Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Risselada Blog

  • Double Indemnity

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Double Indemnity  (1944)

    Double Indemnity  (1973)

    Double Indemnity

    This blog is referring to the 1973 TV movie which is remake of the 1944 original classic film.  That's right, this is not even a stab at a new adaptation of the novel, which would already be questionable since such a great version already exists.  This is actually a restaging of the exact original Billy Wilder and Raymond Chandler penned screenplay adaptation.

    This is available on the second DVD included in the DVD release for the original film.  And it is the ONLY thing on that second DVD.  Why it was included I have no idea.  I rented it through Netflix because it listed it as a "bonus features" disc.  The only reason I could imagine someone would want to watch this is for some sick curiosity.

    Lee J. Cobb is the only decent thing here, but even that pales in comparison to the original Edward G. Robinson interpretation of the role.  I think watching this movie so shortly after seeing the original makes it look even worse.  Would I have appreciated it more if I didn't have the original film so fresh in my mind to compare it to?  I'm not sure, but I can't imagine anyone would argue that it would benefit from comparison, which is pretty much impossible to do.

    And who is this Samantha Eggar?  And why are her eyes ten miles apart?  Yeah Barbara Stanwyk is kind of funny looking too, but she could actually act.

    Rating: 3/10


  • movie recommendation site suggestions - Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sunrise  (1927)

    This blog entry is part of my "movie recommendation site suggestions".  Read more about that here.

    Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans

    This is often argued to be the greatest silent film ever made and sometimes even to be the greatest film ever made altogether (most likely by those who think that silent film is a more pure form of cinema).  The film certainly is impressive in the way it is shot and constructed.  It's hard to think of any silent film that does much better.  But I have a few qualms with the story and characters.

    *SPOILERS* At first it is hard to feel sympathetic for an adulterer, especially when there is nothing apparently wrong at home or with his wife.  In fact she seems like a wonderful woman.  Then when he is convinced by his mistress to kill his wife and pretend she has drowned so that they can get married and move to the city, it is shocking to see him accept.  Even though it is clear he is reluctant and this is such a heavy burden, it's very confusing.  Then when he actually begins to approach his wife in the boat to try to throw her overboard and she realizes his intent, it takes her a long time to not be afraid of him and then to actually even start to trust and fall in love with him again.  But for me as a viewer, it takes me even longer than her to trust him.  And then at the end when he attempts to strangle the mistress to death, I'm not sure if he will ever be able to restrain his violence or take responsibility for his own actions.

    And also, what the heck was that scene with the pig all about??
    *END SPOILER*

    Despite these criticisms it still is a must see movie for the striking visuals and construction, especially for a silent film.  I won't go too much into the details of what makes that so good.  It's largely apparent, and if you haven't seen it you should watch it and find out for yourself.

    Rating: 8/10


  • movie recommendation site suggestions - Double Indemnity

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Double Indemnity  (1944)

    This blog entry is part of my "movie recommendation site suggestions".  Read more about that here.

    Double Indemnity

    Working in the insurance field, I don't see many movies that focus on the area of my profession.  In fact I can't think of a single movie other than this one.  Some films may mention insurance matters briefly, but this is the only one I can think of that is so central to the plot.  They sure do make it seem interesting though.  At least Edward G. Robinson's character Barton Keyes seems almost like an adventurous detective (or maybe you are all thinking I'm crazy).  Then again, I don't work in claims so maybe it really is like that.

    Although there were many films before this film that have been labled as film-noir a lot of people, including many who speak on the special features of this DVD, maintain that this should be considered the first true film-noir.  The stark black and white cinematography, the femme fatale, the degenerate characters being sucked into a world of crime.  The prototypes for these features of many subsequent film-noirs were solidified here.  Yet the film also features so many aspects that are so different from many subsequent film-noirs as well.  The characters are a lot more wholesome.  Fred MacMurray never gets more amoral than he does in his Billy Wilder films, but it still pales in comparison to many of the more well known noir characters like Sam Spade, Philip Marlowe and Mike Hammer.  Screenwriters Wilder and Chandler actually made a lot of changes from the original James M. Cain story for improvement to the screen and in general.  The DVD features a wealth of information on the whole process and the people involved including two audio commentaries.  I wouldn't bother watching the second DVD in the set though.  I'll say why in a later blog.

    Like a lot of fim-noirs, there are a few things that just don't make sense or are too unbelievable when you go back over the plot in your head.  But like all of the good film-noirs, you aren't too bothered by it while you are actually watching the movie because everything else is just too good.

    Rating: 9/10


  • movie recommendation site suggestions - Dzien swira (Day of the Wacko)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Day of the Wacko  (2002)

    This blog entry is part of my "movie recommendation site suggestions".  Read more about that here.

    Dzien swira (Day of the Wacko)

    I don't think I would have ever heard of or thought about watching this movie if it hadn't been consistently popping up on the top of the list for Netflix's recommended movies for me.  I can see why it would be recommended.  It depicts a lot of very specific quirks, thoughts, and annoyances that people have.  Well some of the things might seem idiosyncratic, I think a lot of people will find themselves identifying with the main character.  His strange rituals may not be exactly the same as the ones that the viewer has cultivated, but most people have these strange thoughts and ticks that have built throughout their lives.  The strange thing he has to do with his pants every time he sits down is hilarious because many of us have certain things we have to do to be comfortable.  The thoughts he has when riding the train about exactly where he should sit to avoid a plethora of different possible annoying scenarios with other passengers are probably the types of things all of us have thought.  The strange dance that occurs on the bus when one person leaves and everyone switches seats might be a bit exaggerated, but is indicative of a lot of real scenarios.  I'm sure there are lots of things here that would be even more relevant to people familiar with modern Polish society, but for the most part I think it would be quite identifiable to a lot of different modern cultures.

    The main reason I could not give this the highest score is because of just how pessimistic it is.  You can identify with the annoyances of modern life, but it's hard to be too sympathetic with the protagonist when it's clear his horrible attitude has a huge bearing on how his life has panned out and how he goes through his day.  Some of the things in the film that seem so invasive into his world could be subjectively viewed a lot less hostile if he had a different attitude or perspective.  To throw my Christian worldview into this again, this is a movie that shows pretty well what the life and mind of someone is like who is trying to live for themselves instead of living in hope through Christ.  It also shows the frustration of seeing people as enemies or annoyances instead of people of worth made in the image of God.

    Rating: 8/10


  • A Day at the Races

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    A Day at the Races

    I just have not been able to give any Marx Brothers movie less than a perfect rating.  Despite imperfections in some parts of the movies, the best parts of the movies are just so wonderful that I cannot bare to dock them any points.  However common consensus seems to be that their films took a sharp down turn after this film and the death of Irving Thalberg, the brothers' big advocate at MGM.  I've seen all of their films made up to this point, but I'm a little hesitant about what I'll find next.  Even if they aren't perfect, it's good to know they have so many perfect films to go back to.

    Rating: 10/10


  • Okie Noodling

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Okie Noodling  (2001)

    Okie Noodling

    Another documentary where the filmmakers couldn't help kind of putting themselves into the film and instigating certain events.  But it wasn't as severe as some instances, and luckily the rest of the film plays out rather well.

    The subject of this film is "noodling" which is fishing with your hands.  Specifically, fishing for catfish by sticking your fingers in a hole and wiggling them around until the fish bites your hand and you pull the fish out with it's mouth clamped on to your hand.  These fish do have teeth and these guys do get bloody.  If you find this idea interesting, then the film should satisfy your interest.

    The main piece of interference by the filmmakers is setting up a noodling contest.  But I do have to admit it leads to an interesting event with many of the people previously visited in the film all coming together.

    Even though I watched it on DVD, it looks like the film is free to watch here with a link on Spout.  So click on it now, and you haven't wasted any money or major effort if you decide it's not for you.

    Rating: 7/10