Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Risselada Blog

  • Double Indemnity

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Double Indemnity  (1944)

    Double Indemnity  (1973)

    Double Indemnity

    This blog is referring to the 1973 TV movie which is remake of the 1944 original classic film.  That's right, this is not even a stab at a new adaptation of the novel, which would already be questionable since such a great version already exists.  This is actually a restaging of the exact original Billy Wilder and Raymond Chandler penned screenplay adaptation.

    This is available on the second DVD included in the DVD release for the original film.  And it is the ONLY thing on that second DVD.  Why it was included I have no idea.  I rented it through Netflix because it listed it as a "bonus features" disc.  The only reason I could imagine someone would want to watch this is for some sick curiosity.

    Lee J. Cobb is the only decent thing here, but even that pales in comparison to the original Edward G. Robinson interpretation of the role.  I think watching this movie so shortly after seeing the original makes it look even worse.  Would I have appreciated it more if I didn't have the original film so fresh in my mind to compare it to?  I'm not sure, but I can't imagine anyone would argue that it would benefit from comparison, which is pretty much impossible to do.

    And who is this Samantha Eggar?  And why are her eyes ten miles apart?  Yeah Barbara Stanwyk is kind of funny looking too, but she could actually act.

    Rating: 3/10


  • movie recommendation site suggestions - Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sunrise  (1927)

    This blog entry is part of my "movie recommendation site suggestions".  Read more about that here.

    Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans

    This is often argued to be the greatest silent film ever made and sometimes even to be the greatest film ever made altogether (most likely by those who think that silent film is a more pure form of cinema).  The film certainly is impressive in the way it is shot and constructed.  It's hard to think of any silent film that does much better.  But I have a few qualms with the story and characters.

    *SPOILERS* At first it is hard to feel sympathetic for an adulterer, especially when there is nothing apparently wrong at home or with his wife.  In fact she seems like a wonderful woman.  Then when he is convinced by his mistress to kill his wife and pretend she has drowned so that they can get married and move to the city, it is shocking to see him accept.  Even though it is clear he is reluctant and this is such a heavy burden, it's very confusing.  Then when he actually begins to approach his wife in the boat to try to throw her overboard and she realizes his intent, it takes her a long time to not be afraid of him and then to actually even start to trust and fall in love with him again.  But for me as a viewer, it takes me even longer than her to trust him.  And then at the end when he attempts to strangle the mistress to death, I'm not sure if he will ever be able to restrain his violence or take responsibility for his own actions.

    And also, what the heck was that scene with the pig all about??
    *END SPOILER*

    Despite these criticisms it still is a must see movie for the striking visuals and construction, especially for a silent film.  I won't go too much into the details of what makes that so good.  It's largely apparent, and if you haven't seen it you should watch it and find out for yourself.

    Rating: 8/10