territory of self-parody. The New York Times' A.O. Scott notes the "theatrical faux-naïveté" which Moore applies to his investigation of French, Canadian, and British healthcare; this tactic reaches its apotheosis when Moore has himself shot approaching the Eiffel Tower with a dazed, gee-whiz look on his face. Didn't get a chance to visit Paris on all those trips to Cannes, huh MIke?

    But then something interesting happens: the movie ends before Moore can directly confront his boogeyman. There seems to have been a conscious decision on the part of the filmmaker to avoid conflict. Sure, he takes a few sick 9/11 rescue workers (it's debatable how many: there are sweeping, 35mm shots of three boats full of sick people leaving Miami, but only four subjects are shown in later scenes) to Cuba, with the stated goal of getting for "our heroes" the free health care bestowed on "Al Qaeda" at Gitmo, but the gang never makes it to the detention center. In Sicko, Moore and his sick friends get to Cuba, look at their target from afar ... and then walk away. Instead of attempting to follow through with the ostensible point of the stunt, Moore leads the rescue workers to Havana Hospital, where they seek (and obtain) full, no-cost medical care.

    Whether or not Michael Moore ever actually interviewed Roger Smith, the fact that he showed up at (and got kicked out of) GM Headquarters was a political action. In Sicko, Moore sets up stunts but then refuses to follow through. In the final scene, after learning that the French government provides new mothers with what amounts to free in-home maid service, there's a shot of Moore heading up the steps of the U.S. Capital with a laundry basket tucked under his arm. The old Michael Moore would have marched straight up to the first Congressman he encountered and handed him the basket. The new Michael Moore cuts, Sopranos-style, to the closing credits. But unlike David Chase's cut heard round the world, no one will spend weeks dissecting this editing decision--it's clear that Moore, once our most dependable provocateur, is now content to settle for the easy joke.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • FilmCouch #25

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Apocalypto  (2006)

    Ten Canoes  (2007)

    A Mighty Heart  (2007)

    New in theaters, Rolf de Heer's Ten Canoes and Michael Winterbottom's A Mighty Heart, Angelina Jolie's passion project. Both deal with marginalized people and raise the question, "Can westerners make a movie to help us understand non-western people?"

    Dances with Wolves and Apocalypto come under a bit of scrutiny as well.






    Download FilmCouch #25 or subscribe in the iTunes store (search for "filmcouch" or click here to launch iTunes) and a new free episode will download every Friday. Join the FilmCouch group


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<June 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
1234567


Categories
 


Advertisement