Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Tour Spout | Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Smooth_J Blog

  • Summer Castle.

    2 out of 2 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Forrest Gump  (1994)

    Summer Palace  (2006)

    "Sex and politics are on full boil!" NY Times

    "Its sex scenes are mini revolutions!" Guardian

    "I got a boner--from all the sex!" TVs Fred Savage, DGA nominee

    That is the first impression that the viewer of Summer Palace is supposed to receive.  A hot-seat, glorified porno, and that's mostly what the film is.  However, it's a bit more high-class than that: Lou Ye has a better eye for photography than your average porno auteur, and he manages to meld the debauchery with political events, whether or not his characters (that happen to be having sex at the time) know what the hell is going on.

    I actually liked the film.  While the running time was a bit on the long-side, and certain scenes were way too brooding and self-important, there were frequent shines of brilliance in Lou Ye's direction.

    The story involves a girl named Yu Hong from a small Chinese town, who is introduced as being strange and strong-willed and in a passionate romance with her boyfriend.  Just as soon as she sleeps with him in a "lyrical love scene" in the middle of a field, she says that she's leaving him and going to school in Beijing.

    Cut to: Beijing, where disaffected youth smoke like chimneys and have intellectual discussions in their dorm rooms, all the while having an interest in the opposite sex that can only be described as juvenile.  There are long, LONG shots of the heroine's face as she stares down her love interest, Zhou Wei, and establishes an obviously otherworldly mind-connection with him, because those scenes and their wonderfully photographed sex-scenes are really the only connection that they seem to have.  This is the one issue I had with the film--while everything looks beautiful, passionate, and melancholy, there doesn't seem to be much substance behind Yu's and Zhou's relationship.  We're meant to think there is, and there quite possibly may be, but there is not much evidence of it.

    Eventually, the students become wise to this whole "communist government" thing and begin to stage huge protests, to which Yu and her female friends seem to know nothing about.  The depiction of Tiananmen Square is incredibly effective: Yu seems to drift through the endless throngs of people, in a haze, an outsider trapped in something that she cannot escape from.  While at many points the movie seems to be masquerading as something much more important than it really is, this scene is perfect.

    Soon after these protests, and in the format of any sweeping love story, Yu and Zhou are inevitably separated by the forces that brought them together and eventually reunited and need to decide whether their love has lasted.  In general story arch, the film is undeniably conventional.

    It's Lou Ye's outstanding direction that makes the film good.  His eye for gorgeous, continuous shots is unprecedented--I could have fallen for the film after the club scene very early in the film, in which corny pop music is playing and Ye deftly maneuvers his camera to view all parts of the club, while still focusing mostly on Yu's and Zhou's connection.  There is a very French, new-wave feel to it, while still capturing the lyricism of truly Asian art.  The ending is a perfect illustration of this: it is beautiful, it is ambiguous, and it is heartbreaking. (Minus the cheesy, indulgent mini-bios of the character's lives after the film's events--do yourself a favor and press STOP right after the film starts to fade out.)

    I stated earlier in my review that Summer Palace is a glorified porno, and that is an exaggeration.  While there are about 10 sex scenes, including scenes in a field, in a hallway of a public establishment, and in three or four different bedrooms with all manner of partner pairings, it really is not as bad as you'd think from reading the DVD case.  The film would most likely merit an NC-17 rating, but I'm not one to judge.  (The Diving Bell and the Butterfly is PG-13, and there are full nudity shots in it.)  However, the sex scenes really do serve a purpose.  Most of the dialogue between lovers consists of very generic, simple sentences, including "What now?", "What's wrong?", "Do you love me?", etc.  The real passion is established through the imagery, through the feelings evoked by the director's style, and most noticeably through the outstanding music.  The score really is a marvel, though I've heard it criticized as being "atrocious and cliched," two of the last words that came to my mind.  The sex scenes only add to the poetic fervor of the character's and of the film itself.

    Unless the Chinese government is exceptionally stupid (which is more than possible), I would venture to guess that the banning was on account of the sexual liberty shown in the film.  The subplot of political activism and unrest really felt forced, with no real connection to the character's other than their newfound "free-love" feelings, which are revolutionary at this time in China.  I couldn't help but comparing the backdrop to Forrest Gump's backdrop of several generations of political and social turmoil--but while in Forrest Gump, the political commentary added to hilarity (I don't care what people say about that movie), in Summer Palace it only slows down the plot, especially in a God-awful transition montage around the film's halfway point.  As I previously mentioned, the only scene of relevance is the Tiananmen Square sequence.  Another film that is pretty connected in subject matter is Germany's The Lives of Others, a far superior film, demonstrating East Germany's secret police's invasion of privacy and censorship while trying to catch a pair of stage actors who infuse their plays with political satire.  However, that is more of a morality tale than a romance, and Summer Palace is almost strictly romance with attempted undertones of political importance.

    Once again, I have found myself picking apart and bringing down a film that I actually enjoyed.  I didn't love it, since it has its obvious flaws, but it is a good movie, and an excellently photographed one.  If you're easily offended by full-frontal nudity and gratuitous sex, you might do best to steer away from this one.  But it is a decent, lyrical love story from a very talented director.  Its hot-seat political significance should really only be remembered for the reaction of the Chinese government.


  • The Midnight Sun

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Memento  (2000)

    Insomnia  (2002)

    Batman Begins  (2005)

    The Prestige  (2006)

    Something about Insomnia just did not work.  I mean, it had the makings of a great movie, and to be honest, it almost was a great movie.  But there was just something missing, something lacking from the basic feel of the movie that couldn't really be made up for, no matter how hard Pacino, Williams, and director Chris Nolan tried.

    The story is pretty obviously a remake of a Norwegian film made in the 90s, which apparently is pretty superior to this; one thing that this film succeeded at was making me put that film on the top of my list of films to see.  The general idea of the story is excellent, with the guilt and insanity of the murder case thrown in with Dormer's (Pacino's) own guilt for the accidental murder of his partner and his shady tactics used to put a child murderer behind bars in LA.

    The insomnia of the midnight sun is absolutely perfect.  It seems as though insomnia is a great subject for Nolan to tackle, since in each and every one of his movies to date involves his depiction of the acute sensory details of his characters' illusions and flashbacks.  In Memento, it's Guy Pearce's momentary flashbacks of his wife being brutally beaten.  In The Prestige, there are very specific images of drowning and guilty flashbacks.  Even in Batman Begins he uses a very acute, jumpy imagery to portray the effects of Scarecrow's hallucinogen.  In Insomnia, he manages to use most of these tricks the entire movie--the jumpy eye movements, the flashes of light, the strange sounds of everyday life echoing in the ears.  On the level of Nolan's direction, the film in beautiful.

    However, something is just wrong with the script.  Nothing is really ever played out as it should be--it's not as though there's much to be desired.  I can't really even place my finger on it.  I mean, the film is a taut, nearly explosive thriller.  But why did I feel so disconnected from it?  My only explanation is that the pacing of the film was just slightly off, and the ending was a pretty cliched, making use of a awfully bland and textbook performance by Hilary Swank (bleh).  I mean, even she sort of contributed to the film's overall lackluster feel, and she should have been a huge asset.

    Pacino and Williams are great...it's actually really interesting to see Pacino play a role like this, since his character's are usually so collected and outspoken, while in this he is forced to downplay and portray a man who is slowly going insane from lack of sleep. ("Six days," says Williams.  "You beat my record.")

    The film is worth watching, because it's surely entertaining and well-made.  Nolan really tries his hardest, and there's nothing you can say to criticize his direction.  But the script is lacking, and Hilary Swank pretty much sucks.


  • I may be bad, but I feel...GOOD.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Army of Darkness  (1992)

    The Evil Dead  (1983)

    Step Brothers  (2008)

    Zombie Strippers  (2008)

    I fricken loved this movie.  This week I got my full share of shamelessly heartfelt, hysterical belly laughs, since I saw Step Brothers earlier in the week and then this.  But to be honest, I haven't had this much fun watching a movie since Zombie Strippers.

    The movie starts in the middle of the action with little to no explanation as to what's going on--I suppose the first two Evil Dead films sort of serve as the exposition, or maybe this movie really needs no introduction.  The basic gist is that Bruce Cambell gets sent back in time by malevolent forces and is deemed as a hero of prophecy after defeating several undead foes with a chainsaw and then a miraculously appearing shotgun.  Never have the people of the middle ages seen such heroics--or such raw, quotable attitude--in one man, heightened by his "boom-stick" and perpetually bloody chainsaw.

    He is soon commisioned to retrieve the Necronomicon, the book of the dead, so that he may save the kingdom from the evil forces.  But he insists that he only wants to get back to his own time, and that's the only reason he's going to get it.  Impressed by his bravery, he finds a marvelously sanitary medieval squeeze, who is swept off her feet when he grabs her violently and says: "Gimme some sugar, baby."

    The best part of the film is undeniably Bruce Cambell.  He is an undeniable hard-ass, and some of his one liner's are DROP DEAD HILARIOUS (heh).  However, my ceaselessly analytical mind did pick up on some distinct visual properties of the film.  It's campy set decoration brings to mind some of Burton's work, which seemingly all came later than this, such as Nightmare Before Christmas and Edward Scissorhands.  Even the stop-motion effects of the living dead seem almost taken right out of Nightmare.

    This is one of those B-Movie gems that is hilarious in its insistence to not be taken seriously.  Even the scenes that at first seem legitimately meant to scare, some classic camp or gag is thrown in to make it completely hysterical.  It is at once a tribute to the genre, and even moreso a parody, all the while remaining faithful to its origins and throwing in an inventiveness that is difficult to find anymore.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<August 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31123456


Categories
 


Advertisement