Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

rubywoo Blog

  • complete ambiguity

    2 out of 2 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    W.  (2008)

    Oliver Stones W is a weird kettle of fish, it took me a few days after seeing it to get my head together about how I felt about it. My gut reaction was somewhat ambiguous and whenever I thought I had settled on an opinion it was countered by something else in the way the film played out. Stone is getting complex.

    First and foremost the cast do an incredible job. Josh Brolin is fan-freakin’-tastic as Dubya himself - mannerisms and motivation are superb. Richard Dreyfuss is perfectly underhand and sinister as Cheney, Condoleezza Rice is played to a T by an almost unrecognizable Thandie Newton, I could go on and on, the casting features no obvious weak link.
    I think what it was that confused my morals was the humanization of Bush, yes he is made out to be a giant buffoon, but also just as a man who has no real idea the impact of the **** ups he’s making - his entire motivation being gaining approval from his mean ol’ Dad.

    The early part of the film delves (pretty deep it has to be said) into Dubya’s alcoholism and inability to well, do anything. I think this is the part that resonates the loudest, realising that once upon a time - with the exception of the silver spoon thing - he wasn’t all that different from anyone I know, a black sheep, not groomed for success. It’s the journey for patriarchal validation (helped along by a heart attack) that leads him to religion and his presidential quest.

    As a biopic it’s pretty impressive, carefully choosing which life shaping events to present to the viewer. The soundtrack is a little clunky and obvious, and seems somewhat out of place in a film far less overplayed and sensational than I think any of us expected (really, the cartoon music as W goes about his day to day tasks - and the Robin Hood music as he gets his cabinet lost on his estate).

    This movie isn’t super enjoyable (but then show me a political biopic that is) but it is super watchable, not overly long, pretty coherent, well acted and cleverly directed. It also made me feel slightly better about Oliver Stone and his film making abilities.


  • almost unwatchable

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Max Payne  (2008)

    I  went to a screening of max payne a couple of weeks ago, and I found it to be almost unwatchable. There is nothing interesting about this movie, the acting is mediocre, the script is non existant, the characters are in no way engaging. The visuals are pretty good, but it is almost exactly like sitting behind your friend while they're playing the game, although when you're watching your friend play you're at least routing for the *hero*. Mark Wahlberg makes sure you're not bothered whether he lives or dies.

    The highlight of the movie is Chris O'Donnell, not that he's any good, but it's at least a little interesting to see what he looks like these days.

    This movie makes my top 25 worst movies I've had to sit through, that makes it WORSE than Vampire In Brooklyn. Uh hu. Don't go and see this movie, even if it is part of your job.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<November 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2627282930311
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30123456


Categories
 


Advertisement