Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Risselada Blog

Spout Mavens review - Yihe yuan (Summer Palace)

3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.
Under discussion:

Summer Palace  (2008)

I've been pretty lax about making myself write these maven reviews in a timely manner.  I notice that just about everyone else has already written a review on Summer Palace already, and anything I'm about to say has probably already been covered by someone.  I'd recommend joem18b's review of the film as one of the most comprehensive collection of thoughts on various aspects of the film.  Of course it may take you longer to finish reading his 4,778 word review than it does to watch this 140 minute movie.

How much does enjoying and understanding this film rely on being already aware of certain aspects of a culture?  It's a question I have to ask when considering a film made outside of the culture I am familiar with.  In this case I am very unfamiliar with China's political history and the featured events in Tiananmen Square.  This movie shows some of the physical events occurring, but the reason behind them is not explained.  I thought perhaps the reason was that the filmmakers were merely trying to use these events as a backdrop for a more universal story of love and relationships.  Well if that is true, then it's unfortunate because the main story and characters are frustrating and not very engaging.  The characters themselves don't even seem to know what's going with themselves (the main story) or the events going on in the bigger world around them (the more interesting background).  Which leads me to the other possibility.  Maybe the characters aren't the only ones who don't really know what was happening around them.  Maybe the filmmakers had no idea what all of these events going on at that time meant either.  Information from some of the other maven viewers regarding this film seem to support the fact that most of the entire nation of China has less idea about what happened in some of their history than people do in the United States.

Maybe I should be viewing the movie in that context then.  A bunch of confused kids are forced to live together (college) with no apparent role models.  At least there is hardly ever an adult on screen, and when there is the film gives them very little importance.  It's hard to see what the goals and motivations of any of the characters are other than to experiment in sex and lounge about.  In the context shown, I guess I could believe that maybe they wouldn't have any other goals, but the problem is that we know what is being shown isn't the whole context.  We know that the kids are going to class, that they have parents, that there must be other kids around them who do have real goal and motivates because there is a revolution going on around them!  So why are the main characters so apathetic, selfish, and aimless?  The film gives no reason, and there must be some reason if you expect for me to empathize with Yu Hong's plight.  All we get is narration of diary entries that spout unconnected emotions and metaphors without offering any tangible source for these feelings.  How can I react, be affected, or learn anything then from this story?

There are some good things about this movie.  There are a few wonderful images, an example being a shot of a boat on the water that doesn't seem sped up but somehow the sunset seems incredibly expedited.  I'm not sure how they did this shot but it's beautiful.  It's also apparent that the actors are all quite talented.  So it's a waste sometimes that the cameraman is so often asked to film nothing, while the actors are asked to do nothing.  Nothing of interest at any rate.

Rating: 5/10

posted on Thursday, September 25, 2008 2:04 PM by Risselada


Was this review helpful?
Yeah Yeah Nope Nope



Comment    Email me new comments.


Risselada
Posted Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:01 AM

Thanks for the comments. This doesn't really answer the question necessarily, but at any rate I think what the audience perceives as being the fimmakers inention will affect the way they feel. So the filmmakers definitely needs to consider that, if they care at all about the way their audience will react.
Risselada
Posted Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:00 AM

I think you are quite correct joem18b. I think this actually happens with fimmakers quite often. It's unfortunate unless you happen to have had similar experiences that you can relate to.
joem18b
Posted Tuesday, September 30, 2008 1:41 AM

TheWorkingDead: Well, you'll probably never come back to read this, but your question about the filmmakers intent vs the audience's feelings for some reason puts me in mind of arguments with my spouse: there is was i said, or thought i said, or did, or thought i did, vs what my spouse thought i said, or knew i said, or did. confusing and frustrating.
TheWorkingDead
Posted Friday, September 26, 2008 3:08 AM

Good review, and pretty apt. I think I was more forgiving than most, if only because of aspects of the film I enjoyed that I think I probably made up. And also, in regards to joem18b, it raises an interesting question. At what point does a film stop being about what the filmmaker intended, and start being about what the audience feels?
joem18b
Posted Thursday, September 25, 2008 9:56 PM

and thanks for linking to my review! it's great to know that someone is reading these things.
joem18b
Posted Thursday, September 25, 2008 5:35 PM

Very nice review. I think that, in the end, the director relied on the autobiographical elements in the movie to provide it with a resonance that he felt but that most of us didn't.