Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • Blog Nosh 11/12/07

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    • wgastrike.png“Thank God for the strike,” says Bob Rehak at Graphic Engine. “There is just too much new content out there, and with the scribes picketing, we now have a chance to recover ??? to catch up.” Meanwhile,
      Nikki Finke reports that Jason Bateman is just one star who is refusing to promote an upcoming film by crossing picket lines to tape interviews. We think Micheal Bluth would have accidentally driven the stair car through the picket line.
    • At Re:Sources, Pamela Cohn conducts a “case study in indie distribution” with Ben Niles, director of the documentary Note By Note: The Making of Steinway L1037, and Jim Browne of Argot Pictures. Browne says that if you really want to book your self-produced film in theaters, you’ll have better luck if it’s a documentary: “Theaters aren???t willing to take a chance on narrative features that have no name actors in them. I see little indies all the time that are really strong, well-made movies, but they don???t have the cash to take out the kind of advertising you would need to drive audiences to the theater, or they don???t have any kind of recognizable talent.”
    • Spout Maven Demndiary has posted reviews of Frownland, The Tracey Fragments, Grace is Gone and tons more from the Denver Film Festival.
    • At Libertas, Dirty Harry says liberal polemics like Lions For Lambs are failing because blogs like his have pulled back the curtain and engendered mass distrust of the Hollywood system. Of course, they also spread negative buzz sight unseen from the moment the logline appears in Variety, but that’s just part of the process…
    • On Day 10 of AFI Fest, Craig Kennedy calls In Search of a Midnight Kiss “the nicest surprise of the festival.”
    • In the name of making a “dent on [his] December bills with money that I earned by expressing myself on this website,” Michael Tully is taking a Radioheadian approach to blogging.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Fossethon: Searching for STAR 80

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Star 80  (1983)

    picture-5.png

    When I first learned of Bob Westal’s Bob Fosse Blogathon, my plan was to write about Star 80, a film I’ve never seen but have long wanted to. I had ample time, in the ensuing month and a half, to track down a copy of Star 80 on DVD, watch it two or three times, and come up with oodles of brilliant ideas in relation to it.

    But I didn’t. I lost track of time. I forgot. And I inevitably found myself wandering around the East Village on Saturday, looking everywhere but finding Star 80 nowhere. Even Kim’s on St. Marks, which has a full Fosse section on its DVD sales floor, didn’t have it. “These are supposed to be the spoils of living in New York,” I grumbled internally on the subway back to Queens. “My apartment is too small and my savings are non existant, but at the very least, if I want to buy something, I’m supposed to be able to find it.”

    I wasn’t necessarily shit out of luck, re: the blogathon–I have a copy of Cabaret on my DVD shelf, I could have just written about that–but at some point on the way home I decided that my inability to find a copy of Star 80 was significant. It certainly said something about my own laziness, but it also speaks to the film’s lasting legacy. Made by an Oscar-winning director, based on a true story, featuring actors portraying debatably significant real-life figures such as Hugh Hefner and Peter Bogdanovich, Star 80 has nonetheless fallen into the dustbin of cinema history. Even YouTube, the crumb catcher for the toaster of forgotten pop culture, offers no help.

    I don’t have any explanations. I haven’t even seen the movie. But I can ramble a bit after the jump.

    (more…)


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Haircut of the Year

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    bardem.pngIFC Blog has a visual breakdown of the references employed by critics to describe Javier Bardem’s haircut in No Country For Old Men. Prince Valiant references were most abundant; ever the lone wolf, Armond White was the only critic to namedrop Richard III. Jim Emerson seems to have dropped his Tony Danza reference too late to make it into IFC’s calculations, but I think it’s spot-on (and period accurate, if we’re buying the contention that No Country takes place in 1980). Although, for the record, I’m with Andrew Tracy of Reverse Shot??????it may engender colorful pie charts, but unnecessary quirk/kitsch like that haircut makes this film weaker, not stronger.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Norman Mailer 1923-2007

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    mailer.pngMy experience with Norman Mailer, who died this weekend at age 84, was fairly limited, so here’s a look at some of the tributes to him springing up on the blogs:

    • Jeff Wells recalls interviewing Mailer for the press kit for his final film, Tough Guys Don’t Dance: “He was in a pissy mood when I called him to do the initial interview. But we eventually got rolling and he gradually came to realize I wasn’t an idiot.”
    • Lou Lumenick reruns an interview with Mailer from 1987, in which he explains why he chose to direct films without a script: “I figured the screenwriter had no control over the movie anyway — why bother with a script? Write the movie out of what you shot.”
    • At The Guardian, Mark Hooper assesses Mailer’s real impact on the craft of filmmaking: “Ever the perfectionist, he complained about the phoney “punch” sounds used on movie soundtracks, and so he locked himself away with the sound designer and repeatedly punched himself in the face. The sound designer claims to have used the more accurate sound of Mailer’s masochism in countless features since.”
    • Stu links back to The Reeler’s coverage of Mailer’s last public appearance, at the launch of a retrospective of his moving image work. At the time, Mailer assessed his filmmaking career thusly: “I was a bold amateur who had developed a certain confidence that if you bash into things with enough competence — if you have enough skills of another sort — you can translate a good many of them surprisingly.”
    • Video evidence: Rex Sorgatz links to a TV debate between Mailer and Marshall McLuhan on Google Video; Mike at Bad Lit tells us where “you can watch [Rip] Torn whack Mailer with a hammer, whereupon the writer tries to chew Torn???s ear off.”
    • I what I guess could be described as a dissenting obit in 5,200 words (!), Roger Kimball ignores Mailer’s side career as filmmaker and concentrates on slamming him for epitomizing “a certain species of macho, adolescent radicalism that helped to inure the wider public to displays of violence, anti-American tirades, and sexual braggadocio.” Fair enough, but couldn’t it wait until the corpse cooled?

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Shoegaze Doc To Be Scored By Brad Laner

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    c0548911??21.jpgThe 15 year-old version of Karina is jumping up and down at the news that Brad Laner of Medicine is composing the score for Beautiful Noise. I swear I’ve written about this film before, but I can’t find a previous post on Spout about it, so here’s the rundown: directed by Eric Green, Noise is a documentary about shoegaze, the British flash-in-the-pan trend that, or a couple of years in the late 80s, sort of united stoney, droney bands like My Bloody Valentine, Ride, Lush and Jesus and Mary Chain, before a press backlash made uttering the very name of the trend anathema.

    (If that syndrome sounds familiar, check out the Wikipedia sections on both the shoegaze movement and its backlash, which attribute the genre’s collapse to a single Melody Maker story which referred to the genre as “The Scene Which Celebrates Itself.” After that story, shoegazers “became perceived by critics as over-privileged, self-indulgent and middle-class.” Ho-hum.)

    Anyway.

    (more…)


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog

  • Oscars: Critics vs. Voters on Docs

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    On the eve of the release of the documentary shortlist, the Academy’s list of semi-finalists for the Best Documentary Feature Oscar nomination, AJ Schnack does the math to rank the 30 best reviewed documentaries of the year. His findings might surprise you. Although the race’s obvious heavyweights (particularly Michael Moore’s Sicko, and the two Iraq docs produced by Alex Gibney No End in Sight and Taxi to the Dark Side), do make the cut, data provided by Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic reveals that the most critically beloved documentary of the year is none other than The King of Kong, directed by Seth Gordon, who we interviewed back in August.

    Gordon’s video game rivalry doc certainly has come a long way since opening at Slamdance, where it competed for the attention of Park City with Chasing Ghosts, a Sundance entry covering some of the same ground and featuring some of the arcade all-stars. But Kong’s eventual dominance over that film by way of critical reception (99% on Rotten Tomatoes) and relative box office success ($678,000 so far, making it the eighth highest grossing doc of the year and one of the Top 100 docs of all time) may just have to be victory enough. With so many semi-high-profile non fiction films out this year about serious global crises, AJ implies that AMPAS might decide that Kong is too fluffy to make the shortlist.

    This might be the perfect example to reveal the growing chasm between film critics and the Academy.

    (more…)


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog