Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Risselada Blog

  • Tulsa

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Tulsa  (1949)

    Tulsa

    My girlfriend rode with one of he friends who was moving from New York to Santa Fe.  She got picked up in Chicago, and along the way they stayed overnight in a hotel in Tulsa.  I guess it was a pretty boring place.  One of my best friends actually grew up around there so my girlfriend called me when I was there to call him and ask him if there was anything to do.  Well the answer was, not much.  Although I did direct them towards this strange kind of architectural village and the famous praying hands statue which is kind of creepy and is also the largest bronze sculpture in the world.

    Praying Hands

    My girlfriend and her friends also like to give each other goofy gifts, and shortly after this trip her friend sent her a DVD of this movie she found called simply Tulsa.

    So we decided to watch it, and after getting it started I realized it was a lot bigger budget movie than I had expected.  I'm not sure why, maybe because it sounded a little bit sensationalist in a B movie way on the DVD cover presentation.  And actually if I had known more about the distributor, I would have really assumed it was a B movie.  One of the best things about this DVD is the GIGANTIC library of DVD covers you can browse through that are also distributed by Alpha Video.  Now after doing some research I found out that Alpha Video specializes in distributing public domain movies on DVD.  Check it out for lots of Boris Karloff, Bela Lugosi, and Roy Rogers.  And a bunch of shit staring a group of kids I'd never heard of before called the "East Side Kids".  Apparently there were endless amounts of these series of movies staring different groups of young kids such as The Bowery Boys, The Dead End Kids, and Little Tough guys.  Of course they all end up getting mixed up together and with Bela Lugosi and Gorillas and other spooks.  Man things got pretty inbred back then.

    None of that has anything to do with the movie Tulsa, but it was one of the most interesting discoveries from watching the DVD.  As for Tulsa itself, it seemed like some kind of old advertisement for "responsible oil companies" kind of like the energy companies today that are talking about things like "clean coal" (does it really exist??).  Its kind of addressing the horrible toal oil drilling can take on the environment, but also saying "hey this country was built on oil, and it's a great thing if we use it correctly".  Maybe that's true, but the movie kind of says it in a trite and corny way.

    It's not a bad movie to have going on in the background if you are interested in movies of the era, but I wouldn't recommend going out of your way to see it.

    Rating: 5/10


  • Off the Charts: The Song-Poem Story

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Off the Charts: The Song-Poem Story

    I was first informed of the world of song poems by my friend Tony who is the founder of my favorite Chicago band Let's Get Out of This Terrible Sandwich Shop.  For decades musicians have been placing adds in periodicals asking for people to send in their written lyrics or "poems" to be actually sung and set to music and recorded.  The idea is that "the music industry needs writers!" and your song may turn into the next big hit.  The truth is out of hundreds of thousands of song poems ever recorded, none of them have been a big hit.  But the songs are recorded and put on records (or probably CDs these days) and sent out to the poem writer.  Of course this is all after a certain fee by the poem writer has been sent.

    Eventually collectors began to discover copies of these records and sometimes entire collections.  As you can imagine, when eccentric people are implored to send in their lyrics and some often equally quirky but sometimes talented session musicians are pumping out versions of these songs, there are quite a few recordings out there that are fascinatingly odd.  Like nothing you've ever heard!

    It's a wide world out there with many different personalities on both the poem writer and the musician end, and even on the collector end as well.  This documentary introduces us to some of the most interesting and notable personalities in this culture.  If you are interested in all things weird and beautiful but not too offensive (uh mostly, except for John Trubee who I had actually been quite familiar as a very oddball prank phone call artist from the 70's before I'd seen this movie, and I'd recommend finding his recordings for something extra weird and fucked up!) then you should really pick this one up.

    And my friend Tony, by the way, along with Tom who is also in the afore mentioned Let's Get Out of This Terrible Sandwich Shop have played a few shows as a song poem cover band titled Ecstasy to Frenzy, one of their favorite Rodd Keith song poem titles.  And I've heard rumors they may be playing a show with song poem writer turned performer himself Gary Forney sometime soon in Chicago.  I hope to see you there!

    (oh and if you do rent this DVD make sure you watch "America Sings" on the special features.  It's absurdly horrible!)

    Rating: 8/10


  • movie year countdown - round #2 - #22 - 1964-5 - Suna no onna (Woman in the Dunes)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    This blog entry is part of my "movie year countdown round #2".  Read more about that here.

    Suna no onna (Woman in the Dunes)

    This movie was not what I expected it to be.  And I actually expected it to be extremely strange.  Luckily it wasn't as strange as I thought, although certainly nothing ordinary.  I say luckily because I wouldn't want this movie to be anything other than what it is.

    The film perfectly pulls your around as you experience the confusion and frustrations of the character.  Sometimes you can see things coming before he does.  Sometimes you think you know what's coming.  Your hopes are often dashed, until the shocking ending.  Until you consider it all and realize the shock makes total sense.

    It's an amazing film about the relativity of our situations in life.  Put in a different context your entire outlook and even goals can change.  I think it's an important movie for being able to look into the lives of other people who we cannot seem to comprehend how they could live and believe certain things.  It's the whole genes vs. environment thing.  Yes there are certain things about our personality that would never change, but it's amazing at how much we can adapt to any situation that we never thought we could if necessary.

    I thought about this movie a lot after I saw it.  And I've been thinking a lot about it again as I wanted to make this little blog entry.  The more I think about it, the more amazing it becomes.  I'm rating this movie a 9, but I have the feeling that after another viewing it could go up to a 10.

    Rating: 9/10


  • movie year countdown #84 - 1923 - The Hunchback of Notre Dame

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    This blog entry is part of my “movie year countdown”.  To read more about that check out my first Spout filmblog entry.

    The Hunchback of Notre Dame

    This is both the first version of The Hunchback of Notre Dame that I've ever experienced (I've never read the book or seen any other movies or plays about it) and the first Lon Chaney movie I've ever seen.  And this actually would not normally have been my first choice for my introduction to either of these.

    I'm not about to set about reading the novel.  It's just too long and daunting and honestly the story is just not interesting enough to me to go into it.  And as for film William Dieterle's version is famously the best.  And Dieterle's The Devil and Daniel Webster is one of my favorite films, so I've been wanting to see another one of his adaptations for a while.

    As for Lon Chaney I was hoping to see The Unknown or one of his clown films first.  Or of course even his most well known The Phantom of the Opera would have been preferable.

    The reason I did chose this movie was simply because in creating my obsessive movie year countdown project, this seemed to be the only movie released in 1923 that really worked best with the combination of everything else I was watching.

    I say all this to explore the fact that maybe I didn't enjoy or rate this movie as well as I would have if I didn't have this feeling that I was missing out on something better.  Also, the DVD copy available is just horribly marred and could benefit from a further restoration I think.  That is, if anyone deemed it worth preserving.

    Another thing that really confused me for most of the movie is how the film was trying to get me to react to Phoebus.  Again, I am not familiar with any other versions of this story, but at first it seemed like the movie was setting him up to be a villain, but by the end it seems like we are supposed to be cheering for him.  The problem is, I'm not sure where this change takes place and it isn't a situation where the ambiguity is a good thing.  Maybe if it had been presented differently where we see a more identifiable change it would work.  I did some brief research on this character and it seems like different adaptations of the work present him as entirely villainous or sometimes redeemable, I'm not sure why.  Although I'm not sure if I'm interested enough to care too much.

    I'll be sure to watch the William Dieterle version later though and see if that piques my interest.

    Rating: 6/10


  • The King of Kong

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Grizzly Man  (2005)

    The King of Kong

    I had high hopes for this film and it did not disappoint!  Although I don't see relatively too many new releases, I think it's still a lot to say that I consider this one of the most enjoyable movies to come out in the last couple years.  And I think it's my favorite documentary to come out since Grizzly Man in 2005 and I've seen a couple others that are also really great.

    Supposedly the filmmaker is now going to be making a dramatized version of this story in a new film.  I've very skeptical about how that will play out, at least I wonder how well it will play with anyone who has already seen the actual documentary.  How can you find someone to play Billy better than the real Billy?  The filmmakers claim they have a lot worse footage of Billy they didn't show because it wasn’t really relevant and they didn't want to make him seem any worse.  Are they going to dramatize that kind of thing in the movie?  Why not show the real footage!  I don't know.  The best thing about this movie is that it's real.  OK, of course we know with any documentary (especially one with such a traditional little guy vs. the big guy story line like this one) that there is a lot of selective editing to fit the real story into a narrative the filmmakers think will work to pull at your emotions.  But knowing this is pretty much real is what really gets you involved!

    And there are so many interesting secondary characters that come in and out of the movie besides Billy and Steve who are compelling enough on their own to make several movies.  Walter Day, Robert Mruczek, Steve Sanders, Brian Kuh, Mark Alpiger, Doris Self, Mike Thompson, and of course Roy "Mr. Awsome" Shildt who should have his own movie!  The special features have lots of additional footage of these fascinating people.  As well as some people who had only a very little amount of time in the film or none at all.  Check out Bryan Wagner discussing Burger Time strategy in a hilarious scene with his little crony sitting next to him repeating what he says.  It's so geeky it's great.  And then on the special features you will also discover one of the most interesting people who never made it into the film.  Joel Hedge, the Xybots champion must have his own movie!  Is it out there already!  Someone must make it.

    Basically there are infinite interesting aspects of this film.  The filmmakers were actually filming several different potential story lines in the world of this classic video game competitions and you can see a few of them creep in as their stories come into contact with this one.

    I took so much joy in watching all of the special features on this DVD.  And there are plenty of them!  But I just can't get enough.  Now that I think about it, I would totally eat up a dramatization of this movie just to see more of it, in any way I could!  Bring it on!

    Rating: 10/10


  • movie year countdown #83 - 1924 - The Thief of Bagdad

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    White Heat  (1949)

    This blog entry is part of my “movie year countdown”.  To read more about that check out my first Spout filmblog entry.

    The Thief of Bagdad

    I had the joy of watching this film up on a huge projector screen.  We had set it up at my girlfriend's apartment when we had a movie night party to watch Rock 'n' Roll Nightmare, a really horrible movie that I've blogged about before, but one that can be extremely fun to watch when drunk with a bunch of friends.

    We left the screen up at her apartment the rest of the weekend and I watched a couple more movies including this one.  I was quite enchanted with it, and kind of wonder if I would have been as much if I hadn't seen it on such a big screen.  I wonder how much the screen size really affects my opinion or enjoyment of a movie.  I would assume most of the time it would be more enjoyable.  I wonder if there are any situations where seeing a movie on a big screen can actually make it worse.  Like maybe it would magnify the flaws of the movie?  Does anyone feel like that situation has ever occurred to them?

    I think I would have liked this movie either way though.  Douglas Fairbanks is captivating.  There's the right amount of drama, humor, and enchantment for a film like this.  And I realized that this is the second movie directed by Raoul Walsh I've seen in my movie year countdown.  The other one being White Heat with James Cagney which he made 25 years later and is a different kind of movie altogether.  The man had a highly long and prolific career with movies in almost every genre it seems.  All I can say is I know he's made at least two movies I love.

    Rating: 9/10