Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Risselada Blog

  • BrĂ¼no

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Film Name  Production Year

    Borat  (2006)

    Bruno  (2009)

    Brüno

    The last of the three Sacha Baron Cohen characters from Da Ali G Show to get it's own feature film.  Comparisons to the previous film Borat are unavoidable as the filmmakers practically encouraged it.

    With pretty much the same filmmaking team, Brüno is clearly an attempt to recreate the success fo Borat by sticking to the same structure.  Both films are a documentary style with a mix of staged and improvised scenes about a foreigner coming to America with a quest.  He travels around the country to different venues with his comrade who he gets angry at and abandons before being reunited at the end.  So there are no chances taken on the structure.  If it worked for you last time, hopefully it will work for you again.  Just don't expect any surprises there.

    Now about the actual character and the meat of the scenes.  Here is where Brüno in the movie is different from the movie Borat, and most of the time it doesn't work as well.  If you could describe Borat with one word, one thing he is about and that Cohen is trying to convey to the people he meets, it is "foreign".  To many Americans "foreign" means strange.  And people seem to be delusional about how "strange" a foreign person could or should be.

    For people who are extremely concerned about being polite and PC, Borat gets away with taking a shit at a table and not getting as harsh of a reaction as fellow America.  He plays catch with a football and can't seem to figure out how to catch it from two feet away, or throw it more than a foot.  He can't even figure out how to hold it.  But people aren't as bemused as they should be.  Can being foreign sometimes mean that you don't even know how to hold a ball (when there is apparently nothing physically wrong with you)?  No, it basically means you are retarded.

    For people who are themselves a bit immoral in their racism or sexism, they have found a friend in Borat who provides many of the same predilections.  Of course sometimes Borat finds himself on the harsh end of the racism himself.

    Now Brüno is also foreign, but if there was one word to describe him, this would not be it.  His word is clearly "gay".  And while Cohen can make up whatever kind of strange behavior he would like to come off as "foreign", being "gay" already has all of it's own established stereotypes.  And in this movie Brüno pushes them so hard that I think even most gay people and gay rights activists would be antagonized.  I never thought I'd say this until I saw the movie, but the Brüno in the Da Ali G Show TV show actually now seems like it had some subtlety and restraint.  Thus in the movie we don't get that portion of reactions like in Borat where people seem to be sympathetic to him despite crossing lines.  Most people who go along with him are people who are almost more depraved then him.  The most memorable of these is probably also the most memorable scene in the movie for me:  the interview with the parents of toddlers auditioning to be in a music video who will subject their children to no limits of unspeakable danger and humiliation just to get them work in show business.  I'm not kidding.  There are no limits.  It is shocking and disgusting, but unlike some other portions of this movie, in an important way that needs to be exposed.

    I might sound like I didn't like the movie more than I did though.  I did enjoy it, I just think there was potential for it to have been better.  Or maybe I'm just getting a little worn out of a good thing.

    Bradolf Pittler

    Rating: 8/10


  • Spout user recommendations - protexblue - House of Bamboo

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Film Name  Production Year

    Johnny Guitar  (1954)

    House of Bamboo  (1955)

    I have asked certain users on Spout to recommend a movie to me.  I will be blogging about these films as I watch them.  This film was recommended to me by protexblue

    House of Bamboo

    It wasn't too long ago that I met protexblue on Spout, but I liked him right away after browsing his movie ratings.  And then after a couple correspondences and seeing a few of his posts, I knew this guy was someone I wanted to listen to.  His taste in movies is fantastic.  His observations and insights are acute, and his ability to put them into words is adroit.  Here is how he put his recommendation of this movie to me:

    I'm recommending Sam Fuller's House of Bamboo based on the mixture of Japanese and classic American films in your 5 star films list. For whatever reason the DVD was released in the "Fox Film Noir" collection, even though it's from the mid 50s pulp thriller shot in color cinemascope - so you see a lot of people giving it mid-range reviews online because they were expecting heavy shadows and dutch angles. I first tracked it down after reading it was Godard's favorite Fuller film, and if you see Contempt or Two or Three Things I Know About Her you can really see the influence on his widescreen compositions. I'll leave the description to the back of the box or Netflix - but all you really need to know is Sam Fuller directs Robert Ryan vs Robert Stack in Tokyo.

    I thought his recognizing of my penchant for Samuel Fuller and Japanese cinema was astute, and thus the recommendation made sense to me.  I was looking forward to seeing more Fuller films, although this one was not originally near the top of my list.

    Although he mentions Godard in his recommendation, I have only seen one Godard film, and did not like it.  So I can't comment on that connection.  But I will say that the compositions were probably the most striking and enjoyable part of the film.  I'm remembering an interesting directly above crane shot.  And also a lot of interesting things with windows, and those paper Japanese walls, and other translucent surfaces.

    The story took me a while to get into.  I like Robert Stack, but most of my exposure to him has actually been more of his self parody comedy style of recent years.  But now watching him in this movie I kind of feel like he was always a parody of sorts.  His character is largely a shallow portrayal of the stereotypical film noir protagonist, but bordering on being a cipher.  Robert Ryan's character however is much more interesting, even if a bit bemusing at times.  *SPOILER*  His blatant carelessness at the end of the movie during his plot to finish off Robert Stack seems so out of character with his calm and precise manner of the rest of the film, that it lowered my enjoyment of the film.  Of course the homosexual subtext (which according to the audio commentary Ryan and Fuller had worked out but Stack was completely oblivious to [as was his character] during the filming) may provide the reason to why Ryan may have been so flustered at finding out Stack was an undercover investigator.  But still, his plan goes from working so well, to turning into such a disaster by his own carelessness so quickly that it still seems out of character.

    The fact that the film takes place in Japan provides some more interesting scenery and a bit of culture clash to the context, but mostly the Japanese stay on the perifery of the story without becoming too central.  The love story with Mariko becomes part of the plot, but again the real meat of the story at least for me came from the interactions with Ryan's character Sandy Dawson.  Fuller makes a few observations about Japanese culture and they way they see love and romance and racism, but it didn't hold as much depth as I was hoping for.

    See the movie for the compositions and for Robert Ryan.  This was worth watching, and I will watch more Fuller films, but unfortunately this was my least favorite of his so far.

    Next I'm hoping I can see Johnny Guitar, protexblue's number one recommendation for me if it ever comes out on Region 1 DVD or to a theater near me!

    Samuel Fuller:
    Total feature length films seen: 5
    Previous average film score: 9.25
    New average film score: 8.8

    Rating: 7/10


  • director introductions - David O. Russell - Three Kings

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Three Kings  (1999)

    This is the first film I've seen by director David O. Russell.

    Three Kings

    Attempting to fit drama, comedy, action, history, ensemble, and politics in a movie can sometimes succeed, but like any movie, if the comedy, action, or characters are not particularly appealing to me then it doesn't matter how much you try to fit in there.  This movie was interesting enough to me for one watch.  And the history lesson about some of the less publicized facets of the larger events surrounding Operation Desert Storm in this country was worthwhile.  But one watch through was enough.  Actually three was way too much, but I have a compulsion about watching DVD extras.  If I rent a DVD, it's because I want to expose myself to this movie for a particular reason.  Even if I don't like it, I want to figure out what the deal is with it.  Thus I forced myself to watch both of the commentary tracks here as well.  After this film, and hearing David O. Russell's commentary, I do not find too much particularly appealing about him or his work to make me seek out more of his stuff.  He comes off as just a bit arrogant, even about his humor.  I was confused about how he explained that he didn't put too much effort into making the actual heist that original or interesting because the movie isn't really about the heist.  It's just the structure of the movie.  Well, if that's the case he should have figured out a different way to do his movie and take it out all together.  Because if it's the structure it's still important, otherwise you lose the audience before you even get to what the film is "really about".

    There are a lot of facets of this movie that have good things and bad things about them.  I haven't even gone into some of the different cinematography styles they used.  But overall it's all just too uneven for me to call it a great film.  Maybe I should have checked out one of Russell's earlier dark comedies instead for my first movie of his, but at this point I don't have too much further interest.

    Rating: 7/10


  • director ratings - Joe Berlinger and Bruce Sinofsky - Brother's Keeper

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Film Name  Production Year

    Brother's Keeper  (1992)

    Salesman  (1969)

    This is the third feature length film I've seen by directors Joe Berlinger and Bruce Sinofsky working as team.  I chose to watch this film based on previous good ratings I've given other films by this director and to better my favorite directors by algorithm listing.

    Brother's Keeper

    The two other films I've seen by Joe and Bruce are the first and second Paradise Lost films.  In a way, the story of those films are the same in that they are both about an ambiguous murder trial.  But in many ways they are opposites within that context.  Both take place in kind of rural areas, but in one the locals band together to support the accused where as in the other most locals have turned against the accused.  In one the accused is rather old, and in the other they are quite young.  There are too many interesting similarities and polar opposites to go through the list, but the point is that these directors know how to find these interesting cases and document them in a way that seems true but also narratively involving.

    I think there area  lot of mixed feelings about these filmmakers in the documentary world.  Their style is a bit different from some of the other stuff that has been seen.  They were able to get access to a small group of people living much of their lives in much privacy and seclusion.  This is a fascinating thing to see.  It's both a regional story and a courtroom drama, both of which I find appealing.  And it was made at a time that was still before cameras and reality TV had become so present in society that it was hard to capture people in real life without them altering their behavior for the camera.  If you do too, then don't miss out on this one!

    Interesting fact:  This was the #1 movie on Ethan Coen's list top five favorite movies of all time.  The list also included Salesman by the Maysles brothers who Joe and Bruce had worked with before and met each other through their production company.

    Joe Berlinger and Bruce Sinofsky:
    Total feature length films seen: 3
    Previous average film score: 9
    New average film score: 9

    Rating: 9/10


  • Spout user recommendations - laurabot - Wendy and Lucy

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Film Name  Production Year

    Labyrinth  (2007)

    Wendy and Lucy  (2008)

    I have asked certain users on Spout to recommend a movie to me.  I will be blogging about these films as I watch them.  This film was recommended to me by laurabot

    Wendy and Lucy

    I do not know laurabot all that well, but have conversed with her about movies on a couple occasions.  She has her own distinctive taste which I appreciate.  She gave me quite a few different suggestions for films to see, many of which I had heard of and have wanted to see anyways, so I kind of felt like she was in tune with what I was looking for.  I was considering seeing Labyrith since I hear so many cultural references to it, even today and feel embarrassed I still have never seen it.  And laurabot urged me so much that I do need to see it.  I did however ultimately chose Wendy and Lucy since it had been stuck in my head ever since I saw the trailer for it.  The sad scenario of a person with few friends, and apparently no real good friends, no home, and not many possessions striking out on a last hope to make a new life for themselves I found appealing.  Of course in this society one little thing going wrong can cause a sequence of that show just how fleeting possessions can be.

    The movie turned out to be mostly what I expected, which was a good thing in this case.  *SPOILER*  The biggest surprise to me was that Wendy did make a major mistake of her own that could have been avoided, that being shoplifting.  I can see why she would do it and the desperation of her situation.  But now that I think about it, knowing was really wrong with her car, maybe the outcome would have been the same in the end whether she had shop lifted or not.  *END SPOILER*

    One thing that I've been trying to come to terms with is the acting style in this movie.  Although I sense that the movie is trying to be very realistic, some of the dialogue sounds a bit strange, or maybe the way it's delivered is strange.  I'm not sure if it's just bad acting or writing, or if it's a deliberate attempt by the writer/director to write and direct actors in a way that is just kind of strange.  Some of my favorite directors like Hal Hartley for instance do have very specific ways of writing and directing actors that gives them a deliberate style.  I can't tell if it is deliberate in this case.  Sometimes it is a bit charming, and sometimes it is a bit off putting.  Either way, Michelle Williams stands out as a much better actors than the rest of the cast.  Which although I'm guessing is quite true in general, I would think that the director would want everyone to fit together a bit better.  Or maybe this too was deliberate to make her stand out and the other characters feel just slightly more alienating.

    This movie just goes to show how much more important strong human relationships are rather than money and possessions.  Even though a dog is a nice friend to have, one is lost in the world without good human friends.

    Rating: 9/10


  • Loaded Weapon 1

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Film Name  Production Year

    Airplane!  (1980)

    Lethal Weapon  (1987)

    Lethal Weapon 2  (1989)

    The Naked Gun  (1988)

    Loaded Weapon 1

    I guess the full title of this film is National Lampoon's Loaded Weapon 1.  I could never really figure out what the connection was between the different films with the "National Lampoon's" prefix was, but I just looked it up and realized it's just the name of a production company.  You know that the films are always comedies, and probably could have the descriptions of "zany", "crude", or "base" attached to them.  Most people will think of Animal House or the Vacation movies (written by the recently departed John Hughes).  Although I just found out the first ever National Lampoon's film was titled National Lampoon's Disco Beaver from Outer Space.  But Loaded Weapon 1 is actually a bit different in that it's pretty much a spoof movie, where the others aren't.  Obviously trying to work within the style created by the Zucker Abrahams Zucker team who did Airplane! and The Naked Gun, this film is much more based on a sequence of gags than really building complex character or scenarios.  Which is fine with me.  I love that stuff when it's done well.  And I feel that Loaded Weapon 1 was done well.  I have seen it a handful of times, and just pulled the shrinkwrap off a DVD that I've had in my house for a while after buying it on clearance to show my girlfriend.  I think she fell asleep like she usually does, but I still had a great time.

    It's a short little film, as it should be.  It's primarily a spoof of The Lethal Weapon movies which I have never seen.  I have seen enough pieces of them and know the basic plot that I'm still able to enjoy what they are spoofing.  A good spoof somehow gives you an insight into what the original scene of a movie it is spoofing was like even if you haven't seen it.  It's hard to explain how this is done, but if you GET the joke, you can sense where it's coming from.  One of the most striking things about the movie I think is how many cameos there are.  Here's a list:

    Dr. Joyce Brothers
    James Doohan (Scotty)
    F. Murray Abraham
    Charlie Sheen
    Dennis Leary
    Corey Feldman
    Phil Hartman
    J.T. Walsh
    Erik Estrada
    Larry Wilcox
    Paul Gleeson
    Whoopie Goldberg
    Christopher Lambert
    Bruce Willis

    And Denise Richards (although she was not at all a celebrity at that time)

    Of course you have the main characters played by Emilio Estevez who was pretty well known then.  Samuel L Jackson was less well known.  But then you got some other funny performances from John Lovitz, Tim Curry, Kathy Ireland, and of course the wonderful William Shatner, who tries to pull off such a goofy voice here.

    So if you want some laughs, and to see a "gratuitous beaver scene" check this movie out.  Like I said, it's short and sweet.

    Rating: 9/10


 


Advertisement