Spout's Scavenger Hunt
Advertisement

Risselada Blog

  • movie year countdown #4 - 2003 - Ruang rak noi nid mahasan (Last Life in the Universe)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Ichi the Killer  (2001)

    This blog entry is part of my “movie year countdown”.  To read more about that check out my first Spout filmblog entry.

    Ruang rak noi nid mahasan (Last Life in the Universe)

    Honestly, it's hard for me to conceptualize a different identity for a lot of countries in The Orient.  After living in a big city for a few years I'm starting to differentiate between different types of food, but even that all seems to blend together pretty closely.  I've seen movies from China, Hong Kong, Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and others most likely.

    In the specials features of this film the filmmakers often comment on how they were really trying to bring their feelings and images of Thailand to the screen.  The only other movie from Thailand I've seen is Ong-Bak, which had many scenes in the city as well.  But Last Life in the Universe seems to give you more of the real modern sense of the place.

    Of course half of the movie is really Japanese.  The story is about how to different but lonely personalities come together, different even in that they are from different cultures, speak different languages.  And Japanese I do feel much more of an affinity for.  Not just because I've seen so many more Japanese movies and because it's influence in our culture seems so much more prevalent somehow.  But I also studied the Japanese language in college for two years.  Not that I can remember much of anything of the actual language.  My professor was in serious contention for the absolute sweetest and nicest guy I've ever met at any stage in my life, but he was also a sap and let people pass without really learning or retaining much.  Nonetheless, I feel some kind of affinity for Japanese and see how it is separate from other Oriental cultures (even though it has assimilated so much of them).

    The Japanese character is played by Tadanobu Asano, who is quite a different personality from the last movie I saw him in, Ichi the Killer.  The movie actually acknowledges this in an amusing way.  There is a scene with two gangsters chatting in some kind of prostitute bar, when one makes a violent suggestion to another one.  The other's response is that the first guy has seen too many yakuza films.  The image immediately cuts to a poster of Asano's masochistic character Kakihara.  We then realize the poster is on the wall of the library where Asano's timid character of this film, Kenji, is working.

    I guess I don't have much of a main point or anything to say about this movie.  There actually are a lot of really interesting themes in this movie that I won't go into.  I was actually for some reason expecting to like it more than I did for some reason.  But in the end I actually did like it quite a bit.

    Takashi Miike has an amusing acting bit at the end.

    The obligatory score: 8/10 stars


  • movie year countdown #3 - 2004 - The Passion of the Christ

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Con Air  (1997)

    Armageddon  (1998)

    This blog entry is part of my “movie year countdown”.  To read more about that check out my first Spout filmblog entry.

    The Passion of the Christ

    To start off with, I will tell you that I do call myself a Christian.  I think it's obvious why that might be something you might like to know about someone who is talking about this movie.

    I remember the hype when this movie came out.  It seemed like most Christians considered it obligatory for them to see this film.  I honestly don't make much personal effort to see most films that come out in the theater, but that is often even more of the case for movies with as much hype as this one.  That isn't to say I specifically avoided this movie.  I was always curious, but only so I would have some sort of reference point for any conversation or allusions to the film.

    Finally I've seen it.  I guess I just needed to know for sure that I didn't need to see it.  Well, I think I was right.

    I never quite got the idea of focusing strictly on events of Christ's crucifixion and the hours immediately leading up to it.  I know Passion Plays have been around for a long time, since the middle ages I believe.  But isn't this also the same era that gave us our modern image of Hell as some subterranean, fiery pit of physical torture?  Sure there were flashbacks to other well known moments of Jesus' life throughout the ordeal, but I was already too bored with the rest of it to get anything out of these clips, which seemed almost like television commercial length when compared to how drawn out the main focus of the film was.

    I suppose I hand guessed, but not fully anticipated how much of a Hollywood technique affair this would be.  They talk about this thing as the highest grossing independent film.  Well it has the pacing and directing of movies like Con Air and Armageddon.  There's no moment of silence, few static shots.  I think there are more moments where the film is played back at an altered frame rate than not.

    And here's something that my friend Nick said when he watched it with me that seems to really describe what is going on here.  Everything is external.  When something evil is going on, real life physical demons appear or people turn into demons.  The brutality is all visualized to the most extreme, comical lengths.  The camera angles, the expressions on people's faces.  There's hardly a time when the music stops and we get a real scene of some quality film acting.  Take a look at Passolini's The Gospel According to St. Matthew, which is probably the best movie about the life of Jesus that I've seen, for an example of the opposite.  This is a movie that, despite some also comical low quality effects, tells things fairly straightforward without any embellishment.

    I'm sure this has also been said several times before: the culmination of the story with the resurrection is certainly made clear, but in this situation I just think it needed more emphasis.

    The obligatory score: 4/10 stars


  • movie year countdown #2 - 2005 - The Comedians of Comedy

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    This blog entry is part of my “movie year countdown”.  To read more about that check out my first Spout filmblog entry.

    The Comedians of Comedy

    I'm not sure the first time I saw Zach Galifianakis.  It may have even been even before his brilliant stand-up act on Comedy Central Presents.  But I knew the first time I ever saw him sitting at his piano with his massive beard that his form of subversive humor was about as straight up my alley as I would ever find.  When I discovered he was being given a talk show on VH1, I waited with anticipation and have never been more rewarded.  Late World with Zach (which unfortunately isn't listed on Spout) began with a song by Frank Black and ended within a matter of months.  That was no surprise though.  Zach's style and sense of humor went against everything mainstream and typically presented to the public.  It was even more subversive in that it wasn't what you typically imagine as being the image of subversive.  Zach really knew what was funny, to me at least and the handful of other guys who all crammed into a college dorm room every night of the week for its run in 2002.  If any portion of this show ever becomes available on DVD, rent it immediately.

    Anyways, this leads me to The Comedians of Comedy.  I'm not sure that this movie ever had any kind of theatrical release since it was apparently produced by Netlfix.  The name apparently being a reference to the big stand-up comedy movie The Original Kings of Comedy (which itself was probably a reference to The King of Comedy, but I don't know) and other spinoffs like The Queens of Comedy and The Original Latin Kings of Comedy.  The name of the movie is actually the name of the stand-up comedy tour that four comedians are doing around the country, often at venues that would usually feature live bands.  The four comedians are Patton Oswalt, Brian Posehn, Maria Bamford, and of course Zach Galifianakis.

    Zach you know how much I loved before seeing this.  Patton I have been a fan of since Small Doses (which surprisingly isn't listed on IMDB, TV.com, Spout, or much of anywhere, but believe me it was a real show) on Comedy Central.  I've heard his CD Feelin' Kinda Patton and think it's fantastic.  Patton also has a small cameo in Magnolia, amongst other films.  Brian Posehn I know mostly from Mr. Show and Mission Hill.  Maria Bamford was a name I didn't recognize, but discovered that she was a familiar face.  I had probably seen her on one of the myriad of stand-up programs they used to have on Comedy Central when I used to watch that channel so often so many years ago.

    The movie is partly a back stage documentary, and partly a record of the actual stand-up.  Zach, Patton, and Brian I would consider funny.  Maria doesn't do it for me.  She seems to be out of place, not just as the only woman, but also in her style of humor.  Brian is funny enough, but I probably wouldn't go out of my way to see his act.  I know that Patton is very funny, but many of the portions of his stand-up act that are shown feel like they are dulled by being taken out of context.  Unlike Zach, he does not hop so quickly from one gag to the next, and you really have to settle in for the long haul to really absorb his hilarity.  Zach of course is by far the funniest, and also the most interesting thing about this movie, both with his actual act and his comments and behavior off stage.  Much of the off stage stuff is sort of boring actually.  We find out what huge nerds Patton and Brian are.  One of the more interesting portions is when the cast speaks about their early days, what it was like, and how they got to where they are now.

    There are a few behind the scenes staged bits.  All of the funniest ones, done by Zach.  The part where he is explaining how he is sick of slapstick and more of a sucker for the spoken word of comedy, when suddenly the leg of his chair falls out from underneath and he goes rolling down a dirty hill where the camera follows him and he continues talking as if nothing happened.  It's most likely the funniest part of the film.  And the extended take of the whole scenario on the special features is especially brilliant.  Zach brings himself to tears in one of the most inspired moments of false dramatic acting I've seen in a while.

    There is also a rather confusing narrative film within the film that was created on the spot by Zach and Brian.  After you watch the entirety of it on the special features you figure out why it's confusing.  They cut out the final punch line.  Even though Zach refers to it later in the movie.  I'll just let you know, it involves mayonnaise.

    But probably one of the most fascinating moments, that is a little glimpse into Zach's head and the way he is always looking out for any opportunity, is when he encounters the street performers outside of the laundromat and contracts them to appear at his show that night to turn one of his jokes into an extended song.  The movie may be worth seeing for these moments alone, certainly, if these were the only things in the movie.

    Anyways, you can probably tell now that I'm rather taken with Zach.  And I can also say disappointedly that because of the fact that he wasn't actually on every leg of the tour, he gets the least air time.  And listening to too many boring in-between moment elsewhere with Maria, or sometimes incoherent editing gives the movie less impact.

    Oh well.  I hear I hear that Zach has a new DVD out called Live at the Purple Onion.  So if anything this movie has excited me enough to check that out.

    The obligatory score: 6/10 stars


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<March 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567


Categories
 


Advertisement