Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • BlogNosh 12/19/07

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    • Count on The Hater to find a movie-centric angle to this whole Britney’s pregnant sister thing, and as with a good 50% of the time wasters in the film blogosphere these days, it has something to do with Juno. A side-by-side comparison reveals that Jamie-Lynn Spears’ teen pregnancy seems to be somewhat less loveably quirky than that of a certain fictional character. Consider the contrasting fathers to be: “Juno: Quiet, shy high-schooler who loves running track and orange tic-tacs. Aptly played by Michael Cera. Jamie-Lynn Spears: Quiet (at least in Ok!) college student who loves statutory rape. Adequately played by Some Dude.”
    • This week marks the 10 year anniversaries of both the death of Chris Farley, and the release of Titanic. Whitney Matheson memorializes the former, Ryan Stewart wonders if/why the former merits memorializing at all.
    • At The Circuit, Mike Jones has a suggestion for Sundance’s “woefully attended” New Frontier program.
    • Is Rob Zombie turning the fake trailer he made for Grindhouse into a feature, or is he just playfully asking his blog readers what they want for Christmas?

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Liberals, Conservatives United in Hate For MPAA

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    taxiposter.pngBloggy reactions are starting to float in on that whole MPAA vs. Taxi to the Dark Side thing, and although we’re sill seeing the predictable squabbling over ideology, pretty much everyone seems to be united on one thing: the poster itself is far less offensive than the MPAA’s stance on it.

    AJ Schnack spoke with Taxi director Alex Gibney, who characterized the ruling as “a cover-up”:

    Removing the hood is the ultimate cover-up. [The U.S.] didn’t use to do that sort of thing. Removing the hood sends the same message as the Bush administration with the CIA tapes. It’s OK to do it, it’s just not OK to show it.

    Hammering home roughly the same message, The Cinetrix proposes a protest campaign:

    This movie needs to be seen. These images need to be seen. ****, I’m willing to run the one-sheet image every day here until the decision is reversed.

    Meanwhile, the boys at conservative film blog LIBERTAS think that the very idea of the film is reprehensible…which is why they’re mad at the MPAA for drawing more attention to it by giving the poster an air of snuff. In a post broken by images of the World Trade Center aflame, Dirty Harry writes:

    (more…)


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Peter Jackson Saves New Line with ‘Hobbit’ Announcement

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I’m sure you heard about the announcement heard round Middle Earth the world yesterday: Peter Jackson has settled his differences with New Line and has come on board as executive producer of the studio’s two Lord of the Rings prequels. It wasn’t mentioned in the press release, but Jackson has decided not to direct either of the installments in New Line’s adaptation of Tolkien’s The Hobbit, though the news that he’s involved should be enough. Clearly, the studio simply needed to get some good news, any good news, out there — likely more for Time Warner shareholders than Tolkien or Jackson fans.

    I wasn’t the only person to immediately assume the settlement between Jackson and New Line had something to do with the latter’s disappointment with the box office of The Golden Compass. Both bloggers and blog comments were quick to claim that, “The Golden Compass’s low box office was the best thing that could have happened for LotR fans” (said “E” on Cinematical) and pat themselves on the back, as if it was all planned: “Well done everyone for not turning up for Compass!!” (from “wildphantom07″ on AICN). The real question, then, is how much more in Jackson’s favor was the settlement? We’ll probably never know, but we can imagine. After a very bad year, New Line was possibly pretty desperate.

    Of course, nobody at the studio would ever admit to such a suggestion. Entertainment Weekly has the denial:

    New Line is quick to point out that The Hobbit resolution is in no way a reaction to disappointing domestic box office numbers for their most recent release, The Golden Compass, which they had hoped would launch a new franchise. “Absolutely not,” said Lynne. “This has been in the works for a while now. Golden Compass, by the way, overseas, is performing spectacularly. Obviously, we have been disappointed with its performance here, but I think overall it will do quite well.”

    (more…)


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Ronnie Bronstein and Abel Ferrara, Together At Last

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Frownland  (2007)

    indieWIRE has released the results of their annual critic’s poll for the best undistributed films of 2007, and Ronnie Bronstein’s Frownland has made the top ten. The Gotham award winner received seven votes, the same number as Abel Ferrara’s Go Go Tales, which is interesting for a number of reasons. For one thing, Ferrara and Bronstein were two of just three American directors to make the Top Ten. For another, in the case of both films, whether or not they’re actually undistributed is basically a question of semantics.

    I first heard that IFC had acquired Go Go Tales back at the New York Film Festival in September, and have heard a number of confirmations of that rumor since. Anthony Kaufmann even references those whispers in his indieWIRE write-up of the poll, noting that “for now, [Go Go Tales is] still technically available.” It basically gets to keep its place on the list because IFC hasn’t yet issued a press release.

    Meanwhile, Silent Light earned 20 votes in the poll, which would have been good enough to tie for second place…had the film not been disqualified because Tartan quietly acquired U.S. distribution rights last month. I certainly didn’t get a press release about that??????I’ve got to be one of the film’s most vocal supporters, and I didn’t find out about the deal until a month after the fact. Frownland, meanwhile, has distribution in France, and due to the number of North American film festivals where it’s played, it’s probably been seen by more non-critics on this continent than the film ranked right below it on the list, Nick Broomfield’s Battle for Haditha.

    This is not about me fronting like Silent Light deserves recognition and Go Go Tales (which I’m on the record as having loved) does not, nor am I trying to argue with the rules of this particular poll. But it does seem like proof positive that not only is the line between “distributed” and “undistributed” getting a lot murkier, but the idea of distribution-as-victory is maybe not all it’s cracked up to be.

    (more…)


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Viral Marketing in the Meta Stage Still Funny

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Michael Clayton  (2007)

    Eventually Judd Apatow’s schtick will no longer be fresh. But it may continue to be funny, even after the viral marketing backlash. Case in point: this new sketch/advertisement for Walk Hard, which takes Apatow’s viral brand to a mega-meta level. As much as the idea of fake fights involving Apatow and his actors is now a tired concept, the video is hilarious. And as much as Apatow’s self-referential jokes about being self-referential about being self-referential are as obvious as they are mind-wrapping, the video is still hilarious.It helps that this time around, there’s more funny guys involved and more going on at once. It’s not simply funny to watch Craig Robinson chasing after Judd Apatow because he’s pissed about being in another one of his “fucking commercials”, but it’s comedic gold to inter-cut it with Paul Rudd, Jonah Hill and Justin Long realizing they no longer have to talk about Apatow’s movies and can freely discuss their desire to see Michael Clayton.

    Funny is funny, regardless of the situation or the motive.

    (more…)


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • FilmInFocus

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    stuartatonement.png“At the age of 15 or 16, same as some kids discover pot, I discovered Martin Scorsese and David Lynch.” Jamie Stuart sent an email pointing to FilmInFocus, an advertorial portal newly launched by Focus Features, in partnership with Faber and Faber and FILMMAKER Magazine. Stuart has produced three new short films for the site. My favorite of the three is called “Jamie Stuart analyzes Atonement,” but that seems like a slight misnomer–it’s really an analysis of the inspirations and influences of Atonement’s director, Joe Wright, who’s literally on the couch and under the microscope.

    Another FilmInFocus feature that may be of interest: Behind the Blog, an (apparently) running series of interviews with film bloggers, including Friends of Spout David Hudson and Andrew Grant.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog