Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Tour Spout | Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SpoutBlog on spout.com

  • BlogNosh 10/18/07

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    herzogtee.png

    • David Lynch’s book Catching the Big Fish gave Jürgen Fauth the push he needed to try transcendental meditation. “A year later, I haven’t missed any of the twice-daily meditation sessions and can corroborate all of the claims Lynch makes for TM,” he writes at Muckworld.
    • Chris Thilk ponders: “What is J.J. Abrams going to lose when he reveals the actual name of his mystery film about some apocalyptic event and the New York partiers caught up in it?”
    • Virginia Heffernan’s awesome Screens blog has changed names and focus. It’s now called Medium and, as Heffernan writes in the first entry, it’ll be a place to “venture further into the mysteries of TV-Internet convergence, while also tracking the music, movies and games that have shown up for the collision.”
    • It’s official: Austin’s new Alamo Drafthouse at the Ritz is opening November 1. Jette Kernion has the details on the opening night festivites at Slackerwood.
    • There’s a 4-ton Transformer in a mall in Los Angeles. The Underwire has pics and deets.
    • The image above can be worn in t-shirt on your chest, if you can make it to Cinefile in Los Angeles. Thanks to Ray Pride for alerting us to the news–I might send my sister over there with some orders, if anyone wants one.

    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog's blog

  • Armond White Defends Tyler Perry, Trashes Judd Apatow

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Knocked Up  (2007)

    Superbad  (2007)

    After explaining why Lionsgate declined to screen the film for critics, Armond White begins his review proper of Why Did I Get Married? on contrarian autopilot: “Most critics don’t ‘get’ Tyler Perry basically because most critics are whites who are not only clueless about Perry’s African-American culture, but unsympathetic to his particular expression.” Okay, probably. But isn’t that obvious? I started to wonder if old Armond wasn’t losing his touch.
    Oh, but wait! Further down the page, he hits us Whiteys where it really hurts, by attacking sacred dude-com cow Judd Apatow. “Nothing in Knocked Up is as meaningful as Perry’s spectacle of men who must restrain their anger physically or his politically incorrect fashion show of women proudly, luxuriously wearing furs as signs of pleasure and achievement,” White sniffs. It gets better, when White insists that the derogatory terms most commonly used to describe Trapped in the Closet would be better applied to SuperBad. And I could go on. Just read it in full.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog's blog

  • Why Does Warner Brothers Keep Screwing Up?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Anne Thompson has written an impassioned post, defending Michael Clayton against Warner Brothers’ mismanagement:

    What makes me crazy is that the studio had a well-reviewed, smart-house, classy movie that played well for the Academy and cost only $22 million. That’s peanuts to a studio like Warners and there was no earthly reason to go wide! They could have let those per-screen averages play out slowly over time, kept the movie simmering in a successful mode, and widened gradually, keeping the Oscar race in mind. This is the kind of movie that builds and finds an audience. As long as it’s successful, all well and good. But taint it with a 4th-place weekend and you’ve got the perception of damaged goods.

    I haven’t seen Clayton yet, but from what I can tell, she’s totally right: this is the kind of movie that needs to play small for a few weeks, adding cities and screens bit by bit, so that coastal, early-adopting grown-ups have a chance to see and spread the word to their peers.

    It’s so strange that Warner Brothers keeps bungling like this. Just take a look at the Warner Brothers tag on this blog, and it’s just one stupid scandal and/or mistake right after another. They either failed to sufficiently support Jesse James out of apathy, or they deliberately sabotaged its release. They let Nikki Finke’s “Robinov hates women” meme spread unchallenged for days before issuing a denial. And now they’re letting what should have been an easy (if slow-burning) prestige hit fall to their impatience. This is where I break into the Jerry Seinfeld voice in order to say, “What is the deal, with Warner Brothers?” And with sure-to-be gems like Man Wich in the pipeline, can it really get better before it gets worse?


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog's blog

  • George Lucas: The Next Online Video Star?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    lucas_narrowweb__300×4850.jpgChris Albrecht at NewTeeVee has crafted an open letter to George Lucas, re: eventual distribution options for his in-the-works Star Wars TV series:

    Mr. Lucas, take a cue from Radiohead, and tell the networks to take a hike.

    Why bother with traditional TV? You own the one of the biggest brands in the, well, universe. The shows are already being produced without a network commitment. Avoid the hassle of negotiating terms with networks around the world (and dealing with their marketing and promotions).

    But most of all, it would give you what you are famous for — control.

    The reference to Radiohead seems a little bit off the mark, as Albrecht doesn’t seem to be suggesting that Lucas set up his own storefront and/or allow fans to set their own price. It’s also worth noting that Radiohead’s price-it-yourself experiment has not been an unqualified success: though 1.2 million copies were legitimately purchased last week, another 500,000 were downloaded illegally. But if Georgie were to follow one of Albrecht’s suggestions and broadcast his series via an ad supported video sharing network like Brightcove, piracy wouldn’t be an issue, and he’d be able to keep all ad revenue for himself.

    It would be a very, very encouraging sign if someone like Lucas were to wake up to the fact that the internet is where his fan base lives, and subsequently take the initative to come to them. But even if Albrecht is right in that an online-self release would actually give Lucas *more* control over his content, I think the perception amongst traditional media producers is still that the internet is the wild west, and that releasing content in this world is equivalent to giving up control. Isn’t that why Video ID exists?


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog's blog

  • Michael Moore is a Bigger Self-Promoter Than Kanye West

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    gawkgraph.png…that, and other revelations about what celebrities blog about, courtesy of this feature on Gawker. Surprising: 36% of all celebrity blogging is devoted to “shameless self-promotion”; I would have pegged it at 70 or 80 percent. Not so surprising: statistically, blogging celebrities devote exactly as much virtual ink to “indecipherable rants” as “Republicans.” Nice graph, but I have to say, I’m SHOCKED that the Gawk squad let Jeff Bridges’ use of the word “netiquette” slip by un snarked-upon.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog's blog

  • Barbarella Remake in Limbo

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Planet Terror  (2007)

    Rose got workThe NY Observer says Robert Rodriguez has lost Universal’s backing for his Barbarella remake, over the filmmaker’s insistence that his fiancee, Rose McGowan, play the title role. Rodriguez and McGowan “fell in love” on the set of Planet Terror, which led to the end of Rodriguez’s 16-year marriage to his producer, Elizabeth Avellan. According to the story, when the studio was first informed that Rodriguez intended to cast McGowan over “more famous names [like] Nicole Kidman, Halle Berry and Jessica Alba”, they re-calibrated Barbarella’s budget from $100 million to something “in the double-digit millions.” Rodriguez denies this; he says Universal will give him $60 million to make the film, no questions asked, but he thinks he needs $82 million, so he’s shopping the project around to other studios.

    Of note: McGowan face was injured in a car accident earlier this year, leading to actress to obtain major plastic surgery. It’s possible that the studio is worried the 17 Cherry Darling obsessives that might pay to see McGowan in a Barbarella outfit may not even be able to recognize her (see this related rumor about the actress’ reported post-surgery trouble landing work). Also of note: not one of the three “more famous” actresses listed above has proven that she can actually open a movie.


    Originally posted on:SpoutBlog's blog

 


Advertisement