Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

ShaunHuston filmblog

Reviews

Reviews of movies
 
  • PopMatters feature on Touch of Evil

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Touch of Evil  (1958)

    I have a feature on directors, marketing, auteur-ship, Orson Welles, and Touch of Evil up at PopMatters. It will be on the front page for another day or so.


  • Hellboy, on the page and on the screen

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Hellboy  (2004)

    If you've seen Hellboy and Hellboy II, but never read the comic, I have a comparison of the character in the two media here.


  • PopMatters reviews

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I haven't been keeping up with blogging anywhere lately but on Twitter. So, here is an update on DVD reviews I've had up at PopMatters recently:


  • New documentary review at PopMatters

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    I have a review of A Hundred Dollars and a T-Shirt, a documentary about zines and Pacific Northwest zine culture, up at PopMatters.

    PopMatters home.
    Direct link to review.


  • Review of Criterion DVD of Drunken Angel

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Drunken Angel  (1948)

    “National cinemas” is a central concept in film studies. At a broad level, it is a useful and effective device for discussing differences between groups of films made in particular times and places. Theoretically, it is given weight by the role that national states have played in developing cinematic traditions and movie industries in many parts of the world. However, like many frameworks for generalization, the idea of national cinemas starts to fray at the edges the closer one looks at individual films and filmmakers. The work of Japanese writer-director Akira Kurosawa is a strong case in point.

    On the one hand, it is easy to code Kurosawa’s films as “Japanese”. His best known works are historical period pieces redolent with characters and landscapes that appear to be so very culturally and geographically specific: samurai, Buddhist temples, light dappled forests. So, too, with recurring themes: honor, duty, fealty.

    On the other hand, beneath the surface, it is possible to see Kurosawa drawing from a cultural heritage that is more global than national. He adapted and borrowed from various “Western” literary and cinematic figures, including William Shakespeare, John Ford, and Dashiell Hammett. From the other side, his works have inspired and been adapted by “Western” filmmakers such as Sergio Leone, Sam Peckinpah, and George Lucas, as well as influencing Hong Kong action cinema. Kurosawa’s Drunken Angel, recently released in a new DVD version by the Criterion Collection, highlights the blurriness of the boundaries between national cinemas.

    Initially released in 1948, Drunken Angel is set in a Tokyo neighborhood immediately after World War II. The central feature of this district is a sump or bog. Bubbly, murky, full of waste and bacteria, the sump is a powerful signifier for the neighborhood as a whole as its residents struggle to survive against the challenges of resource shortages, disease, and domination by organized crime. As the central character, Dr. Sanada (Takashi Shimura), tells his gangster patient, Matsunaga (Toshiro Mifune), the bog represents all of the “scum” surrounding the young, TB-ridden yakuza, holding him down and keeping him from healing. Sanada’s fight to get Matsunaga to adequately care for himself, both in terms of his illness and the way he lives, drives the film’s narrative.

    The dramatic tension rises palpably with the arrival of Okada (Reizaburo Yamamoto), formerly in charge of the neighborhood now managed by Matsunaga. Okada’s return also poses a threat to the doctor’s female assistant, Miyo (Chieko Nakakita), who had some kind of unspecified, but clearly abusive, relationship with the older gangster before he was sent to prison. The movie culminates in a showdown between the two yakuza.

    As noted by more than one of the contributors to the supplemental features included with the new disc, and notably by Kurosawa himself, Drunken Angel is often cited as the writer-director’s “first film”. This is not a literal statement, Kurosawa had already directed some seven features before Drunken Angel, but a figurative one, implying that it is the first film over which Kurosawa believed he had true authorship. And, indeed, the movie exhibits a number of qualities typical of his subsequent work.

    There are, initially, the flawed protagonists of Drunken Angel. The title, in fact, refers to the doctor, who is an unapologetic alcoholic. His work in a down trodden part of the city is presented as the result of both an instinct towards serving the poor and the marginal and the good doctor’s alcoholism. Unsurprisingly, Matsunaga is a conflicted and conflicting character. Even his final decision to throw himself to the wolves can be read more than one way, as equally noble and ignoble.

    Complicated heroes and deeply flawed central characters populate virtually all of Kurosawa’s later films, and particularly touchstone works like Rashomon (1950), The Seven Samurai (1954), Yojimbo (1961), and Ran (1985). Drunken Angel also shares with these films, Rashomon excepted, implacable, far less ambiguous villains for its flawed protagonists to face.

    Throughout the film, Kurosawa, photographer Takeo Ito, and art director Takashi Matsuyama play with light and shadow. Characters continually move into one and out of the other, and, as in Sanada’s and Matsunaga’s first scene together, are sometimes bisected by light and dark. The careful use of light and shadow to signify qualities and complexities of character, and moral choices, is a persistent visual trope in Kurosawa’s work, one that also contributes to the distinctive look and feel of his films. Indeed, his movies often seem to be worlds unto themselves, and this is no less true of the gritty, contemporary Drunken Angel than it is of the fairy tale-like The Hidden Fortress (1958).

    The Hollywood influence on Kurosawa is evident in Drunken Angel on a number of levels, including the costumes, especially the zoot-suited gangsters, the noirish urban setting, and the inclusion of musical production numbers. Indeed, like all Hollywood gangsters, the yakuza in Drunken Angel hang out in a dance hall-****-night club, the perfect setting for breaking out into song and dance.

    The carefully selected and produced extra features included with the new Criterion Collection DVD all intelligently locate the film within its time and place and in the context of Kurosawa’s filmography. The disc includes a booklet featuring an essay by Ian Buruma and excerpts from Kuroawa’s own Something Like an Autobiography (Vintage, 1983).

    In addition to a commentary track from scholar Donald Richie, the DVD itself includes two supplemental pieces. One, “Akira Kurosawa: It is Wonderful to Create,” is part of a series on “Toho Masterworks,” and is originally from 1998. It focuses on discussions with and about Kurosawa and the long term collaborators with whom he worked for the first time on Drunken Angel, chiefly Mifune, art director Matsuyama, and composer Fumio Hayasaka. The other, “Kurosawa and the Censors,” is a talking head documentary short featuring film scholar Lars-Martin Sorensen. The subject of this piece is the role that American censors and the attempt to re-engineer Japanese society after the War played in the production of Drunken Angel.

    Sorensen reviews censor notes on various versions of the story and scripts for the film and discusses how Kurosawa reacted to and dealt with these notes. This feature places the issue of national cinema, and Kurosawa’s “Japanese-ness” in a unique light, as it shows US government control over another country’s film industry occurring at a level far beyond that ever asserted at home.

    One of the distinguishing characteristics of Criterion Collection DVDs is the treatment of film as a form of art worthy of serious criticism and contextual examination. Richie’s commentary track is richly interpretative, moving from discussions of post-War Japan to Kurosawa’s body of work, and back to Drunken Angel itself. As it happens, Richie is able to speak about the film both from a more detached academic perspective and from first hand observation of the film shoot.

    Interestingly, Richie and Sorensen offer radically different interpretations of the movie’s ending, wherein a ray of hope is brought to the film in the form of a 17-year-old school girl (Yoshiko Kuga) Sanada had been treating for TB, but who appears to have fought off the illness. Richie sees this ending as being consistent with other choices made by Kurosawa over the course of his career, and notably in Rashomon, while Sorensen sees it as false, at least as much a product of the censorship regime as it is from Kurosawa’s artistic vision.

    Presenting these kinds of discussions of their selections is one of the primary values of a Criterion DVD. Another is in the attention paid to the film-to-DVD transfer. While hardly pristine, the newly restored and digitized film is bright and clear, and the sound quality is excellent.

    One need not know much about Japanese national cinema or Akira Kurosawa or post-War Japan to enjoy and appreciate a film like Drunken Angel. Knowledge of the film’s historical and artistic contexts will enhance one’s appreciation of the movie and open up new ways of seeing the film, but its basic artistry, dramatic power, and eminently translatable narrative are perfectly capable of standing virtually alone. Whatever one’s interest in seeing the movie, the new Criterion Collection edition allows viewers to experience Drunken Angel on multiple levels.

    Originally published 01/10/2008 by Shaun Huston on PopMatters: http://www.popmatters.com/pm/film/reviews/52837/drunken-angel/

     


  • DVD Review: Cinema 16: European Short Films

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Like all anthologies, Cinema 16: European Short Films is marked by unevenness. Differences in tone, style, interests, and skill between the contributors gives rise to this variability, but it is also unlikely that any two (or three, or four, or five, etc.) viewers/ readers will have the same reaction to the collected films in the two-disc set.

    As with most anthologies unified by geography, little holds the short works compiled by producers Luke Morris and Ben Lederman together beyond their regionality, and given that six of the 16 films are British in origin, arguably the least “European” of the EU states, the significance of even that tie is questionable.

    Not that the unevenness of the collection detracts from its worth or the value of individual films. However, the value of each work is likely to be in the eyes of the beholder, more so because all of the films in the anthology can fairly be called “experimental”, at least in the sense that each seems grounded in one or more ideas or techniques that its makers wanted to play with.

    In some cases, the experiment is more visual in nature (Juan Solanas’ The Man without a Head, Jan Svankmajer’s Jabberwocky), in others more thematic (Roy Andersson’s World of Glory, Nanni Moretti’s The Opening Day of Close-Up), while others are more character or narrative driven (Anders Thomas Jensen’s Election Night, Martin McDonagh’s Six Shooter). Of course, these distinctions are mostly a matter of emphasis rather than being absolute. The salient point is that the films are likely to appeal to viewers in different ways by virtue of their varying purposes and strengths.

    In addition to the UK, the places represented in the collection are: France (two films), Sweden, Czechoslovakia (from 1971), Austria, Denmark (two films), Hungary, Ireland, and Italy. The oldest work is from 1958, Ridley Scott’s Boy and Bicycle, and the most recent are from 2005, Run Wrake’s Rabbit and Bálint Kenyeres Before Dawn. There are two animated films, Rabbit and “abberwocky, the latter stop-motion, while one, The Man without a Head, uses visual effects to create a hybrid world of animation and live-action.

    The remaining titles are live action, all but four in color. In spite of the national range of the collection, of the non-English language titles, only Election Night and The Opening Day of Close-Up are truly dialogue heavy. The remaining selections are either virtually wordless, such as Before Dawn, or feature dialogue that seems more perfunctory than necessary, as in The Man without a Head.

    If the English-language titles weren’t among the most dialogue driven in the collection, it would be tempting to say that the producers were attempting to make a statement about the international language of cinema, or some such thing, but instead it would seem that the collection has been tailored for a British and North American audience. There isn’t anything inherently wrong with this choice, and it does help to make the collection accessible to viewers in the target markets, but it is worth noting that language seems to have been a limiter applied to the selections.

    Few of the directors highlighted in European Short Films have mainstream recognition, although some, Lynne Ramsay (Morvern Callar, 2002), Nanni Moretti (The Son’s Room, 2002), may ring bells with hardcore cinephiles. The collection is, however, leavened with early works from three “name” directors: besides Scott’s Boy and Bicycle, the set also includes Christopher Nolan’s Doodlebug (1997) and Lars Von Trier’s Nocturne (1980). Of these three, only Von Trier’s fragmentary exploration of a woman’s fear of the light reads as immediately characteristic of the director’s later work.

    Boy and Bicycle, a rambling slice-of-life film narrated by the protagonist’s internal monologue, seems far removed from the epic films for which Scott is best known. On the other hand, the main character is played by a very young Tony Scott, marking the film as an important starting point for two notable film careers. Nolan’s Doodlebug is an amusing trifle, and, at three minutes, also the shortest film in the anthology.

    My personal favorites from the collection are as follows.

    Juan Solanas’ The Man without a Head (2003) is, indeed, about a man without a head. The film follows our hero as he tries to find a proper “top” to zip on as he prepares for a much anticipated night out. Part experiment in digital cinema and part exploration of self-image and self-identity, The Man without a Head is weirdly romantic, with a look and feel that evokes Paris in the 1930s, but also one of the more accessible selections in the collection.

    Wasp‘s (2003) big moment, an image of a wasp entering a baby’s mouth, is overwrought and roughly rendered, but by the time it appears, writer-director Andrea Arnold has already spun a story of such complexity and conflicting emotion that its failure hardly matters. The film is grounded by Nathalie Press’ performance as “Zoë,” an all too young, poor, and unworldly mother of four. Wasp‘s narrative turns on Zoë’s chance meeting with an ex, “Dave” (Danny Dyer), which leads to a date later that day. Unable to secure care for her children, but not wanting Dave to know the full details of her life since they last knew each other (or maybe wanting to return to a time when she could just be young), Zoë stashes her kids outside of the pub while she hooks up with the guy.

    Zoë’s choices here are appalling, verging on neglect, but Arnold never lets the audience simply judge her at a distance. As bad as Zoë ‘s parenting is at this moment, it is also easy to understand why she does what she does. It helps that earlier in the film you get to see her bonding with her children. She does seem to be doing the best she can, even if her best isn’t very good. The weight of class bears down heavily on Zoë, but while this helps to explain her life situation, it is never intimated that her immediate choices are anything but her own. In twenty-three minutes, Press and Arnold achieve a level of complexity that few narrative features reach in two hours. Of all the films in the set, this is the one that I found myself thinking about the most days after having viewed for the first time.

    Roy Andersson’s ”World of Glory (1991) is a cool, but hardly bloodless, cautionary tale about the dangers of complacency in comfortable, affluent, and bureaucratic societies. The film begins with a scene out of Nazi Germany, naked people being loaded onto a truck and gassed in transit, and then shifts to a biographical narrative from an unnamed protagonist. This narrative culminates in the narrator’s emotional break down in a restaurant. No one quite knows how to deal with him in this moment, and most simply try to remain “normal” in the face of the narrator’s suffering. The implication is that self-satisfaction, conformity, and a desire that life run smoothly and efficiently takes its toll on our ability to deal with difference. When the narrator’s break down is considered in light of the opening scene, at which the main character is present, the film seems to be asking not only how we will deal with those who disturb us, but how we will deal with our “solution” for such people.

    Je t’aime John Wayne (2000) is both a send up and an homage to the cool romance of the French New Wave starring Kris Marshall (Love Actually, 2003, The Merchant of Venice, 2004), a Londoner obsessed with both French cinema and American pop culture (not unlike many of the New Wave directors). Director Toby MacDonald and writer Luc Ponte’s offering is light as air, but visually clever, stylish, and, for me, the most purely pleasurable piece in European Short Films.

    Run Wrake’s animated Rabbit is a twisted morality tale about greed. Inspired by a set of educational stickers from the 1950s, Rabbit has the look of an illustrated children’s book but features bloody and strange imagery, including children hacking apart farm animals and a magical “Idol” that emerges from a rabbit’s stomach. The Idol can turn everyday objects into valuable goods. The children decide to turn this discovery to their advantage, but, ultimately, are unable to control events and suffer for their grasping ways. Dark and whimsical, Rabbit is among the most inventive and transfixing films in the anthology.

    Before Dawn is composed entirely of one long take shot from wide and medium-wide angles (save for one close-up). The scene unfolds at dawn in a wheat-filled valley. A truck appears, and as its horn is honked, people, clearly in violation of some law, emerge in the field. They are loaded onto the truck. As they take off, police vehicles appear, including a helicopter.

    Of those in the collection, Bálint Kenyeres’ film arguably takes best advantage of the short form, as the choice to shoot not only in a single-take, but also at a distance would, in most cases, be unsustainable at a longer length. In a thirteen minute film, however, these choices create tension. Don’t be surprised if you find yourself squinting at the screen, trying to get a better view of the scene unfolding in front of you.

    Thirteen of the 16 films on European Short Films come with commentary tracks. All but one of these features the director (the one exception is Jabberwocky, which has commentary from film scholar Peter Hames. The track for “Je t’aime John Wayne” includes not only director MacDonald, but also writer Ponte and producer Luke Morris).

    Perhaps due to the concentrated nature of the films or the fact that their origins lie in very specific ideas or purposes, as a group, the commentaries included with the collection are remarkably focused and substantive. These are complemented by a booklet included with the discs, which provides background on the filmmakers, as well as excerpts from interviews and the commentary tracks. Ultimately, though, whether one takes advantage of the included extras will likely depend on the extent to which one is drawn to the films. The unevenness of the selections themselves, particularly from the viewer’s perspective, is likely to be even more pronounced when it comes to listening to the commentaries.

    Even in the YouTube age, when tens of thousands of short videos, many of which are original works of one kind or another, are made available online every day, the short film remains a marginal form in the world of cinema. The works collected on Cinema 16: European Short Films are too long and many are too esoteric too appear and thrive on a service like YouTube. On the other hand, they are too short and, again, too esoteric to be featured at the local multiplex, or even, in most locations in the US, at the art house. Short film nonetheless remains the form through which many filmmakers find their voice and on which they cut their creative teeth. For some, it remains the medium of choice for most of their careers.

    The Cinema 16 collections are welcome opportunities for a wider public to see works that would normally only be made available at festivals and in specialized screenings, and few at locations outside of major cities. From the vantage point of experience, the unevenness of the European Short Films collection is part of its appeal, for it allows viewers to expose themselves to works that they would otherwise avoid or miss. You may not like everything you see, but you can learn something from each selection.

    This review originally appeared on PopMatters on 30 November 2007. http://www.popmatters.com/pm/film/reviews/51344/cinema-16-european-short-films


 


Advertisement