Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

SlipOfTheTongue Blog

  • simple and effective

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    13 Tzameti  (2006)

    This is the definition of a good first feature.  It's not over-complicated, takes place in very few locations and involves one simple twist that makes it unique from other films.  Director Gela Babluani sets up the story at a deliberate pace that creates a sense of uncertainty but he doesn't telegraph what is to come.  (People who can't tough out the slow beginning should stick to American movies.)  There is a bit of Hitchcock both in the manner in which the story is set up and in the way that its main character is thrust into the middle of extraordinary circumstances. 

    An ordinary day laborer (Sebastien, a roofer) who is down on his luck finds himself faced with an opportunity and he takes it, stepping into another world.  In this world brutality and finance once again meet as they have in many recent horror films.  Once the character crosses over we ourselves cross over with him into a different kind of movie.  This new movie feels more like a game and the characters are chess pieces.  It then becomes our duty (unless we choose otherwise) to watch this game play out to the end.  It is like getting in line for a frightening roller coaster ride at an amusement park and not being able to back out.  We are trapped.  There is nothing particuarly flashy in the way the director causes this to happen but in 13 TZAMETI there are definite choices being made and I like most of them.  It almost doesn't matter how the movie ends.  It's more about the twist and the ticking clock.

    Without giving anything away, suffice it to say that there is a trend toward explicitly showing man's inhumanity to man in the movies these days.  It seems we are so oversaturated by media stimuli and so snake bitten by cynicism that the only way for us to feel "changed" at the movies is for us to experience the horror of torturing or killing our fellow man.  I don't blame the movies for this.  They are a reflection of the times.  Leave it to a good filmmaker to exploit our moral weaknesses and to get noticed while doing it.      


  • Outfest Closer a Mixed Result

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Kiss the Bride  (2008)

    Director C. Jay Cox has crafted a romantic comedy full of attractive people who are not shrieking over the top stereotypes.  For this we give him props.  The director knows how to cast great looking men and he is also good at creating believable moments of intimacy between characters, both gay and straight.  However, this film (the closing night selection for Outfest 2007) is like a row boat with 37 oars in the water.  It tries to do too much without settling down and effectively telling the core story between the two male leads.   If only the narrative were a bit tighter and more focused this could have been a good one.  The references to Julia Roberts' "My Best Friend's Wedding" only serve to remind us that this movie is a lot less funny and not as well constructed.  Still, there's good beefcake to be had and there are some funny moments here and there.  I was moved at times by the sincere approach Cox takes toward his characters and the modern spin he puts on gay relationships.  I wish the overall results were not so mixed.  Hopefully Cox will turn it around next time.  I liked his last film (Latter Days) very much and he's too good a director to become a one hit wonder.  Final note, Steve Sandavoss is a highlight in this film.  The former lead of Latter Days plays a supporting role here and he casts a funny and endearing shadow over a film that is not quite as good as he is. 

  • Next Link In The Chain

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    When the world signed on for a string of movies based on the Harry Potter book series we knew this thing would take a while.  H.P. and the Order of the Phoenix is perhaps the one installment so far which feels like setup for something to come and not very much like a stand alone movie.  What we get is another small link which is part of a very long narrative chain (my prediction is that we will have run out of fossil fuels by the time the last movie is completed).  My understanding is that there were many details in the book which were left out of the movie.  It feels that way.  I enjoyed the craftsmanship of this movie and had a good time with some of the directorial flourish, but wished that there was more of a beginning, middle and end. 

  • Too Cute For It's Own Good

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Caught this gay themed comedy at Outfest 2007 and was squirming by the end.  Somewhere in this coming of age tale is a likeable story about celebrating diversity (not a new theme but a noble one).  Unfortunately, even this gets lost in the haphazard parade of drag queens, shy individualists and beefy hunks (all token symbols of a movie that's trying too hard).  The biggest problem with THE CURIOSITY OF CHANCE is that the director doesn't know what he wants to say.  It's a mish mash.  This is the kind of movie where you can't tell the bad actors from the good ones because the director is steering everyone down such a misguided path.  I'm grasping at straws here but at least the movie did have a decent 80's soundtrack.

  • Taking The Time

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Ten Canoes  (2007)

    The film TEN CANOES centers on a story within a story.  It is the recreation of an oral tale told by an elder member of an Australian Aboriginal tribe in the language of Ganalbingu.  The film was inspired by a series of photographs taken by anthropologist Donald Thomson circa 1930.  In one black and white photograph tribe members scouted for wood to be used in the building of canoes.  It is this journey which serves as a backdrop for the story being told about tribe members past. 

    TEN CANOES has a studied, anthropological quality itself and this style is maintained through much of the film.  The funnier moments come and go rather quickly and one longs for more of them.  All of this has been channeled through the directorial sensibilities of Rolf de Heer, who loves his subject matter very much.  One suspects that narrator David Gulpilil Ridijimiraril Dalaithngu (thank God I took high school typing) loves himself as well.  Before we even know what is going on we are being told what a great story we are about to hear.  The warm up unfolds at a somewhat languorous pace.  The film starts with slow tracking shots of unblemished Aboriginal lands and the rhythms of the first part of the film are an echo of that pacing, slow to the point of stillness.

    As we transition from the time period of the storyteller to the time period of the story being told, we move from color to black and white and back to color again.  This is a good way of distinguishing between time periods, but the black and white sequences are distinctly less satisfying.  The color cinematography in this film is so striking and accomplished that the black and white suffers by comparison.  One wonders if the color was simply removed in the digital intermediate process in order to simulate black and white for certain scenes.  The end result is not as lush and expressive as one might hope.

    As the older narrator spins his cautionary tale to the younger tribe member Dayindi (actor Jamie Dayindi Gulpilil Dalaithngu) it becomes clear that the point of this story is meant to be revealed over a long span of time.  We must wait for the outcome and then judge its relevance.  And wait.  Taken at its essence the moral of this story is practical but not particularly earth shattering nor profound.  But it does fit the story.  Essentially, it is "be careful what you wish for or you might get it".  Patience is also held up as an important virtue.  To an extent we are also rewarded for our own patience as viewers.  We are asked to wait out the entire sequence of events before we know why the story is really being told.  One can infer that the notion of “patience” also implies respect for land and tradition and history.  These are things that never change in the Aboriginal culture of this story and young people (like Dayindi) often, at first, do not appreciate such things.
                   
    What is amazing about this movie is that if you can wait out its small self-indulgences (the toothy, self-congratulatory grinning of the actors, the beamingly overconfident narration) you will be rewarded with a strange gift.  The movie works.  Almost invisibly, beyond its creative flourishes, in the end, it is a story well told.  There is a character who meets an untimely end.  The way in which the others say goodbye to him is both fascinating and poignant.  In the end the film succeeds in telling a story and conveying the moral behind it.  When it is over you feel as though you have been someplace you haven’t been before.  Though the movie seems to be, to a large degree, fabrication you still feel as though you have been to a place where tradition still exists, and where the people co-exist and commune with nature and pass on lessons to their young.  It is a simple, sometimes dangerous life.  Although the Aboriginal communities are largely modernized today, the feeling of communing with nature is part of their history and the spirits of their ancestors must still prowl the landscapes.  This movie is full of great, fascinating faces, particularly the women.  And the character of Birrinbirrin is quite humorous to watch.  The real life Aboriginees act out the various parts and this gives the movie a feeling of authenticity.  In the end, there are even a few jokes about farting and penis size thrown in.  Hey, in a land this rough you've got to keep yourself entertained.  TEN CANOES is a story worth telling, about a simple and fascinating existence, one that spans back centuries.

  • McClane Rebooted

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    If the original DIE HARD was a near perfect piece of popular fimmaking then LIVE FREE OR DIE HARD should at least get four stars for being a bit of a throwback to a simpler time.  Actually it really only deserves three stars, but I can't help myself because I liked it so damned much.

    The problem with modern action movies is that they have adopted a near childlike attitude toward emotional escalation.  Filmmakers assume that bigger is better, most is best, and that loudest should arrive before you even get to louder.  It's a common misconception we have with our "everything America" attitude.  We just expect things to come to us.  We don't think in shades of grey.  We project an immediate assumption of greatness and have no time to work for it.  We no longer build greatness brick by brick.  Modern action movies are a reflection of that attitude.  Emotionally speaking, we are a country of 14 year olds.  We want our boom booms big and loud and we want them now.

    This sequel does a small amount to go against that grain, while simultaneously enabling its worst tendencies.  I enjoyed it, but then I think of all those moments of sheer excess that made me feel I was watching the travesty of TRUE LIES all over again.

    It's hero (Bruce Willis) is a scarred, aging veteran of multiple disasters and bureaucratically mis-managed near catastrophes.  If only there had been a John McClane around during Katrina maybe someone could have gotten water to those f%^&#g people a little sooner.  This is a return to the emotional roots of the first DIE HARD, if not the sheer skill and technique of its filmmaking.  Timothy Olyphant is no Alan Rickman that's for sure.  He's a mediocre villain. Fortunately, however, this is Willis' show and he equips himself nicely.  In this script, Willis somehow achieves that Indiana Jones type balance (between common vulnerability and superhuman indestructable survivalism).  I'm not sure how they did it, but in the middle of all the explosions McClane is funny without being too jokey, old fashioned without being a stodgy bore, and vulnerable without enducing the wrong kind of chuckles.  He's mellowed a bit but other than that he's the same guy.  It's a pleasure to be around this character again.    

    Although the movie trucks along at a decent clip, it is nowhere near as tightly constructed as the first DIE HARD and its characters are not as memorable.  Don't get me wrong, I'm a huge Justin Long fan (he was vastly underrated in both Galaxy Quest and Jeepers Creepers, and there's a reason the most intelligent company of the past twenty years chose him to advertise their computers) but he ain't the bad guy.  We do need a greater evil on the other end of the phone to perry and thrust with Willis.  Again, I miss Alan Rickman.

    There is also just a little too much ARMAGEDDON in LIVE FREE OR DIE HARD.  Willis' exploits are just a bit too grandiose.  Instead of merely staying alive inside a giant skyscraper and crawling through glass, here he jumps on top of a supersonic fighter jet and drives a giant semi truck across a collapsing freeway and outruns explosions and such.  It's just a little too far outside of realilty to feel like the real DIE HARD and this is what seems to be part of the problem.

    Can you really go home again?  Would a modern audience accept a leaner more scaled back McClane?  Who knows.  I think next time we should try it though.  How about a single location?  Does that scare you Hollywood?  And let's also concentrate more on creating great characers, scenes and moments rather than trying to out-explode our predacessors. 

    Still it's fun to have Willis back again in something approaching the balance and tone of the original.  He's getting old.  I'm not sure how many more of these he has in him before it's time for Shia LeBeouf and all the other young action stars bank rolled by Coca Cola, AT&T and Steven Spielberg to take their turn on the action stage.  It's just that kind of world Bruce.  You can only be cool for so long. 


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<July 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
24252627282930
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234


Categories
 


Advertisement