Frem Here To Awesome Festival
Advertisement

rlpolo04 Blog

  • Rescue Dawn

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Rescue Dawn  (2006)

    Rescue Dawn- ***½
    Directed by Werner Herzog
    July 28, 2007

    There is a moment of ease and when all the chaos surrounding the imprisoned German-American Vietnam pilot Dieter Dengler (Christian Bale) and fellow prisoner of war Duane (Steve Zahn) has taken a back seat to their simple conversation. Dieter explains to him how he became a pilot and what motivated him (a fighter pilot was attacking his town when he was a little boy and Dieter and the pilot both made eye contact, from here on he knew what he wanted in life). After he tells him the story, the two just stare off into some sort of amazement or they’re both searching for what they once had. This is when Dieter wants that feeling back. He’s now motivated to escape the camp. Based on the true events, we realize Dieter should be recognized for his courageous achievements.

    Legendary director Werner Herzog does a fantastic job of capturing the feeling of loneliness and hatred. The setting of the film is all natural and Herzog is known for that. Just see his films Aguirre, the Wrath of God, Fitzcarraldo, and even the documentary hit Grizzly Man and you’ll also realize all these films put man against nature. The most amazing shots in the movie aren’t scripted at all, rather they are an act of nature. Notice the shot when Dieter is finished talking to his group. Herzog pulls the camera up slowly and shows the giant rocks that overshadow him. The intense river ride as well. Herzog wants to make it clear to us that the jungle is the prison. The other point the makes clear is that the Vietnam war was hell. No one thought the war would be so time consuming. At one point, Dieter signals to US choppers and they fire shots at him. That signifies the confusion that was going on.

    As Dieter plunges deeper into his plan to escape, people might find the movie to drag a bit. But this is how it should be. You can’t jazz up something that isn’t true. Our audience is prone to the heavy use of special effects but here there is none of that. As he descends into the jungle, we feel that we are doing it with him. This is all done with perfection by Bale. He is, today, the best all around actor we have. Whether he plays a psycho, an insomniac, batman, or a 17th century English settler, he makes the audience believe his character. Surely, he’ll do the same magic in the upcoming western 3:10 to Yuma.

    When he falls from the sky to the Vietnam city of Laos, the procedure is done perfectly. The camera style seems to be documentary like, making us more involved in the action. They torture him and throw him in the camp. This is where he meets five others who each have been captured from about 1 ½ years to 2 ½ years. One of the tells Dieter “keep your head down and mouth shut, that’s your only way to survive.” Well, this person doesn’t know Dieter. He’s a person who refuses to die. He tells them he has a plan to escape and eventually they come to accept that task. He came to give these terrified men some hope.

    Herzog does something unique during these scene at the POW camp. Amongst all the torturing and confusion, Herzog adds a touch of comedy and that’s exactly what was needed. When they all go to bed at night they’re all handcuffed together. They undo them to escape but one the guard is coming to check on them and they frantically try to put them back on and act like nothing happened. Three Americans and three Asians are the prisoners and they bond with time. Three Americans and three Asians are the prisoners and they all bond with time.

    The ending is breathtaking and heartfelt, just like the entire movie itself. Set to the haunting score of Klaus Badelt the movie hits you in the gut. No special effects at all. No need for them. This movie isn’t suppose to be thrilling. What it sets out to do is show us the anguish that Dieter goes through. This is pure and great filmmaking at its absolute best.


  • Transformers Review

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Transformers  (2007)

    Transformers- ***
    Directed by Michael Bay
    July 3, 2007

    During the middle of the movie, a fat kid with a digital camera comes running out of his house to take pictures of craters that fell from the night sky. He screams “this is 100 percent better than Armageddon!” Director Michael Bay makes it clear to us that he’s having a blast making this movie. The kid wasn’t lying. It is more fun than Bay’s Armageddon, and his Pearl Harbor. He found the right place to work his magic and we don’t feel overwhelmed by the special effects. This movie needs them unlike his previous films did. Having Steven Spielberg as executive producer could have only helped Bay.

    I was never into the whole Transformers craze that was full throttle through the 80’s and 90’s. Morphing cars, airplanes, anything, it never struck interest in me. Never watching it could be a good thing because I didn’t expect it to be much (unlike TMNT). Watching it could have been a good thing as well because I could have a better idea of what was going on with the meaning and importance of the cube. Transformers proves to be a great action film and a great teenage love story at the same time. Fan of the franchise or not , the movie does it good justice.

    The arena for this epic but still simple battle between good and evil is our planet Earth. It’s between the Autobots (good guys) led by Optimus Prime and the Decepticons (bad guys) led by Megatron. They came to Earth from their planet Cybertron because the Allspark can make everything good again. Which is hidden somewhere in our planet. If the Decepticons retrieve it, they will have complete power over the entire human race.

    Shia LaBeouf gives a strong performance here. He’s Sam Witwicky, the kid in the 11th grade who gets picked on and made fun of because he didn‘t make the football team and he doesn‘t have an attractive car. His dad takes him out to buy one: a yellow dirty Camaro. It turns out that this car is a transformer, Bumblebee, a good one. This car also helps him get the girl he desires the beautiful Mikaela (Megan Fox). She doesn’t even know that he’s in five of her classes. The car does whatever it can to help Sam get with the girl. This car also makes us feel sorry for him and we get shown that it also possesses feelings. When Mikaela makes fun of its paintjob he transforms into a new beautiful and shiny Camaro. I got the feeling that there was real chemistry between Sam and Mikaela. I really loved the scenes between these two.

    There is one thing going for him: he’s the great great grandson of the great explorer Morgan Whitwicky. He founded the first transformer buried beneath ice. Sam is in desperate need of money so he’s auctioning off all of the explorers legendary equipment, all in order to buy a car. He soon finds out that the explorer’s eyeglasses are worth more than what he wants to get for them.

    Our troops are stationed in Qatar and it’s here where we first witness a Decepticon. It rips through the entire camp and leave only a handful of Army survivors. When Secretary of Defense (Jon Voight) finds out about this he brings in a bunch of voice analysts to try and figure out what was making this weird noise that they recorded at the camp site. Voight is running the entire country while the President is shown once and that is asking for a dingdong to eat.

    The government has been hiding the fact that it had a Decepticon named Megatron locked up, along with the Allspark. Both buried beneath layers of concrete. They didn’t think it was any kind of threat. Huh. What else is the government hiding from us? Voight didn’t even know about this. It’s so top-secret that it had a group named Sector Seven, run by the energetic John Turturro, as the only people in the world knowing about it. Know a pair of Army men (Tyrese Gibson and Josh Duhamel) and computer nerds, Sam and Mikaela, and the Sec. of Defense know where this is stationed. It’s there job to keep the Allspark from the Decepticons. An epic battle sequence that lasts roughly around a half-hour puts the icing on the cake.

    One of the best scenes in the movie would have to be when all the Autobots are hiding in Sam’s backyard. It was something out of a screwball comedy. Hilarious how huge robots out to save the world have to avoid being seen by Sam’s parents.

    I got irritated on a couple of instances during this movie. Those little evil transformers went around government facilities and airports like it was nothing, nobody ever saw them. Where is everybody! Always the guy who knows most about hacking computers is living at home with his mother or grandmother. One time I hope we get a man who lives in a top-secret facility, rather than the projects. Most of all is the fact that recent movies continue to use the same plot that contains bad guys hacking into our computers and stealing valuable information. We’ve seen it in Breach, Fantastic Four, and Live Free or Die Hard. That is only this year. Enough is enough.


  • Badlands

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Badlands  (1973)

    Badlands- ***
    Directed by Terrance Malick
    May 2, 2007

    At the end of the film an officer tells Kit (Martin Sheen, never better) “you’re quite an individual” Kit replies “you think they’ll take that into consideration?” This scene really sums up the entire movie because Kit wants to be his own person and wants people to know him. Badlands (1973) is based on the true story of Charles Starkweather and Caril Ann Fugate (Malick changed the names to Kit and Holly). They went on a shooting spree in the Midwest during the year 1958. Terrance Malick brings this story to life as he writes, produces and directs for the first time at the age of twenty-nine.

    It happens all too quickly. I really couldn’t figure out why they loved each other so much. That is the only problem I had with this beautifully shot film. Kit, who is twenty-five, just got of work (he’s a garbage man) and lays eyes on a young red headed girl twirling a baton in her front yard. The girl’s name is Holly (Sissy Spacek) she’s fifteen years old who acts as if she’s more in her twenties. She knows a lot of things that your normal fifteen year old wouldn’t. At first she tells him that she’s forbidden to see him because he’s a garbage man and her father (Warren Oates) doesn‘t approve of that. Kit understands that. The next day he comes back to her house jobless. He quit his job as a garbage man so he can have her in his life.

    Other than that, their relationship is every really built upon. They just laid eyes on each other and BOOM they have this relationship going on that has her going along every plan he has. We never see them in a normal conversation, never eating together, or sleeping with one another. Nothing. There’s no foundation or base to the relationship that it wants us to believe is going on.

    Kit goes on a shooting spree starting with Holly’s father because he told him he can’t see his daughter. He knows Kit is no good. No good is a tough title but maybe he is just a troubled and lost soul. The same goes for Holly as she lost her mother at an early age and doesn’t have a good relationship with her father. She isn’t even mad when Kit guns him down. Holly might’ve been looking for a “father” figure. Kit is ten years older than she is and really cares for her. The only logic for her is to go with the man who really loves her and is willing to do anything to keep their lone intact.

    The story is told in a humble narrative by Holly. She seems so sincere when she talks through the narration. So we have an idea that she makes it out of this fiasco and Kit doesn’t. Their journey is memorable. They can’t live or be seen by the public because there is a huge reward out for them. They go around South Dakota and Montana making their homes in tree shacks. Kit carelessly shoots whoever witnesses their being around.

    This being Malick’s first directorial he would follow with only three more movies: Days of Heaven (1976), The Thin Red Line (1998) and The New World (2005) all of which take place in the past and have narration done. His films have your normal and nice people who suddenly turn bad and some kind of switch ticks them off.

    The performance that Sheen gives is brilliant and low key. Never once does he go “over the top.” It reminded me of a young Brando or James Dean performance. The way Sheen handled himself was flawless and his way of mumbling words was so Dean like. He also resembled they way he looked and throughout the movie people tell him how much he looks like James Dean.

    That was the problem with Kit and why he was so troubled. He wanted people to recognize him and know who he is. When he is taken into an army base a guy asks him how old he is and Kit replies “don’t you read the papers?” That whole scene there is great. As he is handcuffed and begin showed off to the police men and officers Kit has his “15 minutes of fame.” He offers his personal belongings as if though he is some hero as he offers his comb, jacket, and lighter. He wanted to be famous and somebody. In this final scene he doesn’t care that he’s going to be sentenced to death because he’s caught in the moment. He wanted to be a criminal but not this big of a criminal.


  • Music and Lyrics

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Music and Lyrics  (2007)

    Music and Lyrics- ***½
    Directed by Marc Lawrence
    May 9, 2007

    We all know what happens to former musicians in the entertainment business: very rarely does one stay on top for a very long period of time. there are all kinds of categories you can place groups or people into. The Beatles and Stones never died down or faltered. Then they’re the groups that had a five year or so run and a couple of number one his and never heard from again like Ricky Martin, REO Speedwagon and the Backstreet Boys. Finally there’s the one hit wonder ala Bahhamen, Vanilla Ice, or the group that did the Macarena. You have to be able to put out music, great music, at a reasonable rate and music that transcends time periods. Those are the signs of a great musician.

    Alex Fletcher (Hugh Grant) falls into the middle category of performing artists. He is a member of the former 80’s band sensation POP (think Duran Duran). The band broke up after their lead singer went onto a solo career stealing the rest of the band’s music. This left Alex as a washed up “has been” who is being auditioned for a TV show entitled “Battle of the 80’s Has-Beens” and when he finds out there is no singing involved just fighting he backs out. Sort of like a VH1 show, the Surreal Life. Now he finds himself playing for High School reunions and theme park side shows. The next day he’s approached by his agent Chris (the loveable Brad Garrett) that the next big (think Spears or Aguliara big) female singer Cora (Haley Bennett) would love for to do a duet with an “old-timer.“ Alex is the man to write her a new song. She’s bee in love with him since his “POP” days. The catch is that he never wrote lyrics (like most people today) and has to do so in a couple of days or he’ll loose his chance to become famous again.

    The lyricists that his manager brings him is rubbish. Fate brings along to him a new girl who waters his plants in his apartment named Sophie Fisher (Drew Barrymore) who has a knack of coming up with some clever and deep lyrics. They need each other. Consider a scene when they rearrange his room and both of them move the piano easily. Later on Alex tires to move the piano by himself and doesn’t even budge it.

    Sophie is plagued with the guilt of a famous writer who wrote a book about a crazy character that’s based on her. She always feels tied up and seems to never let go of that. Writing lyrics for a song let her frustrations and feelings out. Everyone has a story to tell and a song to write.

    Hugh Grant is terrific in this role. His previous film American Dreamz also has a good character but not like this one. The scenes between him and Barrymore really work and doesn’t seem as if they re acting, but seems they are doing this without any scripts. Just playing it off the top of their heads. Great chemistry. It reminded me of a Cary Grant comedy in a way. I know comparing Hugh Grant to Cary Grant is a huge stretch but in this role he captures some of Cary’s essence. The thing is that he plays this role so effortlessly and is hilarious in doing so.

    In accepting to do this project it leads to the conventional love between Alex and Sophie and the conventional break-up and yep, the conventional “get back together” scene which eventually leads to the happy ending. I know it sounds sappy and all very predictable but here director Marc Lawrence crafts something much smarter and funny and two very loving characters that the audience will surely love. With the two on screen, we never want them out of our sight. Together writing Cora’s song “Way back Into Love” they achieve a song that’s very catchy and has great lyrics. Cora wants to switch the beat and melody all together, making it more hip and modern.

    What also makes this movie succeed is the wonderful soundtrack. Every song in this movie is catchy and a feel good song. A rarity when a movie sets out to do this that it achieves so many great songs. From the great entrance video “Pop goes my Heart” to the mellow “Way back Into Love” Grant does two things here: he has an undeniably loving charm and has a great voice.

     


  • Knocked Up

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Knocked Up  (2007)

    Knocked Up- **
    Directed by Judd Apatow
    June 2, 2007

    It’s not that I reject every comedy that comes my way. I embraced Apatow’s 40-year-old Virgin and Wedding Crashers and I even had a soft spot for Benchwarmers. I knew that that this movie wasn’t going to be even close to the Virgin and I was right in my prediction.

    I don’t want to say that this movie attends to be preachy and tries real hard to get a point across but sadly it does. Not bailing out on your problems and such which is set to a bunch of loser characters that are in this movie. How a not so handsome man can get work it out with a woman out of his league. Also, at the end there is too much drama in the hospital room about the baby coming out.

    A beautiful girl Allison Scott (Katherine Heigl) is a behind the scenes worker on the E! but then she gets a promotion to be seen on TV as she gets to interview celebrities. She’s so excited that she goes out to a club with her older sister Debbie who is married, well to do and has two children but she still needs to know if she is still hot to other men. It’s here where Allison meets a real loser Ben (Seth Rogen) whose job consists of smoking pot all day and constructing a website (where people can go to find celebrities nude in certain parts of a movie) with his four loser buddies all living under one roof! She gets so drunk that she doesn’t care if Ben looks like a wild animal. Why does she fall for him and have sex with this guy so easily? I’ll never know. She rushes him on putting on his condom and he can’t wait any longer and digs right in without it. Drunk or not you have to be able to know if a guy looks half decent or not.

    What follows is eight ten sixteen and eventually twenty-eight weeks later ( I wish those zombies came and tore some of these people up). She gets symptoms and doesn’t want to face the fact that she is pregnant to this guy. She then wants him to take this seriously. Buys books, cribs and wants him to give up his childish games and focus on reality for once. Allison seems like she comes from a nice family (she lives with her sister) but there is only one scene she talks about the problem with her mother. Nothing more.

    The tagline for this movie is: What if this guy got your daughter pregnant? The answer: I’d hunt him down. No offense to Seth Rogen at all but he just isn’t what you would call a “leading man” in Hollywood. He did very funny work in Apatow’s previous film Virgin because he wasn’t the main focus. Steve Carroll was in a very little cameo for this film and to tell you the truth he was better than Rogen. While he was on screen I wasn’t laughing at his obscene-not so funny jokes but laughing at him as he made a fool of himself. Plain and simple: Seth Rogen is no lead actor.

    I can’t sympathize with characters that don’t care about their own lives.

    A bright spot in this long running movie is Debbie’s husband Pete played by the ever so likeable Paul Rudd. He also was in Virgin. When he’s on screen it seems that we want to see more of him and his charm. Very good role for him in this film. His marriage isn’t working out so Ben and him head to Las Vegas to get away from their troubles to do “man things.” Ben eventually tells him that he actually has it good because Debbie actually wants him to be around every second. Ben, sadly, is trying out his Mr. Phil segment while his own life is already in shambles.

    This movie is also very hip and up to the minute on the hot topics of the entertainment world. They talk about going to see Spider-Man 3, Cirque du Soleil in Las Vegas, in a hilarious scene Ryan Seacrest talks about his career dominating the entertainment world, “Lost” with Matthew Fox, and all the movie referrals from Wild Things to Total Recall. That stuff makes this movie seem like you are watching your next door neighbors. Apatow does a good job at making conversation and making us want to join in sometimes only when the people who are doing the talking are not talking about rubbish, which goes on a lot in this movie.


  • Pride

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Pride  (2007)

    Pride- ***1/2
    Directed by Suna Gonera
    March 23, 2007

    When a movie is based on a true story, I try to do whatever it is to steer away from it and not learn anything about it. It's best this way and you don't know what you're going to be in store for. Pride is a true story that isn't all about a black swimming team who wants respect from the other white swimming teams but about how something good can effect a whole. It's these little inspirational true stories that we have no clue about until they get put on the silver screen with a great actor and script. It's only when this happens that we get to see such a good story be told to the entire world.

    A man comes to a run down, dirty, and drug filled community, who at first, has no means of changing that community but when he encounters some young men in search of guidance, he has nothing else to do but change that community for the better. And boy, does he ever. That man is Jim Ellis (a pitch perfect Terrence Howard), a black man in 1974 Philadelphia who has a degree in math and the only thing that gets him is a job cleaning out an old recreation centre because it's on the verge of getting shut down. Ellis, due to the color of his skin, gets turned down a teaching job at a prestigious white school even if he has a better education than most of the teachers already there.

    While cleaning out the centre he encounters a pool that is full of clutter and needs to be fixed. He works with the janitor of the centre Elston (a solid Bernie Mac). This brings memories back for him because he was a swimming phenom in high school but ran into racism problems and never really got back into it. Now he sees his chance to make a comeback by means of coaching and to get that recreation centre up and running for the community. What makes neighborhoods bad and useless like this one is that the government and local authorities take away the kids basketball hoops and recreation centers. When all that is taken away from them, they get a bitter feeling in their mouth and resort to evil ways such as drugs.

    I just wished they focused more time on the boys training and learning how to swim. It went too fast for me as they got right into a tournament.

    Ellis cares for each and every one of his kids on the team and he doesn't want them to live a life of drugs. He confronts the drug dealer of the neighborhood and shows he can be gentle at times and the next moment an animal.

    Terrence Howard is one of the best actors that we have working today. His previous movies Crash and Hustle & Flow, he completely stole the show and let the world know that he arrived. In Pride his work is equal to his work in those movies, if not better. Please and I hope sometime soon he gets awarded for his talent, it should've happened by now. The emotion he shows here is unbelievable and heart wrenching. He cries better than anyone in movies, we feel what he feels. The voice, o that voice of his is quite humble and sorrowful.

    You might think that this is just like your everyday sports movie that deals with the underdog. Then you're right. But this movie brings to the table a whole lot more and packs a better punch than its predecessors. There are several scenes in this movie that can give you goosebumps. Such as Ellis' speech to his team about how they have too much pride and when Ellis grabs his two players out of the drug dealer's car and gives him a piece of mind.

    Pride is a motivating film by first time director Suna Gonera. It follows the same formula of every other sports movie, but this one for some reason works better. When do we ever get a movie about a black swimming team? It's always refreshing to get something new. Even though the clichés are here, I just believe that Howard performance is perfect and it changes the whole outcome of the film.


  • 12 Angry Men

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    12 Angry Men  (1957)

    12 Angry Men- **** (Classic Movie)
    Directed by Sidney Lumet
    June 25, 2007

    Twelve men walk into a smoldering, small, fan-less room. They are a jury and have to make their decision on whether or not an 18-year-old boy who stabbed his father to death is guilty or not guilty. We only see outside of the small room for 3 minutes (secondhand learning of the case, never any flashbacks) and one of the scenes it shows the judge telling the jury to make their decision in a bored tone voice. He knows that the jury is going to vote “not-guilty” but he’s wrong. Most of them are thinking that this is going to be a half-hour meeting. Some light up their cigarettes, open the windows to get a whiff of fresh air, and sit back ready to make their vote. The foreman of it all then lays the rules that there has to be a unanimous decision and then asks to hear everyone’s verdict. Eleven hands go up for guilty that would lead to the boy getting sentenced to the electric chair and one lone hand is proudly raised for not guilty.

    This room consists of all types of prejudices, anger, and souls that seem to be heading in the wrong direction. The lone voter is played by Henry Fonda. He has to battle and reason with these men until they decide to come over and see his point of the murder. As a whole this case isn’t as clear as it seems to be. The boy who’s convicted is a foreigner from Thai and resides in the slums. We only get shown his face one time. That shot comes in the beginning of the movie as the camera does a close up on his face that leads us to his lonely and even innocent looking eyes.

    The camera work is phenomenal. Right off the bat we are the ones entering the court building. As the camera rises to read the name of the building and then the camera opening the doors to the courtroom. The camera is the viewer. When each of the jurors begin to talk they are looking at the camera, which makes it as if they are talking to us about the case. We become part of the case and begin to feel the pain and frustration that each of these men are going through.

    Lee J. Cobb stills the entire movie. His character is simply ruthless but at the same time he’s yearning to be tended to. He’s having his own personal trail: deciding to forgive his 22 year-old boy who walked out on him. That’s eating him up inside and whenever he looks in his wallet and see the picture of him and his son he becomes more possessed and hateful. All the anger that he wants to unleash on his boy he wants to unleash on the boy who is up for murder. Guilty or not guilty, he just wants this boy sentenced to death. Just like some of the other men on the jury, they also believe that kids these days have no respect for their elders.

    There’s a specific scene where this idea that these men possess about the younger generation comes back to bite them. One of the young guilty voters raises his voice and begins to insult a not-guilty voter who just happens to be an old man. Another scene is when Fonda’s character explains how the boy up for murder could have just screamed “I’ll kill ya” to his father accidentally and never really meaning it. Fonda gets Cobb all worked up and Cobb shouts back “I’ll kill ya!” The rest of the men are shocked and the expression on Cobb’s face is haunting as he finds out what he said.

    Fonda’s character coming up with these unbelievable stories about how the kid can be guilty have the jurors scratching their heads. He believes in something and having the odds against him makes him only better. This isn’t your average guy who would just say “not-guilty” because he has to go to a New York Yankee baseball game. He realizes that all the evidence that has been presented isn’t all that conclusive and that shouldn’t be enough to sentence a kid to death. As Fonda is talking, expressing his point of view, some of the others are doodling on paper and playing tic-tac-toe. Fonda gets outraged and rips up the paper and yells “you think this kids life is a game!”

    We’re never given the clean cut verdict but instead we’re left with the final shot in the room with Cobb’s head down on the table and Fonda coming over to but his coat on him.

    This movie places number 14 on IMDB top 250 movie list. Not using Technicolor also enhances its glow and increases its age. Made in 1957, Technicolor was in full throttle.

    Each character is very distinguished. When the votes begin to even out that is when we get to see the true colors of these men. The jurors who vote guilty have the prejudice mentality but most of all they look the part as well. As for the jurors who voted “guilty” look as if they’re you’re everyday nice guy. Director Sidney Lumet (Dog Day Afternoon) marked his career movie directing debut with this film. The way he shapes and creates incredible depth to each of the jurors is amazing. We come to know each of their likes and dislikes. One of them is a messenger, a broker, an architect, two baseball junkies, a catch phrase writer, a foreigner, a sissy, a guy who doesn’t sweat, a racist, and a foreman and a man who lived in the slums.

    They all come together in this small room and for one week they sat and listened to everyone’s story. Now it’s time to hear each others. Everyone became friends or enemies. They walk out of the room each going their separate ways. It’s not until this scene that we get a real name. As the old man runs over to Fonda’s character and asks for his name and he replies “Davis.” Never again will these people see each other but that room, on one scorching New York day, bonded them.


  • VERTIGO

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Vertigo  (1958)

    Vertigo- **** (Classic Movie)
    Directed by Alfred Hitchcock
    June 28, 2007

    Alfred Hitchcock’s 1958 masterpiece is a movie that you don’t just watch but you have to absorb it. Being this the third time watching it I always seem to find something new. There isn’t a dull moment or an unimportant scene in this film. Everything a movie should be is all packed nicely into this film. Vertigo consists of a troubled love story, a character study, a thriller, a surreal dream, a detective story, and most of all, a movie about obsession.

    Former San Francisco policeman Scottie Ferguson (James Stewart) gets offered a job that he doesn’t want in the first place but eventually accepts it and it turns out to be a job that leads him to an overwhelming state of obsession. An old college friend Gavin Elster (Tom Helmore) offers the job to him. He suspects that his wife Madeleine (Kim Novak) is possessed by an old spirit named Carlotta. He wants Scottie (he’s been off duty for awhile now after his accident he had with heights, now has vertigo) to look after her, spy on her and see where she goes all during the day. Scottie is hesitant at first but comes to accept the task.

    Amongst the ever so many great scenes in the movie (Kim Novak’s character coming out of the neon green light, the dreamlike sequences), I really found enjoyment when Scottie is spying on Madeleine. It’s here where we see the beautiful city of San Francisco shot gloriously on camera and being set to the haunting sounds of Bernard Herrmann’s, (who also did music for Citizen Kane) powerful score. These scenes play out to only that music and we go about fifteen minutes with no dialogue, just Scottie following Madeleine around town. It plays out like a silent film, despite no dialogue Hitchcock still holds are every bit of attention and interest. She drives around the entire day going in alley entrances to shops to buy flowers, hypnotized by a tombstone in a beautiful cemetery (Carlotta’s grave), studying a portrait of Carlotta inside a museum. Scottie at first can’t seem to place all of her locations together until Gavin tells him that she yearns to find Carlotta and be one with her. Her final stop of the day is under the Golden Gate Bridge where she jumps into the bay. Lucky Scottie was there to pull her out and take her back to his cozy home. Was he lucky, or just being set-up to follow her.

    Having taking her in, he becomes to lover her and she the same way. She tells him of this reoccurring dream she has about a small Spanish set-up of a town that includes a church and a farm. Scottie recognizes this and tells her that she needs to face her fears. Only this place becomes her graveyard. She runs up a bell tower and Scottie after her. Vertigo begins to set in for him and can’t get to the top in time to save her from jumping from the top, killing herself.

    But it wasn‘t really Madeleine. Gavin has trained her to lure Scottie in so Gavin can kill his “real” wife. He created Madeleine and everything she dons from her makeup and hair down to her dress and shoes . She is a woman who he is having an affair with but after he gets what he wanted, he boots her and heads for Europe by himself. Scottie then sets into massive depression as he thinks the love of his life died.

    Madeleine is really Judy (also played by Kim Novak) a girl that Scottie spots on the street and instantly falls for her because she looks like his Madeleine. He molds her into the way he wants her to look and that is the way Madeleine looked. He doesn’t understand that Gavin created Madeleine using Judy as a model. So Scottie is shaping this woman after the woman he desire, the thing is they’re the same person. Changing her hair from brown to blonde, buys her the right clothes, takes her to Ernie’s the best restaurant and also the restaurant where he first laid eyes on Madeleine and changes her make-up. These two people are having their lives ripped from under them because of a person who wanted his own wife killed just so he could leave for Europe.

    We sense Scottie’s rage and anger. Stewart can play good and evil equally good. Here, in the second half of the movie, is his evil side coming out. Hitchcock brought out that side. Although Stewart is known for his silly comedies: Philadelphia Story, and also known for being a good guy “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.” Here we see his dark side. In his four Hitchcock films (Rope, The Man Who Knew Too Much, Rear Window, and Vertigo) he played the role that he normally wouldn’t play and he played them to perfection.

    The camera job is just a clinic. When the camera focuses on Scottie’s vertigo we get the sick feeling that he has. Zooming out while moving the camera away from the focal point. When he is running up the tower he looks down and we get the awful sense. Another is when he is walking up stairs in a hotel. They seem so steep and high and the camera tracks him(he looks so small against them) making his journey up them. Take the scene when Scottie and Judy are kissing and the camera circles around them only to bring back memories of the old farm in the background while they kiss.

    Hitchcock takes this story to a different level and the twist ending only rises this movie. It can easily be called Hitchcock’s finest ending.

    He had a thing for blonde leading ladies (Kim Novak, Grace Kelly, Eva Marie Saint, Tippi Hedren, Janet Leigh, Doris Day and Ingrid Bergman). He made them up because he fantasized about them. He loved them. So Stewart’s character is just like Hitchcock in ways of making up a girl in his own image. Nobody else’s vision mattered only his.


  • The Hoax Review

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Hoax  (2007)

    The Hoax- ***1/2
    Directed by Lasse Hallstrom
    April 8, 2007

    Richard Gere tears into the role as Clifford Irving in this surprise movie about trying to get his Howard Hughes autobiography published, while lying to all who enter his world. Gere is back to form here and he looks better and cooler than ever (having a fake nose and his hair died dark black doesn't hurt either). Though this movie is about how Irving lied and conned his way on trying to get his book published but if you would dig deeper you find a more complex and scary plot development and that is how Irving falls under the power of Howard Hughes' spell.

    This is based on the true story taking place in 1971 about Irving who is a struggling author who recently got his new book turned down by McGraw-Hill. The next day he goes into their office and says he's going to write the book of the century. "That book would sell more copies than the Bible itself", that book is going to be the Autobiography of the eccentric Howard Hughes, whom Leonardo DiCaprio played perfectly in the 2004 hit movie The Aviator. This is when Irving begins to enter a world he wished he'd never explored. Along for the ride is his best friend Dick (Alfred Molina who adds a hilarious touch to this movie) who is his researcher and also a children's literature author. With the idea to write this autobiography they receive a one-million dollar advance because the people at McGraw-Hill think they're really dealing with Howard Hughes himself but it's really Irving they are dealing with. The company is willing to negotiate anything because Hughes is such a powerful man (hotels evacuated their entire building for him).

    Irving transforms right before our eyes as he writes letters in Hughes' handwriting, steals some top secret information from his closest colleagues and in a haunting scene Irving slowly becomes the eccentric billionaire as he starts to dress and talk just like him, recording himself the entire way. It shows you how one can be overwhelmed by what he is set out to do. It was suppose to be something quick to get him some money, but instead it ruined and alters his entire life. His relationships between Dick and his wife Edith (Marcia Gay Harden) go to shambles as he chooses his obsession with getting his book published over his closest of friends.

    The relationship between Clifford and Dick is strange. They're total opposites. When Dick is asked a question, he's suppose to come in on cue, by McGraw-Hill associates he panics and always breaks into a sweat. Meanwhile, Clifford has to bell him out and capture the associates with his compelling story about how both of them really meant Howard Hughes (which is done to perfection, you have to see it to believe it).

    Irving's greed also played a part in his downfall. He found information in a list of documents he got a hold of from Hughes' advisors that would have President Nixon impeached (how Hughes gave money to wipe away some debt). We see how one man will go so far over the edge to keep something going even though he knows he's going to end up in jail if he gets caught. Today we are told that he is still trying to get that autobiography published. Irving wanted this published but McGraw-Hill denied it and this sent him mad. He wasn't happy with just getting his fake book published, he wanted to go further and drop some major bombs. This resulted in Hughes making a phone speech on TV as he finally tells the world that he never had any contact with Irving at all (it was shown as the real footage). Watching Gere act as this scene plays out is magical. What a performance he puts on this entire film.

    Director Lasse Hallstrom (What's Eating Gilbert Grape, Chocolate) does some really impressive work here. As well as cameraman Oliver Stampleton as he creates beautiful images with beautiful color (the scene when Irving is tossed out a window shades of Vertigo and when he is racing home in the night driving his convertible on a winding road, such beautiful colors). What I loved about it was he would have flashback scene when Irving was telling a false story to either Time Magazine or McGraw-Hill or when he would try to confess something to someone. These aren't your normal flashbacks, these flashbacks never happened during the movie and since Irving believes in his head they really did happen we're suppose to believe that they really did. It's done to perfection. A true psychological game The Hoax turns out to be.


  • 300 Review

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    300  (2007)

    300- ***
    Directed by Zack Snyder
    March 10, 2007

    If people loved the way Sin City (another Frank Miler comic book) was made with such flavor that it popped off of the screen, I am sure that you will get on your knees and bow for Zack Snyder's new kind of filmmaking movie called 300. It is a bloody, sexual, and extremely violent movie that uses computers unlike any other movie that we've seen in past years. Even though I am kind of biased to computer generated movies (Lord of the Rings) this movie made me sit back and enjoy the visuals of a great PS3 game. I like the natural filmmaking (no blue screen or green screen) not the kind that your next door neighbor can do on his laptop computer. This being something that I've never seen before, I let it work its magic and try not to let that ruin the movie, which it didn't.

    This movie is about the Battle of Thermopylae in 480 BC which takes place in a narrow path between mountains on the coast of Greece, which translates to "Hot Gates". A ripped and honorable King Leonidas (Gerard Butler) has a problem as his 300 army of Spartans are out numbered 100 to 1 as they go to war with the Persian army that includes giants, elephants, rhinoceros, ninjas, and creatures. They are lead by a gay commander (who is a tall man as he towers over everyone) Xerxes (Rodrigo Santoro) who wants everyone to answer to him.

    We are told the story in the beginning of the movie about Leonidas and how he became a powerful and well respected king. He was trained at a very young age and fought amongst the men of Sparta and thrown into the wild left to die. Surviving the wild as he slays a red eyed wolf, he returns to Sparta greeted by the men and women there on their knees. They either return home warriors or not return at all. Training at a young age proves to be smart and the Spartans continue to do that with their own children and children of others so that there will always by a King Leonidas as the ruler of Sparta.

    Back home in Sparta most of the people don't support the King's decision of war and are hesitant of sending more men into the battle knowing that they are going to lose. Queen Gorgo (Lena Heady) does anything to help get the council to voter her way for more troops even if she sleeps with another man Theron who is part of the council.

    This movie garnished so much hype that going in I expected more than what I left with. Sometimes a movie can market very well by showing all the great scenes of the movie during the previews and when you see the movie you want more of those scenes. Without question Snyder gives us a treat, just like the groundbreaking Citizen Kane did to audiences in 1941, as he displays dazzling color, beautiful slow motion sequences, and of course for most of the movie, the gory and at times a little silly battle scenes. This is something that we dream about containing unforgettable images and color. This is a movie that you have to see on the big screen the DVD will not do it justice. As for the history of the movie goes, turn on the History Channel because what we get here is a movie that is so beautiful we don't really care if it's accurate or not.

    At times my mind seems to be telling me that I've seen this material before such as when the Queen is in the fields and the wind is blowing as the slow motion kicks in, is like a scene in the 2000 Best Picture winner Gladiator and some parts reminded me of Troy especially the ending while they are talking about Leonidas. The dialogue at times, to me, was like treading through mud as I couldn't just grasp what they were trying to say at times. But don't let that ruin a film about honor and betrayal because this could be the next generation of movie making.


  • A Mighty Heart Review

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    A Mighty Heart  (2007)

    A Mighty Heart- **
    Directed by Michael Winterbottom
    June 24, 2007

    You have to have a mighty heart to watch this movie. Yea it’s tough to watch because director Michael Winterbottom (Wonderland) makes this movie boring and really unwatchable within the first half-hour or so. What could have been a movie of great emotional power is instead a chore for us to watch. Having this based on the true story of Wall Street journalist Daniel Pearl, who got brutally murdered by a group of terrorists, is that we know the outcome before the movie even starts and that only makes the movie worse.

    “How can you find one man amongst all of these people?” - Mariane Pearl (Angelina Jolie)

    That quote expresses Mariane’s frustrations as her husband Daniel Pearl has been kidnapped by a group of terrorists in Karachi, Pakistan. They’re both journalists and after 9/11, in 2002, they traveled to get interviews and stories about a “shoe-bomber.” They’ve been living in Pakistan for a year and a half. All the other American journalists already left for American but not Daniel and his wife. All he wants is just one more interview with a powerful person, Sheikh Gilani. Daniel gets information through email from Sheikh’s supporting people about when and where to meet him. Eventually it turns into a circus. He always asks the question “is it safe?” and the answer is always “if you’re in a public place.” Being a Jew doesn’t help him either and the terrorists think that journalists are CIA agents. When you’re a journalist you have to do what you have to do, even if it means trusting people in the worst part of the world.

    We’re never shown how Danny gets kidnapped or any action when he’s being held captive. Instead, it’s all Jolie’s show as she buts on Oscar caliber acting to keep the audience’s attention while the entire movie is all procedurals. Playing this role, Jolie completely morphed and looked more like Jennifer Lopez but let’s thank God that she didn’t act like her. Most of the time we get Jolie just sitting at her table looking through paper’s and writing on a white chalk board because everything is so confusing. Most of all she’s seven months pregnant and she doesn’t want to create any problems for the baby. It’s at the end of the movie where we get the powerful and exhilarating scene of her breaking down and letting everything out but it’s the scenes where she gets interviewed that gets you in the heart. She isn’t going to let anybody terrorize her. Having her baby only makes her stronger as she keeps moving forward.

    Jolie’s acting can only carry this movie so far. The middle of A Mighty Heart is down right snooze worthy. To top it off, most of the people doing the talking (Pakistani officers) are so hard to understand.

    Shot in a docu-style way makes this movie more authentic and buts you in the middle of all this commotion. Besides Jolie’s acting, what I loved most were the flashback scenes of Mariane and Daniel (only time he is in the movie are in these scenes) having diner, getting married, and cuddling in bed. Though they didn’t work my feelings the way I wanted them too, they still benefited the movie.


  • Zodiac Review

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Zodiac  (2007)

    Zodiac- ****
    Directed by David Fincher
    March 3, 2007

    The long awaited return of director David Fincher is finally here. Cinephiles everywhere have been waiting impatiently for this film; his last film was Panic Room (2002). He's the mastermind that brought us a clever detective movie Seven and the man who played around with our heads and we loved it in Fight Club. He brings the same, if not better, magic here in Zodiac (unexpected twists and turns) that covers a mysterious murderer spanning from 1969 all the way to 1991. Based on the true events.

    A psychopath goes on a killing spree in the San Francisco Bay Area taking lives of both men and women. He writes letters to the different newspapers telling them to publish his cryptograms that when decoded tells what he is going to do next and states his name as Zodiac. If the newspapers don't publish them he makes it clear that he will kill more. This cryptogram makes people become obsessed with the Zodiac. The people who are infatuated with this man are two detectives, a crime reporter, and a political cartoonist. Once they enter this psychological cat and mouse chase with Zodiac it slowly chips away at each of their lives ruining marriages, friendships, careers, and their minds. Each one of them spends two decades trying to catch the man.

    The performances are all top notch as the cartoonist of the San Francisco Chronicle Robert Graysmith (Jake Gyllenhaal) wants to become a carton himself and save San Francisco from Zodiac. As he becomes more absorbed in the letters, he goes to crime reporter Paul Avery (Robert Downey Jr. at his best) to get more information about the case. Both of them then turn to animal cracker eating SFPD homicide inspector Dave Toschi (Mark Ruffalo) and his partner William Armstrong (Anthony Edwards). These four men's lives are never the same as Zodiac plays with their minds. Avery gets so fed up with the whole thing that he drinks himself to death. Armstrong wants to watch his kids grow up. Toschi gets the boot out of the case but is still willing to help Robert solve the case. Robert jeopardizes his relationship with his wife and kids but manages to keep his head on straight and not let Zodiac mess with his mind. He only wants to look Zodiac eye to eye and make sure he knows that someone knows he's the killer.

    Fincher demonstrates the character study so perfectly. He focuses how each person involved with this case is affected by it. Avery early in the movie dresses so elegant but right when he dives into this case he starts to dress like a bum and drink more and more. If Fincher spent more time Zodiac and the bloodshed he wouldn't have achieved greatness. Instead we see how a killer can be the center of so many people and how it alters their lives.

    If Zodiac would've struck in this day of age could he possibly do all of what he did. With TV shows such as CSI and the technology that they have at their fingertips I would think he'd get caught. During the movie one police dept. asks the other if they could fax a document over, in reply "we don't have a fax machine." Back then it was very hard trying to catch a man like Zodiac. Technology has advanced so much.

    We are given hints of who the Zodiac might be. In one of the killing sequences, we see a couple lying on the ground by a lake in Napa. In the distance (a horridly haunting image) we see a man, in a way limping towards them. Then hides behind a tree and comes out with a mask and long gown on and stabs them and leaves them to die. As SFPD questions a man who they think is a highly capable suspect his name is Arthur Lee Allen who is eerie and belongs in your nightmares. He walks into the room where he is being questioned, limping.

    The movie is shot richly, darkly, and beautifully. The opening shot of the movie is an overhead view of the Golden Gate Bridge and the city as it's lined with fog. A city haunted and blinded by one man. At 165 minutes its well worth the time to see a master, Fincher, do what he does best and that is screw with our minds. Sit back and enjoy what you're going to see because it's not that often you see a movie like this.


  • Grindhouse Review

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Grindhouse  (2007)

    Grindhouse- ****
    Directed by Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez
    April 6, 2007

    You have to accept Grindhouse for what it is and what it brings to the table. It offers the audience more than three hours to get away and get lost in the two stories. Rodriguez (Sin City) and Tarantino (Pulp Fiction) don't hold anything back as they create a movie full of laughs, horror, suspense and such behavior that only these two directors can achieve. This movie is suppose to do homage to the seventies B-Movies. We get two movies into one screening with fake trailers to accompany it during intermission. Grindhouse is in its own world and league and was I ever excited to be enthralled in all of it.

    Rodriguez was first to bat with his feature presentation of Planet Terror, which works better than any other B-Movie of its kind. It has to do with a bio-terrorism plot and how the civilians have to handle an attack by zombies (the people who have been exposed to the noxious chemical gas) whose faces form huge boils and their heads inflate three times the regular size. We get our hero's who are memorable and we will never forget them. Darling….Cherry Darling (a smoken hot Rose McGowan) is a go-go dancer and has dreams of becoming a doctor until her leg gets torn off by the zombies and has to use a peg and a gun as a leg. El Wray (Freddy Rodriguez) is Darling's ex-boyfriend who has charisma, talent, and bravado of a John Wayne type. Then the small town sheriff (Michael Brehin) adds some humor. These are the people that lead their community friends against Bruce Willis' evil plan (as he tries to use the noxious gas for his own needs) and also to kill the zombies.

    We get the homey feeling (each film is in the same location) watching this movie with settings such as "The Bone Shack" and the hospital (which is the same set-up for the second movie). Like the movie Slither last year Planet Terror one-ups it because it forms its characters better and makes them more believable. Rodriguez does a wonderful job establishing each character from the bio-scientist to the doctor's (Kurt Russell) wife to the strip club owner. We all get how they feel and act.

    When a movie like this comes around it makes you enjoy the movies better. At a running over three hours you don't stop and look at your watch one time or start to get restless in your seat. It flows and it makes you grip your chair or the person next to you. I found myself jumping, laughing, and absorbed in both movies. It's always a treat to get something like this early in the year and to obtain such a fun action movie that isn't dull.

    Quentin Tarantino's dialogue filled feature was second, Death Proof and it didn't fail to live up to Planet Terror it kept the momentum, never slowing down and always keeping your interest. Since Rodriguez focused on science fiction and some heavy violence, Tarantino is going to stay put in reality (Austin Texas) and do what he does best and that is making any conversation interesting and fun. He introduces to us a psychopath killer who has a perfect head of hair and a tan most people would kill for his name... Stuntman Mike (Kurt Russell) he stalks young woman and tries killing them by way of his "Death Proof" car. This movie is in two parts each part with Stuntman Mike dealing with a different group of girls (first group led by Austin, Texas DJ Jungle Julia, Arlene and Shanna, the second group led by bad-ass ghetto bitch Kim, Lee, Zoe, and Abernathy).

    The car chase scene between Stuntman Mike and the second group of girls is done to perfection (no CGI crap or computers) and Tarantino delivers to us a movie that doesn't have to lure us in with explosions and what not, but his power to carry a movie on sheer dialogue alone is amazing. Any other movie would have Stuntman Mike leave the girls alone after trying to ride them off the rode and kill them but instead QT has the girls go after him.

    QT makes us feel like we're part of each girls group sitting at their table listening in on their conversations and makes us grow found of them and establishes how they act so we can be close to them.

    Each movie is great in its own way but Tarantino's film seems to have a special ring to it. Like his previous works Pulp Fiction (the car ride with Jackson and Travolta riding to make a hit talking about what a quarter pounder is called in Europe) and Reservoir Dogs (when all of them are talking at the diner table about the rights of giving a tip to a waitress) we get the same style of dialogue in those films as we do here, on the same level of greatness. I loved listening to the smart dialogue in Death Proof because it makes us realize who are characters really are. QT also shows us his obsession with feet! In the beginning of his movie it opens with Jungle Julia's (Sydney Tamiia Poiter) feet dangling out the window of her friends car. Then later on one of the girls brings up a "foot massage." Echoes of Pulp Fiction. Tarantino also expresses his love of movies when he mentions classic films such as Vanishing Point and others. When the girls are at a restaurant we see an array of Italian movie posters, indicating his love for cinema.

    The only thing I didn't like about this movie was when the screen would say "REEL MISSING." That only happening when some sex was going to happen and they would tease us with a little sample or some sexy talk, they should've gone the entire way with that. They showed us heads exploding off, so what's wrong with giving us a little hot action or a nice lap dance!

    This whole "Grindhouse" feel works. Each movie looks very vintage and worn out. Also, I loved how in Death Proof they kept redoing scenes, very innovative. Kudos to everybody in these two films because some or most played parts in both movies including Tarantino. Grindhouse brings out the children in Tarantino and Rodriguez, they dreamed of making a one of a kind movie like this.


  • Black Snake Moan Review

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Black Snake Moan  (2007)

    Black Snake Moan- ***½
    Directed by Craig Brewer
    March 3, 2007

    He feeds her, drinks with her, preaches the Bible to her, gives her cough medicine, puts band aids on her and even gives her baths and oh yea I almost forgot that he has her chained to a radiator heater inside of his run down one-floor house in the middle of nowhere. The weirdness can be seen clearly but get this: the man is doing it for a good reason, a Christian kind of reason.

    His name is Lazarus (a terrific Samuel L. Jackson) who is a bible reading man, plays a mean guitar and grows his own vegetables and sells them to make a living. He has just gotten through a 12-year-old marriage with his wife and is lost and needs something to motivate him to make him forget about his past troubles. This is when he lays eyes on Rae (Christina Ricci) who is half naked lying beaten and battered and left for dead on the side of a dirt road right outside of his home in the Deep South. Her past is dreadful. She loves to have sex with anything that walks. You can call her the “town slut.” Her boyfriend, who has severe anxiety, Ronny (another good performance by Justin Timberlake) had to leave to go join the service. When he is gone she goes to get sex from drug dealers and parties like an animal. She needs loving and her mother or father never really showed her that. Her father raped her as a little girl while her mother did nothing but watch.

    The relationship between Lazarus and Rae seems bizarre but as a whole it works very well. Why it works so well is because we have Rae who wants to change her life but can’t find the right guidance to do so. Lazarus doesn’t want to see her end up dead. Being a religious man, he works as a priest trying to get her head on straight and to make her walk a righteous path. Having his name Lazarus, no surprise, he brings her back from near death so she can alter her decisions in life. In the end it’s a feel good movie in which you can walk out smiling.

    Director Craig Brewer does it again after his smash hit two years ago Hustle & Flow exploded onto the scene about a troubled pimp trying to make his life better and to do the right thing. He almost crafts the same formula here as our two main characters have their own problems but together they each carry the same sense of loneliness. Lazarus hopes to cure Rae of her evil ways. When she does get cured maybe she will help someone else, like Ronny. Brewer makes us want to go help a lost soul and try to show them the right way of living life. You will never see a movie quite like this; it’s one of a kind.


  • Days of Glory (Indigenes) Review

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Days of Glory  (2006)

    Days of Glory (Indigenes)- ***½
    Directed by Rachid Bouchareb
    June 18, 2007

    These are the people’s stories that high schools and colleges should be teaching not just to history majors but to all students. This is a story that has to get the attention that it deserves because there’s meaning to it and it’s such a powerful film.

    It was nominated for Best Foreign Language Film (Algeria) at last years Oscars. And it won the Best Ensemble Cast at last years Cannes Film Festival. Rightly so! The movie mainly follows five French Army men. Each of them have their own troubles. Taking place during WWII in parts of Italy, France, and Tolstoy. This movie has deep meaning and a powerful result.

    “Indigenes”, meaning Natives, is what this movie is all about. Several hundred North African soldiers gathered their pride and what they felt was right, to go join the French Army run by Sgt. Martinez (Bernard Blancan) and help liberate France from the Germans. Leaving behind their loved ones for a good cause and to make their own poverty stricken lives better. The guts that these men possess is overwhelming. As the group of soldiers come back to France after winning a little battle, one of the North African Arabian soldiers Said (Jamel Debbouze) tells a lovely woman who is at the parade of their arrival: “I never even seen France before and I’m fighting for it.”

    The natives that joined the French Army get treated like animals and slaves. The French and the natives don’t get along and that leads to arguments then fights. Even though these men are fighting for the same country for the same reason and against the same enemy it’s hard to see eye to eye. This subject is something no other war movie ever tried to capture.

    During a lunch break one of the natives tries to get a tomato and the server will not serve any of them a tomato while the next person in line, a French men, gets a juicy tomato. This leads to a speech given by one of the natives about how they deserve equal quality because they are all ONE and the Captain coming down to straighten the situation out.

    Said is a man struggling to fit in with the rest of the Army. The Sgt. Though has something special for him and Said plays as his “gopher.” It grows on him and when the Sgt. Tells him he has been upgraded to a Private (the Sgt. Is joking) but Said turns down the offer and prefers “gopher” to Private. The relationship’s that form over this war begin to set in.

    Messaoud (Roschdy Zem) is obsessed with a beautiful French woman named Irene (Aurelie Eltvedt). He has a tattoo around his neck that translates to “unlucky” but he tells her he isn’t now because he found her. As he leaves her to go back and fight he never gets a letter in return from her. He’s heartbroken. He’s written ten times and the French mail carriers read the letter and stamp “ceased” on it. They don’t want a beautiful French woman with an Algerian soldier.

    Yassir (Samy Naceri) has a wounded brother that he’s looking after the entire way of their journey through war. They enter church’s and his brother wants to take the collections of the church. He stops him. Dead German soldiers get their pockets picked by these two when they are told that they shouldn’t. They’re poor and that’s why they joined this war. Even though, when they were children, the French Army killed their entire family. They put that behind and join the army that killed their family.

    Abdelkader (Sami Bouajila), a corporal, yearns to be sergeant on day. His day will come sooner than he thinks. This man follows his heart and stands up for things that he believes is wrong: the tomato scene. Higher officers want soldiers who obey their every order but Abdelkader does just the opposite. The smartest and most commanding of his regiment.

    Rachid Bouchareb directs with such detail. There’s a shot that takes us to a birds eye view and we see the French army amongst the mountains and they look like ants in an ant farm. The final twenty minutes is also captivating and with the music playing it makes it more dramatic. It takes place in the rural village of Alsace where our four North African soldiers find themselves against devastating odds. All that stops as the French Army comes to rescue them and the four realize, whether they die or not, that they know that they did the right thing on joining and helping France liberate their country.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<July 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3