Frem Here To Awesome Festival
Advertisement

Smooth_J Blog

  • HATS

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Raising Arizona  (1987)

    I finally got around to seeing Miller's Crossing, and I was actually very surprised.  Not about how good it was, but how toned down the typical Cohen's themes were.  It was, all in all, a conventional gangster flick.  There were the undertones and the symbolism and all that stuff, but none quite as prominent as in their other movies, such as Raising Arizona and Fargo.  However, the symbolism of Tom's hat is very prominent, and is referred to pretty often.

    Gabriel Byrne is very good as the film's anti-hero, Tom.  He seems like a sceptical, sarcastic bastard for most of the movie, but he brings a lot of sympathy and humor to the character.  The closing scenes are especially well-done by him, and he perfectly embodies everything that the film makes him out to be in those closing 10 or 15 minutes.  The rest of the cast is also terrific, especially Albert Finney, who lends the film a veteran presence as the seasoned actor that he is (and was, even in 1990).

    The story is very inventive and fresh, especially for a gangster film.  For the most part, the style is very much like earlier gangster movies, and there's also a lot of noir influence as well.  There is always a sense of mystery and unknowing, making a very suspenseful film.

    I've noticed on other sites that there's a lot of talk about Tom's hat.  I think that Tom's hat represents his dignity and his cool, collected nature.  When he loses his hat, which happens quite often in the film, it is when he is bested or put down by someone.  However, when he has his hat on, he is a smart-mouthed, smooth gangster, unpredictable yet calm.  This was one of the only instances of trademark Cohen that I noticed in the film, though I'm sure I'll find more when I watch it again.

    The Coens, when making a movie, tend to imitate some type of medium in filming it.  In Miller's Crossing's case, it's the gangster-noir film.  And they execute it perfectly.  It's a great film.

    And, hats off to them for finally winning best picture and director.  I can't wait for Burn After Reading.


  • Powerful, but just short of a masterpiece

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Mystic River  (2003)

    I'm not typically a fan of Clint Eastwood's directing.  In fact, I generally hate it.  It's way too moody, way too brooding, and no one ever seems happy or light-hearted.  He depicts the world as being a terrible place where everyone is depressed and messed up.  Which may be true, but it makes for a very sobering viewing experience.  For example, I hated Million Dollar Baby a lot.  It was depressing, annoying, and the entire movie was done in shadows, which pissed me off (however, Morgan Freeman was amazing).  While a lot of this was the case for Mystic River, for some reason I found more to like in this movie.  It was extremely powerful and intense, and the human stories were very well-done.  It was damn near perfect, until the overly extended ending.  Though there were some errors before that, too.

    The opening scenes of the film are extremely disturbing and gut-wrenching.  They set the stage for themes of the film as a whole.  And they allow Tim Robbins to delve deep into the character of Dave, a tortured, broken soul, who is just trying to go through life and forget the tragedy of his childhood.  Sean Penn gives a tour-de-force turn as former criminal Jimmy, but the strange thing is, you don't really feel much sympathy for his character after the first hour and half or so.  I'm pretty sure you were supposed to be rooting for him, but it's just almost impossible to.  He is an asshole, a headstrong thug, and though he plays it perfectly, you only really feel sympathy for him immediately following the death of his daughter.  After a while, when he and his friends the Savage Brothers begin to seek revenge on their own, you lose respect and feeling for his character.  And it would have been nice to be able to feel for him during the over-long ending.

    Kevin Bacon is solid, as is the rest of the supporting cast.  It's a great ensemble film, but a lot of the characters are never really delved into very much.

    The ending is meant to be a shocker, but I kind of saw it coming for a while.  However, that doesn't make it any less explosive and heartbreaking.  It would have been sufficient to cut out about half of the final scenes, because the film tries to push a point about Jimmy being a "king" and he's back on top and all of that, but it's really ineffective.  The closing shot is haunting...I have never seen water and music used to such great effect.

    Thank God I had just watched O Brother, Where Art Thou before I watched Mystic River, or I probably would've been extremely forlorn all through it.  Mystic River is a sobering experience, but a emotionally powerful one.


  • "You're dumber than you think I think you are."

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Chinatown  (1974)

    What an amazing movie.  I'm not really one to rave about the noir genre, but WOW.  Jack Nicholson is amazing as Jake Gittes, a Los Angeles private eye, who is just a little bit too nosy for his own good.  As usual, not only does Jack act outstandingly, his eyebrows should also have been nominated for best actor, and that's an extremely outstanding feat.  Faye Dunaway is perfect in the role of Evelyn Mulwray, playing it with a tortured grace that is a spectacle to watch.  The rest of the cast is superb as well.

    The mood set by Roman Polanski in Chinatown is unmatchable.  The entire movie feels cool, calm, and collected, even as the plot twists and treachery run rampant.  Jake Gittes remains a nosy smart-ass all the way throughout, but shows a depth of character that is extremely rare in a noir film.  The music is outstanding, as well as the story of greed and deception in Los Angeles.  The motif of water is used to great effect, especially close to the end.

    The ending is one of the best I've ever seen.  While you desperately want things to turn out well, you almost can't shake the feeling that they're not.  And when the beeping of Evelyn Mulwray's car horn is heard resounding through Chinatown, you know.  It is powerful, and it is amazing, and in a way, extremely disturbing (especially seeing Noah Cross' face as he steals away the girl).

    All in all, one of the greatest movies I've ever seen.  Right near the top of my favorites.  "Forget it, Jake.  It's Chinatown."


  • Why I love the movie Rushmore

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Bottle Rocket  (1996)

    Rushmore  (1998)

    I watched Rushmore today, mostly because I felt like a bag of douch for some reason.  Anyways, I realized how amazing this film really is.  I promptly went to Amazon and bought the movie Bottle Rocket, and am now really pumped to see it.  Wes Anderson, say what you will about him, is a genius, and though The Royal Tenenbaums is widely considered his best work to date, I'm almost positive he will create much better films in the future.

    Jason Schwartzman is, all in all, a huge jerk in this movie.  But he plays it too such a degree that it is a wonder to watch.  He makes one bad move after another, one wrong decision after the next, and you still can't help but feel bad for this pompous little nerd.  Bill Murray, as always, is outstanding, and the Olivia Williams gives a great performance as the teacher stuck between the savage duelings of Murray and Schwartzman.  The fact that she never seems to be wondering why they're so smitten by her is extremely interesting, and almost makes you want to see more of her character.

    Wes Anderson shamelessy uses indy and low-key classic rock tunes to heighten his story, and while it seems extremely cliche in The Life Aquatic (though I still love that movie), it works perfectly in Rushmore.  The music melds with the story, and the strange little insights thrown in by background characters (and even a tree in one scene) give depth and symbolism to what could have been a farce comedy.  Wes Anderson gracefully tip-toes the line between a dumb comedy and a smart, touching one.

    I could analyze the small faults of the movie for days, but I'm not going to, because I really just can't bring myself to do so.  The movie itself is just so likeable, and the style so fascinating, that it's hard to critique negatively.  The one thing I will say about it, however, is that even though Schwartzman's character is so strangely relatable, he does get way too whiny and way too cocky in some scenes.  But even when he does, it only adds to the film as a whole, and only makes the ending all the more satisfying.

    This is the film that Anderson really started to come into his own.  The "quirky" camera angles, the bizarre love interests, the deadpan deliveries; all are demonstrated in Rushmore.  While The Royal Tenenbaums took all of Anderson's ideas and melded them together to one huge ensemble comedy, Rushmore presses the same ideas, but into a smaller package (excuse the dumb metaphor).  Rushmore could almost be said as a better film than The Royal Tenenbaums, and I definitely do like it better, but the performances and storylines in the latter do push it ahead a little bit.

    Rushmore is by far my favorite high-school film of all time, if it can even be considered that.  It is so much farther ahead than other films of that genre, and so much more mature and developed.  This is a movie that should undeniably be remembered, especially in the near future, when Anderson crafts his best film to date (though unfortuneately, it'll have to wait until after he flops with The Fanstastic Mr. Fox or whatever--but who knows, right?).


  • Good Movie

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Broken Flowers  (2005)

    I remember hearing about this movie back when it came out, and I was really curious as to what all the buzz was about.  The story sounded good, and Noah Baumbach is a good friend of Wes Anderson, who I really like, and who was also a producer on the film.  So, I've always meant to see it, and when I saw it on sale for 4 dollars at Blockbuster, I had to get it.

    All in all, The Squid and the Whale was a really good film.  The performances are great, even Jeff Daniels doing an all out Bill Murray impersonation (not surprisingly, Bill Murray was previously signed on to that role before dropping out to do Broken Flowers).  Laura Linney is amazing as usual, and both of the kids give extremely realistic and emotional performances.  And Billy Baldwin is hilarious, as a contemporary-hippie tennis instructor.

    Baumbach analyzes very well the stuck-up nature of New York City writers.  Jeff Daniels' character is an "intellectual" and scorns people who do not like good movies or interesting things.  Laura Linney, also an intellectual, searches for companionship outside of her mind capacity, someone simple and ordinary, almost to escape from herself.

    While it's somewhat disturbing to watch the youngest child spiral downhill at such a young age, there is something extremely and disturbingly realistic about the way he is characterized that it is never doubted.  And the older kid (who is meant to be Noah Baumbach's character, as the movie is autobiographical) is a whiny, somewhat stuck-up high-schooler.  As much as I hate to say it, I could relate to this character in so many ways.  It's the fact that Baumbach was writing and analyzing himself as well as the world that surrounded him as a teenager that makes the movie so understandable and so undeniably real.

    The divorce of the parents is characterized like a clash between two titans, subtley downplayed to great stylistic effect.  Right when it seems as though the two have emotions for each other again, one of them shows a side so savage and so awful that it seems like they will never shift sympathies again.  The metaphor of the squid and the whale at the museum exibit is absolutely brilliant (hence the title), making for an amazing ending to a solid film.

    Sometimes the movie shifts into the quirkiness of a Wes Anderson comedy, and while in some situations it works very well, in others it takes a little bit away from the film's credibility.  I feel as though he should have downplayed the teen angst a little bit, just as he downplayed the clash between the parents a little bit, but I can understand why he wouldn't, considering the film is about him.  And the youngest kid kind of disturbed me a little bit, though that shouldn't affect my view of a movie.

    All in all, a really great movie, but not quite done to perfection.


  • The Basketball Diaries

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I just felt I should do a short post about this film.  My friend has been telling me about it for a few years now, not exactly praising it, but just pestering me to see it.  So, over at his house last night, I finally did.  Let me just say, what a depressing movie.

    The gratuitous drug depiction and Leonardo DiCaprio's character's fall from grace is heart-rending, and I really couldn't get it out of my head.  While it's not necessarily a great film, it's an explosive study of the pressure placed on athletes these days and the possible tragic outcomes of such pressure.  Watching these kids ruin their lives piece by piece was very devastating.

    The Basketball Diaries is definitely a film worth seeing, if only to marvel at the power of such a heartbreaking story.  However, it's probably one of the worst movies to try and watch at a party, because it kind of sucks the fun out of an entire night.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<February 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728291
2345678


Categories
 


Advertisement