Frem Here To Awesome Festival
Advertisement

Risselada Blog

  • The Hole

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Hole  (1998)

    The Hole

    This was my first Tsai Ming-Liang movie, and it made me fall instantly in love with his focus and style.

    Apparently made as part of a series of movies from different directors around the globe as a focus on the upcoming new millennium, I would like to see the rest although I don't think I have.  I know Hal Hartley has one that I would like to see as well.

    This movie is all about contrasts.  It's actually a musical, I guess you could say.  The setting is Taipei where a large section of the city has been quarantined due to the outbreak of some strange pathology.  The two main characters a young man and woman have both decided to remain in their apartment complex while everyone else has evacuated.  It's apparent that this building and this life is all that they have.  They don't seem to have any other family or friends that are terribly concerned with them.  The man's apartment is directly above the woman's but they don't seem to know each other at all.  It's always raining as well.  It never stops.  And sometimes bag of garbage can be seen falling as well.  The complex is rather run down.  And the rain coming in begins to soak the woman's apartment.  She tries desperately at first to keep the place dry and the wall paper from falling off of the wall.

    The movie is extremely laconic and almost all of the dialogue comes from the television, and even that isn't very often.  The interactions are so few and so unusual that there isn't much talking.  Just like real life can be.

    Here's where it gets more interesting though.  At the beginning of the movie a repair man comes to the apartment of the man.  For some reason after he leaves there is a significant hole in the middle of the man's floor.  He gets bored and picks away at it, forcing an interaction with the woman below.  He pours things onto her and sticks his leg through.  Interactions like this are about as interesting as it gets for people in such a sort of aimless situation like this.

    Then we get to what really makes this movie great.  It's that contrast I was talking about.  A number of times during the movie, the woman is singing and dancing while a Grace Chang song plays on the soundtrack.  She is wearing a gorgeous dress and looking as if she was in a big budget musical.  She is still surrounded by the squalor of the apartment complex, but the surroundings turn into her stage and props.  Eventually back up dancers join her to make it much more extravagant.  Later the man joins her in one of the dance numbers, well dressed himself.  The contrast of this against the rest of the movie is stunning.

    We also find out that the strange disease affecting the area makes people being to act like cockroaches.  Crawling around on their hands and knees close to the ground, hiding in dark wet places.

    In the context of the movie, the final image of the film is one of the most stunning I've seen.

    This movie also made me fall in love with Grace Chang, her music at least.  I have yet to see any of her actual films.  Her music is difficult to find here in the USA, I from what I've gathered is not that easy to find elsewhere either.  Which seems strange since she was apparently such a big star.  If anyone knows where I can get a CD with her music on it, let me know!!

    Rating: 10/10


  • The Devil and Daniel Webster

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Devil and Daniel Webster (1941)

    I read the original famous short story by Stephen Vincent Benet and loved it so much that I just had to see the movie.  I was surprised to love the movie just as much, and it has become one of my absolute favorites.  I have watched it a couple times now.

    The original story has sort of a mythic, overblown type of language sometimes that I think is both authentically patriotic, ridiculous, and rather facetious.  I think it's very American, or what I like about what's American.  Kind of like how the Coen brothers are very American but in a more full way than is normally identified.

    I would recommend anyone reading this story and if you love it, then see the movie for sure.  The Criterion edition actually has an audio recording of it being read by Alec Baldwin (who ended up directing a recent modern adaptation of the story but apparently disowned it after the studios got their hands on it).

    The real gold here is Walter Huston.  This is one of the most deep-down enjoyable performances you will simply enjoy just watching.  The final breaking the fourth wall type of image of the film is just so delightful that sometimes I want to watch the movie again just to get that that final moment.  It's frightening how loveable he can make the devil seem.  You know the devil works by his charms.

    Edwards Arnold playing the other half of the title's duel namesakes is worth mentioning as well.  And Anne Shirley has always the ideal of feminine beauty to me

    Rating: 10/10


  • Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Ali G Indahouse  (2002)

    Borat  (2006)

    Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan

    I've been a fan of Sacha Baron Cohen for a while.  Before he brought Ali G to the US, my friend Nick discovered the original British show when he was staying over in London.  We all watched clips of it over the internet and thought it was brillaint.   Pleasantly surprised when he started making a splash in my country as time wore on.

    I was not a big fan of the Ali G movie Ali G Indahouse from what I remember.  I think it was because it was entirely scripted with actors.  I believe Cohen's outrageousness can only come alive in his interviews.

    The Borat movie is nearly perfect.  Not necessarily any better than what had already been seen on Da Ali G Show, but I don't know how you could get much better than that.

    I'm not going to try to dissect or interpret too heavily here what Borat says about what Cohen is saying, what this movie says about American, what is says about the audience, is there a moral dilemma associated with this type of movie making, and many other big questions like that, because they have been discussed in other areas of this site already I think.  And I do not have any easy answers either though.

    I think primarily what I find interesting about what Borat is that it reveals how many American people will accept certain inhuman behaviors from foreign people as if it is part of their culture.  It's amazing to me that people could put up with a grown man with absolutely no conception of how to throw or catch a ball and attribute that to some foreign trait.  That they would shit in a bag if a toilet was available.  And a lot of other just outrageous things.  Even if it was part of the other person's culture, why would they put up with it!  Because they believe they are being kind and politically correct.  Very silly.

    I find this movie to be absolutely wonderful and hilarious.  You may disagree with me.  But then again, I love the Jackass movies too.

    Rating: 9/10


  • 300

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sin City  (2005)

    300  (2007)

    300

    I've had trouble talking with people about this movie because it seems to be one of those very dividing love or hate type movies, although for me when I put the good and bad parts together I think it's just about average.

    The visuals were stunning yes.  The action sequence depicted in exciting ways never before seen.

    Most everything else was crummy.  The acting, dialogue, plot, you know those other things.  As for the acting I guess you can't expect much.  When you have a such a stringent requirement that all of your actors have to be so perfectly physically buff, you can't be too picky on other skills like acting ability.  But actually the lead female was the worst for some reason and not that attractive to me either, so I don't know what happened there.  As for dialogue and plot though I just don't know what happened.

    I suppose the general public (and I'll include myself in that group this time) was introduced to the name Frank Miller though Sin City.  That movie had the amazing visuals but with fantastic acting, a varied cast of extremely interesting characters, and some really exciting dialogue and little bits of plot.  I was first informed of 300 by my friend Adam, who had recently and coincidentally already been interested in the same story about the Spartans, but I think he was infatuated with the visuals in the movie trailer and associating what he thought about Frank Miller from Sin City believed the other elements would be as good.  Adam may have ended up being the person I know who hates this movie the most now.

    I never actually planned on watching this movie in the theater, but my friend Patrick wanted me to go.  He ended up loving it even though I think he recognized as much as I did how thin the acting and plot and themes were.  My friend Andy also likes it quite a bit because he said it was one of those movies you have to be expecting to like it just for the visuals.  Well I just can't get into that mood that people talk about, even if I hadn't expected it to up to the caliber of Sin City I don't think I would have liked it any more.  I can't have stylized violence for it's own sake.  Even if it's just a straight up genre piece, it has to be presented properly.

    And I was also upset when they showed that fat Persian man/creature with both of his forearms replaced by giant jagged blades and then never brought him into an action scene to actually fight.

    Again though, the action sequences really are stunning.  And even though if the other elements had been there this could have been much better, it's still a mildly fun time.

    Rating: 7/10


  • Spout Mavens review - O Homem do Ano (The Man of the Year)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Godfather  (1972)

    GoodFellas  (1990)

    City of God  (2002)

    Doing to some slight research into the most recent DVD screener I received from Spout, The Man of the Year, I felt there might be some promise.  Alas, this was one of the worst I've seen in a while.

    I watched the trailer for the movie which was on the DVD as well after I had finished.  It featured a quote from who knows where stating "If Quentin Tarantino had been Brazillian".  I'm not sure what the second part of this sentence was because the trailer failed to let us know.  But I tried to think of a number of possibilities.  One of the simplest ones probably would have been, "he would have made a movie that looked nothing like this one."  Really this movie has none of the wit or enjoyable dialogue that you would find in a Tarantino movie.

    For another comparison, I saw a quote from a review by Phil Villarreal from the Arizona Daily Star.  He says "If 'City of God' is Brazil's answer to 'The Godfather,' then 'The Man of the Year' is Rio's 'GoodFellas.'"  Thematically yes this is about a person who gets swept up into organized crime and violence of sorts.  He also has to deal with machismo and women and family problems.  Yes, but he speaks in platitudes.  "Learning to kill is like learning to die" and such.  The other movies named have much deeper levels of character.

    The supposed premise to this movie is that this normal joe type of guy gets roped into a life of violence and crime through a series of events that started with something quite harmless and trivial, dying his hair blonde after losing a bet in a soccer game.  This history of this character Máiquel (played by Murilo Benício) is never explored, but it's pretty apparent from the beginning that he was never much of a nice or innocent guy in the first place.  What actually happens is that after getting his hair dyed, he walks into a bar where some guy named Suel makes fun of his haircut.  Suel doesn't do anything but sit there and laugh.  Máiquel is the one who goads him on and instantly threatens violence.  Suel seems content to avoid violence.  Máiquel buys a gun and finds Suel later.  When he encounters Suel, Suel is calm and doesn't even threaten back.  Máiquel shoots Suel who was unarmed and not doing anything.

    We find out later that everyone in the community treats Máiquel like a hero for killing Suel because I guess he was a real nuisance and an asshole.  They could have done a better job of showing this.  Máiquel looked like the asshole though the whole movie.  Actually everyone did.  I don't think there was a single sympathetic character in the whole movie.

    I've never been to Rio, and I know of it's big problems with gang violence.  But I have friends who have been there and I don't think it can be as desperate and clichéd as this.  The Dentist whose daughter was raped and wants the guy dead for it when his daughter is obviously a total whore.  The uncle who won't shut up about how once you get married your wife will turn into a fat, screaming, selfish banshee.  And of course that ends up happening.  The other young whore to suddenly jumps to a life of worshipping Jesus and talking about his virtues but the portrayal of this just completely weird and unbelievable.  The corrupt cop.  Ok, these things happen.  People like this exist, but what new insight does this movie have?  None.  Every time any type of compelling drama looked like it was about to begin, all of these clichés just overpowered it.

    I guess I don't want to say that it was complete rubbish.  Despite the bad acting and writing, there were often some engaging visuals.  The photography and editing were both notable at times.  Other than that I just cannot recommend this.

    Again I've never been to Rio and maybe this is what it really is like down there.  Maybe I'm just avoiding the truth.  But if that's true well it's just too depressing for me to want to experience.  That's probably not a good reason, but I am still pretty sure it's not really like that.  People are people and I've met enough of them to recognize what's real and what is narrative cliché.

    Rating: 4/10


  • movie year countdown #11 - 1996 - Hard Core Logo

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Hard Core Logo  (1996)

    This blog entry is part of my “movie year countdown”.  To read more about that check out my first Spout filmblog entry

    Hard Core Logo

    I chose to watch this movie based on strong urging from my friend Andy.  I was also interested in the fact that it was distributed on Tarantino's Rolling Thunder series.

    It's sort of a punk-rock version of This is Spinal Tap.  If you are big into punk-rock movies, philosophies, and aesthetic, you will probably find this movie funny and interesting.  And if you are a Canadian punk, probably even more.  Joe Dick is a serious dick, if you like people acting like total assholes.  But if you are fascinated with any of history's punk-rock idols then you'll know what to expect.

    I had a fairly good time with it, but overall got a little tired of it.  It was fun enough for one time, but I don't have any desire to ever see it again.

    Not much else I have to say about it.

    Rating: 7/10


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<August 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2930311234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678


Categories
 


Advertisement